Chapter published in:
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 4160
References

References

Ariel, Mira
1990Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope
2007 “Principles of Person Reference in Tzeltal Conversation.” In Person Reference in Interaction. Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 172–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1994Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
2018Interactional Linguistics. Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, Bois W.
1980 “Beyond Definiteness: The Trace of Identity in Discourse.” In The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, ed. by Wallace L. Chafe, 203–274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J., and Tanya Stivers
(eds) 2007Person Reference in Interaction. Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erringer, Anu
1996 “The Functions of Demonstrative Adjectives. Semmoinen, tämmöinen and tuommoinen in Finnish Conversations.” Master’s thesis. Department of Linguistics, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Etelämäki, Marja
2005 “Context and Referent in Interaction. Referential and Indexical Dimensions of the Finnish Demonstrative Pronouns.” In Minimal Reference. The Use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse, ed. by Ritva Laury, 12–37. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
2006Toiminta ja tarkoite: Tutkimus suomen pronominista tämä. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., and Barbara A. Fox
1996 “Interactional Motivations for Reference Formulation: He had. This Guy Had, a Beautiful, Thirty-Two O:lds.” Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara A. Fox, 145–168. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
1892”Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosphie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by G. Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
1981Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hacohen, Gonen, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
2006 “On the Preference for Minimization in Referring to Persons: Evidence from Hebrew Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1305–1312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, William
1990Referential Practice. Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1992 “The Indexical Ground of Deictic Reference.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, ed. by Charles Goodwin, and Alessandro Duranti, 43–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007 “Person Reference in Yucatec Maya Conversation.” In Person Reference in Interaction. Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 149–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2009”Designing Utterances for Action: Verb Repeat Answers to Assessments.” In Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 122–151. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho
2004Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
1988 “Subjekteina ja objekteina toimivat nominilausekkeet puhutussa suomessa.” Licentiate thesis. University of Helsinki.
Heritage, John
2007”Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in Person (and Place) Reference.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by Nick Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 255–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012a “The Epistemic Engine: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b “Epistemics in Conversation.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1990[1971] “Shifters and Verbal Categories.” In Roman Jakobson on Language, ed. by Linda Waugh, and Monique Monville-Burston, 386–392. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1922Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Juvonen, Päivi
2005 “On the Pragmatics of Indefinite Determiners in Spoken Finnish.” In Minimal Reference. The use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse, ed. by Ritva Laury, 190–211. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Koivisto, Aino
2016 "Receipting information as newsworthy vs. responding to redirection: Finnish news receipts "aijaa" and "aha(a)"." Journal of Pragmatics 104: 163-179.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel
1977Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva
1995 “On the Grammaticization of the Definite Article se in Spoken Finnish.” In Historical Linguistics 1993, ed. by Henning Andersen, 239–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Sen kategoriasta. Onko suomessa jo artikkeli? [Regarding the category of se: does Finnish have an article yet?]” Virittäjä 100 (2): 162–181.Google Scholar
1997Demonstratives in Interaction. The Emergence of a Definite Article in Spoken Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Definiteness.” In Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics. Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 5, ed. by Frank Brisard, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 50–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lepäsmaa, Anna-Liisa
1978 “Tunnettuuden ilmaisemisesta Helsingin puhekielessä.” Master’s thesis. Department of Finnish, University of Helsinki.
Lerner, Gene H.
1989 “Notes on Overlap Management in Conversation: The Case of Delayed Completion.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 167–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 “On the Syntax of Sentences in Progress.” Language in Socicety 20: 441–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene
1996 “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction. ‘Second Person’ Reference in Multiparty Conversation.” Pragmatics 6 (3): 281–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders
1955[1940]Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. by Justus Buchler. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Elwys De Stefani, and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2015Time and Emergence in Grammar: Left-Disclocation, Right-Dislocation, Topicalization and Hanging Topic in French. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1981 “Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 223–253. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Russel, Bertrand
1905 “On Denoting.” Mind XIV (4): 479–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996 “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of Systematics.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and Cultural Description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith H. Basso, and Henry A. Shelby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
2001Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Auli Hakulinen
2009 “Alternative Responses to Assessments.” Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 281–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2007 “Alternative Recognitionals in Initial References to Persons.” Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by Nick Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 73–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vatanen, Anna
2014Responding in Overlap: Agency, Epistemicity and Social Action in Conversation. Doctoral dissertation. University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
2017 “Delayed Completions of Unfinished Turns. On the Phenomenon and its Boundaries.” In Linking Clauses and Actions in Social Interaction, ed. by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 153–174. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Vilkuna, Maria
1992Referenssi ja määräisyys suomenkielisten tekstien tulkinnassa. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar