Chapter published in:
Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse
Edited by Turo Hiltunen and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 330] 2022
► pp. 179202
Arons, Wendy
1994 “Translator’s Introduction.” In When Midwifery Became the Male Physician’s Province: The Sixteenth Century Handbook The Rose Garden for Pregnant Women and Midwives, Newly Englished, by Eucharius Rosslin, trans. by Wendy Arons, 1–25. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar
Böhme, Gernot
2017 “Midwifery as Science: An Essay on the Relation between Scientific and Everyday Knowledge.” In Society and Knowledge: Contemporary Perspectives in the Sociology of Knowledge and Science, ed. by Nico Stehr, and Volker Meja, 373–392. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, Heather A.
2001 “Male Appropriation and Medicalization of Childbirth: An Historical Analysis.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 33 (3): 334–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cody, Lisa Forman
2005Birthing the Nation: Sex, Science, and the Conception of Eighteenth-Century Britons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Patricia
2015Blood, Bodies and Families in Early Modern England. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1995 “Discourse, Power and Access.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 84–104. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011 “Discourse, Knowledge, Power and Politics: Towards Critical Epistemic Discourse Analysis.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 28–63. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evenden, Doreen
2000The Midwives of Seventeenth-Century London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2010Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fissell, Mary E.
2004Vernacular Bodies: The Politics of Reproduction in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flügge, Sibylla
1998Hebammen und heilkundige Frauen: Recht und Rechtswirklichkeit im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt a. M./Basel: Stroemfeld.Google Scholar
Fritz, Gerd, Thomas Gloning, and Juliane Glüer
(eds) 2018Historical Pragmatics of Controversies: Case Studies from 1600 to 1800. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, Monica H.
2008aMaking Women’s Medicine Masculine: The Rise of Male Authority in Pre-Modern Gynaecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008b “Gendering the History of Women’s Healthcare.” Gender & History 20 (3): 487–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “The Sources of Eucharius Rösslin’s ‘Rosegarden for Pregnant Women and Midwives’ (1513).” Medical History 53: 167–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gubalke, Wolfgang
1985Die Hebamme im Wandel der Zeiten: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Hebammenwesens. 2nd edition, ed. by Ruth Kölle. Hannover: Elwin Staude.Google Scholar
Hanson, Clare
2004A Cultural History of Pregnancy: Pregnancy, Medicine and Culture, 1750–2000. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, David
1993 “Provincial Midwives in England: Lancashire and Cheshire, 1660–1760.” In The Art of Midwifery: Early Modern Midwives in Europe, ed. by Hilary Marland, 27–48. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hobby, Elaine
1999 “Introduction.” In The Midwives Book, or the Whole Art of Midwifery Discovered, by Jane Sharp, ed. by Elaine Hobby, xi–xxxi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009 “Introduction.” In The Birth of Mandkind: Otherwise Named, The Woman’s Book, by Thomas Raynalde, ed. by Elaine Hobby, xv–xxxix. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Keller, Eve
2000 “Embryonic Individuals: The Rhetoric of Seventeenth-Century Embryology and the Construction of Early-Modern Identity.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 33 (3): 321–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “The Subject of Touch: Medical Authority in Early Modern Midwifery.” In Sensible Flesh: On Touch in Early Modern Culture, ed. by Elizabeth D. Harvey, 62–80. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
2007Generating Bodies and Gendered Selves: The Rhetoric of Reproduction in Early Modern England. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
King, Helen
1993 “The Politick Midwife: Models of Midwifery in the Work of Elizabeth Cellier.” In The Art of Midwifery: Early Modern Midwives in Europe, ed. by Hilary Marland, 115–130. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995 “ ‘As if none understood the art that cannot understand Greek’: The Education of Midwives in Seventeenth-Century England.” In The History of Medical Education in Britain, ed. by Vivian Nutton, and Roy Porter, 184–198. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2012 “Midwifery, 1700–1800: The Man-Midwife as Competitor.” In Nursing and Midwifery in Britain since 1700, ed. by Anne Borsay, and Billie Hunter, 107–127. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kruse, Britta-Juliane
1994 “Neufund einer handschriftlichen Vorstufe von Eucharius Rößlins Hebammenlehrbuch Der schwangeren Frauen und Hebammen Rosengarten und des Frauenbüchleins Ps.-Ortolfs”. Sudhoffs Archiv 78: 220–236.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
1995 “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lieske, Pam
2007–2009Eighteenth-Century British Midwifery. 12 Vols. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
Lingo, Alison Klairmont
2017 “Editor’s Introduction.” Midwife to the Queen of France: Diverse Observations, by Louise Bourgeois, trans. by Stephanie O’Hara, and ed. by Alison Klairmont Lingo, 1–65. Toronto: Iter Press.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Tania
2012A Social History of Maternity and Childbirth: Key Themes in Maternity Care. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Hara, Stephanie
2017 “Translator’s Introduction.” Midwife to the Queen of France: Diverse Observations, by Louise Bourgeois, trans. by Stephanie O’Hara, and ed. by Alison Klairmont Lingo, 67–77. Toronto: Iter Press.Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi
2011 “Eighteenth-Century English Medical Texts and Discourses on Reproduction.” In Languages of Science in the Eighteenth Century, ed. by Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, 333–355. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi, and Irma Taavitsainen
2010 “Scientific Discourse.” In The Handbook of Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 549–586. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Wendy
1996Midwifery and Medicine in Early Modern France: Louise Bourgeois. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Plappert, Garry
2019 “Not Hedging but Implying: Identifying Epistemic Implicature through a Corpus-Driven Approach to Scientific Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 139: 163–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomata, Gianna
2011a “Observation Rising: Birth of an Epistemic Genre, 1500–1650.” In Histories of Scientific Observation, ed. by Lorraine Daston, and Elizabeth Lunbeck, 45–80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2011b “A Word of the Empirics: The Ancient Concept of Observation and Its Recovery in Early Modern Medicine.” Annals of Science 68 (1): 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan
1996Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinarz, Jonathan, and Rebecca Wynter
(eds) 2015Complaints, Controversies and Grievances in Medicine: Historical and Social Science Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2017 “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 44–59. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2016 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 23–61. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Richards, Jennifer
2015 “Reading and Hearing The Womans Booke in Early Modern England.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 89 (3): 434–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Paul
1993Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, Sheena
2011 “Transcending the Sexed Body: Reason, Sympathy, and ‘Thinking Machines’ in the Debates over Early English Midwifery.” In The Female Body in Medicine and Literature, ed. by Andrew Mangham, and Greta Depledge, 89–106. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Staub, Susan C.
2011 “Surveilling the Secrets of the Female Body: The Contest for Reproductive Authority in the Popular Press of the Seventeenth Century.” In The Female Body in Medicine and Literature, ed. by Andrew Mangham, and Greta Depledge, 51–68. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
2001 “Evidentiality and Scientific Thought-Styles: English Medical Writing in Late Middle English and Early Modern English.” In Modality in Specialized Texts: Selected Papers of the 1st CERLIS Conference, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, and Marina Dossena, 21–52. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012 “Audience Guidance and Learned Medical Writing in Late Medieval English.” In Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena, and Françoise Salager-Meyer, 431–456. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Päivi Pahta, Turo Hiltunen, Martti Mäkinen, Ville Marttila, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr, and Jukka Tyrkkö
2010Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus. In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tatlock, Lynne
2005 “Volume Editor’s Introduction.” In The Court Midwife, by Justine Siegemund, trans. and ed. by Lynne Tatlock, 1–30. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B.
1984Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Katharine Phelps
2014 “Marketing Midwives in Seventeenth-Century London: A Re-Examination of Jane Sharp’s The Midwives Book .” Gender & History 26 (2): 223–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitt, Richard J.
2016a “Evidentiality in Early Modern English Medical Treatises (1500–1700).” Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 2 (2): 235–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016b “Using Corpora to Track Changing Thought Styles: Evidentiality, Epistemology, and Early Modern Scientific Discourse in English and German.” Kalbotyra 69: 265–291.Google Scholar
2018 “ ‘And all this is spoken of the naturall byrth …’: Metadiscourse in The Birth of Mankind and Its German Source Text, Rosengarten .” English Text Construction 11 (2): 225–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Adrian
1995The Making of Man-Midwifery: Childbirth in England, 1660–1770. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar