RSWH = Rosenthal, Bernard, Gretchen A. Adams, Margo Burns, Peter Grund, Risto Hiltunen, Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Merja Kytö, Matti Peikola, Benjamin C. Ray, Matti Rissanen, Marilynne K. Roach, and Richard B. Trask (eds.). 2009. Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Secondary sources
Adamson, Sylvia. 2021. “Where Do We Go from Here? Prospects and Problems for
Historicising Third-Wave Sociolinguistics.”Paper presented at ICEHL 21, International Conference of English Historical Linguistics, Leiden (online), June9.
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. “Evidentials, Paths of Change and Mental Maps: Typologically
Regular Asymmetries”. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Bäcklund, Ingegerd. 2006. “Modifiers Describing Women and Men in Nineteenth-Century
English.” In Nineteenth-Century English: Stability and Change, ed. by Merja Kytö, Mats Rydén, and Erik Smitterberg, 17–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bäcklund, Ulf. 1973. The Collocation of Adverbs of Degree in English. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Baker, Emerson. 2015. A Storm of Witchcraft: The Salem Trials and the American
Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Becker, Kara. 2009. “/r/ and the Construction of Place Identity on New York
City’s Lower East Side.”Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (5): 634–658.
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. “Epistemological Positioning and Evidentiality in English
News Discourse: A Text-Driven Approach.”Text & Talk 26 (6): 635–660.
Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics: Studies in
Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Berglind Söderqvist, Erika. 2020. “Evidentiality in Gendered Styles in Spoken
English.”ICAME Journal 44: 5–35.
Besnier, Niko. 1990. “Language and Affect.”Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 419–451.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1988. “Adverbial Stance Types in English.”Discourse Processes 11 (1): 1–34.
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1989. “Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Grammatical Marking
of Evidentiality and Affect.”Text 9 (1): 93–124.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.
Black’s Law Dictionary. 1999. Edited by Bryan A. Garner (ed. in chief). 7th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Group.
Boggel, Sandra. 2009. Metadiscourse in Middle English and Early Modern English Religious
Texts: A Corpus-based Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton.
Borst, Eugen. 1902. Die Gradadverbien im Englischen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Boye, Kasper. 2010. “Evidence for what? Evidentiality and Scope.”Sprachtypologie and Universalienforschung 63 (4): 290–307.
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive
Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boyer, Paul, and Stephen Nissenbaum. [1974] 1997. Salem Possessed: The Social Origins of Witchcraft. Reprint. New York: MJF Books.
Boyer, Paul, and Stephen Nissenbaum. 1977. The Salem Witchcraft Papers: Verbatim Transcripts of the Legal
Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Outbreak of 1692. 3 vols. New York: Da Capo Press.
Brewer, Holly. 2001. “Age of Reason? Children, Testimony, and Consent in Early
America.” In The Many Legalities of Early America, ed. by Christopher L. Tomlins and Bruce H. Mann, 293–332. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Brinton, Laurel. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic
Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, William. 1688. The Clerk’s Tutor in Chancery. London.
Bucholtz, Mary. 1999. “‘Why Be Normal?’ Language and Identity Practices in a
Community of Nerd Girls.”Language in Society 28 (2): 203–223.
Burr, George (ed.). 1914. Narratives of the Witchcraft Cases, 1648–1706. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Busse, Beatrix. 2010. “Adverbial Expressions of Stance in Early Modern ‘Spoken’
English.” In Proceedings. Anglistentag 2009 Klagenfurt, ed. by Jörg Helbig and René Schallegger, 47–63. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Calef, Robert. 1700. More Wonders of the Invisible World, or, The Wonders of the
Invisible World Display'd in Five Parts. London: Nath. Hillar. (Accessed at [URL])
Caporael, Linnda. 1976. “Ergotism: The Satan Loosed in Salem.”Science 192: 21–26.
Carlson, Laurie W.1999. A Fever in Salem: A New Interpretation of the New England Witch
Trials. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Caulfield, Ernest. 1943. “Pediatric Aspects of the Salem Witchcraft
Tragedy.”American Journal of Diseases of Children 65: 788–802.
Cecconi, Elisabetta. 2012. The Language of Defendants in the 17th-Century English Courtroom: A
Socio-Pragmatic Analysis of the Prisoners’ Interactional Role and
Representation. Bern: Peter Lang.
CED = A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. 2006. Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University)
and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University).
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2012. “Performing Self on the Witness Stand: Stance and Relational
Work in Expert Witness Testimony.”Discourse & Society 23 (5): 465–486.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2014. “Interactive Patterns of the Opening Statement in Criminal
Trials: A Historical Perspective.”Discourse Studies 16 (3): 347–364.
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic
Writing.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chamberlain, Richard. 1681. The Compleat Iustice Enlarg’d. London.
Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Claridge, Claudia. 2006. “‘With the most superlative felicitee’:
Functions of the Superlative in 19th-century English.” In Syntax, Style, and Grammatical Norms: English from
1500-2000, ed. by Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt, and Herbert Schendl, 73–89. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Claridge, Claudia. 2017. “Voices in Medieval History Writing.”Nordic Journal of English Studies 16 (1): 7–40.
Claridge, Claudia, Ewa Jonsson, and Merja Kytö. 2021. “A Little Something Goes a Long Way: Little
in the Old Bailey Corpus.”Journal of English Linguistics 49 (1): 61–89.
Claridge, Claudia, and Merja Kytö. 2021a. Degree and Related Phenomena in the History of
English. Special Issue, Journal of English Linguistics 49 (1)–(2).
Claridge, Claudia, and Merja Kytö. 2021b. “Degree and Related Phenomena in the History of English:
Evidence of Usage and Pathways of Change.”Journal of English Linguistics 49 (1): 3–17.
Clark, Lynn. 2008. “Re-examining Vocalic Variation in Scottish English: A
Cognitive Grammar Approach.”Language Variation and Change 20: 255–273.
Clarke, Matthew. 2009. “The Discursive Construction of Interpersonal Relations in an
Online Community of Practice.”Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2333–2344.
Clift, Rebecca. 2006. “Indexing Stance: Reported Speech as an Interactional
Evidential.”Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (5): 569–595.
Devitt, Amy J.2020. “The Blurred Boundaries of Genres-in-use: Principles and
Implications from Rhetorical Genre Studies for English Historical
Linguistics.” In Studies in the History of the English Language VIII: Boundaries and
Boundary-Crossings in the History of English, ed. by Peter J. Grund and Megan E. Hartman, 45–72. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Díaz-Vera, Javier E.1999. “Reconstructing Variation in the Speech Community: Evidence
on Early American English Negative Constructions from the Salem
Witchcraft Papers.”Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 8: 275–289.
Doty, Kathleen L.2010. “Courtroom Discourse.” In Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 621–650. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Doty, Kathleen L., and Risto Hiltunen. 2009. “Formulaic Discourse and Speech Acts in the Witchcraft Trial
Records of Salem, 1692.”Journal of Pragmatics 41 (3): 458–469.
Doty, Kathleen L., and Mark Wicklund. 2017. “‘Shee gave Selfe both Soule and body to the Devill’: The Use
of Binomials in the Salem Witchcraft Trials.” In Binomials in the History of English: Fixed and Flexible, ed. by Joanna Kopaczyk and Hans Sauer, 241–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dow, George F. (ed.). 1921. Records and Files of the Quarterly Courts of Essex County. Vol. 8. Salem, MA: Essex Institute. (Accessed at [URL].)
Dow, George F. (ed.). 1975. Records and Files of the Quarterly Courts of Essex County. Vol. 9. Salem, MA: Essex Institute. (Accessed at [URL])
Du Bois, John W.2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, and
Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Eckert, Penelope.2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction
of Identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eckert, Penelope.2008. “Variation and the Indexical Field.”Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 453–476.
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. “Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in
the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation.”Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. “Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as
Community-Based Practice.”Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–490.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1998. “Communities of Practice: Where Language, Gender, and Power
All Live.” In Language and Gender: A Reader, ed. by Jennifer Coates, 484–494. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet.1999. “New Generalizations and Explanations in Language and Gender
Research.”Language in Society 28(2): 185–201.
Englebretson, Robert. 2007b. “Stancetaking in Discourse: An Introduction.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, and
Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
ETED = An Electronic Text Edition of Depositions 1560-1760. 2011. Edited by Merja Kytö, Peter J. Grund and Terry Walker. Available on the CD accompanyingTestifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England by Merja Kytö, Peter J. Grund and Terry Walker. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fennell, Barbara.2011. “‘Dodgy Dossiers?’ Hearsay and the 1641
Depositions.”History Ireland 19 (3): 26–29.
Fidell, Thomas.1658. A Perfect Guide for a Studious Young Lawyer. London.
Finegan, Edward.2010. “Corpus Linguistic Approaches to ‘Legal Language’: Adverbial
Expression of Attitude and Emphasis in Supreme Court
Opinions.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard and Alison Johnson, 65–77. London: Routledge.
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2003. “The Grammar of Stance in Early Eighteenth-Century English
Epistolary Language.” In Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, ed. by Pepi Leistyna and Charles F. Meyer, 107–131. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Fitzmaurice, Susan.2004. “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity, and the Historical
Construction of Interlocutor Stance: From Stance Markers to Discourse
Markers.”Discourse Studies 6 (4): 427–448.
Fitzmaurice, Susan M.2010b. “Coalitions, Networks, and Discourse Communities in Augustan
England: The Spectator and the Early Eighteenth-Century
Essay.” In Eighteenth-Century English: Ideology and Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 106–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, Barbara A.2001. “Evidentiality: Authority, Responsiblity, and Entitlement in
English Conversation.”Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11 (2): 167–192.
Ghesquière, Lobke.2021. “‘A Good Deal of Intensity’: On the Development of Degree and
Quantity Modifier Good.”Journal of English Linguistics 49 (2): 159–181.
Gisborne, Nikolas, and Jasper Holmes. 2007. “A History of English Evidential Verbs of
Appearance.”English Language and Linguistics 11 (1): 1–29.
Godbeer, Richard.1992. The Devil’s Dominion: Magic and Religion in Early New
England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Godbeer, Richard.2018. The Salem Witch Hunt: A Brief History with Documents. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford.
González-Díaz, Victorina.2008. “Recent Developments in English Intensifiers: The Case of
Very Much.”English Language and Linguistics 12 (2): 221–243.
Görlach, Manfred.1992. “Text-Types and Language History: The Cookery
Recipe.” In History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical
Linguistics, ed. by Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen, and Irma Taavitsainen, 736–761. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Görlach, Manfred. 2001. “A History of Text Types: A Componential
Analysis.” In Towards a History of English as a History of Genres, ed. by Hans-Jürgen Diller and Manfred Görlach, 47–88. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
Gray, Bethany, and Douglas Biber. 2015. “Stance Markers.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann, 219–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gray, Bethany, Douglas Biber, and Turo Hiltunen. 2011. “The Expression of Stance in Early (1665–1712) Publications
of the Philosophical Transactions and Other
Contemporary Medical Prose: Innovations in a Pioneering
Discourse.” In Medical Writing in Early Modern English, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta, 221–247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grund, Peter.2006. “Manuscripts as Sources for Linguistic Research: A
Methodological Case Study Based on the Mirror of
Lights.”Journal of English Linguistics 34 (2): 105–125.
Grund, Peter.2007a. “From Tongue to Text: The Transmission of the Salem
Witchcraft Examination Records.”American Speech 82 (2): 119–150.
Grund, Peter J.2007b. “The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations, and
Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft
Trials.”Studia Neophilologica 79 (1): 3–24.
Grund, Peter J.2011. “The Languages of the Depositions.” In Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England, Merja Kytö, Peter J. Grund, and Terry Walker, 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grund, Peter J.2012a. “The Nature of Knowledge: Evidence and Evidentiality in the
Witness Depositions from the Salem Witch Trials.”American Speech 87 (1): 7–38.
Grund, Peter J.2012b. “Textual History as Language History? Text Categories,
Corpora, Editions, and the Witness Depositions from the Salem Witch
Trials. Studia Neophilologica 84 (1): 40–54.
Grund, Peter J.2016. “Seeing is Believing: Evidentiality and Direct Visual
Perception Verbs in Early Modern English Witness
Depositions.” In Studies in the History of the English Language VII: Generalizing vs.
Particularizing Methodologies in Historical Linguistic Analysis, ed. by Don Chapman, Colette Moore, and Miranda Wilcox, 153–172. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Grund, Peter J.2017a. “Description, Evaluation and Stance: Exploring the Forms and
Functions of Speech Descriptors in Early Modern
English.”Nordic Journal of English Studies 16 (1): 41–73.
Grund, Peter J.2017b. “Sociohistorical Approaches.” In English Historical Linguistics: Approaches and Perspectives, ed. by Laurel J. Brinton, 218–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grund, Peter J.2018b. “Function-to-Form Mapping in Historical Pragmatics: Past,
Present, and Future.” Presentation in the workshop “English Historical
Pragmatics: The state-of-the-art” at ICEHL 20, International Conference of English Historical Linguistics, University of Edinburgh, UK. August27–31.
Grund, Peter J.2019. “What is the Role of the Synchronic in (English) Historical
Linguistics?”Plenary Paper Presented at SHEL-11, Studies in the History of the
English Language, Indiana University, Bloomington. May8–11.
Grund, Peter J.2020a. “Writing the Salem Witch Trials.” In A Companion to American Literature, vol. 1, Origins to 1820, ed. by Theresa Gaul, 73–88. Oxford: Blackwell.
Grund, Peter J.Forthcoming. “Scribes and Scribal Practices.” In Cambridge Handbook of Historical Orthography, ed. by Marco Condorelli and Hanna Rutkowska. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grund, Peter J., Margo Burns, and Matti Peikola. 2014. “The Vagaries of Manuscripts from the Salem Witch Trials: An
Edition of Four (Re-)Discovered Documents from the Case against Margaret
Scott of Rowley.”Studia Neophilologica 86 (1): 37–50.
Grund, Peter, Risto Hiltunen, Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Merja Kytö, Matti Peikola, and Matti Rissanen. 2009. “Linguistic Introduction.” In RSWH, 64–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grund, Peter J., Matti Peikola, Johanna Rastas, and Wen Xin.2021. “The ‘u’ and ‘v’ Alternation in the History of English:
Spelling Dynamics in the Handwritten Legal Documents from the Salem
Witch Trials (1692).”American Speech 96 (2): 127–160.
Grund, Peter J., and Terry Walker. 2011. “Chapter 2: Genre Characteristics.” In Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England, Merja Kytö, Peter J. Grund, and Terry Walker, 15–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting
Boundaries.”Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18 (1): 83–101.
Hale, John.1702. A Modest Enquiry into the Nature of Witchcraft. Boston: B. Green and J. Allen. (Accessed at [URL])
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.
Hansen, Chadwick.1969. Witchcraft at Salem. New York: Braziller
Harris, Sandra.2001. “Fragmented Narratives and Multiple Tellers: Witness and
Defendant Accounts in Trials.”Discourse Studies 3 (1): 53–74.
Haskins, George L.1960. Law and Authority in Early Massachusetts: A Study in Tradition and
Design. New York: Macmillan.
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2010. Adjunct Adverbials in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hewings, Martin.2004. “An ‘Important Contribution’ or ‘Tiresome Reading’? A Study
of Evaluation in Peer Reviews of Journal Article
Submissions.”Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (3): 247–274.
Hickey, Raymond.2017. “The Scope of English Historical
Linguistics.” In English Historical Linguistics: Approaches and Perspectives, ed. by Laurel J. Brinton, 12–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hiltunen, Risto.1996. “‘Tell me Be you a Witch?’ Questions in the Salem Witchcraft
Trials of 1692.”International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 9 (25): 17–37.
Hiltunen, Risto.2004. “Salem 1692: A Case of Courtroom Discourse in a Historical
Perspective.” In Approaches to Style and Discourse in English, ed. by Risto Hiltunen and Shinichiro Watanabe, 3–26. Osaka: Osaka University Press.
Hoffer, Peter Charles.1996. The Devil’s Disciples: Makers of the Salem Witchcraft
Trials. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hoffer, Peter Charles.1997. The Salem Witchcraft Trials: A Legal History. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Hoffer, Peter Charles.1998. Law and People in Colonial America. Rev. ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Holmes, Janet.1990. “Hedges and Boosters in Women’s and Men’s
Speech.”Language and Communication 10 (3): 185–205.
Holmes, Janet, and Miriam Meyerhoff. 1999. “The Community of Practice: Theories and Methodologies in
Language and Gender Research.”Language in Society 28 (2): 173–183.
Holtgraves, Thomas, and Benjamin Lasky. 1999. “Linguistic Power and Persuasion.”Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18 (2): 196–205.
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, Susan.2004. “Counting the Uncountable: Problems of Identifying Evaluation
in a Text and in a Corpus.” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 157–188. Bern: Peter Lang.
Hunston, Susan.2011. Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and Evaluative
Language. London: Routledge.
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson (eds.). 2000. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of
Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, Ken.2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
Ito, Rika, and Sali Tagliamonte. 2003. “Well Weird, Right Dodgy,
Very Strange, Really Cool:
Layering and Recycling in English Intensifiers.”Language in Society 32(2): 257–279.
Jacobs, Andreas, and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics.” In Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of
English, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.). 2009a. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jaffe, Alexandra.2009b. “Introduction: The Sociolinguistics of
Stance.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jucker, Andreas H.2000. “English Historical Pragmatics: Problems of Data and
Methodology.” In English Diachronic Pragmatics, ed. by Gabriella di Martino and Maria Lima, 17–55. Naples: Cuen.
Jucker, Andreas H, and Joanna Kopaczyk. 2013. “Communities of Practice as a Locus of Language
Change.” In Communities of Practice in the History of English, ed. by Joanna Kopaczyk and Andreas H. Jucker, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.). 2010. Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena, and Matti Rissanen. 2011. “Attitudes of the Accused in the Salem Witchcraft
Trials.” In Communicating Early English Manuscripts, ed. by Päivi Pahta and Andreas H. Jucker, 241–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, María José López-Couso, and Belén Méndez-Naya. 2020. “The Dynamics of Stance Constructions.”Language Sciences (Special Issue) 82.
Kamensky, Jane.1997. Governing the Tongue: The Politics of Speech in Early New
England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kamensky, Jane.1998. “Female Speech and other Demons: Witchcraft and Wordcraft in
Early New England.” In Spellbound: Women and Witchcraft in America, ed. by Elizabeth Reis, 25–51. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2007. “The Role of I Guess in Conversational
Stancetaking.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, and
Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 183–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Karlsen, Carol F.1987. The Devil in the Shape of a Woman: Witchcraft in Colonial New
England. New York: Norton.
Keble, Joseph.1683. An Assistance to Justices of the Peace for the Easier Performance of
their Duty. London.
Kopaczyk, Joanna.2013a. The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs: Standardization and Lexical
Bundles (1380–1560). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kytö, Merja. 1991. Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus:
Studies on can/may and shall/will. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Kytö, Merja. 2005. “The Emergence of American English: Evidence from
Seventeenth-Century Records in New England.” In Legacies of Colonial English: Studies in Transported
Dialects, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 121–157. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kytö, Merja, and Päivi Pahta. 2016. “Introduction.” In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, ed. by Merja Kytö and Päivi Pahta, 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kytö, Merja, and Terry Walker. 2003. “The Linguistic Study of Early Modern English Speech-Related
Texts: How ‘Bad’ can ‘Bad’ Data Be?”Journal of English Linguistics 31 (3): 221–248.
Labov, William.1969. “Contraction, Deletion, and Inherent Variability of the
English Copula.”Language 45 (4): 715–762.
Labov, William.1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William.1984. “Intensity.” In Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, 43–70. Washington, DC: Georgetown University. Press
Labov, William.1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. 1, Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, William.2003. “Uncovering the Event Structure of
Narrative.” In Linguistics, Language, and the Real World: Discourse and
Beyond, ed. by Deborah Tannen and James E. Alatis, 63–83. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal
Experience.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Proceedings of the 1966 Annual
Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Landert, Daniela.2017. “Meta-Communicative Expressions and Situational Variation of
Stance Marking: I say and I tell
(you) in Early Modern English
Dialogues.”Nordic Journal of English Studies 16(1): 120–144.
Landert, Daniela.2019. “Function-to-Form Mapping in Corpora: Historical Corpus
Pragmatics and the Study of Stance Expressions.” In From Data to Evidence in English Language Research, ed. by Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen, and Irma Taavitsainen, 169–190. Amsterdam: Brill.
Landert, Daniela.2021. “Stance Adjectives in Early Modern English. Focusing on
Epistemic Adjectives.”Paper presented at ICEHL 21, International Conference of English
Historical Linguistics, Leiden (online), June8.
Langbein, John H.2003. The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laws and Liberties = The General Laws and Liberties of the Massachusets Colony: Revised
& Re-printed, by Order of the General Court holden at Boston. May
15th. 1672. (Accessed at [URL])
Lawson, Deodat.1692. A Brief and True Narrative of some Remarkable Passages Relating to
Sundry Persons Afflicted by Witchcraft at Salem Village. Boston: Benjamin Harris.
Leitner, Magdalena.2017. “Curses or Threats? Debating the Power of Witches’ Words in
17th-Century Scottish Courtrooms.”Nordic Journal of English Studies 16(1):145–170.
Mappen, Marc.1996. Witches and Historians: Interpretations of Salem. 2nd edn. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Martin, James R.2000. “Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in
English.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of
Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.
Mather, Cotton.1693. The Wonders of the Invisible World. Observations as well Historical
as Theological upon the Nature, the Number and the Operations of the
Devils. Boston: Benjamin Harris.
Mather, Cotton.1710. Bonifacius. An Essay upon the Good, That Is to Be Devised and
Designed, by Those Who Desire to Answer the Great End of Life, and to Do
Good While They Live. Boston: B. Green. (Accessed at [URL])
Mather, Increase.1693. Cases of Conscience Concerning Evil Spirits Personating Men,
Witchcrafts, Infallible Proofs of Guilt in Such As Are Accused with that
Crime. Boston: Benjamin Harris.
Mazzon, Gabriella.2014. “The Pragmatics of Sir Thomas Bodley’s Diplomatic
Correspondence.”Journal of Early Modern Studies 3: 117–131.
Mazzon, Gabriella.2016. “English Historical Pragmatics.” In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, ed. by Merja Kytö and Päivi Pahta, 54–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Méndez-Naya, Belen. 2008. “Special Issue on English Intensifiers:
Introduction.”English Language and Linguistics 12 (2): 213–219.
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2011. “Individuals and Communities.” In The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone, and Paul Kerswill, 181–191. Los Angeles: Sage.
Meriton, George.1685. Nomenclatura Clericalis, or, The Young Clerk’s Vocabulary in English
and Latine. London.
Meurman-Solin, Anneli. 2012. “Historical Dialectology: Space as a Variable in the
Reconstruction of Regional Dialects.” In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ed. by Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy and Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre, 465–479. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Meyerhoff, Miriam.2002. “Communities of Practice.” In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes, 526–548. Oxford: Blackwell.
Miller, Arthur. [1953] 2003. The Crucible. New York: Penguin.
Milroy, Lesley.1987. Language and Social Networks. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mittwoch, Anita, Rodney Huddleston, and Peter Collins. 2002. “Chapter 8. The Clause: Adjuncts.” In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey K. Pullum, 663–784. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, Colette.2011. Quoting Speech in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, Colette.2019. “Communities of Practice and Incipient Standardization in
Middle English Written Culture.”English Studies 100 (2): 117–132.
Moore, Emma.2006. “‘You Tell all the Stories’: Using Narrative to Explore
Hierarchy within a Community of Practice.”Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (5): 611–640.
Morrill, Calvin, and Peter C. Facciola. 1992. “The Power of Language in Adjudication and Mediation:
Institutional Contexts as Predictors of Social
Evaluation.”Law and Social Enquiry 17 (2): 191–212.
Nevalainen, Terttu, and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart
England. Harlow: Pearson.
Nevalainen, Terttu, and Matti Rissanen. 2002. “Fairly Pretty or Pretty Fair? On the Development and
Grammaticalization of English Downtoners.”Language Sciences 24 (3–4): 359–380.
Nevalainen, Terttu, and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2012. “Introduction: Rethinking and Extending Approaches to the
History of the English Language.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Closs Traugott, 1–14. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newton, John, and Jo Bath (eds.). 2008. Witchcraft and the Act of 1604. Leiden: Brill.
Norton, Mary Beth.2002. In the Devil’s Snare: The Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692. New York: Knopf.
O’Barr, William M. 1982. Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power, and Strategy in the
Courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
Ochs, Elinor.1992. “Indexing Gender.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OED = Oxford English Dictionary. Available at [URL]. (As accessed 2021.)
Pable, Adrian.2008. “From ‘Standard’ to ‘Nonstandard’ Grammar. New England in the
Days of Salem Witchcraft and the Civil War.” In Standards and Norms in the English Language, ed. by Miriam A. Locher and Jürg Strässler, 105–126. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Palander-Collin, Minna. 1999. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in
Middle and Early Modern English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Palmer, F. R.1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paradis, Carita.2008. “Configurations, Construals and Change: Expressions of
DEGREE.”English Language and Linguistics 12 (2): 317–343.
Peters, Hans.1993. Die englischen Gradadverbien der Kategorie booster. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Peters, Hans.1994. “Degree Adverbs in Early Modern English.” In Studies in Early Modern English, ed. by Dieter Kastovsky, 269–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pomerantz, Anita M.1984. “Giving a Source or Basis: The Practice in Conversation of
Telling ‘How I know’.”Journal of Pragmatics 8: 607–625.
Powers, Edwin.1966. Crime and Punishment in Early Massachusetts, 1620–1692: A
Documentary History. Boston: Beacon Press.
Precht, Kristen.2003. “Stance Moods in Spoken English: Evidentiality and Affect in
British and American Conversation.”Text 23 (2): 239‒257.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Ray, Benjamin C.2015. Satan and Salem: The Witch-Hunt Crisis of 1692. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Reichelt, Susan, and Mercedes Durham. 2017. “Adjective Intensification as a Means of Characterization:
Portraying In-Group Membership and Britishness in Buffy the
Vampire Slayer.”Journal of English Linguistics 45 (1): 60–87.
Rissanen, Matti.1996. “Genres, Texts and Corpora in the Study of Medieval
English.” In Proceedings. Anglistentag 1995 Greifswald, ed. by Jürgen Klein and Dirk Vanderbeke, 229–242. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Rissanen, Matti.1997. “‘Candy no Witch, Barbados’: Salem Witchcraft Trials as
Evidence of Early American English.” In Language in Time and Space. Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Viereck on
the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, ed. by Heinrich Ramisch and Kenneth Wynne, 183–193. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
Roach, Marilynne K.2002. The Salem Witch Trials: A Day-by-Day Chronicle of a Community under
Siege. New York: Cooper Square.
Roach, Marilynne K.2009. “Biographical Notes.” In RSWH, 925–964. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, Enders A.1991. The Devil Discovered: Salem Witchcraft, 1692. New York: Hippocrene.
Rosenthal, Bernard.1993. Salem Story: Reading the Witch Trials of 1692. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenthal, Bernard.2009. “General Introduction.“ In RSWH, 15–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenthal, Bernard, and Margo Burns. 2009. “Chronological Arrangement.” In RSWH, 95–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer. 2015. “Introduction - Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the
Foundations.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ryan, Mary.1975. Womanhood in America, from Colonial Times to the Present. New York: New Viewpoints.
Schiff, Stacy.2015. The Witches: Salem, 1692. New York: Little, Brown, and Co.
Schneider, Edgar.2002. “Investigating Variation and Change in Written
Documents.” In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes, 67–96. Oxford: Blackwell.
Semino, Elena, and Mick Short. 2004. Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a
Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge.
Shurtleff, Nathaniel B. (ed.). 1854. Records of the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay in New
England . Vols. 3–4. Boston: William White.
Smith, Jeremy J.2020. Transforming Early English: The Reinvention of Early English and
Older Scots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, Joseph H.1961. Colonial Justice in Western Massachusetts (1639–1702). The Pynchon
Court Record. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Spanos, Nicholas, and Jack Gottlieb. 1976. “Ergotism and the Salem Village Witch
Trials.”Science 194: 1390–1394.
Starkey, Marion.1949. The Devil in Massachusetts: A Modern Enquiry into the Salem Witch
Trials. Garden City, NY: Doubleday
Stenroos, Merja.2008. “Order out of Chaos? The English Gender Change in the
Southwest Midlands as a Process of Semantically Based
Reorganization.”English Language and Linguistics 12 (3): 445–473..
Stirling, Lesley, and Rodney Huddleston. 2002. “Deixis and Anaphora.” In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey K. Pullum, 1449–1564. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stoffel, Cornelis.1901. Intensives and Down-Toners: A Study in English Adverbs. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Stubbs, Michael.1986. “‘A Matter of Prolonged Field Work’: Notes Towards a Modal
Grammar of English.”Applied Linguistics 7 (1): 1–25.
Stygall, Gail.2012. “Discourse in the US Courtroom.” In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, ed. by Lawrence M. Solan and Peter M. Tiersma, 369–380. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Suhr, Carla.2012. “Portrayal of Attitude in Early Modern English Witchcraft
Pamphlets.”Studia Neophilologica 84: 130–142.
Sveen, Hanna Andersdotter.2005. “Honourable” or “Highly-sexed” Adjectival Descriptions of Male and
Female Characters in Victorian and Contemporary Children’s
Fiction. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Swales, John.1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sweetser, Eve.1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of
Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taavitsainen, Irma.2001. “Evidentiality and Scientific Thought-Styles: English Medical
Writing in Middle English and Early Modern English.” In Modality in Specialized Texts; Selected Papers of the 1st CERLIS
Conference, ed. by Maurizio Gotti and Marina Dossena, 21–52. Bern: Peter Lang.
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H. Jucker. 2010. “Trends and Developments in Historical
Pragmatics.” In Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 3–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tagliamonte, Sali.2008. “So Different and Pretty Cool! Recycling Intensifiers in
Toronto, Canada.”English Language and Linguistics 12 (2): 361–394.
Thompson, Geoff, and Susan Hunston. 2000. “Evaluation: An Introduction.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of
Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, Joanna K.2002. “‘Powerful/Powerless’ Language in Court: A Critical
Re-Evaluation of the Duke Language and Law Programme.”Forensic Linguistics 9 (2): 153–167.
Thompson, Roger.1983. “‘Holy Watchfulness’ and Communal Conformism: The Functions
of Defamation in Early New England Communities.”New England Quarterly 56 (4): 504–522.
Thornton, Tamara Plakins.1996. Handwriting in America: A Cultural History. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid (ed.). 2000. “Social Network Analysis and the History of
English.”European Journal of English Studies (Special issue) 4(3)..
Trask, Richard B.2009. “Legal Procedures Used during the Salem Witch Trials and a
Brief History of the Published Versions of the Records.” In RSWH, 44–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs.1989. “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of
Subjectification in Semantic Change.”Language 65 (1): 31–55.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs.2020. “Expressions of Stance-to-Text: Discourse Management Markers
as Stance Markers.”Language Sciences 82.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Upham, Charles W.[1867] 2000. Salem Witchcraft. With an Account of Salem Village and a History of
Opinions on Witchcraft and Kindred Subjects. Mineola, NY: Dover.
Van Linden, An.2020. “The Diachrony of Stance Constructions with
‘No’ Chance and
‘No’ Wonder.”Language Sciences 82.
Walker, Terry.2011. “Chapter 4: Legal Background.” In Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England, Merja Kytö, Peter J. Grund, and Terry Walker, 101–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Watts, Richard J.1999. “The Social Construction of Standard English: Grammar Writers
as a ‘Discourse Community.’” In Standard English. The Widening Debate, ed. by Tony Bex and Richard J. Watts, 40–68. London: Routledge.
Watts, Richard J.2008. “Grammar Writers in Eighteenth-Century Britain: A Community
of Practice or a Discourse Community?” In Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century
England, ed. by Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 37–56. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wenger, Etienne.1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, Etienne, Richard McDermott, and William M. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing
Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Whitt, Richard J.2010. Evidentiality and Perception Verbs in English and German. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Willard, Samuel.1692. Some Miscellany Observations on our Present Debates Respecting
Witchcrafts, in a Dialogue between S. & B. / By P.E. and
J.A. Philadelphia: William Bradford.
Włodarczyk, Matylda. 2007. Pragmatic Aspects of Reported Speech: The Case of Early Modern
English Courtroom Discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Włodarczyk, Matylda. 2013. “Community or Communities of Practice?” In Communities of Practice in the History of English, ed. by Joanna Kopaczyk and Andreas H. Jucker, 83–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.