Part of
The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts
Edited by Esther Linares Bernabéu
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 335] 2023
► pp. 3264
References
Alvarado Ortega, María Belén
2005 “La ironía y la cortesía: una aproximación desde sus efectos.” Estudios de Lingüística de la Universidad de Alicante 19: 33–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Humor y género: análisis de conversaciones entre mujeres.” Feminismo/s 24: 17–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
1994Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2001Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “A primer for the linguistic of humor.” In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. by Victor Raskin, 101–155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Humor and mirth. Emotions, embodied cognition, and sustained humor.” In Emotion in Discourse, ed. by Lachlan J. Mackenzie, and Laura Alba Juez, 189–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin
1991 “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.” Humor 4 (3–4): 293–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, Christian F. Hempelmann, and Sara Di Maio
2002 “Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modelling incongruities and their resolutions.” Humor 15 (1): 3–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ballesteros Doncel, Esmeralda
2016 “Circulación de memes en WhatsApp: ambivalencias del humor desde la perspectiva de género.” Empiria. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales 35: 21–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Nancy D.
2009 “Responses to failed humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1825–1836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, Susan
1999The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brenes Peña, Ester
2011Actos de habla disentivos. Actos de habla disentivos Identificación y análisis. Sevilla: Alfar.Google Scholar
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas
2019Macrobarómetro de octubre de 2019. Preelectoral Elecciones Generales 2019, [URL]
Chagas, Viktor, Fernanda Freire, Daniel Rios, and Dandara Magalhães
2019 “Political Memes and the Politics of Memes: A Methodological Proposal for Content Analysis of Online Political Memes.” First Monday 24: 2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, Jan, and Villy Tsakona
2018 “Investigating the dynamics of humor: Towards a theory of interactional humor.” In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor. Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters, ed. by Jan Chovanec, and Villy Tsakona, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard
1979El gen egoísta. Barcelona: Labor.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta, and Jan Chovanec
2015Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, Noam, Limor Shifman, and Zohar Kampf
2015 “ ‘It Gets Better’: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity.” New Media and Society 18 (8): 1698–1714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallardo Paúls, Beatriz, and Salvador Enguix Oliver
2016Pseudopolítica: El discurso político en las redes sociales. Valencia: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
2001 “The pragmatics of humor support.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 14 (1): 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1988 “Paying compliments: a sex-preferential politeness strategy.” Journal of Pragmatics 12 (4): 445–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanai, Akane
2016 “Sociality and classification: Reading gender, race, and class in a humorous meme.” Social Media and Society 2: 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred
2008 “Cortesía, emociones y argumentación.” In Cortesía y conversación: de lo escrito a lo oral, ed. by Antonio Briz Gómez et al.., 25–52. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
König, Katharina
2019 “Stance taking with ‘laugh’ particles and emojis –Sequential and functional patterns of ‘laughter’ in a corpus of German WhatsApp chats.” Journal of Pragmatics 142: 156–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linares Bernabéu, Esther
2020La construcción discursiva de la identidad de género femenina en el monólogo humorístico subversivo. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante, [URL]
Mancera Rueda, Ana
2019 “Estudio exploratorio de las estrategias de encuadre discursivo en memes humorísticos publicados en Twitter durante las elecciones generales de noviembre de 2019 celebradas en España.” Dígitos 6: 197–207.Google Scholar
Mancera Rueda, Ana, and Ana Pano Alamán
(2013) El discurso político en Twitter. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
(2015) “Valores sintáctico-discursivos de las etiquetas en Twitter.” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 64: 58–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) La opinión pública en la red. Análisis pragmático de la voz de los ciudadanos. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marino, Gabriele
2015 “Semiotics of spreadability: A systematic approach to Internet memes and virality.” Punctum. International Journal of Semiotics 1 (1): 43–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milner, Ryan M.
2012The World Made Meme: Discourse and Identity in Participatory Media. Kansas: University of Kansas, [URL]Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R., and Delia Chiaro
2009Humor in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padilla García, Xose A., and Elisa Gironzetti
2012 “Humor e ironía en las viñetas cómicas periodísticas: un estudio pragmático-intercultural.” In Pragmática y Comunicación Intercultural en el mundo hispanohablante, ed. by María Elena Placencia, and Carmen García, 93–133. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pano Alamán, Ana
(2015) “Ironía verbal y actividad de imagen en el discurso de políticos y ciudadanos españoles en Twitter.” Pragmática Sociocultural 3: 59–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) “Condensación y fragmentación del discurso político en Twitter”. In Mutaciones discursivas en el siglo XXI: la política en los medios y las redes, ed. by Nel·lo Pellisser, and Joan Oleaque, 75–92. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.Google Scholar
(2020) “Complimenting behavior in Spanish political discourse on Twitter”. In Complimenting Behaviour and (Self-)Praise across Social Media, ed. by Maria Elena Placencia, and Zoreh Eslami. 145–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
2006The linguistics of laughter: A corpus-assisted study of laughter-talk. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pestarino, Julieta, and Greta Winckler
2018 “Memes políticos: apropiabilidad digital en la web 2.0.” Artefacto visual 3(4). Available at: [URL]
Piata, Anna
(2018) “On-line humorous representations of the 2015 Greek national elections”. In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor. Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters, ed. by Villy Tsakona, and Jan Chovanec, 257–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raskin, Victor
2008 “Theory of humor and practice of humor research: Editor’s notes and thoughts.” In The Primer of Humor Research, ed. by Victor Raskin, 1–16. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor
2012La lingüística del humor en español. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
(Ed.) 2016Metapragmatics of humor. Metapragmatics of humor Current research trends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2019a “En modo humorístico: habilidades metapragmáticas en discursos de humor.” In Estudios lingüísticos en homenaje a Emilio Ridruejo, ed. by Antonio Briz Gómez et al.., 1231–1242. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
2019bHumor de género: del texto a la identidad en español. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “Disrupted vs. sustained humor in colloquial conversations in peninsular Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics 178: 162–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor, and María Belén Alvarado Ortega
(eds.) 2013Irony and Humor: From pragmatics to discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shifman, Limor
2013Memes in Digital Culture. Boston: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tay, Geniesa
2015 “Binders full of LOLitics: Political humour, internet memes, and play in the 2012 US Presidential Election (and beyond).” The European Journal of Humour Research 2(4): 46–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Social Media Family
2021Estudio sobre los usuarios de Facebook, Twitter e Instagram en España, [URL]
Tsakona, Villy
2009 “Humor and image politics in parliamentary discourse: A Greek case study.” Text and Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language Discourse Communication Studies 29(2): 219–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Genres of humor.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humour, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 489–503. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1997Discourse as social interaction. Londons: SAGE.Google Scholar
Vanderveken, Dayan
1990Meaning and Speech Acts: Principles of Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, Bradley, and Bret Bowers
2015 “Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape.” New Media and Society 17 (11), 1886–1906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winckler, Greta
2019 “Internet Memes: una relación visual contemporánea.” Arte y sociedad. Revista de investigación 17: 1–11.Google Scholar
Yus Ramos, Francisco
2018 “Identity-Related Issues in Meme Communication.” Internet Pragmatics 1 (1): 113–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019a “Multimodality in memes. A cyberpragmatic approach.” In Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 105–131.Google Scholar
Yus Ramos, F.
2019b “A cognitive pragmatics of the phatic Internet.” In Emotion in discourse, ed. by J. Lachlan, and Laura Alba-Juez, 161–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yus Ramos, Francisco
2021Smartphone Communication. Interactions in the APP Ecosystem. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2011 “Ambient affiliation: a linguistic perspective on Twitter.” New Media Society 13 (5): 788–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
20 Minutos
(2019): “Rivera presenta su arma secreta para el debate: Aún huele a leche0411–2019, [URL]