Chapter published in:
Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and practice
Edited by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus and Hartmut Haberland
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 318] 2021
► pp. 145172


Alston, William P.
2000Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1975How to Do Things with Words (2nd rev., ed. by James O. Urmson, and Marina Sbisà). Oxford: Oxford University Press [First edition 1962]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish
1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2018 “Relational Work in Multimodal Networked Interactions on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 134–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2012 “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17(4): 501–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Caleb T., David B. Schrock, and Patricia Dauterman
2012 “Speech Acts Within Facebook Status Messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31(2): 176–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DiNucci, Darcy
1999 “Fragmented Future.” Print 53(32): 221–222.Google Scholar
Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring
2010 “Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” Communication Theory 20: 249–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Sage L.
2007 “Disagreeing to Agree: Conflict (Im)politeness and Identity in a Computer-Mediated Community.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 742–759. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Relationality, Friendship, and Identity in Digital Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 305–320. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
2004 “Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior.” In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ed. by Sasha Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray, 338–376. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C., and Jannis Androutsopoulos
2015 “Computer-Mediated Discourse 2.0.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd edn.), ed. by Deborah Tannen, Deborah S. Schiffrin, and Heidi Ehernberger Hamilton, 127–151. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Labinaz, Paolo, and Marina Sbisà
2017 “Credibilità e disseminazione di conoscenze nei social network [Credibility and Knowledge Dissemination in Social Networks].” Iride 30: 63–86.Google Scholar
Lewis, David
1979 “Scorekeeping in a Language Game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsili, Neri
2020 “Retweeting: Its Linguistic and Epistemic Value.” Synthese. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G.
2005Language: A Biological Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly, Tim
2007 “What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” Communications & Strategies 65: 17–37.Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
1984 “On Illocutionary Types.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 93–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987 “Acts of Explanation: A Speech Act Analysis.” In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Argumentation. Vol. 2, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles Arthur Willard, 7–17. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1989Linguaggio, ragione, interazione. Per una pragmatica degli atti linguistici [Language, Reason, Interaction. For a Pragmatic Theory of Speech Acts]. Bologna: il Mulino; reprinted as a digital edition by Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2009 [the page numbers indicated in the paper refer to the digital edition]. https://​www​.openstarts​.units​.it​/bitstream​/10077​/3390​/1​/Sbis%c3%a0​_linguaggio​_ragione​_interazione​.pdf (accessed 10 April 2018).
1990 “Speech Acts and the Expression of Affect.” Grazer Linguistische Studien 33–34: 279–295.Google Scholar
1999 “Ideology and the Persuasive Use of Presupposition.” In Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference. Vol. 1, ed. by Jef Verschueren, 492–509. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar
2001 “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1791–1814. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Communicating Citizenship in Verbal Interaction: Principles of a Speech Act Oriented Discourse Analysis.” In Analysing Citizenship Talk: Social Positioning in Political and Legal Decision-Making Processes, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf, and Alfons Bora, 164–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “How to Read Austin.” Pragmatics 17: 461–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Uptake and Conventionality in Illocution.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5: 33–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Varieties of Speech Act Norms.” In Normativity and Variety of Speech Actions, ed. by Maciej Witek, and Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, 23–50. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020 “Assertion among the Speech Acts.” In The Oxford Handbook of Assertion, ed. by Sanford C. Goldberg, 159–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975 “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” In Language, Mind and Knowledge, ed. by Keith Gunderson, 344–369. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken
1985Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Thomas W.
2017 “Telepresence and Trust: A Speech-Act Theory of Mediated Communication.” Philosophy & Technology 30: 443–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.
1964 “Intention and Convention in Speech Acts.” The Philosophical Review 73: 439–460. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Witek, Maciej
2013 “Three Approaches to the Study of Speech Act.” Dialogue and Universalism 23: 129–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “An Interactional Account of Illocutionary Practice.” Language Sciences 47: 43–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2011Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “El discurso de las identidades en línea: El caso de Facebook [The Discourse of Online Identities: The Case of Facebook].” Discurso & Sociedad 8: 398–426.Google Scholar