Cover not available
Part of
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 397–

Interactional reciprocity in human–dog interaction

| University of Helsinki
| University of Helsinki

This chapter explores the potential existence of interactional reciprocity in human–dog interactions by analyzing experimental data on situations where dog owners fail to produce reciprocally modified actions for two minutes. We found that their dogs soon realized the strangeness of the situation. While they pursued missing feedback with touch, gaze and vocalizations, they also addressed other humans and requested their attention. Therefore, the dogs oriented to the lack of reciprocity and attempted to repair it. We demonstrate that interactional reciprocity in human–dog interactions can be breached, thus proving its existence. Moreover, we show that it also returned when the experiment ended. The findings are compared with mother–infant experiments where evidence of interactional reciprocity has also been found.

Keywords: conversation analysis, dogs, experiment, Finnish, high-pitch vocalizations, intersubjectivity, interspecies interaction, reciprocity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The Still-Face Paradigm
    • 1.2The Strange Situation Paradigm
  • 2.The setting and methods
  • 3.Research questions
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1The Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retriever and the passive owner
      • 4.1.1The dog sets a new project
      • 4.1.2The dog requests help from the owner and others
      • 4.1.3Once contact is restored, the dog engages in play
    • 4.2The Saluki and its passive owner
    • 4.3Summary of the analysis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.18sim
References
Ainsworth, Mary D. Salter, and Silvia M. Bell
1970 ‟Attachment, Exploration, and Separation: Illustrated by the Behavior of One-Year-Olds in a Strange Situation.” Child Development 41 (1): 49–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, John
1958 ‟The Nature of the Child’s Tie to His Mother.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 39: 350–373.Google Scholar
de Waal, Frans
2019 Mama’s Last Hug: Animal Emotions and What They Tell Us about Ourselves. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Dixon, Suzanne Z., Michael Yogman, Edward Tronick, Lauren Adamson, Heidelise Als, and Berry Brazelton
1981 ‟Early Infant Social Interaction with Parents and Strangers.” Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry 20: 32–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
1998 ‟Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (3–4): 295–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goode, David
2007 Playing with My Dog Katie. An Ethnomethodological Study of Dog–Human Interaction. West Lafayette: Pursue University Press.Google Scholar
Heffner, Henry E. and Rickey S. Heffner
2008 ‟High-Frequency Fearing.” In The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference. Vol. 3: Audition ed. by Peter Dallos and Donata Oertel, 55–60. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Horn, Lisa, Ludwig Huber, and Friederike Range
2013 ‟The Importance of the Secure Base Effect for Domestic Dogs – Evidence from a Manipulative Problem-Solving Task.” PLoS ONE 8(5), e65296. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Itakura, Shoji
2004 ‟Gaze-Following and Joint Visual Attention in Nonhuman Animals.” Japanese Psychological Research 46 (3): 216–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Greger, Elinor K. Karlsson, Angela Perri, Matthew T. Webster, Simon Y. W. Ho, Joris Peters, Peter W. Stahl, Philip J. Piper, Frode Lingaas, Merete Fredholm, Kenine E. Comstock, Jaime F. Modiano, Claude Schelling, Alexander I. Agoulnik, Peter A. Leegwater, Keith Dobney, Jean-Denis Vigne, Carles Vilà, Leif Andersson, and Kerstin Lindblad-Toh
2012 ‟Rethinking Dog Domestication by Integrating Genetics, Archeology, and Biogeography.” PNAS 109 (23): 8878–8883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindwall, Oskar, Gustav Lymer, and Jonas Ivarsson
2016 ‟Epistemic Status and the Recognizability of Social Actions.” Discourse Studies 18 (5): 500–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael
2007 ‟Foreword.” In Playing with My Dog Katie. An Ethnomethodological Study of Dog–Human Interaction by David Goode, xiii–xv. West Lafayette: Pursue University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons-Ruth, Karlen, Nadia Bruschweiler-Stern, Alexandra M. Harrison, Alexander C. Morgan, Jeremy P. Nahum, Louis Sander, Daniel N. Stern, and Edward Z. Tronick
1998 ‟Implicit Relational Knowing: Its Role in Development and Psychoanalytic Treatment.” Infant Mental Health Journal 19 (3): 282–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesman, Judi, Marinus H. van I Jzendoorn, and Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg
2009 ‟The Many Faces of the Still-Face Paradigm: A Review and Meta-Analysis.” Developmental Review 29 (2): 120–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza.
2018a ‟Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018b ‟The Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet Shops.” Discourse Studies 20 (6): 743–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Lynne, and Colwyn Trevarthen
1985 ‟Emotional Regulation of Interactions Between Two Month-Olds and Their Mothers.” In Social Perception in Infants ed. by Tiffany M. Field and Nathan A Fox, 177–197. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.Google Scholar
Naderi, Szima, Ádám Miklósi, Dóka Antal, and Vilmos Csányi
2001 ‟Co-Operative Interactions between Blind Persons and Their Dogs.” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 74/2001: 59–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagasawa, Miho, Shouhei Mitsui, Shiori En, Nobuyo Ohtani, Mitsuaki Ohta, Yasuo Sakuma, Tatsushi Onaka, Kazutaka Mogi, and Takefumi Kikusui
2015 ‟Oxytocin-Gaze Positive Loop and the Coevolution of Human–Dog Bonds.” Science 348 (6232): 333–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Richard
2010 ‟Prosodic Constructions in Making Complaint.” In Prosody in Interaction ed. by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, and Margret Selting, 81–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prato-Previde, Emanuela, and Paola Valsecchi
2014 ‟The Immaterial Cord: The Dog–Human Attachment Bond.” In The Social Dog. Behaviour and Cognition ed. by Juliane Kaminski and Sarah Marshall-Pescini, 165–189. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rehn, Therese, Ragen T. S. McGowan, and Linda J. Keeling
2013 “Evaluating the Strange Situation Procedure (SSP) to Assess the Bond between Dogs and Humans.” PLoS ONE 8 (2): e56938. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Riede, Tobias, and Tecumseh Fitch
1999 ‟Vocal Tract Length and Acoustics of Vocalization in the Comestic Dog (Canis familiaris).” Journal of Experimental Biology 202: 2859–2867. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson
1974 ‟A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation” Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sales, Gillian, and David Pye
1974 Ultrasonic Communication by Animals. London: Chapman and Hall. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret
2010 ‟Prosody in Interaction: State of the Art.” In Prosody in Interaction ed. by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, and Margret Selting, 3–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack, and Tanya Stivers eds.
2013 The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stern, Daniel N
1971 ‟A Micro-Analysis of Mother–Infant Interaction.” Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 10 (3): 501–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya.
2013 ‟Sequence Organization.‟ In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 191–209. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2010 ‟Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell
2013 “Introduction.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 1–8. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Streeck, Ulrich
2013 ‟Implizites Beziehungswissen.” Psychotherapeut 58 (2): 143–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2006 Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2011 Analysing Conversation. An Introduction to Prosody. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taylor, Anna Magdalena, Victoria Frances Ratcliffe, Karen McComb, and David Reby
2014 ‟Auditory Communication in Domestic Dogs: Vocal Signalling in the Extended Social Environment of a Companion Animal.” In The Social Dog. Behaviour and Cognition, ed. by Juliane Kaminski and Sarah Marshall-Pescini, 131–163. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tiira, Katriina, and Hannes Lohi
2014 ‟Reliability and Validity of a Questionnaire Survey in Canine Anxiety Research.” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 155: 82–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
1995 ‟Joint Attention as Social Cognition.” In Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development, ed. by Chris Moore and Philip J. Dunham, 103–130. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Topál, József, and Márta Gácsi
2012 ‟Lessons We Should Learn from Our Unique Relationship with Dogs: An Ethological Approach.” In Crossing Boundaries. Investigating Human–Animal Relationships, ed. by Lynda Birke and Jo Hockenhull, 163–186. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tronick, Edward, Heidelise Als, Lauren Adamson, Susan Wise, and Berry T. Brazelton
1978 ‟The Infant’s Response to Entrapment between Contradictory Messages in Face-to-Face Interaction.” Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 17 (1): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volodina, Elena V., Ilya A. Volodin, and Olga A. FilatovA
2006 ‟The Occurrence of Nonlinear Vocal Phenomena in Frustration Whines of the Domestic Dog (Canis familiaris).” In Advances in Bioacoustics 2, Dissertationes Classis IV: Historia Naturalis, ed. by Matija Gogala and Tomi Trilar. Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (Ljubljana), XLVII-3, 257–270.Google Scholar
Walker, Gareth
2013 ‟Phonetics and Prosody in Conversation.‟ In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 455–474. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Harjunpää, Katariina
2022. Repetition and prosodic matching in responding to pets’ vocalizations. Langage et société N° 176:2 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Mondémé, Chloé
2023. Gaze in Interspecies Human–Pet Interaction: Some Exploratory Analyses. Research on Language and Social Interaction 56:4 ► pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Reed, Beatrice Szczepek
2023. Designing Talk for Humans and Horses: Prosody as a Resource for Parallel Recipient Design. Research on Language and Social Interaction 56:2 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.