Chapter in:
Beyond Meaning
Edited by Elly Ifantidou, Louis de Saussure and Tim Wharton
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 324] 2021
References:

References:

Assimakopoulos, Stavros
2017 “Relevance.” In The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Anne Barron, Yueguo Gu, and Gerard Steen, 310-322. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beck, Hanno T.
2007 “Comprehension Procedures and Non-communicative Utterances.” MS. Retrieved from: https://​semanticsarchive​.net​/Archive​/GEzZGEyO​/Beck​_2007​.pdf.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2012 “Relevance theory.” In The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language, ed. by Gillian Russell, and Delia Graff Fara, 163-176. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davis, Wayne
1992 “Speaker Meaning.” Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 223-253.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Louis, and Tim Wharton
2019 “La notion de pertinence au défi des effets émotionnels [Relevance and emotional effects].” TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage 35. Retrieved from: https://​journals​.openedition​.org​/tipa​/3068.
Grice, H. Paul
1957 “Meaning.” Philosophical Review 66: 377-388.Google Scholar
1969 “Utterer’s Meaning and Intention.” Philosophical Review 78: 147-177.Google Scholar
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2008 “Intention in Pragmatics.” Intercultural Pragmatics 5: 99-110.Google Scholar
Kolaiti, Patricia
2009 “The Limits of Expression: Language, Poetry, Thought.” PhD diss., University College London.Google Scholar
2019The Limits of Expression: Language, Literature, Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L., and Mary Talbot
1988 “Computation and the Soul.” Journal of Pragmatics 12: 743-789.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1982 “Mutual Knowledge and Relevance in Theories of Comprehension.” In Mutual Knowledge, ed. by Neil V. Smith, 61-85. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1996 “Fodor’s Frame Problem and Relevance Theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19: 530-532.Google Scholar
1997 “Remarks on Relevance Theory and the Social Sciences.” Multilingua 16: 145-151.Google Scholar
2002 “Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-Reading.” Mind and Language 17: 3-23.Google Scholar
2015 “Beyond Speaker’s Meaning.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15: 117-149.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999Understanding Pragmatics. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim
2008 “ ‘MeaningNN’ and ‘Showing’: Gricean Intentions and Relevance-Theoretic Intentions.” Intercultural Pragmatics 5: 131-152.Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim, and Claudia Strey
2019 “Slave to the Passions: Making Emotions Relevant.” In Relevance: Pragmatics and Interpretation, ed. by Kate Scott, Billy Clark, and Robyn Carston, 253-267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston
2019 “Pragmatics and the Challenge of ‘Non-propositional’ Effects.” Journal of Pragmatics 145: 31-38.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
1993 “Relevance and Understanding.” Pragmalingüística 1: 335-366.Google Scholar
2018 “Relevance Theory and Literary Interpretation.” In Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory, ed. by Terence Cave, and Deirdre Wilson, 185-204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
1985 “On Choosing the Context for Utterance-Interpretation.” In Foregrounding Background, ed. by Jens Allwood, and Erland Hjelmquist, 51-64. Lund: Doxa.Google Scholar
1993 “Linguistic Form and Relevance.” Lingua 90: 1-25.Google Scholar
2004 “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Lawrence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 607-632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2015Relevance Theory. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. 2nd ed., ed. by Bendt Heine, and Heiko Narrog, 642-662. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar