Part of
Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse
Edited by Turo Hiltunen and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 330] 2022
► pp. 120
References
Archer, Dawn, Jonathan Culpeper, and Matthew Davies
2008 “Pragmatic Annotation.” In Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Volume 1, ed. by Anke Lüdeling, and Merja Kytö, 613–640. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight
1999Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight, and Ellen Valle
2012 “Corpus Analysis of Scientific and Medical Writing Across Time.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
1988Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad
2019Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2nd edition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
1994 “Intra-Textual Variation within Medical Research Articles.” In Corpus-Based Research into Language. In Honour of Jan Aarts, ed. by Nelleke Oostdijk, and Pieter de Haan, 201–221. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan, and Dwight Atkinson
1993 “ARCHER and Its Challenges: Compiling and Exploring a Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers.” In Creating and Using English Language Corpora, ed. by Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie, and Peter Schneider, 1–13. Amsterdam: RodopiGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2005Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Michael
2011Performing Medicine: Medical Culture and Identity in Provincial England, c. 1760–1850. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bynum, W. F.
1994Science and the Practice of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, Brian, and Anne O’Keeffe
2015 “Pragmatics.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Douglas Biber, and Randi Reppen, 235–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan
2015 “Register variation.” In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Douglas Biber and Randi Reppen, 309–329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2012 “Expanding Horizons in Historical Linguistics with the 400-Million Word Corpus of Historical American English.” Corpora 7 (2): 122–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorgeloh, Heidrun
2016 “The Interrelationship of Register and Genre in Medical Discourse.” In Variational Text Linguistics: Revisiting Register in English, ed. by Christoph Schubert and Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer, 43–65. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A.
1994 “Dialect, Register and Genre. Working Assumptions about Conventionalization.” In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. by Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan, 15–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Joseph
2017 “Reproducible Research: Strategies, Tools, and Workflows.” In Big and Rich Data in English Corpus Linguistics: Methods and Explorations. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 19, ed. by Turo Hiltunen, Tanja Säily, and Joe McVeigh. [URL]
Geertz, Clifford
1973 “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, 3–30. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio
2001 “The Experimental Essay in Early Modern English.” European Journal of English Studies 5 (2): 221–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio, and Francoise Salager-Meyer
(eds) 2006Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio, Stefania Maci, and Michele Sala
(eds) 2015Insights into Medical Communication. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany Ekle, Douglas Biber, and Turo Hiltunen
2011 “The Expression of Stance in Early (1665–1712) Publications of the Philosophical Transactions and Other Contemporary Medical Prose: Innovations in a Pioneering Discourse.” In Medical Writing in Early Modern English, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta, 221–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardie, Andrew
2014 “Modest XML for Corpora: Not a Standard, but a Suggestion.” ICAME Journal 38: 73–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo
2010 “Philosophical Transactions.” In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta, 127–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Intensification in Eighteenth Century Medical Writing. Journal of English Linguistics, 49 (1), 90–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, and Jukka Tyrkkö
2013 “Tagging Early Modern English Medical Texts.” Paper presented at the Corpus Analysis with Noise in the Signal (CANS) workshop, Lancaster University, 22nd July 2013. [URL]
Hiltunen, Turo, and Jukka Tyrkkö
2019 “Manual to the LMEMT Corpus.” In Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Turo Hiltunen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Tanja Säily, and Joe McVeigh
2017 “How to Turn Linguistic Data into Evidence.” In Big and Rich Data in English Corpus Linguistics: Methods and Explorations. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 19, ed. by Turo Hiltunen, Tanja Säily, and Joe McVeigh. [URL]
Honkapohja, Alpo
2017Alchemy, Medicine, and Commercial Book Production. Turnhout: Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Andreas, and Andreas H. Jucker
1995 “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics.” In Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
2008 “Historical Pragmatics.” Language and Linguistic Compass 2 (5), 894–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Corpus Pragmatics” In Methods in Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider, and Wolfram Bublitz, 455–66. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt
2009 “Corpus Linguistics, Pragmatics and Discourse.” In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse, Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt, 3–7. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen
2014 “Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics: Intersections and Interactions.” In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker, and Jukka Tuominen, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurin, James
1724An Account of The Success of Inoculating The Small Pox in Great Britain. London: J. Peele.Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas
2009 “Historical Corpus Pragmatics: Focus on Speech Acts and Texts.” In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME29), ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt, 13–36. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd
2018“Reflecting on the Quantitative Turn in Linguistics.” Online lecture. University of Freiburg. [URL]. (Accessed 9 February 2021.)
Labov, William
1972 “Some Principles of Linguistic Methodology.” Language in Society 1 (1): 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehto, Anu, Alistair Baron, Maura Ratia, and Paul Rayson
2011 “Improving the Precision of Corpus Methods: The Standardized Version of Early Modern English Medical Texts.” In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta, 279–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark
2014 “How Big Data is Changing How We Study Languages.” The Guardian 7 April 2014 [URL]
Marchi, Anna, and Charlotte Taylor
2018 “Introduction: Partiality and Reflexivity.” In Corpus Approaches to Discourse. A Critical Review, ed. by Charlotte Taylor, and Anna Marchi, 1–16. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Gillian
2014 “Pragmatics and Medical Discourse.” Pragmatics of Discourse, ed. by Klaus P. Schneider, and Anne Barron, 491–524. Berlin, München, Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehl, Seth
2021 “Why Linguists Should Care about Digital Humanities (and Epidemiology).” Journal of English Linguistics, 49 (3), 331–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L.
2001Pragmatics: An Introduction. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Millar, Neil, Brian Budgell, and Keith Fuller
2013 “ ‘Use The Active Voice Whenever Possible’: The Impact of Style Guidelines in Medical Journals.” Applied Linguistics 34 (4): 393–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moessner, Lilo
2008 “Variation and Change in the Writings of 17th-Century Scientists.” In English Historical Linguistics 2006. Volume II: Lexical and Semantic Change, ed. by Richard Dury, Maurizio Gotti and Maria Dossena, 75–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1999 “Making the Best Use of “Bad” Data: Evidence for Sociolinguistic Variation in Early Modern English.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 100 (4): 499–533.Google Scholar
Nwogu, Kevin Ngozi
1997 “The Medical Research Paper: Structure and Functions.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (2): 119–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez-López, Pilar and Nuria Edo-Marzá
2016 “Medical Discourse: Building Bridges between Medicine and Society.” Medical Discourse in Professional, Academic and Popular Settings, ed. by Pilar Ordóñez-López, and Nuria Edo-Marzá, 1–8. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pahta, Päivi
1998Medieval Embryology in the Vernacular: The Case of De spermate [Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 53]. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi and Irma Taavitsainen
2004 ”Vernacularisation of scientific and medical writing in its sociohistorical context.” In Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Medieval English, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piqué-Angordans, Jordi, and Santiago Posteguillo
2006 “Medical Discourse and Academic Genres.” In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ed. by Keith Brown, 649–657. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pumfrey, Stephen, Paul Rayson, and John Mariani
2012 “Experiments in 17th Century English: Manual versus Automatic Conceptual History”. Literary and Linguistic Computing 27 (4): 395–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Redden, Elizabeth
2020 “Rush to Publish Risks Undermining COVID-19 Research.” Inside Higher Education 8 June 2020 [URL]
Rissanen, Matti, and Jukka Tyrkkö
2013 “The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts (HC).” In Principles and Practices for the Digital Editing and Annotation of Diachronic Data. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 12, ed. by Anneli Meurman-Solin, and Jukka Tyrkkö. Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL]
Rockwell, Geoffrey
2013 “Inclusion in Digital Humanities.” In Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader, ed. by Melissa Terras, Julianne Nyhan and Edward Vanhouette. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús
2008Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Editorial: Corpus Pragmatics.” Corpus Pragmatics 1: 1–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Karin Aijmer
2015 “Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, ed. by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise, María Ángeles Alcaraz Ariza, and Maryelis Pabón Berbesí
2007 “Collegiality, Critique and the Construction of Scientific Argumentation in Medical Book Reviews: A Diachronic Approach.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1758–1774. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas, Sebastian Hoffmann, and Paul Rayson
2008 “Corpus Tools and Methods, Today and Tomorrow: Incorporating Linguists’ Manual Annotations.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 23 (2): 163–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John
2000 “Language for Specific Purposes.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20: 59–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
2000Scientific Language and Standardisation 1375–1550. In The Development of Standard English: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, ed. by Laura Wright, 131–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Scholastic Genre Scripts in English Medical Writing 1375–1800.” In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change, ed. by Richard J. Whitt, 95–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Polite Society Language Practices: Letters to the Editor in The Gentleman’s Magazine.” In Irma Taavitsainen and Turo Hiltunen (eds) 2019 Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, 129–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “A Medical Debate of ‘Heated Pamphleteering’ in the Early Eighteenth Century.” In Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English: Literary and Linguistic Approaches, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 141–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “Scientific book reviews in the seventeenth century: Early stages of the genre.” In The Role of Context in the Production and Reception of Historical News Discourse, ed. by Nicholas Brownlees. 67–86. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Susan Fitzmaurice
2007 “What It Is and How to Do It.” In Methods in Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen, 11–36. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Turo Hiltunen
(eds) 2019Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Turo Hiltunen
Forthcoming. “Medical and Scientific Writing.” In New Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume II: Documentation, sources of data and modelling ed. by Merja Kytö and Erik Smitterberg Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Taavitsainen, Irma, Peter Murray Jones, and Turo Hiltunen
2019 “Sociohistorical and Cultural Context of Late Modern English Medical Texts.” In Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, ed. by Turo Hiltunen, and Irma Taavitsainen, 17–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Päivi Pahta
2010 “Scientific Discourse.” In Handbook of Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 3–32. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H. Jucker
2015 “Twenty Years of Historical Pragmatics: Origins, Developments and Changing Thought Styles.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16 (1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Päivi Pahta
(eds) 2010Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2011Medical Writing in Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Turo Hiltunen, Anu Lehto, Ville Marttila, Päivi Pahta, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr and Jukka Tyrkkö
2019Late Modern English Medical Texts: The Corpus. In Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Turo Hiltunen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Päivi Pahta, Turo Hiltunen, Martti Mäkinen, Ville Marttila, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr, and Jukka Tyrkkö
2010Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus. In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Päivi Pahta, and Martti Mäkinen
2005Middle English Medical Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Jeremy J. Smith, Carla Suhr, and Turo Hiltunen
(Forthcoming) Genre in Early Modern Medical English: Sociocultural Contexts of Production and Use, 1500–1820. (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
2001Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
2008 “The State of English Language Studies: A Linguistic Perspective.” In English Now: Selected Papers from the 20th IAUPE Conference in Lund 2007. Lund Studies in English 112, ed. by Marianne Thormählen, 199–225. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
2013 “Continental European Perspective View.” In The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Yan Huang. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voigts, Linda E.
1984 “Medical Prose.” In Middle English Prose: A Critical Guide to Major Authors and Genres, ed. by A. S. G. Edwards, 315–335. New Brunswick: Rutgers.Google Scholar
1989 “Scientific and Medical Books.” In Book Production and Publishing in Britain, 1375–1475, ed. by Jeremy Griffths, and Derek Pearsall, 345–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wear, Andrew
2000Knowledge and Practice in English Medicine, 1550–1680. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, Charles
1975The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine and Reform 1626–1660. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar