Achieving the intersubjectivity of sensorial practices
Body, language, and the senses in tasting
activities
Intersubjectivity is a crucial issue not only for how
participants in social interaction communicate and coordinate shared
projects, but also for how they engage in sensing the material world
around them while they are jointly acting in that world. This paper
offers an ethnomethodological and conversation analytic study of
sensoriality that provides for a multimodal interactional analysis
of sensory practices. On the basis of a video-recorded beer tasting
session, I show how, far from being limited to individual and
neuro-physiological processes, situated activities of sensing are a
collective accomplishment here and now, emerging within joint
activities of searching, finding, and sharing relevant features of
taste, building agreements, and overcoming divergent views.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.From individual experiences to public evidences of sensorial
qualities: Sharing sensations
- 2.1The evidence of ‘smoke’ (Group 1)
- 2.2The evidence of ‘smoky’ (Group 2)
- 3.Searching for what it tastes: Building intersubjectivity
- 3.1Searching for taste: From the glass to the aroma
wheel
- 3.2Finding taste descriptors: Overhearing from one table to
another
- 4.Conclusion
- Transcription conventions
-
References
References (29)
Backhouse, Anthony E.
2005
[1994] The Lexical Field of Taste: A
Semantic Study of Japanese Taste
Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barretto, Robert P. J., Sarah Gillis-Smith, Jayaram Chandrashekar, David A. Yarmolinsky, Mark J. Schnitzer, Nicholas J.P. Ryba, and Charles S. Zuker
2015 “
The
Neural Representation of Taste Quality at the
Periphery.”
Nature 517: 373–376.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Classen, Constance
1993 Worlds
of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across
Cultures. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croijmans Ilja, and Majid Asifa.
2016 “
Not
All Flavor Expertise Is Equal: The Language of Wine and
Coffee Experts.”
PLoS
ONE 11 (6): e0155845.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fele, Giolo
2016 “
Il
paradosso del gusto.”
Società
Mutamento
Politica 7 (14): 151–174.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving
1978 “
Response
Cries.”
Language 54 (4): 787–815.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving
1979 “
Footing.”
Semiotica25: 1–29.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles
2017 Co-Operative
Action. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles
2000 “
Action
and Embodiment within Situated Human
Interaction.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haddington, Pentti, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile
(eds) 2013 Interaction
and Mobility. Language and the Body in
Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lawless, Harry T.
1984 “
Flavor
Description of White Wine by ‘Expert’ and Nonexpert Wine
Consumers.”
Journal of Food
Science 49 (1): 120–123.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehrer, Ariane
1983 Wine
and
Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liberman Ken
2013 “
The
Phenomenology of Coffee Tasting: Lessons in Practical
Objectivity.”
More Studies in
Ethnomethodology. New York: SUNY.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza.
2014 “
The
Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social
Interaction.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 65: 137–156.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza.
2016 “
Challenges
of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social
Interaction.”
Journal of
Sociolinguistics 20 (2): 2–32.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza.
2018a “
Visual
Practices: Video Studies, Multimodality and
Multisensoriality. In
Co-Operative
Engagements in Intertwined Semiosis: Essays in Honour of
Charles Goodwin, ed.
by
Donald Favareau, 304–325. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza.
2021 “
The
Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices
of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet
Shops.”
Discourse
Studies 20 (6): 743–769.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza.
2018c “
Multiple
Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction:
Challenges for Transcribing
Multimodality.”
ROLSI 51 (1): 85–106.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza.
2019 “
Contemporary
Issues in Conversation Analysis: Embodiment and Materiality,
Multimodality and Multisensoriality in Social
Interaction.”
Journal of
Pragmatics 145: 47–62.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza.
2020 “
Audible
Sniffs:
Smelling-in-Interaction.
Research
on Language and Social
Interaction 53 (1): 140–163.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, Lorenza.
In
press.
Sensing in Social
Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevile, Maurice
2015 “
The
Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social
Interaction.”
ROLSI 48 (2): 121–151.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevile, Maurice, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mirka Rauniomaa
Ochs, Elinor, Clotilde Pontecorvo, and Alessandra Fasulo
1996 “
Socializing
Taste.”
Ethnos 61 (1–2): 7–46.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shapin, Steve
2011 “
Changing
Tastes: How Foods Tasted in the Early Modern Period and How
They Taste
Now.” In
The
Hans Rausing Lecture. Salvia Småskrifter
14. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schutz, Alfred
1962 Collected
Papers. The Hague: Nijhoff.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Streeck, Jürgen
2011 “
The
Changing Meanings of Things: Found Objects and Inscriptions
in Social
Interaction.” In
Embodied
Interaction: Language and Body in the Material
World, ed.
by
Jürgen Streeck,
Charles Goodwin, and
Curtis LeBaron, 67–78. New York: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Streeck, Jürgen. Goodwin Charles and Curtis LeBaron
(eds.) 2011.
Embodied
Interaction: Language and Body in the Material
World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiggins, Sally
2002 “
Talking
with Your Mouth Full: Gustatory
mmms
and the Embodiment of Pleasure
.”
Research
on Language and Social
Interaction, 35 (3), 311–336.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Barnes, Scott & Francesco Possemato
2024.
Multimodal Analysis of Interaction. In
The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics, Second Edition,
► pp. 115 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.