Cover not available
Part of
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 303–

Emotion, psychophysiology, and intersubjectivity

| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
| Tampere University
| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
| Outward Psychiatric Clinic of Western Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
| Aalto University
| University of Helsinki
Conversation analytical studies on emotion show how expression of emotion is part of the intersubjective experience. Emotions, however, are as much physiological as experiential events. Physiological processes pertaining to emotion involve changes in cardiovascular activity, in the activation of sweat glands, and in muscular activity. The dyadic systems theory by Beebe and Lachmann (2002) suggests that actions that regulate social interaction also serve in the regulation of internal emotional states of interacting subjects. Drawing from this theory, our overall research questions was: how is the expression of emotion in social interaction linked to physiological responses in the participants? Our main result was that thorough conversational affiliation, the participants share the emotional load in the interaction.
Keywords: psychophysiology, autonomic nervous system, affiliation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sharing the emotional load in storytelling
  • 3.Physiology of affiliation and dominance in Asperger’s syndrome
  • 4.Physiology, affiliation and challenge in psychotherapy
  • 5.Discussion
  • References
Published online: 17 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.14per
References (43)
References
American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edition.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles. 2008. “Formulations in Psychotherapy.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehiläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 26–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beebe, Beatrice, and Frank Lachmann. 2002. Infant Research and Adult Treatment. Co-Constructing Interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Margaret, and Peter Lang. 2007. “Emotion and Motivation.” In Handbook of Psychophysiology, ed. by John Cacioppo, Louis Tassinary, and Gary Brentson, 581–607. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Emily, Boris Egloff, Frank Wilhelm, Nancy Smith, Elizabeth A. Erickson, and James Gross. 2003. “The Social Consequences of Expressive Suppression.” Emotion 3 (1): 48–67.Google Scholar
Bänninger-Huber, Eva, and Christine Widmer. 1999. “Affective Relationship Patterns and Psychotherapeutic Change.” Psychotherapy Research 9: 74–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, John, Louis Tassinary, and Gary Berntson (eds.). 2007. Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2012. “Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–46. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael, Anne Schell, and Diane Filion. 2007. “The Electrodermal System.” In Handbook of Psychophysiology (3rd edition.), ed. by John Cacioppo, Louis Tassinary, and Gary Berntson, 159–81. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2011. “The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics.” Human Studies 34: 115–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erwing. 1956. “Embarrassment and Social Organization.” American Journal of Sociology 62 (3): 264–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Elaine, John Cacioppo, and Richard L. Rapson. 1994. Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. C., and Rod D. Watson. 1980. “Aspects of the Properties of Formulations in Natural Conversations: Some Instances Analysed.” Semiotica 30 (3–4): 245–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell (1979) Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology 85(3):551-575.Google Scholar
James, William. 1884. “What is an Emotion?” Mind 9: 188–205.Google Scholar
Kleinbub, Johan R. 2017. “State of the Art of Interpersonal Physiology in Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 2053. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreibig, Sylvia D. 2010. “Autonomic Nervous System Activity in Emotion: A Review.” Biological psychology 84 (3): 394–421.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts: Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lange, Carl G. 1885. Om Sindsbevaegelser: Et Psyko-Fysiologisk Studie. Copenhagen: Jacob Lunds Forlag.Google Scholar
Leary, Timothy. 1957. Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Lizdek, Ivana, Pamela Sadler, Erik Woody, Nicole Ethier, and Giles Malet. 2012. “Capturing the Stream of Behavior: A Computer-Joystick Method for Coding Interpersonal Behavior Continuously Over Time.” Social Science Computer Review 30: 513–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markram, Henry, Tania Rinaldi, and Kamila Markram. 2007. “The Intense World Syndrome – An Alternative Hypothesis for Autism.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 1 (1): 77–96. http://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.006.2007Google Scholar
Markram, Kamila, and Henry Markram. 2010. “The Intense World Theory – A Unifying Theory of the Neurobiology of Autism.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 4: 224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palumbo, Richard V., Marisa E. Marraccini, Lisa Weyandt, Oliver Wilder-Smith, Heather McGee, Siwei Liu, and Matthew Goodwin. 2017. “Interpersonal Autonomic Physiology: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 21: 99–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi. 2011. “After Interpretation: Third Position Utterances in Psychoanalysis.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44: 288–316. 10.1080/08351813.2011.591968Google Scholar
. 2012. “Conversation Analysis in Psychotherapy.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Tanya Stivers, and Jack Sidnell, 551–574. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, Pentti Henttonen, Liisa Voutilainen, Mikko Kahri, Melisa Stevanovic, Mikko Sams, and Niklas RavajA. 2015. “Sharing the Emotional Load: Recipient Affiliation Calms Down the Storyteller.” Social Psychology Quarterly 78: 301–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Johanna Ruusuvuori. 2012. “Facial Expression and Interactional Regulation of Emotion.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä & Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 64–91. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2012. Emotion in Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, António P., Cátia Braga, William B. Stiles, Poliane Teixeira, Miguel M. Gonc¸alves, and Eugenia Ribeiro. 2016. “Therapist Interventions and Client Ambivalence in Two Cases of Narrative Therapy for Depression.” Psychotherapy Research 26: 681–693. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1974. “An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by Richard Bauman, and Joel Sherz, 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sadler, Pamela, Nicole Ethier, Gregory R. Gunn, David Duong, and Erik Woody. 2009. “Are We on the Same Wavelength? Complementarity as Shared Cyclical Patterns within an Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97: 1005–1020.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2010. “Affectivity in Conversational Storytelling: An Analysis of Displays of Anger or Indignation in Complaint Stories.” Pragmatics 20 (2): 229–277.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Complaint Stories and Subsequent Complaint Stories with Affect Displays.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (4): 387–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, Pentti Henttonen, Sonja Koski, Mikko Kahri, Liisa Voutilainen, Emmi Koskinen, Taina Nieminen-von Wendt, Elina Sihvola, Pekka Tani, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2017. “On the Asperger Experience of Interaction: Interpersonal Dynamics in Dyadic Conversations.” Journal of Autism 4 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, Pentti Henttonen, Emmi Koskinen, Anssi Peräkylä, Taina Nieminen von-Wendt, Elina Sihvola, Pekka Tani, Niklas Ravaja, and Mikko Sams. 2019. “Physiological Responses to Affiliation during Conversation: Comparing Neurotypical Males and Males with Asperger Syndrome.” PLoS ONE 14(9). e0222084. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, TanyA. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41 (1): 31–57.Google Scholar
Vehviläinen, SannA. 2003. “Preparing and Delivering Interpretations in Psychoanalytic Interaction.” Text 23: 573–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori 2010. “Recognition and Interpretation: Responding to Emotional Experience in Psychotherapy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 85–107.Google Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa, Pentti Henttonen, Mikko Kahri, Niklas Ravaja, Mikko Sams, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2018. “Empathy, Challenge, and Psychophysiological Activation in Therapist–Client Interaction.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiste, Elina and Anssi Peräkylä. 2013. “A Comparative Conversation Analytic Study of Formulations in Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Psychotherapy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46: 299–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiste, Elina, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2014. “Prosody and Empathic Communication in Psychotherapy Interaction.” Psychotherapy Research 24: 687–701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Katila, Julia, Sara A. Goico, Yumei Gan & Marjorie Harness Goodwin
2023. The Primacy of Affective Engagement in Simultaneously Unfolding Participation Frameworks. In Complexity of Interaction, ► pp. 347 ff. DOI logo
Katila, Julia & Kreeta Niemi
2022. Primary schoolboys’ embodied relationships in the classroom. Research on Children and Social Interaction 6:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.