Chapter published in:
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 373395
References

References

Anward, Jan
2004 “Lexeme Recycled. How Categories Emerge in Interaction.” Logos and Language 2: 1–38.Google Scholar
2015Doing Language. Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
Ayass, Ruth
2020 “Doing Waiting: An Ethnomethodological Analysis.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 49 (4): 419–455.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mihail
1981The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Edited by M. Holquist. Translated by C. Emerson, and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Breyer, Thiemo, Oliver Ehmer, and Stefan Pfänder
2011 “Improvisation, Temporality and Emergent Constructions.” In Constructions: Emergent and Emerging, ed. by Peter Auer, and Stefan Pfänder, 186–217. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias, and Leelo Keevallik
2020aMultimodal interaktionsanalys. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Broth, Mathias, and Lorenza Mondada.
2019 “Delaying Moving Away. Place, Mobility, and the Multimodal Organization of Activities.” Journal of Pragmatics 148: 44–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Jürgen Streeck
(eds.) 2018Time in Embodied Interaction. Synchronicity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Resources. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Fransisco Torreira, and Nick J. Enfield
2013 “Is Huh? a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items .” PLoS ONE 8.11: e78273. Crossref.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
1997 “Open Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28 (1): 69–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Inferences and Indirectness in Interaction.” Open Linguistics 4: 241–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, John W.
2014 “Towards a Dialogic Syntax.” Cognitive Linguistics 25 (3): 359–410.Google Scholar
Etelämäki, Marja.
2016 “Introduction: Discourse, Grammar and Intersubjectivity.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39 (2): 101–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
1981Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language. Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–122. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2000 “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Time in Action.” Current Anthropology 42: 1–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “Interactive Footing.” In Reporting Talk. Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 16–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
Haakana, Markku
2011 “ Mitä ja muut avoimet korjausaloitteet [ Mitä (‘what’) and other open class repair initiators in Finnish interactions] .” Virittäjä 115 (1): 36–67.Google Scholar
Haakana, Markku, Salla Kurhila, Niina Lilja, and Marjo Savijärvi
2021 "Extending Sequences of Other-initiated Repair in Finnish Conversations". In Intersubjectivity in Action. Studies in language and social interaction, ed. by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile
(eds) 2013Interaction and Mobility. Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli
2001 “On Some Uses of the Discourse Particle kyl(lä) in Finnish Conversations .” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 171–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harjunpää, Katariina, Arnulf Deppermann, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2021 “Constructing the Chekhovian Inner Body in Instructions: an Interactional History of Factuality and Agentivity.” Journal of Pragmatics.Google Scholar
Hazel, Spencer
2015 “Acting, Interacting, Enacting – Representing Medical Practice in Theatre Performance.” In Thematic Issue on ‘Health’, Akademisk Kvarter/Academic Quarter, ed. by Malene Kjær, Jens Lohfert Jørgensen, and Anita Holm Riis, 44–64. Aalborg: Aalborg University.Google Scholar
2018 “Discovering Interactional Authenticity: Tracking Theatre Practitioners across Rehearsals.” In Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction, ed. by González Martinez, Johannes Wagner, and Simona Pekarek Doehler, 255–283. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helistén, Marika.
2018Participants’ Multimodal Practices when Managing Activity Suspensions and Resumptions in English and Finnish Interaction. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Oulu.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hoey, Elliott M.
2015 “Lapses: How People Arrive at, and Deal with, Discontinuities in Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (4): 430–453.Google Scholar
2017 “Sequence Recompletion: A Practice for Managing Lapses in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 109: 47–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “How Speakers Continue with Talk after a Lapse in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (3): 329–346.Google Scholar
Ihalainen, Laura.
Forthcoming. “Muuntumisen vuorovaikutuskäytänteet teatterityöskentelyssä.” Doctoral thesis manuscript.
Izarra, Elina, and Sauli Sirviö
(eds.) 2018Alkumetreillä. Väläyksiä erään teatterin ja kaupungin organisoimasta kesäduuniprojektista a [In the beginning. Flashes from a summer job project organized by a theater and a city]. Helsinki: URB-festivaali ja Taide työnä ja työvälineenä -tutkimushanke.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2013 “ Here in Time and Space: Decomposing Movement in Dance Instruction .” In Interaction and Mobility. Language and the Body in Motion, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 345–370. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “Coordinating the temporalities of talk and dance.” In Temporality in interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Susanne Günther, 309–366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino
2016 “Receipting Information as Newsworthy vs. Responding to Redirection: Finnish News Receipts aijaa and aha(a) .” Journal of Pragmatics 104: 163–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kolberg, Iris J.
2012 “ ‘What are you doing?’ How Improvisational Actors use the Body in the Contextualization of the Imagined Material World.” Master’s thesis. Department of Linguistics, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Kurhila, Salla, and Niina Lilja.
2017 ”Toisto ja korjauksenajat.” Virittäjä 121 (2): 213–243.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva.
2005 “Dialogic Syntax and the Emergence of Topics in Interaction – an Initial Exploration.” TRANEL 41: 165–189.Google Scholar
Leppäkoski, Raila.
2001 ”Ohjaaminen: mystiikan ja matematiikan välissä?” In Katarsis: Draama, teatteri ja kasvatus, ed. by Pekka Korhonen, and Anna-Lena Østern, 151–161. Jyväskylä: Atena.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
2005 ”En dialogisk grammatik?” In Samtal och Grammatik. Studier i svenskt samtalsspråk, ed by. Jan Anward, and Bengt Nordberg, 231–328. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Malaska, Jonna.
2016 “Välitöntä toimintaa vaativat direktiivit teatteriharjoituksissa.” Master’s thesis. Finnish language, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza.
2016 “Challenges of Multimodality. Language and the body in social interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 20 (3): 336–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction. Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106.Google Scholar
Nevile, Maurice
2015 “The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (2): 121–151.Google Scholar
Norrthon, Stefan
2017 “Att gestalta ett gräl – transformationen av åtta repliker under en repetitionsprocess på teatern.” Paper presented in Svenskans Beskrivning 27.10.2017, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
2019 “To Stage an Overlap – the Longitudinal, Collaborative and Embodied Process of Staging Eight Lines in a Professional Theatre Rehearsal Process.” Journal of Pragmatics 142: 171–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020 “Teaterrepetitionens interaktion. Professionella praktiker i ett repetitionsarbete från manus till föreställning.” Academic Dissertation. University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Raevaara, Liisa.
2020 “Roolihahmot puheessa ja näyttämöllä. Osallistumisen kehykset ja ammatillinen katse teatteriharjoitusten vuorovaikutuksessa [Stage characters in speech and on stage – participation framework and professional vision in theatre rehearsals].” Puhe ja kieli 40 (4): 251–270. Crossref.Google Scholar
Routarinne, Simo
2004Improvisoi! Helsinki: Tammi.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1995Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Savijärvi, Marjo
2011 “Yhteisestä toiminnasta yhteiseen kieleen. Keskustelunanalyyttinen tutkimus toisen kielen oppimisesta kielikylpypäiväkodin arkitilanteissa. [From shared interaction to shared language. A conversation analytic study on second language learning in an immersion kindergarten].” Doctoral thesis. University of Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10-7309-0Google Scholar
2019 “Yhdessä oppiminen teatteriharjoituksissa. Fokuksessa sanahaut [Collaborative learning in theatre rehearsals. Word-searches in focus].” In Kielen oppiminen luokkahuoneen ulkopuolella [Language learning outside the classroom], ed. by Lari Kotilainen, Salla Kurhila, and Jyrki Kalliokoski. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
[2021] “Ryhmäytyminen teatteriharjoituksissa.” In Kohtaamisia kentällä: Soveltava keskusteluntutkimus ammatillisissa konteksteissa, ed. by Riikka Nissi, Mika Simonen, and Esa Lehtinen. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1991 “Conversation Analysis and Socially Shared Cognition.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, ed. by Lauren Resnick, John Levine, and Stephanie Teasley, 150–170. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
1973 “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 8: 289–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Axel
2014Spiel oder nicht Spiel? Zur interaktiven Organisation von Übergängen zwischen Spielwelt und Realwelt in Theaterproben. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
2018 “Prefiguring the Future: Projections and Preparations within Theatrical Rehearsal.” In Time in Embodied Interaction. Synchronity and Sequentiality of Multimodal Recources, 231–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, Alfred
1990[1962]Collected Papers, Vol. I. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena.
2001Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stukenbrock, Anja.
2015 “Intercorporeal Phantasms: Kinesthetic Alignment with Imagined Bodies in Self-Defense Trainings.” Interaction and Linguistic Structures (InLiSt) 58: 1–23.Google Scholar
Tanner, Samuel J., Erin T. Miller, and Shannon Montgomery
2018 “We Might Play Different Parts: Theatrical Improvisation and Anti-Racist Pedagogy.” The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 23 (4): 523–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra, Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2015Grammar in Everyday Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turunen, Annika.
2018 “Nauramisen normit: Nauruun liittyvä metapuhe nuorten aikuisten teatteriprojektissa [The norms of laughing: Metatalk concerning laughing in young adults’ theatre project].” Master’s thesis. Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugric and Scandinavian Languages and Literature, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Visakko, Tomi
2020 “Looking at the Self in Society: Professional Perception and Midgroundable Roles in Community Theater.” Signs and Society 8:2 262–289. https://​www​.journals​.uchicago​.edu​/doi​/pdf​/10​.1086​/707828Google Scholar
Forthcoming “Becoming Artists: Collective Reflection of Personal Experience in Community Theater.” Signs and Society.Google Scholar
2020aLooking at the self in society: professional perception and midgroundable roles in community theater. Signs and Society 8 (2), 262–289.Google Scholar
2020bBecoming Artists: Collective Reflection of Personal Experience in Community Theater. Signs and Society 8 (3), 369–400.Google Scholar