Part of
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 1
References
Bercelli, Fabrizio, Federico Rossano, and Maurizio Viaro
2013 “Supra-Session Courses of Action in Psychotherapy.” Journal of Pragmatics 57: 118–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde
Chafe, Wallace
1976 “Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View.” In Subject and Topic, ed. by Charles N. Li, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992 “Information Flow in Speaking and Writing.” In The Linguistics of Literacy, ed. by Pamela A. Downing, Susan D. Lima, and Michael Noonan, 17–29. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles
1872The Expression of the Emotion in Man and Animals. London: John Murray. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2015 “When Recipient Design Fails: Egocentric Turn-Design of Instructions in Driving School Lessons Leading to Breakdowns of Intersubjectivity.” Gesprächforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 16: 63–101.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2006 “Demonstratives, Joint Attention, and the Emergence of Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics 17: 463–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul
2007Emotions Revealed. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Etelämäki, Marja
2016 “Introduction: Discourse, Grammar and Intersubjectivity.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39 (2): 101–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007 “Insubordination and Its Uses.” In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, ed. by Irina Nikolaeva, 366–431. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Field, Tiffany M.
2001Touch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1974Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1983 “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48 (1): 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
2017 “Haptic Sociality: The Embodied Interactive Constitution of Intimacy through Touch.” In Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, ed. by Christian Meyer, Jürgen Streeck, and J. Scott Jordan, 126–155. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change of State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven E. Clayman
2013 “The Changing Tenor of Questioning over Time: Tracking a Question Form across US Presidential News Conferences, 1953–2000.” Journalism Practice 7 (4): 481–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1987 “Emergent Grammar.” In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 139–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacoboni, Marco
2008Mirroring People. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
Levinson, Stephen C.
2006 “On the Human ‘Interaction Engine’.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. by N. J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., and N. J. Enfield
2006 “Introduction: Human Sociality as a New Interdisciplinary Field.” In Roots of Human Sociality, ed. by N. J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson, 1–39. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna
1999Language as Social Action: Grammar, Prosody and Interaction in Swedish Conversation. Doctoral dissertation. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Lindström, Jan, Ritva Laury, and Camilla Lindholm
2019”Insubordination and the Contextually Sensitive Emergence of If-Requests in Swedish and Finnish Institutional Talk-in-Interaction.” In Insubordination: Theoretical and Empirical Issues, ed. by Karin Beijering, Gunther Kaltenböck, and María Sol Sansiñena, 55–78. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Jan, Camilla Lindholm, and Ritva Laury
2016”The Interactional Emergence of Conditional Clauses as Directives: Constructions, Trajectories and Sequences of Action.” Language Sciences 58: 8–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
2014 “Interactivities, Intersubjectivities and Language: On Dialogism and Phenomenology.” Language and Dialogue 4 (2): 165–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Intersubjectivity in Dialogue.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 109–126. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Linell, Per, and Jan Lindström
2016”Partial Intersubjectivity and Sufficient Understandings for Current Practical Purposes: On a Specialized Practice in Swedish Conversation.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39 (2): 113–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
1962Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyer, Christian, Streeck, Jürgen, and J. Scott Jordan
2017 “Introduction.” In Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, ed. by Christian Meyer, Jürgen Streeck, and J. Scott Jordan, 16–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Johannes Wagner, and Esther Gonzáles-Martínez
(eds) 2018Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
2006”Facial Expression in an Assessment.” In Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods. Qualitative Audiovisual Data Analysis in Sociology, ed. by Hubert Knoblauch, Bernt Schnettler, Jürgen Raab, and Hans-Georg Soeffner, 127–142. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase
2019 “Intersubjectivity, Normativity and Grammar.” Social Psychology Quarterly 82 (2): 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
2013 “Epistemics, Action Formation, and Other-Initiation of Repair: The Case of Partial Questioning Repeats.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 261–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, Ragnar
1974On Message Structure. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuetz, Alfred
1953 “Common Sense and the Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (1): 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schutz, Alfred, and Thomas Luckmann
1979Structures of the Life-World. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
1994 “Emphatic Speech Style: With Special Focus on the Prosodic Signalling of Heightened Emotive Involvement in Conservation.” Journal of Pragmatics 22: 375–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers Tanya, Tanya Sidnell, and Clara Bergen
2018 “Children’s Responses to Questions in Peer Interaction: A Window into the Ontogenesis of Interactional Competence.” Journal of Pragmatics 124: 14–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
2015 “Experience Sharing, Emotional Reciprocity, and Turn-Taking.” Frontiers in Psychology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2020 “English why don’t you x as a Formulaic Expression.” In Formulaic Expressions: Building Language Structure and Social Action, ed. by Ritva Laury, and Tsuyoshi Ono, 99–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2008Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Malinda Carpenter, and R. Peter Hobson
2005 “The Emergence of Social Cognition in Three Young Chimpanzees.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 70 (1): 1–152.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn
1979 “Communication and Cooperation in Early Infancy. A Description of Primary Intersubjectivity.” In Before Speech: The Beginning of Human Communication, ed. by Margaret Bullowa, 321–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn, and Kenneth J. Aitken
2001 “Infant Intersubjectivity: Research, Theory, and Clinical Applications.” The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 42: 3–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wootton, Anthony J.
1997Interaction and The Development of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha, and Esa Itkonen
(eds) 2008The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson
2022. Can temporal clauses be insubordinate?. Interactional Linguistics 2:2  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Eilittä, Tiina, Pentti Haddington, Antti Kamunen, Laura Kohonen-Aho, Iira Rautiainen & Anna Vatanen
2023. On the Complexities of Interaction: An Introduction. In Complexity of Interaction,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Grossmann, Francis & Anna Krzyżanowska
2022. Désambiguïsation et description lexicographique des formules expressives de la conversation. Lingvisticae Investigationes 45:2  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Haddington, Pentti, Laura Kohonen-Aho, Sylvaine Tuncer & Heidi Spets
2023. Openings of Interactions in Immersive Virtual Reality: Identifying and Recognising Prospective Participants. In Complexity of Interaction,  pp. 423 ff. DOI logo
Martikainen, Silja, Laura Kohonen-Aho, Niina Seittenranta, Emilia Makkonen, Mari Falcon, Valtteri Wikström & Katri Saarikivi
2023. Text-based Patient – Doctor Discourse Online And Patients’ Experiences of Empathy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.