Part of
The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts
Edited by Esther Linares Bernabéu
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 335] 2023
► pp. 200216
References (46)
References
Adetunji, Akin. 2013. The interactional context of humor in Nigerian stand-up comedyPragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 23(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2002. Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detectionEmerging communication, 3, 159–180.Google Scholar
. 2019. Humor and mirth: emotions, embodied cognition, and sustained humor. In Emotion in discourse (pp. 189–211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan, and Andi Gibson. 2011. Staging language: An introduction to the sociolinguistics of performanceJournal of Sociolinguistics, 15(5), 555–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bing, Janet, and Joanne Scheibman. 2014. Blended spaces as subversive feminist humour. In Gender and Humour: Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives, edited by Delia Chiaro and Raffaela Baccolini, 13–29, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Briz Gómez, Antonio and Grupo Val.Es.Co., (2002): Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Anejo de la revista Oralia. Madrid: Arco-LibrosGoogle Scholar
Brock, Alexander. 2015. Participation frameworks and participation in televised sitcom, candid camera and stand-up comedyParticipation in public and social media interactions, 27–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. The borders of humorous intent–The case of TV comediesJournal of Pragmatics, 95, 58–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown Jr, James J. 2017. Louis C.K.’s “weird ethic”. Kairos and Rhetoric in the Network. In Standing Up, Speaking Out: Stand-up Comedy and the Rhetoric of Social Change, edited by Meier, Matthew. R., and Casey R. Schmitt, 245–254, New York: Routledge, Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, Jan., and Tsakona, Villy. 2018. “Investigating the dynamics of humor: Towards a theory of interactional humor”. In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor. Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters, edited by Jan Chovanec and Villy Tsakona, 1–26, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 2007. Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacyJournal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 29–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dore, Margherita. 2018. Laughing at you or laughing with you? In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters, edited by Tsakona, Villy, and Jan Chovanec, 105–126, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2018. Taking cognisance of cognitive linguistic research on humourReview of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 16(1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. 2013Polysemy and conceptual blending. In Trends in linguistics studies and monographs, edited by Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna, 79–94, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gelang, Marie. 2013. Kairos, the Rhythm of Timing. In Off Beat (pp. 89–101). Brill Rodopi.Google Scholar
Fons, Kako. 2017. La creación del material de la comedia. In Micro abierto. Textos sobre stand-up comedy, edited by Alés, Dani; Navarro Romero, Rosa María, 179–186, Madrid: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma de MadridGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1979. FootingSemiotica, 25(1–2), 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Andrea. 1999. Stand-up comedy as rhetorical argument: An investigation of comic culture. Humor 12(1). 33–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Angela. 1999. Stand-up comedy as rhetorical argument: An investigation of comic cultureHumour-International Journal of Humour Research, 12(1), 33–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 1995. Gender and humour: Beyond a jokeUnpublished Master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
. 2001. The pragmatics of humor support. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 14 (1): 55–82, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karachaliou, Rania, and Archakis, Argis. 2015. Identity construction patterns via swearing:: Evidence from Greek teenage storytellingPragmatics and Society, 6(3),421–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga. 1999. Coherent keying in conversational humour: Contextualising joint fictionalisationPragmatics and beyond new series, 125–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Elise. 2011. The playful is political: The metapragmatics of internet rape-joke argumentsLanguage in Society, 40(2), 137–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linares Bernabéu, Esther. 2020La construcción discursiva de la identidad de género femenina en el monólogo humorístico subversivo (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat d’Alacant-Universidad de Alicante).Google Scholar
. 2021a. El monólogo humorístico subversivo en español: Pragmática, humor verbal y construcción discursiva del género. Madrid: Iberoamericana Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linares Bernabéu, Esther. 2021b. Cognitive strategies and figurative language in subversive stand-up comedy: the case of trumping. Studies in Psychology (Special Issue), 1–34.Google Scholar
Lockyer, Sharon., and Pickering, Michael. 2005. Introduction: The ethics and aesthetics of humour and comedy. In Beyond a Joke, edited by Sharon Lockyer, and Michael Pickering, 1–24, London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Alés García, Daniel. 2016. El monólogo cómico español como género autoficcional: apuntes para una poética. Tesis doctoral inédita leída en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Departamento de Lingüística, Lenguas Modernas, Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada.Google Scholar
Medjesky, Christopher. A. 2017. How can rape be funny? Comic persona, Irony and the Limits of rape jokes. In Standing Up, Speaking Out: Stand-up Comedy and the Rhetoric of Social Change, edited by Matthew R. Meier, and Casey R. Schmitt, 227–244, New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Meier, Matthew R., and Casey R. Schmitt, eds. 2017Standing Up, Speaking Out: Stand-up Comedy and the Rhetoric of Social Change. Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Mock, Roberta. 2012. Stand-up comedy and the legacy of the mature vagina. Women and Performance: a journal of feminist theory, 22(1), 9–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rao, Sameer. 2011. “Joke’s on you!” Stand-up comedy performance and the management of hecklers. Senior thesis, Department of Sociology, Haverford College.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Santos, José María (2019). El posicionamiento del “ethos” como estrategia retórica en la comedia de “stand-up” de ValladolidSigna: Revista de la Asociación Española de Semiótica, (28), 1295–1327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor. (2012). La lingüística del humor en español. Madrid: Arco-Libros.Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor. 2013. El monólogo humourístico como tipo de discurso. El dinamismo de los rasgos primariosCuadernos Aispi, (2), 195–218.Google Scholar
. (2019). Humor de género del texto a la identidad en español. Editorial Iberoamericana Vervuert. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rutter, Jason. 1997Stand-up as interaction: Performance and audience in comedy venues (Doctoral dissertation, University of Salford).Google Scholar
. (2001). Rhetoric in stand-up comedy: Exploring performer-audience interactionStylistyka, 10, 307–325.Google Scholar
Tsakona, Villy. 2017. Genres of humorThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Humour. New York: Routledge, pp. 489–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarpetta, Fabiola, and Anna Spagnolli (2009) The interactional context of humor in stand-up comedy. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42.3: 210-230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schnurr, Stephanie., and Chan, Angela. (2011). Exploring another side of co-leadership: Negotiating professional identities through face-work in disagreementsLanguage in Society, 40(2), 187–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Jeannine. 2009. Linguistic aspects of verbal humor in stand-up comedy. Thesis dissertation.[URL]
Val.Es.Co. 2014. Las unidades del discurso oral. La propuesta Val.Es.Co. de segmentación de la conversación (coloquial)Estudios de Lingüística del Español, 35, 13–73.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2016Humour and Relevance (Vol. 4). John Benjamins Publishing company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf, and Joanne R. Cantor. 1996. A disposition theory of humor and mirth. In Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications, edited by Antoni J. Chapman, and Hugh C. Foot, 93–115, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar