Cover not available
Part of
Relationships in Organized Helping: Analyzing interaction in psychotherapy, medical encounters, coaching and in social media
Edited by Claudio Scarvaglieri, Eva-Maria Graf and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 331] 2022
► pp. 151–170

The role of semi-responsive answers for relationship building in coaching

| ZHAW School of Applied Linguistics

This paper discusses the role of semi-responsive answers of clients for relationship building in coaching. Coaching is a process-oriented type of counseling in which a coach and a coachee collaboratively work on solving a particular worklife or daily life related concern of the coachee. The paper aims at identifying and analyzing semi-responsive answers of coachees (second pair part) as reactions to initiating turns of coaches (first pair part). It is hypothesized that semi-responsive answers are of particular relevance for any coaching process as they reveal ambivalences, (inner) conflicts, uncertainties and/or opposition on the client’s side which ought to be noticed and appropriately addressed by the coach. A conversation analysis manual was developed in order to systematically identify and analyze the linguistic characteristics of semi-responsiveness in coachee’s answers. First, theoretical and methodological aspects regarding a conversation analysis manual to study structures of social interaction are discussed. Second, a code-system to identify semi-responsive answers is demonstrated. Finally, based on the transcribed data, semi-responsive answers are analyzed with respect to how they are addressed by the coaches in third position. The data consists of 21 face-to-face coaching sessions (64 hours) in Swiss and Standard German. The analysis demonstrates that semi-responsive answers are both a valuable source of information and a challenge as they require the coach to maintain a balance between facilitating the process and maintaining a good relationship with the client.

Keywords: semi-responsiveness, coaching relationship, conversation analysis, coding manual
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theory
    • 2.1Helping conversation
    • 2.2Conversation analysis and responsiveness
    • 2.3Semi-responsive answers in coaching
    • 2.4Third position actions and the coach-client-relationship
    • 2.5Research question
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1CA-grounded manual
    • 3.2Sample
    • 3.3Developing categories (Codes)
    • 3.4Applying the codes
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.331.07win
References (35)
Behn-Taran, Angelika
2014 “I am my own worst enemy.” A linguistic analysis of interactive dynamics of relational patterns in business coaching conversations. [URL].Google Scholar
Brinker, Karl, and Sven Frederik Sager
2010 Linguistische Gesprächsanalyse. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Burt, Daniel, and Zenobia Talati
2017 “The unsolved value of executive coaching: A meta-analyses of outcome using randomized control trial studies.” International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring 15 (2): 17–24.Google Scholar
De Haan, Erik, and Judie Gannon
2016 “The Coaching Relationship.” In The SAGE Handbook of Coaching, ed. by. Tatiana Bachkirova, Gordon Spence, and David Drake, 195–216. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, doi.org/10.4135/9781473983861.n11Google Scholar
De Meuse, Kenneth P., Dai, Guangrong, and Robert J. Lee
2009 “Evaluating the effectiveness of executive coaching: beyond ROI?” Coaching, 2(2): 117–134.Google Scholar
Deplazes, Silvia, Eva-Maria Graf, and Hansjörg Künzli
2018 “Das TSPP-Modell – Eine Blaupause für die Coaching-Prozessforschung.” Coaching | Theorie & Praxis 4: 69–82. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2008 Gespräche analysieren. Eine Einführung (4. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graf, Eva-Maria
2015 “Kommunikative Basisaktivitäten im Coaching-Gespräch: Ein linguistischer Beitrag zur Coaching-Prozessforschung.” Coaching | Theorie & Praxis 1: 5–14. . DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Äußerung für Äußerung zum Coaching-Prozess: Das Potential einer gesprächsanalytisch fundierten Coaching-Prozessforschung.“ In Coaching-Prozessforschung. Forschung und Praxis im Dialog, ed. by Robert Wegener, Michael Loebbert, Agnes Fritze, and Marianne Hänseler, 141–161. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graf, Eva-Maria, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
2018 “Welche Frage, wann und warum? – Eine qualitativ-linguistische Programmatik zur Erforschung von Frage-Sequenzen als zentrale Veränderungspraktik im Coaching.” Coaching | Theorie & Praxis 4: 17–32. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Graf, Eva-Maria
2019 The Pragmatics of Executive Coaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henne, Helmut, and Helmut Rehbock
2001 Einführung in die Gesprächsanalyse. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rebecca J., Stephen A. Woods, and Yves R. F. Guillaume
2015 “The effectiveness of workplace coaching: a meta analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 89: 249–277. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ueli, and Williams Stiles
2015 “The Responsiveness Problem in Psychotherapy: A Review of Proposed Solutions.” Clincal Psychology Science and Practice 22(3): 277–295. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Mannhardt, Sonja, and Erik De Haan
2018 ”Coaching-Beziehung”. In Handbuch Schlüsselkonzepte im Coaching, ed. by. Siegfried Greif, Heidi Möller, and Wolfgang Scholl, 85–94. Berlin: Springer. . DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Migge, B.
2018 Handbuch Coaching und Beratung. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
Mroczynski, Robert
2014 Gesprächslinguistik. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Nothdurft, Werner, Ulrich Reitmeier, and Peter Schröder
1994 Beratungsgespräche. Analyse asymmetrischer Dialoge. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionaries
2022 “Responsiveness.” [URL]Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar
(eds) 2008 Conversation Analysis of Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi
2013 “Conversation Analysis in Psychotherapy.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by. Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 551–574. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
2019 “Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy: Identifying transformative sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:3: 257–280, DOI logo.Google Scholar
Pick, Ina
(ed.) 2017 Beraten in Interaktion. Eine gesprächslinguistische Typologie des Beratens. Frankfurt am M.: Lang.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant
2002 “The Language of Likelihood in Genetic Counselling Discourse.” Journal for Language and Social Psychology 21(1): 7–31. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Scarvaglieri, Claudio
2013 “Nichts anderes als ein Austausch von Worten. Sprachliches Handeln in der Psychotherapie.” Berlin/Bosten: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwitalla, Johannes
(1979) "Nonresponsive Antworten." Deutsche Sprache, Zeitschrift für Theorie, Praxis, Dokumentation. 7. Jahrgang. 193-211.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
et al. 2009 “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10: 353–402.Google Scholar
Sonesh, Shirley C., Chris W. Coultas, Christina N. Lacerenza, Shannon L. Marlow, Lauren E. Benishek, and Eduardo Salas
2015 “The power of coaching: a meta-analytic investigation.” Coaching 8(2): 73–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanja
2015 "Coding Social Interaction: A Heretical Approach in Conversation Analysis?" Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:1: 1-19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theeboom, Tim, Bianca Beersma, and Annelies van Vianen
2014 “Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 9(1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vehviläinen, Sanna
1999 Structures of Counselling Interaction. A Conversation Analytic Study of Counselling Encounters in Career Guidance Training. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Voutilainen Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
2010 “Recognition and Interpretation: Responding to Emotional Experience in Psychotherapy.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 43(1): 85–107. 10.1080/08351810903474799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa, and Anssi Peräkylä.
2016 “Interactional Practices of Psychotherapy.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health, ed. by. Michelle O’Reilly, and Jessica Lester, 540–557. Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Oliver
2017 “Anwendung der Gesprächsanalyse als Feedback-Instrument im Chat-Coaching.” Coaching | Theorie & Praxis: 17–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by 3 other publications

Fleischhacker, Melanie & Eva-Maria Graf
2024. A closer look into the ‘black box’ of coaching – linguistic research into the local effectiveness of coaching with the help of conversation analysis. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 17:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Fleischhacker, Melanie & Eva-Maria Graf
2024. New ways of investigating coaching: linguistic research on executive, business and workplace coaching – a systematic scoping review. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 17:1 ► pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Kabatnik, Susanne
2024. “Because he was disgusting”: transforming relations through positioning in messenger-supported group psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.