Cover not available
Part of
Relationships in Organized Helping: Analyzing interaction in psychotherapy, medical encounters, coaching and in social media
Edited by Claudio Scarvaglieri, Eva-Maria Graf and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 331] 2022
► pp. 315–328

Relational dimensions of organized helping

Findings and implications

| Ghent University,
| Klagenfurt University,
Article outline
  • 1.Relationship between whom? Personal dimension (the helper and the ‘helped’)
  • 2.Relationships how? Linguistic and discursive dimension (practices and strategies of relationship building)
  • 3.Relationships why? Functional dimension (relationships and change)
  • 4.Relationships when? Temporal dimension (the development of relationships over time)
  • 5.Relationships where? Medial dimension (the communicative medium and its influence on relationships)
  • 6.Relationships who? Identity dimension (the influence of social categories on relationship building)
    • Future directions
  • References
Published online: 7 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.331.14sca
References (34)
References
Ardito, Rita B., and Daniela Rabellino. 2011. “Therapeutic Alliance and Outcome of Psychotherapy: Historical Excursus, Measurements, and Prospects for Research.” Frontiers in Psychology 270: 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. 2010. “Relating.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics (Vol. Handbooks of Pragmatics), ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Sage L. Graham, 137–167. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateman, Anthony W., and Peter Fonagy (eds). 2015. Psychodynamische Therapie. Handbuch Mentalisieren. Gießen, Lahn: Psychosozial-Verlag.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2018. Durkheim and the Internet: On Sociolinguistics and the Sociological Imagination. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, John. 2012. The Making and Breaking of Affectional Bonds. Routledge Classics. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2008. Gespräche analysieren: Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy. 2001. “Aspekte und Merkmale der Gesprächssituation.” In Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. Linguistics of text and conversation: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, ed. by Klaus Brinker, Gerd Antos, Wolfgang Heinemann, and Sven F. Sager, 1148–1161. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad. 1994. “Funktion und Struktur schriftlicher Kommunikation.” In Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft: Vol. 10,1. Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Writing and Its Use: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung: An interdisciplinary Handbook of International Research, ed. by Hartmut Günther, and Otto Ludwig, 18–41. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graf, Eva-Maria. 2019. The Pragmatics of Executive Coaching. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graf, Eva, and Claudio Scarvaglieri. In prep. Psychotherapy and Coaching – A Discourse-analytic Focus on Communalities and Differences.
Graf, Eva-Maria, Claudio Scarvaglieri, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy (eds). 2019. Pragmatik der Veränderung. Problem- und lösungsorientierte Kommunikation in helfenden Berufen. Studien zur Pragmatik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Kysely, Andrea, Brian Bishop, Robert T. Kane, Maryanne McDevitt, and Rosanna Rooney. 2022. “Couples Therapy Delivered through Videoconferencing: Effects on Relationship Outcomes, Mental Health and the Therapeutic Alliance.” Frontiers in Psychology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2008. “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Franziska Thurnherr (eds). 2017. Special Issue: Language and Health Online: Typing yourself Healthy. Bern: Linguistics Online 87.8/17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Jenny. 2003. “Interactive Methods for Constructing Relationships.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Phillip J. Glenn, Curtis LeBaron and Jenny Mandelbaum, 207–220. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marx, Konstanze. 2018. “Hate Speech – ein Thema für die Linguistik.” In Hamburger Schriften zum Medien-, Urheber- und Telekommunikationsrecht: v.12. Recht & Netz, ed. by M. Albers, and I. Katsivelas, 37–57. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jean. 2006. Understanding Attachment: Parenting, Child Care, and Emotional Development. Westport: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza, and Reinhold Schmitt. 2010. “Zur Multimodalität von Situationseröffnungen.” In Studien zur deutschen Sprache: Vol. 47. Situationseröffnungen: Zur multimodalen Herstellung fokussierter Interaktion, ed. by Lorenza Mondada, and Reinhold Schmitt, 7–51. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Norcross, John C., and Michael J. Lambert. 2018. “Psychotherapy Relationships that Work III.” Psychotherapy 55 (4): 303–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawelczyk, Joanna, and Eva-Maria Graf. 2011. “Living in Therapeutic Culture: Feminine Discourse as an Agent of Change.” In Living with Patriarchy – Discursive Constructions of Gendered Subjects Across Public Spheres, ed. by L. Holmgreen, and I. Lassen, 273–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds). 2019. “Understanding Change in Helping Professions.” Special Issue for Communication & Medicine 16(2), 1–195.Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi. 2008. “Conversation Analysis and Psychoanalysis: Interpretation, Affect and Intersubjectivity.” In Conversation analysis and psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charels Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 100–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi. 2019. “Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy: Identifying Transformative Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 52 (3): 257–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pick, Ina, and Claudio Scarvaglieri. 2022. “Helfen im Gespräch: Empirischer Vergleich der Hilfe in Rechtsberatung und Psychotherapie.” In Helfen: Situative und organisationale Ausprägungen einer unterbestimmten Praxis, ed. by Daniela Böhringer, Sarah Hitzler, and Martina Richter, 163-192. Bielefeld: Transcript. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and Jenny Mandelbaum. 2005. “Conversation Analytic Approaches to the Relevance and Use of Relationship Categories in Interaction.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch, and Robert E. Sanders, 149–171. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Eugenia, Antonio P. Ribeiro, Miguel M. Goncalves, Adam O. Horvath, and William B. Stiles. 2013. “How Collaboration in Therapy Becomes Therapeutic: The Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System.” Psychology and Psychotherapy 86 (3): 294–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1995. Lectures on Conversation: Volumes I & II. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarvaglieri, Claudio. 2017. “Beraten und Psychotherapie: Zur Differenzierung zweier Formate helfenden Handelns.” In Beraten in Interaktion. Eine gesprächslinguistische Typologie des Beratens, ed. by Ina Pick, 53–76. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Scarvaglieri, Claudio. 2020. “First Encounters in Psychotherapy: Relationship-Building and the Pursuit of Institutional Goals.” Frontiers in Psychology 11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2007. “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (4): 639–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas. 1992. “Ärztliche Gesprächsführung – Inhalte und Erfahrungen gesprächsanalytisch fundierter Weiterbildung.” In Kommunikationsberatung und Kommunikationstraining, ed. by Reinhard Fiehler, and Wolfgang Sucharowski, 68–78. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stommel, Wyke, and Hedwig te Molder. 2015. “Counseling Online and over the Phone: When Preclosing Questions Fail as a Closing Device.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (3): 281–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurnherr, Franziska. In press/2022. Interpersonal Pragmatics and the Therapeutic Alliance: The Collaborative Work in Email Counseling. NIHIN Studies: Freiburg.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fleischhacker, Melanie & Eva-Maria Graf
2023. New ways of investigating coaching: linguistic research on executive, business and workplace coaching – a systematic scoping review. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.