Part of
Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 325] 2021
► pp. 415448
Aijmer, Karin
1997 “ I think – an English Modal Particle.” In Modality in the Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Toril Swan, and Olaf Jansen Westvik, 1–47. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Analyzing Modal Adverbs as Modal Particles and Discourse Markers.” In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, ed. by Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie, and Paola Pietrandrea, 96–106. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Revisiting actually in Different Positions in Some National Varieties of English.” In Corpus-Based Studies on Language Varieties, ed. by Francisco Alonso Almeida, Laura Cruz García, and Víctor González Ruiz, 115–144. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2019 “Challenges in the Contrastive Study of Discourse Markers: The Case of then .” In Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Óscar Loureda, Inés Recio Fernandez, Laura Nadal, and Adriana Cruz, 17–42. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio
1992 “Pues”. Gramma-Temas 1: 11–26.Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate
2016 “ Alors/donc/then at the Right Periphery: Seeking Confirmation of an Inference.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (2): 208–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernicot, Josie, Judith Comeau, and Helga Feider
1993 “Speech Acts by Mother and Child: Determining their Nature and Form.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 8 (1): 35–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blank, Andreas
1997Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen [Principles of the lexical change of meaning: The case of Romance languages]. Niemeyer: Tübingen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borreguero Zuloaga, Margarita
2014 “Left Periphery in Discourse: Frame Unit and Discourse Markers.” In Left Peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Andreas Dufter, and Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta, 345–382. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “The Evolution of Temporal Adverbs into Consecutive Connectives and the Role of Discourse Traditions: The Case of It. allora and Sp. entonces .” In Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change (Studies in Pragmatics), ed. by Salvador Pons, and Óscar Loureda, 231–270. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder
2012 “A Usage-based Theory of Grammatical Status and Grammaticalization.” Language 88 (1): 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel
2008The Comment Clause in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carretero, Marta, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, and Julia Lavid-López
2017 “Adverbs as Evidentials: An English-Spanish Contrastive Analysis of Twelve Adverbs in Spoken and Newspaper Discourse.” Kalbotyra 70: 32–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corum, Claudia
1975 “A Pragmatic Analysis of Parenthetic Disjuncts.” In Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by Robin E. Grossman, L. James Sam, and Timothy J. Vance, 131–141. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth
2014 “ ‘So very fast then’: Discourse Markers at Left and Right Periphery in Spoken French.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Cross-Linguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 151–187. Brill: Leiden. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández Sánchez, Javier
Fischer, Kerstin, and Maiken Heide
2018 “Inferential Processes in English and the Question whether English has Modal Particles.” Open Linguistics 4 (1): 509–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fretheim, Thorstein
2015 “A Relevance-Theoretic Perspective on the Norwegian Utterance-Final Particles da and altså Compared to their English Counterpart then .” In Final Particles, ed. by Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow, and Margje Post, 249–284. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2012 “El margen derecho del enunciado [The right margin of the utterance].” Revista española de lingüística (RSEL) 42 (2): 63–94.Google Scholar
2019 “Combinaciones entre operadores argumentativos: el regulador escalar si cabe [Combinations between argumentative operators: The scalar regulator si cabe ].” Spanish in Context 16 (2): 151–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo
2013Structural Markedness and Syntactic Structure: A Study of Word Order and the Left Periphery in Mexican Spanish. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier
2001 “Spanish Exclamatives and the Semantics of the Left Periphery”. In Selected Papers from Going Romance 99, ed. by Yves de Hulst, Johan Rooryck, and Jan Schroten, 167–194. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, Margje Post, and Alexander Haselow
2015 “Introduction: Final Particles from a Typological Perspective.” In Final Particles, ed. by Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow, and Margje Post, 3–36. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011 “Discourse Marker and Modal Particle: The Functions of Utterance-Final then in Spoken English.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3603–3623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and the Negotiation of Common Ground in Spoken Discourse: Final Particles in English.” Language and Communication 32 (3): 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Arguing for a Wide Conception of Grammar: The Case of Final Particles in Spoken Discourse.” Folia Linguistica 47 (2): 375–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Left vs. Right Periphery in Grammaticalization: The Case of anyway .” In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research, ed. by Andrew D. M. Smith, Graeme Trousdale, and Richard Waltereit, 157–186. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa
2010 “Assertive bien in Spanish and the Left Periphery.” In Mapping the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Studies Vol. 5, ed. by Paola Benincà, and Nicola Munaro, 19–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991 “On Some Principles of Grammaticalization.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization, ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 17–35. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu, and Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
2013 “From Discourse Markers to Modal/Final Particles: What the Position Reveals about the Continuum.” In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, ed. by Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie, and Paola Pietrandrea, 217–235. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine, and Tania Kuteva
2011 “On Thetical Grammar.” Studies in Language 35 (4): 852–897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995 Reprint. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Revised and expanded version. First published edition. München: Lincom Europa. Original edition, Köln: Kölner Universalienprojekt 1982.Google Scholar
Lewis, Diana M.
2018 “Grammaticalizing Connectives in English and Discourse Information Structure.” In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change, ed. by Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban, and José V. Lozano, 135–157. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makauskaitė, Indrė
2016 “Multifunctionality of the Lithuanian TADA and English THEN in Spoken Discourse: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis.” Kalbotyra 68: 96–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2015 “Epistemicity and Stance: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Epistemic Stance Strategies in Journalistic Discourse in English and Spanish.” Discourse Studies 17 (2): 210–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Multifunctionality of Evidential Expressions in Discourse Domains and Genres: Evidence from Cross-Linguistic Case Studies.” In Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Gerda Hassler, and Marta Carretero, 411–445. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita, Rodney Huddleston, and Peter Collins
2002 “The Clause: Adjuncts.” In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, ed. by Rodney Huddleston, and Geoffrey K. Pullum, 663–784. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nastri, Jacqueline, Jorge Peña, and Jeffrey T. Hancock
2006 “The Construction of Away Messages: A Speech Act Analysis.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (4): 1025–1045. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osa, Adriana
2017 “Negotiation of Discourse Moves: Right Periphery Tags.” In Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SEMDIAL 2017), ed. by Volha Petukhova, and Ye Tian, 97–103. Saarbrucken: Saarland University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruskan, Anna
2015 “Evidential Adverbials in Lithuanian.” Kalbotyra 67: 104–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Functional Variation of Discourse Particles in Lithuanian: A Look at Clause Peripheries.” Corpus Pragmatics 3: 303–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sameer, Imad Hayif
2017 “Analysis of Speech Act Patterns in two Egyptian Inaugural Speeches.” Studies in English Language and Education 4 (2): 134–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, Shie
2017 “On Establishing I think as a Final Particle in Interactions: Some Comparisons with Sentence-Final Particles in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 110: 83–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5 (1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie and Karin Aijmer
2007The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A Corpus-based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995 “Subjectification in Grammaticalisation.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by Dieter Stein and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “The Rhetoric of Counter-Expectation in Semantic Change: A Study in Subjectification.” In Historical Semantics and Cognition, ed. by Andreas Blank, and Peter Koch, 177–196. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery.” English Text Construction 5 (1): 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “On the Rise of Types of Clause-Final Pragmatic Markers in English.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (1): 26–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ureña Gómez-Moreno, Pedro
2015 “Sentence-Final Adverbials: Recurrent Types and Usage.” In Final Particles, ed. by Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow, and Margje Post, 39–54. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Usonienė, Aurelija
2013 “On the Morphosyntactic Status of Complement-Taking Predicate Clauses in Lithuanian.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45 (1): 73–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Non-morphological Realizations of Evidentiality: The Case of Parenthetical Elements in Lithuanian.” In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics, ed. by Peter Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet, and Björn Wiemer, 437–463. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar