Indirectness and co-construction
A discourse-pragmatic view
Indirectness in language can basically be understood in two different ways: on the
one hand, there is the indirectness that is associated with the meaning (either literal or
‘indirect’) of the speaker’s words; on the other hand, we have the indirectness that
is specific for the discourse, understood as the textual work of co-constructing
meaning. The first kind of indirectness is a semantic-contextual one; the other kind
(while also relying on the context for its interpretation) is a pragmatic one, as it
involves the active collaboration of the interactants in language use. It is this
latter understanding of indirectness, in particular as it concerns the ‘voices’ of
the interactants and their access to the underlying ‘indirect’ meanings of the
discourse that will be the subject of my contribution.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Two kinds of indirectness?
- 2.Egocentric vs. pluricentric acts
- 3.Adapting to pluricentricity: On facts and ‘indirect speech’
- 4.The dialectics of context
- 5.The dynamics of discourse
- 6.Indirectness and discourse: the discoursants’ voices
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References (21)
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich. 1994. Speech
Genres and Other Late Essays, ed.
by Caryl Emerson, and Michael Holquist, trans.
by Vern W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press. [1986]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cooren, François. 2015. “In
Medias Res: Communication, Existence, and
Materiality.” Communication Research and
Practice. London: Routledge. (Accessed October 3, 2017). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deyssel, Lodewijk van (ps. Karel
Alberdingk Thijm). 1898. Verzamelde Opstellen (‘Collected Essays’), Vol.
3. Amsterdam: Scheltema & Holkema.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drezner, Daniel W. 2018. “The
White House is Interested in Thucydides.” [URL] (Accessed January 20,
2018).
Dyson, Freeman J. 2014. “The
Case for Blunders.” New York Review of
Books, March 6.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César. 2005. “Indirectness
and Politeness in Mexican
Requests.” In Selected
Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed.
by David Eddington, 66–78, Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hougaard, Anders. 2018. “The
World at Our Feet.” RASK: International Journal
of Language and
Communication 47: 3–12.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ignatius de Loyola, St. 1541. Ep[istolae]
in Monumenta Ignatiana: Epistolae et Instructiones, 12
v. (Madrid 1903–1911).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jørgensen, Johannes. 1916. Mit livs legende (‘The
legend of my life’), Vol.
1. Copenhagen: Gyldendal. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kempis, Thomas A. 1418. De imitatione Christi (‘On the Imitation of
Christ’).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiesling, Scott F., and Elka G. Johnson. 2010. “Four
Forms of Interactional Indirection.” Journal of
Pragmatics 42 (2): 292–306. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mey, Jacob L. 1993. “Edifying
Archie – or: How to Fool the
Reader.” In Pretending
to Communicate, ed. by Herman Parret, 154–172, Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mey, Jacob L. 2000. When
Voices Clash: A Study in Literary
Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics:
An
Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mey, Jacob L. 2009. “Adaptation
in Human-Computer
Interaction.” In Concise
Encyclopedia of Pragmatics: An introduction (Second
Edition), ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 7–13. Oxford: Elsevier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mey, Jacob L. 2018. “Expanding
Pragmatics: Values, Goals, and
Adaptability.” In
Proceedings
Pragmasophia II
, September 18–22,
2018. Lisbon: Faculty of Communication and Social Sciences, Universidade Nova de Lisboa. (Forthcoming)
Moggach, Deborah. 2011. The
Best Exotic Marigold Hotel. New York: Random House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1949. Cours
de linguistique
générale. Paris: Payot [1916].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. 1817. Ozymandias.
In The Complete Poems of John Keats and Percy Bysshe
Shelley. p. 589. New York: The Modern Library, n.y.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Voloshinov, Valentin N. 1973. Marxism
and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press [1930].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Cornish, Francis
2021.
L’anaphore revisitée : fonctionnements discursifs et interactionnels.
Langue française N° 210:2
► pp. 9 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Cornish, Francis
2023.
Anaphoriques en première mention : « Épiphénomène », ou modèle pour le fonctionnement de l’anaphore ?.
Journal of French Language Studies ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.