Cover not available
Part of
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 329–

Movement synchrony as a topic of empirical social interaction research

| Tampere University
| Aalto University
In this chapter, we consider movement synchrony from two different perspectives. On the one hand, we report a small-scale empirical study to test the hypothesis that movement synchrony is a sequential phenomenon, which serves as a demonstration of how conversation analytically informed research on participants’ unconscious tendencies to synchronize their body movements could proceed in practice. On the other hand, we consider movement synchrony through three closely related, yet essentially different, conceptual lenses: conditional relevance, dialogic resonance, and affordance. We suggest that a specific combination of the insights provided by these three conceptual tools would make conversation analytically informed study of movement synchrony both possible and fruitful.
Keywords: movement synchrony, joint decision-making, conditional relevance, dialogic resonance, affordance
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Movement synchrony as a (sequential) contextual phenomenon
  • 3.An empirical case: Synchronization of body movement during joint decision-making
    • 3.1Data and method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Measurements
      • 3.1.3Procedure
      • 3.1.4Data processing
    • 3.2Results
    • 3.3Discussion of the results
  • 4.How should one account for the interactional functions of movement synchrony?
  • References
Published online: 17 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.15ste
References
Arnold, Lynnette
2012 “Dialogic Embodied Action: Using Gesture to Organize Sequence and Participation in Instructional Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 269–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Michael M.
1981[1934] The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Beebe, Beatrice, Daniel Stern, and Joseph Jaffe
1979 “The Kinesic Rhythm of Mother–Infant Interactions.” In Of Speech and Time: Temporal Patterns in Interpersonal Contexts, ed. by Aron W. Siegman and Stanley Feldstein, 23–34. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Benuš, Štefan
2014 “Social Aspects of Entrainment in Spoken Interaction.” Cognitive Computation 6 (4): 802–813. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink
2015 “Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer” [Computer program]. Version 5.4.17, retrieved 3 September 2015 from [URL]Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4/5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T.
1958 “Common Fate, Similarity, and Other Indices of the Status of Aggregates of Persons as Social Entities.” Behavioral Science 3: 14–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chartrand, Tanya L., and John A. Bargh
1999 “The Chameleon Effect: The Perception–Behavior Link and Social Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (6): 893–910. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1994 “No Gap, Lots of Overlap: Turn-Taking Patterns in the Talk of Women Friends.” In Researching Language and Literacy in Social Context, ed. by David Graddol, Janet Maybin, and Barry Stierer, 177–192. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Condon, William S.
1980 “The Relation of Interactional Synchrony to Cognitive and Emotional Processes.” In The Relation of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior, ed. by Mary R. Key, 49–65. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condon, William S., and Louis W. Sander
1974 “Synchrony Demonstrated Between Movements of the Neonate and Adult Speech.” Child Development 45 (2): 456–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cross, Ian
2005 “Music and Meaning, Ambiguity and Evolution.” In Musical Communication, ed. by Dorothy Miell, Raymond MacDonald, and David J. Hargreaves, 27–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jaegher, Hanne, Anssi Peräkylä, and Melisa Stevanovic
2016 “The Co-Creation of Meaningful Action: Bridging Enaction and Interactional Sociology.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371: 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Jürgen Streeck
(eds) 2018 Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007 “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Towards a Dialogic Syntax.” Cognitive Linguistics 25 (3): 359–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., and Elise Kärkkäinen
2012 “Taking a Stance on Emotion: Affect, Sequence, and Intersubjectivity in Dialogic Interaction.” Text and Talk 32 (4): 433–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., R. Peter Hobson, and Jessica A. Hobson
2014 “Dialogic Resonance and Intersubjective Engagement in Autism.” Cognitive Linguistics 25 (3), 411–441.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile
2001[1912] The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (translated by Carol Cosman). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas
2013 Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas, and Paul Kockelman
2017 Distributed Agency. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frith, Chris D., and Uta Frith
2006 “How We Predict What Other People Are Going to Do.” Brain Research 1079: 36–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. and Barbara A. Fox
2010 “Multiple Practices for Constructing Laughables.” In Prosody in Interaction, ed. by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber and Margret Selting, 339–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fusaroli, Riccardo and Kristian Tylén
2012 “Carving Language for Social Coordination: A Dynamical Approach.” Interaction Studies 13 (1): 103–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James J.
1979 The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Nikolas Coupland, and Justine Coupland
(eds) 1991 Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
1987 “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments.” IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1: 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2018 Co-Operative Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, David L., and Steven J. Sherman
1996 “Perceiving Persons and Groups.” Psychological Review 103: 336–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hari, Riitta, Tommi Himberg, Lauri Nummenmaa, Matti Hämäläinen, and Lauri Parkkonen
2013 “Synchrony of Brains and Bodies During Implicit Interpersonal Interaction.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (3), 105–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heider, Anne, and R. Stephen Warner
2010 “Bodies in Sync: Interaction Ritual Theory Applied to Sacred Harp Singing.” Sociology of Religion 71 (1): 76–97.Google Scholar
Heyes, CeciliA.
2011 “Automatic Imitation.” Psychological Bulletin 137 (3): 463–483. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Himberg, Tommi, and Marc R. Thompson
2011 “Learning and Synchronising Dance Movements in South African Songs: Cross-Cultural Motion-Capture Study.” Dance Research 29 (2): 303–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himberg, Tommi, Melisa Stevanovic, Maija Niinisalo, Anssi Peräkylä, Mikko Sams, and Riitta Hari
2017 Gazing the Partner During Proposals and Their Responses in Dyadic Decision-Making. Presentation at the 15th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA2017) in Belfast, Northern Ireland, 16–21 July 2017.Google Scholar
Himberg, Tommi, Julien Laroche, Romain Bigé, Megan Buchkowski, Asaf Bachrach
2018 “Coordinated Interpersonal Behaviour in Collective Dance Improvisation: The Aesthetics of Kinaesthetic Togetherness.” Behavioral Sciences 8(2), 23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodges, Bert H.
2009 “Ecological Pragmatics: Values, Dialogical Arrays, Complexity and Caring.” Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (3), 628–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop, Hanneke
1987 Establishing Agreement: An Analysis of Proposal-Acceptance Sequences. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hove, Michael J., and Jane L. Risen
2009 “It’s All in The Timing: Interpersonal Synchrony Increases Affiliation.” Social Cognition 27 (6): 949–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1987 “Notes on Laughter in Pursuit of Intimacy.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button and John R. E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jensen, Thomas W. and Sarah Bro Pedersen
2016 “Affect and Affordances: The Role of Action and Emotion in Social Interaction.” Cognitive Semiotics 9 (1): 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2010 “Bodily Quoting in Dance Correction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (4): 401–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1990 Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kimbara, Irene
2006 “On Gestural Mimicry.” Gesture 6 (1): 39–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, Marianne
1982 “Posture Mirroring and Rapport.” In Interaction Rhythms: Periodicity in Communicative Behavior, ed. by Martha Davis, 279–298. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
1985 “Postural Mirroring and Intergroup Orientation.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 11: 207–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Launay, Jacques, Roger T. Dean, and Freya Bailes
2012 “Synchronization Can Influence Trust Following Virtual Interaction.” Experimental Psychology 60: 53–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
2002 “Turn-Sharing: The Choral Co-Production of Talk-in-Interaction.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 225–256. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
2009 Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
Louwerse, Max M., Rick Dale, Ellen G. Bard, and Patrick Jeuniaux
2012 “Behavior Matching in Multimodal Communication is Synchronized.” Cognitive Science 36 (8): 1404–1426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1946[1923] “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” In The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, ed. by Charles K. Ogden and Ivor A. Richards, 296–336. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Marsh, Kerry L., Michael J. Richardson, and Richard C. Schmidt
2009 “Social Connection Through Joint Action and Interpersonal Coordination.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2): 320–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, William
1995 Keeping Together in Time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, Lynden K., Louise K. Nind, and C. Neil Macrae
2009 “The Rhythm of Rapport: Interpersonal Synchrony and Social Perception.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (3): 585–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miles, Lynden K., Jordan L. Griffiths, Michael J. Richardson, and C. Neil Macrae
2010 “Too Late to Coordinate: Contextual Influences on Behavioral Synchrony.” European Journal of Social Psychology 40 (1): 52–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Eleanor, and Bambi Schieffelin
1989 “Language Has a Heart.” Text 9 (1): 7–25.Google Scholar
Paxton, Alexandra, and Rick Dale
2013 “Frame-Differencing Methods for Measuring Bodily Synchrony in Conversation.” Behavior Research Methods 45 (2): 329–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips-Silver, Jessica and Peter E. Keller
2012 “Searching for Roots of Entrainment and Joint Action in Early Musical Interactions.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitch, Tal-Chen, Ian Cross, and Pamela Burnard
2013 “Long-Term Musical Group Interaction Has a Positive Influence in Empathy in Children.” Psychology of Music 41 (4): 484–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, Fabian, and Wolfgang Tschacher
2008 “Synchrony in Dyadic Psychotherapy Sessions.” In Simultaneity: Temporal Structures and Observer Perspectives, ed by Susie Vrobel, Otto E. Rössler, and Terry Marks-Tarlow, 329–347. Singapore: World Scientific. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddish, Paul, Joseph Bulbulia, and Ronald Fischer
2014 “Does Synchrony Promote Generalized Prosociality?” Religion, Brain and Behavior 4 (1): 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddish, Paul, Ronald Fischer, and Joseph BulbuliA.
2013 “Let’s Dance Together: Synchrony, Shared Intentionality and Cooperation.” Plos One 8: 1–13. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Richardson, Michael J., Kerry L. Marsh, Robert W. Isenhower, Justin R. L. Goodman, and Richard C. Schmidt
2007 “Rocking Together: Dynamics of Intentional and Unintentional Interpersonal Coordination.” Human Movement Science 26 (6): 867–891. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossano, Federico
2012 Gaze Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction. PhD dissertation. Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
1973 “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 8 (4): 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Richard C., and Beth O’Brien
1997 “Evaluating the Dynamics of Unintended Interpersonal Coordination.” Ecological Psychology 9: 189–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shockley, Kevin, Aimee A. Baker, Michael J. Richardson, and Carol A. Fowler
2007 “Articulatory Constraints on Interpersonal Postural Coordination.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33 (1): 201–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shockley, Kevin, Daniel C. Richardson, and Rick Dale
2009 “Conversation and Coordinative Structures.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2): 305–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shockley, Kevin, Maria-Vee Santana, and Carol A. Fowler
2003 “Mutual Interpersonal Postural Constraints Are Involved in Cooperative Conversation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2): 326–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slaby, Jan, Asena Paskaleva, and Achim Stephan
2013 “Enactive Emotion and Impaired Agency in Depression.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 20 (7–8): 33–55.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-LeenA.
2001 Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, MelisA.
2012a “Establishing Joint Decisions in a Dyad.” Discourse Studies 14 (6): 779–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b “Prosodic Salience and the Emergence of New Decisions: On the Prosody of Approval in Finnish Workplace Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (6), 843–862. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
2014 “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: On the Interface Between Knowledge, Power, and Emotion in Interaction and Social Relations.” Language in Society 43 (2): 185–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Experience Sharing, Emotional Reciprocity, and Turn-Taking.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, Tommi Himberg, Maija Niinisalo, Mikko Kahri, Anssi Peräkylä, Mikko Sams, and Riitta Hari
2017 “Sequentiality, Mutual Visibility, and Behavioral Matching: Body Sway and Pitch Register During Joint Decision Making.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 50 (1): 33–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabensky, Alexis
2001 “Gesture and Speech Rephrasings in Conversation.” Gesture 1 (2): 213–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael and Malinda Carpenter
2007 “Shared Intentionality.” Developmental science 10: 121–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdesolo, Piercarlo, and David DeSteno
2011 “Synchrony and the Social Tuning of Compassion.” Emotion 11 (2): 262–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdesolo, Piercarlo, Jennifer Ouyang, and David DeSteno
2010 “The Rhythm of Joint Action: Synchrony Promotes Cooperative Ability.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46: 693–695. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vatanen, AnnA.
2014 Responding in Overlap: Agency, Epistemicity and Social Action in Conversation. PhD dissertation. University of Helsinki, Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugric and Scandinavian Studies.Google Scholar
Vološinov, Valentin N.
1973[1929] Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Warner-Garcia, Shawn
2013 “Gestural Resonance: The Negotiation of Differential Form and Function in Embodied Action.” Crossroads of Language, Interaction and Culture, 9, 55–78.Google Scholar
Wiltermuth, Scott S., and Chip Heath
2009 “Synchrony and Cooperation.” Psychological Science, 20, 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zivotofsky, Ari Z., and Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
2007 “The Sensory Feedback Mechanisms Enabling Couples to Walk Synchronously: An Initial Investigation.” Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 4: 28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ginman, Karolina, Eeva Anttila, Marja-Leena Juntunen & Kaisa Tiippana
2022. Classroom-Integrated Movement and Music Interventions and Children’s Ability to Recognize Social Interaction Based on Body Motion. Education Sciences 12:12 ► pp. 914 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.