Cover not available
Part of
Beyond Meaning
Edited by Elly Ifantidou, Louis de Saussure and Tim Wharton
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 324] 2021
► pp. 151–160

Hushed tones

Ceremonial treatment as a perspective shifter

| University of Brighton
| University of Brighton
A challenge posed by modern art, especially since the birth of the readymade, is how it is possible to discern art from non-art; institutional theories of art suggest that institutional sanctioning is the primary condition for the identification of an object as art. Here, we propose an explanation for the way that such institutional sanctioning might be reflected in the cognitive work of a viewer, and describe this effect as part of a continuum of behaviours that generate deeper, more varied and ultimately more effort-intensive interpretations of both art and other aspects of the human experience.
Keywords: effort investiture, weak communication, art interpretation, institutional theories of art, ‘artworld’, ostension, guru effect, effort-intensive interpretations
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Weak communication, ostension and perception
  • 3.Relevance in cognition and communication
  • 4.Hushed tones
  • 5.Evading summary
  • References
Published online: 10 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.324.c9
References
Adorno, Theodore. W.
1997 Aesthetic Theory, ed. by Gretel Adorno, and Rolf Tiedemann, trans. by Robert Hullot-Kentor. London: AandC Black.Google Scholar
Brabanter, Philippe. D.
2010 “Uttering Sentences Made Up of Words and Gestures.” In Explicit Communication, ed. by Belen Soria, and Esther Romero, 199‒216. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [URL]. AccessedFebruary 16, 2018. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danto, Arthur
1964 “The Artworld.” Journal of Philosophy 61 (19): 571‒584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickie, George
1969 “Defining Art.” American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (3): 253‒256.Google Scholar
Duchamp, Marcel
1914 Bottle Rack. Galvanised iron.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred
1996 “Vogel’s Net: Traps as Artworks and Artworks as Traps.” Journal of Material Culture 1 (1): 15‒38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madella, Pauline, and Tim Wharton
2017 “Prosodic Pointing and Gestures: Multimodality in Action.” Beyond Meaning. Paper presented at National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
“
Pseuds’ corner,” The Spectator 2007 [URL]. Accessed May 24, 2019.
Rule, Alix, and David Levine
International Art English (on-line). [URL]. Accessed May 24, 2019.
Sperber, Dan
2010 “The Guru Effect.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1: 583‒592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Warhol, Andy
1964 Brillo Boxes (Soap Pads). Paint and ink on wood.Google Scholar
Wentworth, Richard
2016 Making Do and Getting By. London: Koening Books.Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim
2003 “Interjections, Language and the ‘Showing/Saying’ Continuum.” Pragmatics and Cognition 11 (1): 39‒91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “ ‘MeaningNN’ and ‘Showing’: Gricean Intentions and Relevance-Theoretic Intentions.” Intercultural Pragmatics (on-line), 5 (2). [URL]. Accessed May 4, 2016.
Wilson, Deirdre
2011 “Relevance and the Interpretation of Literary Works.” In Observing Linguistic Phenomena: A Festschrift for Seiji Uchida, ed. by Akiko Yoshimura, 3‒19. Tokyo: Eihosha.Google Scholar
2018 “Relevance Theory and Literary Interpretation.” In Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory, ed. by Terrence Cave, and Deirdre Wilson, 185‒204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar