Chapter published in:
The Pragmatics of Adaptability
Edited by N. Daniel Silva and Jacob L. Mey
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 319] 2021
► pp. 3754


Austin, John L.
1975How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press [First edition 1962]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press [First edition 1961]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, John M.
1991Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1981 “On Apologizing.” In Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 259–271. The Hague and New York: Mouton.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1971Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ide, Risako
1998 “Thank You for Your kindness: Japanese Interactional Ritual in Public Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 29(5): 509–529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L.
2001Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd edition). Oxford & Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2009 “Adaptability in Human-computer Interaction.” In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (2nd edition), ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 7–13. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko
2011 “How Are Speech Acts Situated in Context?” In Context and Contexts: Parts Meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etsuko Oishi, 181–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Apologies.” In Handbooks of Pragmatics, Volume 2: Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. by Marina Sbisà and Ken Turner, 499–530. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko
2014 “Discursive Functions of Evidentials and Epistemic Modals.” In Certainty-uncertainty – and the Attitudinal Space in Between, ed. by Sibilla Cantarini, Werner Abraham and Elisabeth Leiss, 239–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko
2015 “Follow-Ups as Speech Acts in Mediated Political Discourse.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin, 33–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Austin’s Speech Acts and Mey’s Pragmemes.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use, ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes, 335–350. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko and Fetzer, Anita
2016 “Expositives in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 96: 49–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olshtain, Elite and Andrew D. Cohen
1983 “Apology: A Speech Act Set.” In Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, ed. by Nessa Wolfson and Elliot Judd, 18–35. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Owen, Marion
1983Apologies and Remedial Interchanges: A Study of Language Use in Social Interaction. Berlin; New York: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
2002 “Cognition and Narrativity in Speech Act Sequences. In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Christiane Meierkord, 71–97. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1979Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar