Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 325] 2021
► pp. 327–350

Chapter 12
The diachronic origin of English I mean and German ich meine

ORCID logo | University of Trier
ORCID logo | University of Hamburg

The pragmatic markers ich meine in German and I mean in English are similar, though not equivalent, in the main aspects of their meaning and function. Both have also been widely studied, yet research on German ich meine has focused on modern data and functions. From a diachronic perspective, we investigate whether the matrix clause function, as claimed in the literature for spoken modern German, is a likely origin of the pragmatic marker or whether, as in English, a derivation from I mean followed by a phrasal complement seems more likely. Furthermore, we assess how well the origins of the pragmatic functions of I mean can be sufficiently described as constructionalization rather than grammaticalization and what role the left periphery plays in this constructionalization process.

Keywords: diachronic linguistics, German, English, Construction Grammar
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3. I mean and ich meine in modern English and German
    • 3.1 I mean in modern English
    • 3.2 Ich meine in modern written and spoken German
  • 4.The diachronic development of I mean and ich mein(e)
    • 4.1The development of the pragmatic marker I mean
    • 4.2The development of the pragmatic marker ich meine
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Corpora and online dictionaries
  • References
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.325.12kol
References

Corpora and online dictionaries

BNC = British National Corpus, here: Sebastian Hoffmann and Stefan Evert
BNCweb (CQP-Edition; [URL])
Bosworth-Toller = Ondrej Tichy and Martin Rocek
2019 Bosworth-Toller Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online. ([URL])
Cambridge Dictionary = Cambridge University Press
2020 ([URL])
COHA = Davies, Mark
2010  The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 million words, 1810–2009. ([URL])
DOEC = Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus
, compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey with John Price Wilkin and Xin Xiang. (Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project 2009).Google Scholar
DWDS = DWDS (Digitales Wörterbuch der Deutschen Sprache) Kernkorpus
1900–1999 ([URL])
HiFoS = Database of the Research Unit “Historische formelhafte Sprache und Traditionen des Formulierens (HiFoS)/Diachronic Formulaic Language and Traditions of Communication
[URL])
Lexico = Oxford University Press
2020 Lexico. Powered by Oxford. ([URL])
MEG-C = Middle English Grammar Corpus, version 2011.1
, compiled by Merja Stenroos, Martti Mäkinen, Simon Horobin, and Jeremy Smith, March 2011, University of Stavanger. ([URL])
OED = OED Online. Oxford University Press
2020 ([URL])
AhdGr = Althochdeutsche Grammatik
2004 Volume I: Laut- und Formenlehre , by Wilhelm Braune, 15.th edition, ed. by Ingo Reiffenstein. Volume II: Syntax, ed. by Richard Schrodt. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1997 “ I Think – An English Modal Particle.” In Modality in Germanic Languages, ed. by Toril Swan, and Olaf J. Westvik, 1–47. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ancient Laws and Institutes of England
. Reprint 2004 Ed. by Benjamin Thorpe. Clark, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
1998 “Zwischen Parataxe und Hypotaxe: Abhängige Hauptsätzeʻ im gesprochenen und geschriebenen Deutsch.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 26: 284–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter, and Susanne Günthner
2003 “Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen. Ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung?” InLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structures) 38: 1–30.Google Scholar
2005 “Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen. Ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung?” In Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, ed. by Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans, and Sarah De Groodt, 335–362. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate
2016a “ Alors/donc/then at the Right Periphery: Seeking Confirmation of an Inference.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2): 208–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b Pragmatic Markers in British English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte
2012 “The Establishment of Quantifier Constructions for Size Nouns: A Diachronic Study of Heap(s) and Lot(s) .” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13: 202–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “The Development of I Mean: Implications for the Study of Historical Pragmatics.” In Methods in Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Susan Fitzmaurice, and Irma Taavitsainen, 37–79. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The Comment Clause in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2006 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, and Benjamin Fagard
2011 “ Alors between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position.” Functions of Language 18 (1): 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2011 “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions.” Linguistics 49 (2): 365–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duden 4 = Duden Band 4. Die Grammatik. Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch
2016 9. edition. Mannheim: Duden Verlag.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter
1999 Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Volume 2: Der Satz. Stuttgart: Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filatkina, Natalia
2018 Historische formelhafte Sprache. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Herausforderungen. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean E., and Josef C. Schrock
2002 “Basic Meanings of You Know and I Mean .” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (6): 727–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne, and Wolfgang Imo
2003 “Die Reanalyse von Matrixsätzen als Diskursmarker: Ich mein-Konstruktionen im gesprochenen Deutsch.” InLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structures) 37: 1–31.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011 “Discourse Marker and Modal Particle: The Functions of Utterance-Final Then in Spoken English.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3603–3623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2011 “Was ist Konstruktionswandel?” In Konstruktionsgrammatik III. Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze, ed. by Alexander Lasch, and Alexander Ziem, 59–75. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004 “Lexicalization and Grammaticalization: Opposite or Orthogonal?” In What makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, ed. by Walter Bisang, 21–44. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1991 “On Some Principles of Grammaticization.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imo Wolfgang
2005 “A Construction Grammar Approach to the Phrase “I Mean” in Spoken English.” InLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structure) 42: 1–37.Google Scholar
Imo, Wolfgang
2006 “Zur Anwendung der Construction Grammar auf die gesprochene Sprache: Der Fall ‚ich mein(e)‘.” In Zugänge zur Grammatik der gesprochenen Sprache, ed. by Vilmos Ágel, and Mathilde Hennig, 3–34. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Construction Grammar und Gesprochene Sprache-Forschung: Konstruktionen mit zehn matrixsatzfähigen Verben im gesprochenen Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2015 Thoughts on Grammaticalization. 3rd edition. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2007 “ Soþlice, Forsoothe, Truly: Communicative Principles and Invited Inferences in the History of Truth-intensifying Adverbs in English.” In Methods in Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Susan Fitzmaurice, and Irma Taavitsainen, 81–105. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Old English Pragmatics and Discourse.” In The History of English: Old English, ed. by Laurel Brinton, and Alexander Bergs, 140–159. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Povolná, Renata
2009 “Interpreting Meaning in Spoken Interaction: The Case of I Mean .” In I-Mean: First International Conference on Meaning in Interaction; Conference Proceedings, ed. by Department of Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies, University of Bristol, 138–150, [URL], last accesses 30 October, 2020.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
1985 Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schützeichel, Rudolf
2006 Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Stein, Stephan
1995 Formelhafte Sprache: Untersuchungen zu ihren pragmatischen und kognitiven Funktionen im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna Brita
1995 “Some Remarks on Comment Clauses.” In The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description, ed. by Bas Aarts, and Charles F. Meyer, 290–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1988 “Grammaticalization and Semantic Bleaching.” In Berkeley Linguistics Society: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting February 13–15 General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization, ed. by Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaiser, and Helen Singmaster, 389–405. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepaniak, Renata
2011 Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac
1991a “A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization: Types of Grammatical Markers, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 313–329. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac
1991b “The Discourse Conditions for the Use of the Complementizer that in Conversational English.” Journal of Pragmatics 15: 237–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995 “Subjectification in Grammaticalization.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in Language, ed. by Dieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “Constructions in Grammaticalization.” In A Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. by Brian D. Joseph, and Richard D. Janda, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Toward a Constructional Framework for Research on Language Change.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies 1 (1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Graeme Trousdale
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2014 “On the Relationship between Grammaticalization and Constructionalization.” Folia Linguistica 48 (2): 557–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2013 Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Olmen, Daniël
2013 “The Imperative of Say as a Pragmatic Marker in English and Dutch.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 23 (3): 247–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ackermann, Tanja
2023. Die formale und funktionale Entwicklung vonbitte. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 51:1 ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.