Chapter published in:
Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse
Edited by Turo Hiltunen and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 330] 2022
► pp. 79–104

Chapter 4
Medical discourse in Late Modern English

Insights from a multidisciplinary corpus of scientific journal articles

| Saarland University
This chapter demonstrates how the Royal Society Corpus, a richly annotated corpus of around 48,000 English scientific journal articles covering more than 330 years, can be used for lexico-grammatical and pragmatic studies that contribute to a broader understanding of the development of medical research articles. The Late Modern English period together with several decades before and after this time frame was a productive period in the medical output of the Royal Society. This chapter addresses typical linguistic features of scientific journal articles from medical and related sciences from this period demonstrating their special status in the context of other traditional and emerging disciplines in the corpus data. Additionally, language usage and text-type conventions of historical medical research articles will be compared to the features of corpus texts on medical topics from Present-day English.
Keywords: Late Modern English, corpus development, register analysis, specialized academic corpora, written English medical discourse, Royal Society Corpus
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The RSC 6.0
  • 3.Late Modern English medical texts in the RSC
    • 3.1Authors of medical texts
    • 3.2RSC texts with medical implications
    • 3.3Linguistic features of medical articles
  • 4.Summary and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.330.04men
References
Atkinson, Dwight
1992 “The Evolution of Medical Research Writing from 1735 to 1985: The Case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal .” Applied Linguistics 13 (4): 337–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
Bellés-Fortuño, Begoña
2016 “Popular Science Articles vs. Scientific Articles: A Tool for Medical Education.” In New Insight into the Analysis of Medical Discourse in Professional, Academic and Popular Settings, ed. by Pilar Ordoñez-Lopez, and Nuria Edo-Marza, 55–78. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
1994 “Intra-textual Variation within Medical Research Articles.” In Corpus-based Research into Language, ed. by Nelleke Oostdijk, and Pieter de Haan, 201–222. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bizzoni, Yuri, Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb, Katrin Menzel, Pauline Krielke, and Elke Teich
2019 “Grammar and Meaning: Analysing the Topology of Diachronic Word Embeddings.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change. Florence: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://​www​.aclweb​.org​/anthology​/W19​-4722/. Accessed 25 November 2019. Crossref
Crespo-García, Begoña, and Isabel Moskowich
2015 “A Corpus of History Texts (CHET) as Part of the Coruña Corpus Project.” In Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2015, 14–23. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University.Google Scholar
Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania, and Elke Teich
2016 “Information-based Modeling of Diachronic Linguistic Change: From Typicality to Productivity.” In Proceedings of the 10th SIGHUM Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities, ed. by Nils Reiter, Beatrice Alex, Kalliopi, and A. Zervanou Berlin: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://​www​.aclweb​.org​/anthology​/W16​-2121, accessed 25 November 2020. Crossref
2019 “Toward an Optimal Code for Communication: The Case of Scientific English.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0(0):1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik, Susanne Flach, Jukka Tyrkkö, and Hans-Jürgen Diller
2015 The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts (CLMET), version 3.1: Improved tokenization and linguistic annotation. Available online at https://​hdl​.handle​.net​/21​.11119​/0000​-0002​-43F3​-0
Fankhauser, Peter, and Marc Kupietz
N.d. Visual Correlation for Exploring Paradigmatic Language Change. http://​corpora​.ids​-mannheim​.de​/diaviz​/description​.html, accessed 25 November 2019.
Fankhauser, Peter, Jörg Knappen, and Elke Teich
2016 “Topical Diversification over Time in the Royal Society Corpus.” Digital Humanities 2016 Conference Abstracts, 496–500. Kraków: Jagiellonian University & Pedagogical University.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Gibson
2001 “If You Pop Over There: A Corpus-based Study of Conditionals in Medical Discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 20 (1): 61–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Stefan, Jörg Knappen, Katrin Menzel, and Elke Teich
2020 “The Royal Society Corpus 6.0 – Providing 300+ Years of Scientific Writing for Humanistic Study.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation 2020 (LREC2020). Marseille, France: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). 794–802. http://​www​.lrec​-conf​.org​/proceedings​/lrec2020​/index​.html
Fischer, Stefan, Peter Fankhauser, and Elke Teich
2017 “Visualization of Corpus Frequencies at Text Level”. Extended Abstracts of the Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL2017). University of Birmingham, UK 25–28 July 2017 https://​www​.birmingham​.ac​.uk​/Documents​/college​-artslaw​/corpus​/conference​-archives​/2017​/general​/paper112​.pdf
Fischer, Stefan, Knappen, Jörg, and Elke Teich
2018 “Using Topic Modelling to Explore Authors’ Research Fields in a Corpus of Historical Scientific English.” Abstracts of DH 2018, 581–584. Mexico City, Mexico. https://​dh2018​.adho​.org​/using​-topic​-modelling​-to​-explore​-authors​-research​-fields​-in​-a​-corpus​-of​-historical​-scientific​-english/
Fløttum, Kjersti
2006 “Medical Research Articles in the Comparative Perspectives of Discipline and Language.” In Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, and Françoise Salager-Meyer, 251–269. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fyfe, Aileen, and Camilla Mørk Røstvik
2018 “How Female Fellows Fared at the Royal Society.” Nature 555 (7695): 159–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fyfe, Aileen, Flaminio Squazzoni, Didier Torny, and Pierpaolo Dondio
2020 “Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865–1965.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (3): 405–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Neville W., and Martin B. Edwards
2014 Medical Writing: A Prescription for Clarity. 4th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood
1987 “Language and the Order of Nature.” In The Linguistics of Writing, ed. by Nigel Fabb, and Alan Durant, 135–154. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew
2012 “CQPweb – Combining Power, Flexibility and Usability in a Corpus Analysis Tool.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (3): 380–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Andrew John
1989 Scientific Naturalists and the Government of the Royal Society 1850–1900. PhD dissertation. The Open University.
Jenicek, Milos
2014 Writing, Reading, and Understanding in Modern Health Sciences: Medical Articles and other Forms of Communication. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Kermes, Hannah, Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb, Ashraf Khamis, Jörg Knappen, and Elke Teich
2016 “The Royal Society Corpus: From Uncharted Data to Corpus.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation 2016 (LREC2016), ed. by Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, Marko Grobelnik, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Helene Mazo, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk, and Stelios Piperidis, 1928–1931. Portoroz, Slovenia: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Knappen, Jörg, Stefan Fischer, Hannah Kermes, Elke Teich, and Peter Fankhauser
2017 “The Making of the Royal Society Corpus.” In Proceedings of the 21st NoDaLiDa Workshop on Processing Historical Language, May 2017, ed. by Jörg Tiedemann and Nina Tahmasebi, 7–11. Gothenburg, Sweden: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Laso, Natalia Judith
2009 A Corpus-Based Study of the Phraseological Behaviour of Abstract Nouns in Medical English: A Needs Analysis of a Spanish Medical Community. PhD dissertation. University of Barcelona.
Lehto, Anu, and Irma Taavitsainen
2019 “Medical Case Reports in Late Modern English.” In Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Turo Hiltunen, 89–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linares, Oscar, David Daly, and Gertrude Daly
2017 Plain English for Doctors and Other Medical Scientists. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCallum, Andrew Kachites
2002 MALLET. http://​mallet​.cs​.umass​.edu/
MEMT – Middle English Medical Texts corpus, CD-ROM
2005 Compilers: Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta and Martti Mäkinen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Menzel, Katrin
2021. “Scientific Eponyms throughout the History of English Scholarly Journal Articles.” In Broadening Perspectives in the History of Dictionaries and Word Studies (Selected Papers from ICHLL 10) ed. by Hans Van de Velde and Fredric Dolezal Newcastle upon Tyne Cambridge Scholars Publishing 159 193
Menzel, Katrin, and Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb
2017 “The Diachronic Development of Combining Forms in Scientific Writing.” Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, 2 (2): 185–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, Katrin
2018 “Using Diachronic Corpora of Scientific Journal Articles for Complementing English Corpus-based Dictionaries and Lexicographical Resources for Specialized Languages.” Proceedings of, the XVIII EURALEX International Congress: Lexicography in Global Contexts, July 2018, Ljubljana, Slovenia, ed. by Jaka Čibej, Vojko Gorjanc, Iztok Kosem, and Simon Krek. 363–372. Ljubljana: Ljubljana University Press.Google Scholar
Menzel, Katrin, Jörg Knappen, and Elke Teich
2021 “Generating Linguistically Relevant Metadata for the Royal Society Corpus.” Research in Corpus Linguistics 9 (1), 1–18. Oxford English Dictionary. http://​www​.oed​.com/. Crossref
Pahta, Päivi, and Irma Taavitsainen
2004 “Vernacularisation of Scientific and Medical Writing in its Sociohistorical Context.” In Medical and Scientific Writing in English 1375–1500, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panocová, Renáta
2015 “Transparency and Use of Neoclassical Word Formation in Medical English.” In Word Formation and Transparency in Medical English, ed. by Pius ten Hacken, and Renáta Panocová, 73–96. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2017a The Vocabulary of Medical English: A Corpus-based Study. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2017b “Synonymy in Medical Terminology – A Challenge in Translation.” In Translation Studies and Translation Practice: Proceedings of the 2nd International TRANSLATA Conference 2014, Part 1, ed. by Lew N. Zybatow, Any Stauder, and Michael Ustaszewski, 207–212. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Roberts, Celia
2006 “Continuities and Discontinuities in Doctor-Patient Consultations in a Multilingual Society.” In Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Contexts, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, and Françoise Salager-Meyer, 177–195. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise
1999 “Contentiousness in Written Medical English Discourse: A Diachronic Study (1810–1995).” Text 19 (3): 371–398.Google Scholar
Stuart, Mark C.
(ed.) 2007 The Complete Guide to Medical Writing. London: Pharmaceutical Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Päivi Pahta
2000 “Conventions of Professional Writing: The Modern Medical Case Report in a Historical Perspective.” Journal of English Linguistics 28: 60–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
2011 “Medical Case Reports and Scientific Thought-styles.” In Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 17. Special Issue: Diachronic English for Specific Purposes, ed. by Francisco Alonso Almeida, 75–98. Spain: Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria.Google Scholar
2015 “Medical News in England 1665–1800 in Journals for Professional and Lay Audiences”. In Changing Genre Conventions in Historical English News Discourse, ed. by Birte Bös, and Lucia Kornexl, 135–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Turo Hiltunen
2019 “Towards New Knowledge: The Corpus of Late Modern English Medical Texts”. In Late Modern English Medical Texts: Writing Medicine in the Eighteenth Century, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Turo Hiltunen, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Robert B.
2018 Medical Writing: A Guide for Clinicians, Educators, and Researchers. 3rd edition. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teufel, Simone, and Noemie Elhadad
2002 “Collection and Linguistic Processing of a Large-scale Corpus of Medical Articles.” In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2002, ed. by Manuel González Rodríguez, and Carmen Paz Suarez Araujo 1214–1219. Las Palmas: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar