Cover not available
Part of
Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and practice
Edited by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus and Hartmut Haberland
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 318] 2021
► pp. 175–206

Chapter 6
Humour and self-presentation on WhatsApp profile status

| Complutense University of Madrid Spain
Self-presentation encompasses a set of strategies through which individuals communicate an image of themselves to others. Self-presentation has been widely studied both in face-to-face communication and online. Most online research, however, has focused on social networking sites, blogs, chatrooms, etc. while less attention has been paid to other online means of communication such as WhatsApp. The aim of this chapter is to analyse self-presentation on WhatsApp statuses. More specifically, I focus on the use of humour as a self-presentation strategy in WhatsApp statuses and ascertain whether or not there are common patterns with regard to gender or age. To this purpose, a corpus of 206 WhatsApp statuses in Spanish was analysed following both a quantitative and qualitative methodology. Results shows the existence of recurrent patterns connected to these variables, which seem to play a crucial role to determine the choice of humour as a self-presentation strategy.
Keywords: humour, self-presentation, WhatsApp , Spanish, profile status, digital communication, incongruity, intertextuality, age, gender
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Humour
    • 2.2Humour and digital communication
    • 2.3 WhatsApp and its statuses
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1Types and frequency of WhatsApp statuses according to realization
    • 4.2Types and frequency of WhatsApp statuses according to content
    • 4.3Humorous statuses
      • 4.3.1Intertextuality
    • 4.4Humorous statuses, gender and age
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.06mai
References
Ahad, Annie Dayani, and Syamimi Md Ariff Lim
2014 “Convenience or Nuisance? The ‘WhatsApp’ Dilemma.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 155: 189–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
1994 Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2001 Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin
1991 “Script Theory Revis(it)ed: Joke Similarity and Joke Representation Model.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 4(3–4): 293–348.Google Scholar
Attrill, Alison
2012 “Sharing Only Parts of Me: Selective Categorical Self-Disclosure across Internet Arenas.” International Journal of Internet Science 7(1): 55–77.Google Scholar
Ballesteros Doncel, Esmeralda
2016 “Circulación de memes en WhatsApp: ambivalencias del humor desde la perspectiva de género [Meme Circulation on WhatsApp: Ambivalences of Humor from a Gender Perspective].” EMPIRIA. Revista de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales 35: 21–45.Google Scholar
Baym, Nancy K.
1995 “The Performance of Humor in Computer-mediated Communication.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bere, Aaron
2012 “A Comparative Study of Student Experiences of Ubiquitous Learning via Mobile Devices and Learner Management Systems at a South African University.” In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on World Wide Web Applications, ed. by Aneen Koch, and Pieter A. van Brakel. Cape Town: Cape Penisula University of Technology.Google Scholar
Berlyne, Daniel E.
1954 “A Theory of Human Curiosity.” British Journal of Psychology: General Section 45(3): 180–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bond, Bradley J.
2009 “He Posted, She Posted: Gender Differences in Self-Disclosure on Social Network Sites.” Rocky Mountain Communication Review 6(2): 29–37.Google Scholar
Bouhnik, Dan, and Mor Deshen
2014 “WhatsApp Goes to School: Mobile Instant Messaging between Teachers and Students.” Journal of Information Technology Education Research 13: 217–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bronstein, Jenny
2012 “Blogging Motivations for Latin American Bloggers: A Uses and Gratifications Approach.” In Blogging in the Global Society, ed. by Tatyana Dumova, and Richard Fiordo, 200–215. Hershey: Information Science Reference. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calero-Vaquera, Mª Luisa, and Ana M. Vigara Tauste
2014 “El discurso del WhatsApp: entre el Messenger y el SMS [The Speech of WhatsApp: between the Messenger and SMS].” Oralia 17: 87–116.Google Scholar
Church, Karen and Rodrigo de Oliveira
2013 “What’s up with Whatsapp? Comparing Mobile Instant Messaging Behaviors with Traditional SMS.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 352–361. New York: ACM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
da Fonte, Renata, and Roberta Caiado
2014 “Práticas discursivas multimodais no WhatsApp: uma análise verbo-visual [Multimodal Discursive Practices on WhatsApp: A Verb-Visual Analysis].” Revista Desenredo 10(2): 475–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devi, Thiyam Satyabati, and Sipiwe Tevera
2014 “Use of Social Networking Site in the University of Swaziland by the Health Science Students: A Case Study.” Journal of Information Management 1(1): 19–26.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2011 “Joker in the Pack: Towards Determining the Status of Humorous Framing in Conversations.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 217–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Garden Paths, Red Lights and Crossroads: On Finding Our Way to Understanding the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Jokes.” Israeli Journal of Humour Research 1(1): 6–28.Google Scholar
2013 “When Does Irony Tickle the Hearer?: Towards Capturing the Characteristics of Humorous Irony.” In Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, ed. by Marta Dynel, 289–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “ ‘I Has Seen Image Macros!’: Advice Animals Memes as Visual-Verbal Jokes.” International Journal of Communication 10: 660–688.Google Scholar
Flores-Salgado, Elizabeth and Teresa A. Castineira-Benitez
2018 “The Use of Politeness in WhatsApp Discourse and Move ‘Requests.’” Journal of Pragmatics 133: 79–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forabosco, Giovannantonio
1992 “Cognitive Aspects of the Humor Process: The Concept of Incongruity.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 5(1–2): 45–68.Google Scholar
2008 “Is the Concept of Incongruity Still a Useful Construct for the Advancement of Humor Research?” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4(1): 45–62.Google Scholar
Frank, Russell
2009 “The Forward as Folklore: Studying E-mailed Humor.” In Folklore and the Internet: Vernacular Expression in a Digital World, ed. by Trevor J. Blank, 98–122. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund
1991[1905] Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious (trans. by A. Richards). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
García-Gómez, Antonio
2010 “Disembodiment and Cyberspace: Gendered Discourses in Female Teenagers’ Personal Information Disclosure.” Discourse & Society 21(2): 135–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Jennifer L., Nicole B. Ellison, and Rebecca D. Heino
2006 “Self-Presentation in Online Personals: The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and Perceived Success in Internet Dating.” Communication Research 33(2): 152–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holcomb, Christopher
1997 “A Class of Clowns: Spontaneous Joking in Computer-Assisted Discussions.” Computers and Composition 14(1): 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hübler, Mike T., and Diana Calhoun Bell
2003 “Computer-mediated Humor and Ethos: Exploring Threads of Constitutive Laughter in Online Communities.” Computers and Composition 20(3): 277–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hum, Noelle J., Perrin E. Chamberlin, Brittany L. Hambright, Anne C. Portwood, Amanda C. Schat, and Jennifer L. Bevan
2011 “A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: A Content Analysis of Facebook Profile Photographs.” Computers in Human Behavior 27(5): 1828–1833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jinsuk, and Kathryn Dindia
2011 “Online Self-disclosure: A Review of Research.” In Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships, ed. by Kevin B. Wright, and Lynne M. Webb, 156–180. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Koestler, Arthur
1964 The Act of Creation. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
2006 “Gender and Humor: The State of the Art.” Journal of Pragmatics 38(1): 4–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Oral Genres of Humor.” Pragmatics 17(2): 263–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, Giselinde
2002 “Media Culture and Internet Disaster Jokes: Bin Laden and the Attack on the World Trade Center.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 5(4): 450–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leary, Mark R., and Ashley Batts Allen
2011 “Self-Presentational Persona: Simultaneous Management of Multiple Impressions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(5): 1033–1049. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
2015 “Jocular Mockery in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Contrastive Study of a Spanish and English Facebook Community.” Journal of Politeness Research 11(2): 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Getting ‘Liked.’” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 573–604. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Emotional Self-Presentation on WhatsApp: Analysis of the Profile Status.” Russian Journal of Linguistics 22(1): 144–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manago, Adriana M., Michael B. Graham, Patricia M. Greenfield, and Goldie Salimkhan
2008 “Self-Presentation and Gender on MySpace.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29(6): 446–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maniar, Avani, and Aanal Modi
2014 “Educating Whatsapp Generation through Whatsapp.” ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 4(8): 23–38.Google Scholar
Marone, Vittorio
2017 “Looping out Loud: A Multimodal Analysis of Humour on Vine.” The European Journal of Humour Research 4(4): 50–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Rod A.
2007 The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Martin, Rod A., Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jeanette Gray, and Kelly Weir
2003 “Individual Differences in Uses of Humor and Their Relation to Psychological Well-Being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire.” Journal of Research in Personality 37(1): 48–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKenna, Katelyn Y. A., and John Bargh
2000 “Plan 9 from Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet from Personality and Social Psychology.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(1): 57–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesch, Gustavo S., and Guy Beker
2010 “Are Norms of Disclosure of Online and Offline Personal Information Associated with the Disclosure of Personal Information Online?” Human Communication Research 36(4): 570–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
2012 “Conversational and Conventional Implicatures.” In Cognitive Pragmatics, ed. by Hans-Jörg Schmid, 405–433. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal. R.
1989 “Intertextuality in Humor.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 2(2): 117–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
1993 “Repetition in Canned Jokes and Spontaneous Conversational Joking.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 6(4): 385–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Non-Verbal Humor and Joke Performance.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 17(4): 401–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, Kenton P., Michael Massimi, Richard Harper, Simon Rubens, and Jessica Morris
2014 “Everyday Dwelling with WhatsApp.” In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1131–1143. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Palmer, Jerry
2003 Taking Humour Seriously. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi
(ed.) 2011 A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plana, Mar Gutiérrez-Colon, Ana María Gimeno Sanz, Christine Appel, and Joseph Hopkins
2015 “Improving Learners’ Reading Skills through Instant Short Messages: A Sample Study Using WhatsApp.” In WorldCALL: Sustainability and Computer-Assisted Language Learning, ed. by Ana María Gimeno Sanz, Mike Levy, Françoise Blin, David Barr, 266–281. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor
1985 Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Ruch, Willibald, Paul E. McGhee, and Franz-Josef Hehl
1990 “Age Differences in the Enjoyment of Incongruity-Resolution and Nonsense Humor during Adulthood.” Psychology and Aging 5(3): 348–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruch, Willibald, and Giovannantonio Forabosco
1996 “A Cross-Cultural Study of Humor Appreciation: Italy and Germany.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 9(1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Moya, Alfonso, and Olga Cruz-Moya
2015a “ ‘Hey There! I am Using WhatsApp’: A Preliminary Study of Recurrent Discursive Realisations in a Corpus of WhatsApp Statuses.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 212: 52–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b “Whatsapp, Textese, and Moral Panics: Discourse Features and Habits across Two Generations.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 173: 300–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shifman, Limor
2007 “Humor in the Age of Digital Reproduction: Continuity and Change in Internet-based Comic Texts.” International Journal of Communication 1(1): 187–209.Google Scholar
2014 Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shultz, Thomas R.
1972 “The Role of Incongruity and Resolution in Children’s Appreciation of Cartoon Humor.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 13(3): 456–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Suls, Jerry M.
1972 “A Two-Stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons: An Information-Processing Analysis.” In The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, ed. By Jerry H. Goldstein, and Paul E. McGhee, 81–100. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suls, Jerry M.
1977 “Cognitive and Disparagement Theories of Humor: A Theoretical and Empirical Synthesis.” In It’s a Funny Thing, Humour: Proceedings of The International Conference on Humour and Laughter 1976, ed. By Anthony J. Chapman, and Hugh C. Foot, 41–46. Oxford: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suls, Jerry M.
1983 “Cognitive Processes in Humor Appreciation.” In Handbook of Humor Research: Basic Issues. Vol. 1, ed. by Paul E. McGhee, and Jerry H. Goldstein, 39–57. New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sultan, Abdullah J.
2014 “Addiction to Mobile Text Messaging Applications is Nothing to ‘Lol’ about.” The Social Science Journal 51(1): 57–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy
2009 “Language and Image Interaction in Cartoons: Towards a Multimodal Theory of Humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(6): 1171–1188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijck, José
2013 “ ‘You Have One Identity’: Performing the Self on Facebook and LinkedIn.” Media, Culture & Society 35(2): 199–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vela Delfa, Cristina V., and Lucía Cantamutto
2016 “De participante a observador: el método etnográfico en el análisis de las interacciones digitales de WhatsApp [From Participant to Observer: The Ethnographic Method in the Analysis of WhatsApp Digital Interactions].” Tonos Digital 31: 1–22.Google Scholar
Wen, Miaomiao, Nancy Baym, Omer Tamuz, Jaime Teevan, Susan T. Dumais, and Adam Kalai
2015 “OMG UR Funny! Computer-Aided Humor with an Application to Chat.” In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC), 86–93. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
Wyer, Robert and James E. Collins
1992 “A Theory of Humor Elicitation.” Psychological Review 99(4): 663–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Chia-chen, and B. Bradford Brown
2016 “Online Self-Presentation on Facebook and Self-Development during the College Transition.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 45(2): 402–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeboah, Johnson, and George Dominic Ewur
2014 “The Impact of WhatsApp Messenger Usage on Students’ Performance in Tertiary Institutions in Ghana.” Journal of Education and Practice 5(6): 157–164.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2016 Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017a “Contextual Constraints and Non-Propositional Effects in WhatsApp Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 114: 66–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b “Incongruity-Resolution Cases in Jokes.” Lingua 197: 103–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Identity-Related Issues in Meme Communication.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 113–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Shanyang, Sherri Grasmuck, and Jason Martin
2008 “Identity Construction on Facebook: Digital Empowerment in Anchored Relationships.” Computers in Human Behavior 24(5): 1816–1836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Cantos-Delgado, Clara & Carmen Maíz-Arévalo
2023. “I hear you like bad girls? I’m bad at everything”: a British-Spanish cross-cultural analysis of humour as a self-presentation strategy in Tinder profiles . The European Journal of Humour Research 11:3 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Minfen & Doreen D. Wu
2022. Rapport building by Chinese celebrities on Weibo and Facebook. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:1 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 october 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.