Cover not available
Part of
Multimodal Im/politeness: Signed, spoken, written
Edited by Andreas H. Jucker, Iris Hübscher and Lucien Brown
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 333] 2023
► pp. 65–98

Chapter 3
Politeness in Catalan Sign Language (LSC)

Mitigation of criticisms in spontaneous discourse in LSC

ORCID logo | Universitat Pompeu Fabra
ORCID logo | Universitat Pompeu Fabra
ORCID logo | Universitat Pompeu Fabra
This paper focuses on politeness in Catalan Sign Language (LSC), concretely on criticisms. The main goal is to analyze linguistic mitigation, specifically through the discourse strategy that consists of expressions for restricting opinions. The data comes from a TV show in LSC, which features real and spontaneous productions of Deaf adult signers. The results show the existence of three different strategies: lexical units that work as hedges of subjectivization, the use of the first-person pronoun to emphasize the personal point of view, and the use of the vertical palm sign with a mitigating function. Moreover, particular non-manual markers are also involved, namely, shrugs, head tilts or raised eyebrows, which work at the prosodic and pragmatic level for mitigation purposes.
Keywords: Catalan Sign Language (LSC), politeness, criticisms, linguistic attenuation, discourse analysis, mitigation, hedges, non-manual markers
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Politeness, face, and face-work
    • 2.2Mitigation strategies: Attenuation and opinion expression
    • 2.3Previous research on politeness in sign languages
    • 2.4Non-manual markers, doubling and vertical palm sign
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Expressions for restricting opinions with lexical units
    • 4.2Expressions for restricting opinions with pointing signs
    • 4.3Expressions for restricting opinions with vertical-palm sign
    • 4.4Summary
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 February 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.333.03moy
References (66)
References
Albelda, Marta, and Ana Mª Cestero. 2011. “De nuevo sobre los procedimientos de atenuación lingüística.” Español actual 96: 9–40.Google Scholar
Albelda, Marta, and Maria Estellés. 2021. “Mitigation Revisited: An Operative and Integrated Definition of the Pragmatic Concept, its Strategic Values, and its Linguistic Expression.” Journal of Pragmatics 183: 71–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albelda, Marta, Antonio Briz, Ana Mª Cestero, Dorota Kotwica, and Cristina Villalba. 2014. “Ficha metodológica para el análisis pragmático de la atenuación en corpus discursivos del español.” (ES. POR. ATENUACIÓN). Oralia 17: 7–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. 2006. “Face as Relational and Interactional: A Communication Framework for Research on Face, Facework, and Politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research 2 (2): 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barberà, Gemma. 2016. “Indefiniteness and Specificity Marking in Catalan Sign Language (LSC).” Sign Language & Linguistics 19 (1): 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barberà, Gemma, Josep Quer, and Santiago Frigola. 2015. “Primers passos cap a la documentació de discurs signat. El projecte pilot de constitució del corpus de la llengua de signes catalana.” Treballs de Sociolingüística Catalana 25: 287–302.Google Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca. 2003. “Face and Politeness: New (Insights) for Old (Concepts).” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1453–1469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, Robert, Joseph C. Hill, Caroline McCaskill, and Ceil Lucas. 2017. “Attitudes Towards Black American Sign Language.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 23 (2): 21–30.Google Scholar
Benitez-Quiroz, C. Fabian, Ronnie B. Wilbur, and Aleix M. Martinez. 2016. “The Not Face: A Grammaticalization of Facial Expressions of Emotion.” Cognition 150: 77–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boncea, Irina Janina. 2014. “Hedging Patterns Used as Mitigation and Politeness Strategies.” Annals of the University of Craiova. Series: Philology, English 2 (1): 7–23.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio. 2004. “Cortesía verbal codificada y cortesía verbal interpretada en la conversación.” In Pragmática sociocultural: estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español, ed. by Diana Bravo, and Antonio Briz, 67–93. Barcelona: ArielGoogle Scholar
Briz, Antonio, and Marta Albelda. 2013. “Una propuesta teórica y metodológica para el análisis de la atenuación lingüística en español y portugués: La base de un proyecto en común (ES. POR. ATENUACIÓN).” Onomázein 28: 288–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bross, Fabian, and Daniel Hole. 2017. “Scope-Taking Strategies and the Order of Clausal Categories in German Sign Language.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2 (1): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. by Esther. N. Goody, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia. 1999. “On Mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (7): 881–909. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Mitigation. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2017. “Introduction.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 1–8. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana, and Wendy Sandler. 2009. “Visual Intonation in the Prosody of a Sign Language.” Language and Speech 52 (2/3): 287–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 2021. “Markers of Epistemic Modality and their Origins: Evidence from Two Unrelated Sign Languages.” Studies in Language 45 (2): 277–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabarró-López, Sílvia. 2020. “Los marcadores del dicurso PALM-UP e IGUAL y su posición: un estudio sobre la lengua de signos catalana (LSC).” Revista de Estudios de Lenguas de Signos REVLES 2: 1–27.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Maria Sifianou. 2019. “Im/politeness and Discursive Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 145: 91–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
George, Johnny Earl. 2011. Politeness in Japanese Sign Language (JSL): Polite JSL Expression as Evidence for Intermodal Language Contact Influence. PhD Dissertation. Department of Linguistics, University of California: Berkley.
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Rituals: Essays on Face-to-Face Conversation. Nueva York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2005. “The Importance of ‘Place’ in Japanese Politeness: Implications for Cross-cultural and Intercultural Analyses.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (1): 41–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Meredith Marra, and Bernadette Vine. 2012. “Politeness and Impoliteness in Ethnic Varieties of New Zealand English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (9): 1063–1076. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoza, Jack. 2007. It’s Not What You Sign, It’s How You Sign It: Politeness in American Sign Language. Washington D.C: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Five Nonmanual Modifiers That Mitigate Requests and Rejections in American Sign Language.” Sign Language Studies 8 (3): 264–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hübscher, Iris, Cristina Sánchez-Conde, Joan Borràs-Comes, Laura Vincze, and Pilar Prieto. Under revision. “Multimodal Mitigation: How Facial and Body Cues Index Politeness in Catalan Requests.” Journal of Politeness Research.
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karabüklü, Serpil, Fabian Bross, Ronnie B. Wilbur, and Daniel Hole. 2018. “Modal Signs and Scope Relations in TID.” FEAST. Formal and Experimental Advances in Sign Language Theory 2: 82–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2004. “¿Es universal la cortesía?.” In Pragmática sociocultural: estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español, ed. by Diana Bravo, and Antonio Briz, 39–53. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim. 2013. “Doubling in RSL and NGT: A Pragmatic Account.” Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 17 (99): 118.Google Scholar
Lackner, Andrea. 2017. Functions of Head and Body Movements in Austrian Sign Language. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1975. “Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts.” In Contemporary Research in Philosophical Logic and Linguistic Semantics, ed. by Donald J. Hockney, William Leonard Harper, and Bruce Freed, 221–271. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (9): 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mapson, Rachel. 2013. “Politeness in British Sign Language: The Effects of Language Contact.” In Multilingual Theory and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, ed. by Alasdair N. Archibald, 167–170. Southampton: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Polite Appearances: How Non-manual Features Convey Politeness in British Sign Language.” Journal of Politeness Research 10 (2): 157–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1988. “Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 12 (4): 403–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Reply to Pizziconi.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1515–1521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Namsaraev, Vasili. 1997. “Hedging in Russian Academic Writing in Sociological Texts.” In Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, ed. by Raija Markkanen, and Hartmut Schroeder, 64–80. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Driscoll, Jim. 2007. “Brown & Levinson’s Face: How It Can – and Can’t – Help Us to Understand Interaction across Cultures.” Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (4): 463–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Face and (Im)politeness.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 89–118. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, Aslı. 2012. “Gesture.” In Sign Language: An International Handbook, ed. by Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, and Bencie Woll, 626–646. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland, and Josep Quer. 2010. “Nonmanuals: Their Grammatical and Prosodic Roles.” In Sign Languages, ed by Diane Brentari, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach, and Bencie Woll. 2012. “Tense, Aspect and Modality.” In Sign Language: An International Handbook, ed. by Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, and Bencie Woll, 186–203. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietrosemoli, Lourdes. 2001. “Politeness and Venezuelan Sign Language.” In Signed Languages: Discoveries from International Research, ed. by Valerie Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sara Taub, and Anne Marie Baer, 163–179. Washington D.C: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Quer, Josep, and GRIN. 2008. “Possessive and Existential Structures in Catalan Sign Language.” In Typological Studies on Possessive and Existential Constructions in Sign Languages, ed. by Ulrike Zeshan, and Pamela Perniss, 33–53. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Roush, Daniel. 2007. “Indirectness Strategies in American Sign Language Requests and Refusals: Deconstructing the Deaf-as-direct Stereotype.” In Translation, Sociolinguistic, and Consumer Issues in Interpreting, ed. by Melanie Metzge, and Earl Fleetwood, 103–56. Washington D.C: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Language Between Bodies: A Cognitive Approach to Understanding Linguistic Politeness in American Sign Language.” Sign Language Studies 11 (3): 329–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 2012. “Visual prosody.” In Sign Language: An International Handbook, ed. by Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach, and Bencie Woll, 55–67. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, and Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. “Rapport Management: A Framework for Analysis.” In Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures, ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 11–46. London: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “Managing Rapport in Talk: Using Rapport Sensitive Incidents to Explore the Motivational Concerns Underlying the Management of Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (5): 529–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “(Im)politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William. 1960. Sign Language Structure. An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf. Silver Spring, MD: Linstock Press.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2005. “Beyond the Micro-level in Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2): 237–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Toward a Universal Notion of Face for a Universal Notion of Co-operation.” In Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, ed. by Istvan Kecskes, and Laurence Horn, 307–338. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.Google Scholar
Veiga-Busto, Raquel. 2021. Person and Number in Catalan Sign Language Pronouns. PhD Dissertation. Department of Translation and Language Science, Universitat Pompeu Fabra: Barcelona.
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2000. “Phonological and Prosodic Layering of Nonmanuals in American Sign Language.” In The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honour Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, ed. by Karen Emmorey, and Harlan L. Lane, 215–244. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
2021. “Non-manual Markers: Theoretical and Experimental Perspectives.” In Routledge Handbook of Theoretical and Experimental Sign Language Research, ed. by Josep Quer, Roland Pfau, and Annika Herrmann, 530–565. London: Taylor & Francis Group. DOI logoGoogle Scholar