Part of
The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts
Edited by Esther Linares Bernabéu
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 335] 2023
► pp. 87107
References (58)
References
Archakis, Argiris, Sofia Lampropoulou, and Villy Tsakona. 2018. “‘I’m Not Racist but I Expect Linguistic Assimilation’: The Concealing Power of Humour in an Anti-racist Campaign.” Discourse, Context and Media 23: 53–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2017. “The GTVH and Humorous Discourse.” In Humorous Discourse, ed. by Władysław Chłopicki, and Dorota Brzozowska, 93–105. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1911/1901. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Temple of Earth Publishing. [URL] (accessed 27 February 2018). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bischetti, Luca, Paolo Canal, and Valentina Bambini. 2021. “Funny but Aversive: A Large-scale Survey of the Emotional Response to Covid-19 Humour in the Italian Population during the Lockdown.” Lingua 249: 102963. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boespflug, Francois. 2011. “Laughing at God: The Pictorial History of Boundaries Not to Be Crossed.” In Humour and Religion: Challenges and Ambiguities, ed. by Hans Geybels, and Walter Van Herck, 204–217. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2012. “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (4): 501–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucaria, Chiara, and Luca Barra. 2016. “Taboo Comedy on Television: Issues and Themes.” In Taboo Comedy: Television and Controversial Humour, ed. by Chiara Bucaria, and Luca Barra, 1–18. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiaro, Delia. 2012. “Translation and Humour, Humour and Translation.” In Translation, Humour and Literature: Translation and Humour (Volume 1), ed. by Delia Chiaro, 1–29. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2018. The Language of Jokes in the Digital Age. #like #share #lol. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chovanec, Jan. 2011. “Humour in Quasi-conversations: Constructing Fun in Online Sports Journalism.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 243–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Irony as Counter Positioning.” In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter, ed. by Manuel Jobert, and Sandrine Sorlin, 165–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Early Titanic Jokes: A Disaster for the Theory of Disaster Jokes?Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 32 (2): 201–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, Jan, and Villy Tsakona. 2018. “Investigating the Dynamics of Humour: Towards a Theory of Interactional Humour.” In The Dynamics of Interactional Humour: Creating and Negotiating Humour in Everyday Encounters, ed. by Villy Tsakona, and Jan Chovanec, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crilley, Rhys, and Precious N. Chatterje-Doody. 2021. “From Russia with Lols: Humour, RT, and the Legitimation of Russian Foreign Policy.” Global Society 35 (2): 269–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh. 2014. Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Christie. 2011a. “Jokes about Disasters: A Response to Tales Told on Television Full of Hype and Fury.” In Sick Humour, ed. by Christian Hoffstadt, and Stefan Höltgen (eds.), 11–40. Bochum: Projekt Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2011b. Jokes and Targets. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dillahunty, Matt. 2019. “Atheist Debates – Notre Dame, and Jokes.” [URL] (accessed 12 March 2022).
Disney. 1996. The Hunchback of Notre Dame. Animation film.Google Scholar
Djerf-Pierre, Monika, Mia Lindgren, and Alexis Mikayla Budinski. 2019. “The Role of Journalism on YouTube: Audience Engagement with ‘Superbug’ Reporting.” Media and Communication 7 (1): 235–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2012. “Swearing Methodologically: The (Im)politeness of Expletives in Anonymous Commentaries on YouTube.” Journal of English Studies 10: 25–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “The Landscape of Impoliteness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 329–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervine, Jonathan. 2019. Humour in Contemporary France: Controversy, Consensus, and Contradictions. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan, and Michaela De Soucey. 2005. “Joking Cultures: Humour Themes as Social Regulation in Group Life.” Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 18 (1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1991/1905. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Georgalidou, Marianthi, Katerina T. Frantzi, and Giorgos Giakoumakis. 2020. “Aggression in Media-sharing Websites in the Context of Greek Political/Parliamentary Discourse in the Years of the Economic Crisis.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8 (2): 321–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2001. “The Pragmatics of Humour Support.” Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 14 (1): 55–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hempelmann, Christian F. 2003. “‘99 Nuns Giggle, 1 Nun Gasps’: The Not-all-that-Christian Natural Class of Christian Jokes.” Humour: International Journal of Humor Research 16 (1): 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hugo, Victor. 2006/1831. The Hunchback of Notre-Dame. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut. 2017. “YouTube.” In Pragmatics of Social Media, ed. by Christian Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 173–200. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, Giselinde. 2005. “‘Where Was King Kong when We Needed Him?’ Public Discourse, Digital Disaster Jokes, and the Functions of Laughter after 9/11.” The Journal of American Culture 28 (1): 70–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Good Humour, Bad Taste: A Sociology of the Joke. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Knowledge about Humour.” In Script-based Semantics: Foundations and Applications. Essays in Honour of Victor Raskin, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 93–133. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kürti, László. 1988. “The Politics of Joking: Popular Response to Chernobyl.” The Journal of American Folklore 101 (401): 324–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laineste, Liisi, Anastasiya Fiadotava, and Tõnno Jonuks. 2020. “When the Moral Mentors Lapse: A Comparative Study of Estonian and Belarusian Clergy Jokes.” Folklore 131 (3): 292–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Paul (ed.). 2008. The Muhammad Cartoons and Humour Research: A Collection of Essays. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research 21 (1): 1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Cardama, Sara, and Fatima García-López. 2021. “Ephemeral Mimetics: Memes, an X-ray of Covid-19.” European Journal of Humor Research 9 (4): 35–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morreall, John. 2009. Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humour. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mpofu, Shepherd (ed.). 2021. Digital Humour in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from the Global South. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 1993. Conversational Joking: Humour in Everyday Talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
2003. “Issues in Conversational Joking.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (9): 1333–1359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oring, Elliott. 1987. “Jokes and the Discourse on Disaster: The Challenger Shuttle Explosion and Its Joke Cycle.” Journal of American Folklore 100 (397): 276–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Moira. 2009. “Humour, Unlaughter, and Boundary Maintenance.” Journal of American Folklore 122 (484): 148–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spilioti, Tereza. 2020. “The Weirding of English, Trans-scripting, and Humour in Digital Communication.” World Englishes 39 (1): 106–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suler, John. 2004. “The Online Disinhibition Effect.” CyberPsychology and Behaviour 7 (3): 321–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy. 2003. “Combining Two Different Realities: Evidence from Greek Bin Laden Jokes.” Antares 6: 49–52.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Humour, Religion and Politics in Greek Cartoons: Symbiosis or Conflict?” In Humour and Religion: Challenges and Ambiguities, ed. by Hans Geybels, and Walter Van Herck, 248–268. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2013. "Okras and the metapragmatic stereotypes of humor: Towards an expansion of the GTVH." In Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, ed. by Marta Dynel, 25-48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Constructing Local Identities via/for Humour: A Cretan-Greek Case Study.” Styles of Communication 9 (2): 118–147.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Online Joint Fictionalisation.” In The Dynamics of Interactional Humour: Creating and Negotiating Humour in Everyday Encounters, ed. by Villy Tsakona, and Jan Chovanec, 229–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020a. Recontextualising Humour: Rethinking the Analysis and Teaching of Humour. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020b. “Tracing the Trajectories of Contemporary Online Joking.” Media Linguistics 7 (2): 169–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakona, Villy, and Jan Chovanec. to appear. “The Sociopragmatics of Humour.” In De Gruyter Handbook of Humour Studies, ed. by Thomas E. Ford, Władysław Chłopicki, and Giselinde Kuipers. De Gruyter Mouton.
Van Herck, Walter. 2011. “Humour, Religion and Vulnerability.” In Humour and Religion: Challenges and Ambiguities, ed. by Hans Geybels, and Walter Van Herck, 191–203. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Vásquez, Camilla. 2019. Language, Creativity and Humour Online. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Simon. 2010. “Liquid Racism and the Danish Prophet Muhammad Cartoons.” Current Sociology 58 (5): 675–692. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 2015. “Irony in and through Follow-ups: Talk and Meta-talk in Online Commenting in the Israeli Context.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence N. Berlin, 173–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda, and Anita Fetzer (eds.). 2015. Follow-ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Contexts and Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Georgalidou, Marianthi
2024. Humorous Genres and Modes in Greek Political Discourse. In Political Humor Worldwide [The Language of Politics, ],  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Mullan, Kerry
2024. “Resident superhero”. Internet Pragmatics 7:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.