Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 325] 2021
► pp. 303–326

Chapter 11
Functional asymmetry and left-to-right movement

Speaking of peripheries

 | Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg | Universiteit Antwerpen
This corpus-based study of the discourse marker speaking of X addresses the issues of functional asymmetry and left-to-right movement. It shows that speaking of X has different pragmatic functions, which may express different degrees of (inter)subjectivity in different peripheral positions. But these functions are not strictly confined to certain peripheries and, diachronically, there is no statistically significant evidence of further (inter)subjectification or change in peripheral preferences. This study thus confirms that the functional asymmetry hypothesis is better understood as a strong tendency that holds better for certain functional domains than for others and it serves as a counterexample to the related left-to-right movement hypothesis therewith.
Keywords: discourse marker, periphery, functional asymmetry, (inter)subjectivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Corpus and dataset
  • 3.Discourse marking functions of SPOX
    • 3.1Topic introduction
    • 3.2Speech act adverbial
    • 3.3Emphasized commenting
  • 4.Peripheral positions and functional asymmetry
  • 5.Left to right movement
  • 6.Summary
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.325.11bai
References (39)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Gisle. 2015. “Discourse Topic Markers from a Cross-Linguistic and Variational Perspective.” Paper presented at the 14th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA 14), Antwerp, July 28.
Beeching, Kate, and Ulrich Detges. 2014. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald, and Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide: Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Jiajun. 2018. “(Inter)Subjectification at the Left and Right Periphery: Deriving Chinese Pragmatic Marker Bushi from the Negative Copula.” Language Sciences 66: 83–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008–. “The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): One Billion Words, 1990–2019.” [URL]
Degand, Liesbeth. 2014. “‘So Very Fast Then’ Discourse Markers at Left and Right Periphery in Spoken French.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 151–178. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, and Benjamin Fagard. 2011. “Alors between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position.” Functions of Language 18 (1): 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2006. “Discourse Particles and Modal Particles as Grammatical Elements.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 403–425. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, and Kerstin Fischer. 1998. “Zur diskursiven und modalen Funktion der Partikeln aber, auch, doch und ja in instruktionsdialogen [On the discursive and modal functions of the particles aber, auch, doch and ja in instructional dialogues].” Linguistica 38 (1): 75–99.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen W. 1997. “Form and Function of the Discourse Marker Anyway: Implications for Discourse Analysis.” Linguistics 35: 343–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1988. “Types of English Discourse Markers.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38 (1/4): 19–33.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Pragmatic Markers.” Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “What Are Discourse Markers?” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (7): 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “The Case of the Empty S1.” Journal of Pragmatics 3: 1625–1630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Topic Orientation Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5): 892–898. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker. 2010. “Contrastive Topics and Distributed Foci as Instances of Sub-Informativity: A Comparison of English and German.” In Comparative and Contrastive Studies of Information Structure, ed. by Carsten Breul, and Edward Göbbel, 15–50. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., and Candace L. Sidner. 1985. “Discourse Structure and the Proper Treatment of Interruptions.” In IJCAI’85: Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2: 832–839. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. “Discourse Marker and Modal Particle: The Functions of Utterance-Final Then in Spoken English.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3603–3623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D., and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu, and Mitsuko Narita Izutsu. 2013. “From Discourse Markers to Modal/Final Particles. What the Position Reveals about the Continuum.” In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, ed. by Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie, and Paola Pietrandrea, 217–236. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1993. “The Discourse Marker Well: A Relevance-Theoretical Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 19: 435–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. “The Discourse Marker Well in the History of English.” English Language & Linguistics 1 (1): 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kong, Lei, and Hongwu Qin. 2017. “The Development of Manner of Speaking Markers in English and Chinese: Pragmaticalization, Grammaticalization and Lexicalization.” Journal of Pragmatics 107: 16–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1974. Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2014. “Setting Up a Mental Space: A Function of Discourse Markers at the Left Periphery (LP) and Some Observations about LP and RP in Japanese.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 92–116. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2018. “Paths of Grammaticalization: Beyond the LP/RP Debate.” In Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change, ed. by Salvador Pons Bordería, and Óscar Loureda Lamas, 334–383. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (version 3.2.1). R. R. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL [URL]
Sohn, Sung-Ock, and Stephanie Hyeri Kim. 2014. “The Interplay of Discourse and Prosody at the Left and Right Periphery in Korean: An Analysis of Kuntey ‘But.’” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 221–250. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanno, Koji. 2017. “Expanding to the Peripheries: A Corpus-Based Study of the Development of the Japanese Discourse Marker Toiuka.” Ampersand 4: 58–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. “From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization.” In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann, and Yakov Malkiel, 245–271. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification.” In Motives for Language Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery.” English Text Construction 5 (1): 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Investigating ‘Periphery’ from a Functionalist Perspective.” Linguistics Vanguard 1 (1): 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija. 2004. “Point of Departure: Cognitive Aspects of Sentence-Initial Adverbials.” In Approaches to Cognition through Text and Discourse, ed. by Tuija Virtanen, 79–98. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar