Part of
The Pragmatics of Adaptability
Edited by Daniel N. Silva and Jacob L. Mey
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 319] 2021
► pp. 143170
References
Austin, John L.
1975How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer, and Markus Steinbach
2011 “Exploring the Meaning of Quotation.” In Understanding Quotation, ed. by Elke Bredel, Jörg Meibauer, and Markus Steinbach, 1–33. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, and Ingrid Van Alphen
2012 “Introductory Remarks on New and Old Quotatives.” In Quotatives. Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller and Ingrid Van Alphen, xi–xxx, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven
1995 “Defining Moments, Presidential Debates, and the Dynamics of Quotability.” Journal of Communication 45(3): 118–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2001New Labour, New Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2000 “Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews.” TEXT 20(4): 1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Reformulation and Common Grounds.” In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Kerstin Fischer, 157–197. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2011 “ ‘Here is the difference, here is the passion, here is the chance to be part of a great change’: Strategic Context Importation in Political Discourse.” In Context and Contexts: Parts meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etsuko Oishi, 115–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Contexts in Interaction: Relating Pragmatic Wastebaskets.” In What is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer, and Petra Schumacher, 105–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “The Multilayered and Multifaceted Nature of Political Discourse.” In The Pragmatics of Political Discourse. Explorations across Cultures, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “ ‘When you came into office you said that your government would be different’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence N. Berlin, 245–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “ ‘And I quote’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 157: 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull
2012 “Doing Leadership in Political Speech: Semantic Processes and Pragmatic Inferences.” Discourse & Society 23(2): 127–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Elda Weizman
2018 “What I would say to John and everyone like John is …”: The Construction of Ordinariness through Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 29(5): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Daniel Weiss
2020 “Doing Things with Quotes: Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 157: 84–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David
1988 “A Turn-Taking System for British News Interviews.” Language in Society 17: 401–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert P.
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1979 “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17: 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton, 161–227. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas
1995 “Interaction Planning and Intersubjective Adjustment of Perspectives by Communicative Genres.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Ester Goody, 175–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko, and Anita Fetzer
2016 “Expositives in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 96: 49–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parker, Joseph, and Mary Bucholtz
2009 “Introduction. Public Transcripts: Entextualization and Linguistic Representation in Institutional Contexts.” Text & Talk 29 (5): 485–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Richmond H.
1992 “Accommodation, Meaning, and Implicature: Interdisciplinary Foundations for Pragmatics.” In Intentions in Communication, ed. by Philip Cohen, Jerry Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack, 325–363. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1980Macrostructures. Hillsdale, N.J.: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Weinberger, David
2011Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts aren’t the Facts, Experts are Everywhere, and the Smartest person in the Room is the Room. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kleinke, Sonja
2023.  Top-down meets bottom-up. In Remedies against the Pandemic [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 102],  pp. 196 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.