Chapter published in:
The Dynamics of Text and Framing Phenomena: Historical approaches to paratext and metadiscourse in EnglishEdited by Matti Peikola and Birte Bös
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 317] 2020
► pp. 63–90
The footnote in Late Modern English historiographical writing
Claudia Claridge | University of Augsburg
Sebastian Wagner | University of Augsburg
An aspect distinguishing historical from other narration is the historiographers’ engagement with sources and other scholars, which shows as intertextuality in the text. A prominent intertextual device is the (foot)note, which originates around 1700 (Grafton 1997: 191) and whose institutionalised presence separates older, literary historiography from the more modern scholarly type and with regard to frequency of use also history from other humanities research (Koskela and Männikkö 2009: 155). A footnote may simply be used to provide a reference, the origin of information and thus evidence. Additionally this evidence may be further commented on. If there is more or other content than a reference, the text-note coherence relationship can be described by adapting the Hallidayan (clause) expansion types of elaboration, extension and enhancement. The exploratory study further shows that positioning of self and others within the historiographical discourse community can be done via stance devices in the footnote text.
Keywords: historiography, footnote, paratext, evidentiality, positioning, reader alignment, evaluation
Published online: 18 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.317.03cla
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.317.03cla
References
Primary sources
Burnet, Gilbert
1681 The History of the Reformation of the Church of England. 2nd ed. London: Chiswell. (pp. I,1–5, II,35–8, III,180–8)
Dugdale, William
1675 The Baronage of England. London: Roper, Martin and Herringman. (pp. I,1–2, I,593–4, II,432–3)
Gibbon, Edward
1776–88 History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. London: Strahan & Cadell. (pp. I,1–6, III,231–6, V,251–61)
Macaulay, Catharine
1763–83 The History of England. London: Dilly. (pp. 1–7, 176–86, 348–59)
Macaulay, Thomas
1848 The History of England. London: Longman, Green, Brown, and Longmans. (pp. 31–95, 161–308, 647–68)
Robertson, William
1781 The History of Scotland. London: Cadell. (pp.1–20, 235–43, 485–90)
Stubbs, William
1874–78 The Constitutional History of England. Oxford: Clarendon. (pp. 1–10, 301–5, 587–91)
Secondary sources
Barker, Nicholas
2009 “The Morphology of the Page.” In The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Vol. 5: 1695–1830, ed. by Michael F. Suarez, and Michael L. Turner, 248–267. Cambridge: Camebridge University Press. 
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981 The Dialogic Imagination (transl. by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bede
1968 A History of the English Church and People. Transl. & introd. Leo Sherley-Price, revised R. E. Latham. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Birke, Dorothee, and Birte Christ
2013 “Paratext and Digitized Narrative: Mapping the Field.” Narrative 21 (1): 65–87.
Bowersock, Glen W.
1984 “The Art of the Footnote.” The American Scholar 53 (1): 54–62.
Brie, Friedrich W. D.
(ed) 1906 The Brut or The Chronicles of England. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. [Early English Text Society O.S. 181]
Burrow, John
2009 A History of Histories. London: Penguin.
Coffin, Caroline
2006 Historical Discourse. London: Continuum.
Davies, Martin L.
2016 How History Works: The Reconstitution of a Human Science. London: Routledge.
De Certeau, Michel
1991 Das Schreiben der Geschichte. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
Genette, Gérard
1997 Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: Camebridge University Press.
Genette, Gérard, and Marie Maclean
1991 “Introduction to the Paratext.” New Literary History 22 (2): 261–272.
Goldstein, Leon
1976 Historical Knowing. Austin/London: University of Texas Press.
Gossman, Lionel
1976 Augustin Thierry and Liberal Historiography. 15 History and Theory. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
Grafton, Anthony
1997 The Footnote. A Curious History. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Hodder Education.
Hesketh, Ian
2011 The Science of History in Victorian Britain: Making the Past Speak. London: Routledge.
Hyland, Ken
2002 “Authority and Invisibility: Authorial Identity in Academic Writing.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (8): 1091–1112.
2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London/New York: Continuum.
Jenkins, Keith
2003 Re-thinking History. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Koskela, Merja, and Tiina Männikkö
2009 “Notes on Notes. Endnotes and Footnotes in Swedish Historical and Philosophical Texts.” In Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse, ed. by Eija Suomela-Salmi, and Fred Dervin, 151–162. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
More, Thomas
1641 The historie of the pitifull life, and unfortunate death of Edward the Fifth, and the then Duke of Yorke, his brother with the troublesome and tyrannical government of usurping Richard the Third, and his miserable end. London: Thomas Payne. (Wing/M2688)
O’Brien, Karen
2001 “The History Market in Eighteenth-Century England.” In Books and Their Readers in Eighteenth-century England: New Essays, ed. By Isabel Rivers, 105–133. London: Continuum.
OED: Oxford English Dictionary
Slights, William W. E.
2001 Managing Readers: Printed Marginalia in English Renaissance Books. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Soffer, Reba N.
1994 Discipline and Power: The University, History and the Making of an English Elite, 1870–1930. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Wagner, Sebastian
2019 Evaluation in Late Modern English History Writing. University of Augsburg: unpublished PhD thesis.