Chapter published in:
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 303–327

Emotion, psychophysiology, and intersubjectivity

| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
| Tampere University
| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
| Outward Psychiatric Clinic of Western Helsinki
| University of Helsinki
| Aalto University
| University of Helsinki
Conversation analytical studies on emotion show how expression of emotion is part of the intersubjective experience. Emotions, however, are as much physiological as experiential events. Physiological processes pertaining to emotion involve changes in cardiovascular activity, in the activation of sweat glands, and in muscular activity. The dyadic systems theory by Beebe and Lachmann (2002) suggests that actions that regulate social interaction also serve in the regulation of internal emotional states of interacting subjects. Drawing from this theory, our overall research questions was: how is the expression of emotion in social interaction linked to physiological responses in the participants? Our main result was that thorough conversational affiliation, the participants share the emotional load in the interaction.
Keywords: psychophysiology, autonomic nervous system, affiliation
Published online: 17 November 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.14per
References

References

American Psychiatric Association
2013 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edition.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles
2008 “Formulations in Psychotherapy.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehiläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 26–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, Beatrice, and Frank Lachmann
2002 Infant Research and Adult Treatment. Co-Constructing Interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Margaret, and Peter Lang
2007 “Emotion and Motivation.” In Handbook of Psychophysiology, ed. by John Cacioppo, Louis Tassinary, and Gary Brentson, 581–607. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Emily, Boris Egloff, Frank Wilhelm, Nancy Smith, Elizabeth A. Erickson, and James Gross
2003 “The Social Consequences of Expressive Suppression.” Emotion 3 (1): 48–67.Google Scholar
Bänninger-Huber, Eva, and Christine Widmer
1999 “Affective Relationship Patterns and Psychotherapeutic Change.” Psychotherapy Research 9: 74–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, John, Louis Tassinary, and Gary Berntson
(eds.) 2007 Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2012 “Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–46. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio
1994 Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael, Anne Schell, and Diane Filion
2007 “The Electrodermal System.” In Handbook of Psychophysiology (3rd edition.), ed. by John Cacioppo, Louis Tassinary, and Gary Berntson, 159–81. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2011 “The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics.” Human Studies 34: 115–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erwing
1956 “Embarrassment and Social Organization.” American Journal of Sociology 62 (3): 264–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, Elaine, John Cacioppo, and Richard L. Rapson
1994 Emotional Contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. C., and Rod D. Watson
1980 “Aspects of the Properties of Formulations in Natural Conversations: Some Instances Analysed.” Semiotica 30 (3–4): 245–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell
(1979) Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology 85(3):551-575.Google Scholar
James, William
1884 “What is an Emotion?” Mind 9: 188–205.Google Scholar
Kleinbub, Johan R.
2017 “State of the Art of Interpersonal Physiology in Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 2053. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreibig, Sylvia D.
2010 “Autonomic Nervous System Activity in Emotion: A Review.” Biological psychology 84 (3): 394–421.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky
1967 “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts: Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lange, Carl G.
1885 Om Sindsbevaegelser: Et Psyko-Fysiologisk Studie. Copenhagen: Jacob Lunds Forlag.Google Scholar
Leary, Timothy
1957 Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Lizdek, Ivana, Pamela Sadler, Erik Woody, Nicole Ethier, and Giles Malet
2012 “Capturing the Stream of Behavior: A Computer-Joystick Method for Coding Interpersonal Behavior Continuously Over Time.” Social Science Computer Review 30: 513–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markram, Henry, Tania Rinaldi, and Kamila Markram
2007 “The Intense World Syndrome – An Alternative Hypothesis for Autism.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 1 (1): 77–96. http://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.006.2007Google Scholar
Markram, Kamila, and Henry Markram
2010 “The Intense World Theory – A Unifying Theory of the Neurobiology of Autism.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 4: 224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palumbo, Richard V., Marisa E. Marraccini, Lisa Weyandt, Oliver Wilder-Smith, Heather McGee, Siwei Liu, and Matthew Goodwin
2017 “Interpersonal Autonomic Physiology: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 21: 99–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi
2011 “After Interpretation: Third Position Utterances in Psychoanalysis.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44: 288–316. 10.1080/08351813.2011.591968Google Scholar
2012 “Conversation Analysis in Psychotherapy.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Tanya Stivers, and Jack Sidnell, 551–574. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, Pentti Henttonen, Liisa Voutilainen, Mikko Kahri, Melisa Stevanovic, Mikko Sams, and Niklas RavajA.
2015 “Sharing the Emotional Load: Recipient Affiliation Calms Down the Storyteller.” Social Psychology Quarterly 78: 301–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
2012 “Facial Expression and Interactional Regulation of Emotion.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä & Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 64–91. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2012 Emotion in Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, António P., Cátia Braga, William B. Stiles, Poliane Teixeira, Miguel M. Gonc¸alves, and Eugenia Ribeiro
2016 “Therapist Interventions and Client Ambivalence in Two Cases of Narrative Therapy for Depression.” Psychotherapy Research 26: 681–693. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1974 “An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by Richard Bauman, and Joel Sherz, 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sadler, Pamela, Nicole Ethier, Gregory R. Gunn, David Duong, and Erik Woody
2009 “Are We on the Same Wavelength? Complementarity as Shared Cyclical Patterns within an Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97: 1005–1020.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
2010 “Affectivity in Conversational Storytelling: An Analysis of Displays of Anger or Indignation in Complaint Stories.” Pragmatics 20 (2): 229–277.Google Scholar
2012 “Complaint Stories and Subsequent Complaint Stories with Affect Displays.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (4): 387–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, Pentti Henttonen, Sonja Koski, Mikko Kahri, Liisa Voutilainen, Emmi Koskinen, Taina Nieminen-von Wendt, Elina Sihvola, Pekka Tani, and Anssi Peräkylä
2017 “On the Asperger Experience of Interaction: Interpersonal Dynamics in Dyadic Conversations.” Journal of Autism 4 (2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, Pentti Henttonen, Emmi Koskinen, Anssi Peräkylä, Taina Nieminen von-Wendt, Elina Sihvola, Pekka Tani, Niklas Ravaja, and Mikko Sams
2019 “Physiological Responses to Affiliation during Conversation: Comparing Neurotypical Males and Males with Asperger Syndrome.” PLoS ONE 14(9). e0222084. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, TanyA.
2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41 (1): 31–57.Google Scholar
Vehviläinen, SannA.
2003 “Preparing and Delivering Interpretations in Psychoanalytic Interaction.” Text 23: 573–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
2010 “Recognition and Interpretation: Responding to Emotional Experience in Psychotherapy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 85–107.Google Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa, Pentti Henttonen, Mikko Kahri, Niklas Ravaja, Mikko Sams, and Anssi Peräkylä
2018 “Empathy, Challenge, and Psychophysiological Activation in Therapist–Client Interaction.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 530. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weiste, Elina and Anssi Peräkylä
2013 “A Comparative Conversation Analytic Study of Formulations in Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Psychotherapy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46: 299–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weiste, Elina, and Anssi Peräkylä
2014 “Prosody and Empathic Communication in Psychotherapy Interaction.” Psychotherapy Research 24: 687–701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar