Question–answer sequences in Japanese first encounters
Wishing to get to know new persons vs. dispreferred behavior of asking questions
The aim of this investigation is to examine the relationship between information-eliciting questions and their corresponding answers that occur in first encounters between male interlocutors in a Japanese semi-formal academic context. This topic acquires a special significance in the context of Japanese culture, where asking questions is regarded as dispreferred verbal behavior. Five types of constraints on initiating question-based conversations in a Japanese social-cultural context have been identified: (i) questions may compel the recipient to speak; (ii) questions may invade the recipient’s personal territory; (iii) questions may reveal conflict between interlocutors; (iv) questions may interrupt someone’s ongoing talk; and (v) questions may reveal the respondent’s inability to answer. The analysis points to a paradox regarding the discursive behaviour of Japanese males: they show a desire to get acquainted with each other, while at the same time they are reluctant to ask questions which might cause uncomfortable feelings.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 3.Social conversation and questions in Japanese
- 4.Questions in Japanese discourse: Why are they dispreferred?
- 4.1Asking questions may compel the question recipient to speak
- 4.2Asking questions may invade personal territory
- 4.3Asking questions may generate or reveal conflict between interlocutors
- 4.4Asking questions may interrupt the interlocutor’s ongoing talk
- 4.5Asking questions may reveal the interlocutor’s inability to answer
- 5.Data and methodology
- 6.Findings and discussion
- 6.1Asking questions may compel the question recipient to speak
- 6.2Asking questions may invade personal territory
- 6.3Asking questions may create or reveal a conflict between participants
- 6.4Asking questions may interrupt the interlocutor’s ongoing talk
- 6.5Asking a question may reveal the interlocutors’ inability to answer
- 7.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
-
Appendix