Cover not available
Part of
Risk Discourse and Responsibility
Edited by Annelie Ädel and Jan-Ola Östman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 336] 2023
► pp. 2–37

Chapter 1
From risk and responsibility to risk discourse

ORCID logo | Dalarna University
ORCID logo | University of Helsinki
ORCID logo | Stockholm University

Risk communication is widely researched in the social sciences, but in linguistics the study of how risk is communicated has not yet formed a coherent field of its own. In this chapter, we approach risk from a discourse perspective, aiming to promote the establishment of risk discourse as a field of study with its own characteristics. We approach the question “What is “risk”?” through a discourse-linguistic analysis that crucially involves the concept of responsibility. We show that there is a body of previous research in linguistics that has dealt with some aspect of risk, but typically without foregrounding risk or using risk as an analytical tool. We show how this state of affairs also applies to responsibility. We argue that an understanding of discourse about risk and risk scenarios needs to be informed by an understanding of the concept of responsibility. The theoretical point of this chapter is therefore to conceive of and establish this type of responsibility-embedded Risk Discourse. Throughout the chapter, we discuss ways in which risk and responsibility can serve as analytical tools in risk discourse studies. This is illustrated by reference not only to previous research, but also to the chapters included in the current volume.

Keywords: risk discourse, risk, responsibility, theorising risk, communicating risk
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Defining ‘risk’ and ‘responsibility’
    • 2.1What is ‘risk’?
    • 2.2What is ‘responsibility’?
    • 2.3Linking risk and responsibility
  • 3.What the study of risk as discourse entails
  • 4.Previous work on risk from the perspective of three definitional scopes
    • 4.1Narrow scope: Risk as characterizing a discourse type
    • 4.2Broad scope: Risk as topic
    • 4.3Extended scope: Discourse-framing something as risk
  • 5.On responsibility
  • 6.A matrix for risk discourse
  • 7.Risk and responsibility in the volume chapters
  • 8.Concluding words and implications
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.336.01ade
References
Abell, Jackie & Elizabeth H. Stokoe
1999 ““I Take Full Responsibility, I Take Some Responsibility, I’ll Take Half of it But No More Than That”: Princess Diana and the Negotiation of Blame in the “Panorama” Interview.” Discourse Studies 1(3). 297–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ädel, Annelie
2010 “How to Use Corpus Linguistics in the Study of Political Discourse.” In Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ed. by M. McCarthy, and A. O’Keeffe, 591–604. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ädel, Annelie, and Jan-Ola Östman
2023 “You may feel a few butterflies in your stomach the first time walking out on a frozen lake: Balancing between Positive and Negative Risk in Adventure Tourism Discourse from ‘Arctic Lapland’.” Presentation at IPrA’s 18th International Pragmatics Conference, Brussels, Belgium.
Ädel, Annelie, Catharina Nyström Höög, and Jan-Ola Östman
2022 “Risks and Responsibilities in the Workplace: Employees Discussing Evacuation Situations.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 16 (3) [2019]: 265–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adelswärd, Viveka, and Lisbeth Sacks
1998 “Risk Discourse: Recontextualization of Numerical Values in Clinical Practice.” Text 18 (2): 191–210.Google Scholar
Andrén, Mats, Johan M. Sanne, and Per Linell
2010 ”Striking the Balance between Formality and Informality in Safety-Critical Communication: Train Traffic Control Calls.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 220–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archer, Wendy & Ruth Parry
2019 “Blame attributions and mitigated confessions: The discursive construction of guilty admissions in celebrity TV confessionals.” Discourse and Communication 13(5): 591–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Paul
1999 “Medical discourse, evidentiality and the construction of professional responsibility.” In Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, ed. by Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts (eds), 75–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, Michael
1997 “Positioning between Structure and Performance.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4): 335–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, Michael, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2008 “Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis.” Text & Talk 28: 377–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich
1992 Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bieswanger, Markus
2016 “Aviation English: Two Distinct Specialised Registers?” In Variational Text Linguistics: Revisiting Register in English, ed. by Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer, and Christoph Schubert, 67–85. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bocanegra-Valle, Ana
2011 “The Language of Seafaring: Standardized Conventions and Discursive Features in Speech Communications.” European Journal of English Studies 11 (1): 35–53.Google Scholar
Boholm, Max
2018 “Risk Association: Towards a Linguistically Informed Framework for Analysing Risk in Discourse.” Journal of Risk Research 21 (4): 480–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulcaen, Chris
2016 “Reflexivity in the Institution, and how It Entangles with Research.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 141–159. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Candlin, Christopher N., Jonathan Crichton, and Arthur S. Firkins
2016 “Crucial Sites and Research Orientations: Exploring the Communication of Risk.” In Communicating Risk, ed. by Jonathan Crichton, Christopher N. Candlin, and Arthur S. Firkins, 1–16. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr
2017 The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 The Discourse of Conflict and Crisis: Poland’s Political Rhetoric in the European Perspective. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Crichton, Jonathan, Christopher N. Candlin, and Arthur S. Firkins
(eds) 2016 Communicating Risk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, Marcel
2022 Warning Signs: The Semiotics of Danger. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna
2013 “Positioning Level 3. Connecting Local Identity Displays to Macro Social Processes.” Narrative Inquiry 23 (1): 40–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, Rainer
(ed) 2003 Communication in High Risk Environments. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Shoshana
2017 “ ‘Mum, the pot broke’: Taking responsibility (or not) in language.” Discourse & Society 28(4): 374–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DuBay, William H.
2004 The Principles of Readability. Costa Mesa, CA: Impact information.Google Scholar
Dudo, A., D.-H. Choi, and D. A. Scheufele
2011 “Food Nanotechnology in the News. Coverage Patterns and Thematic Emphases during the Last Decade.” Appetite 56: 78–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunmire, Patricia
2005 “Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 16: 481–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekwall, Per Erik, Catharina Nyström Höög, and Annelie Ädel
2021 “Towards a Unified Affordance Approach: Searching for Congruent Meaning Making in COVID-19 Warning Designs.” Social Semiotics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2016 “Political Interviews and Responsibility: A Case Study of its Interactional Organization.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 163–196. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., and B. T. S. Atkins
1992 “Towards a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and Its Neighbors.” In Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization, ed. by A. Lehrer, and E. Kittay, 75–102. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Firkins, Arthur S., and Christopher N. Candlin
2016 “Projecting a Definition of Risk Situation: Travel Advice and the Prudential Traveller.” In Communicating Risk, ed. by Jonathan Crichton, Christopher N. Candlin, and Arthur S. Firkins, 323–339. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firkins, Arthur, and Christopher N. Candlin
2006 “Framing the Child at Risk.” Health, Risk & Society 8 (3): 273–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, and Trine Dahl
2014 “IPCC Communicative Practices: A Linguistic Comparison of the Summary for Policymakers 2007 and 2013.” LSP Journal 5 (2): 66–83.Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles, and Jens E. Kjeldsen
2018 “The Affordances and Constraints of Situation and Genre: Visual and Multimodal Rhetoric in Unusual Traffic Signs.” International Review of Pragmatics 10 (2): 158–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo
2012 “Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports.” Discourse & Communication 6(1): 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Angela Cora
2016 “Air Traffic Communications in Routine and Emergency Contexts: A Case Study of Flight 1549 ‘Miracle on the Hudson’.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 57–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony
1999 “Risk and Responsibility.” The Modern Law Review 62 (1): 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorter, Durk
2014 “Linguistic Landscape Studies.” In Handbook of Pragmatics 18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graber, D.
1981 “Political Discourse.” In Handbook of Political Communication, ed. by D. Nimmo, and K. Sanders, 195–224. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Grundmann, Reiner, and Ramesh Krishnamurthy
2010 “The Discourse of Climate Change: A Corpus-Based Approach.” CADAAD 4 (2): 125–146.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Craig, Svenja Adolphs, and Brigitte Nerlich
2007 “The Meanings of ‘risk’: A View from Corpus Linguistics.” Discourse & Society 18 (2): 163–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansson, Sven Ove
2018 “Risk.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta. [URL]
Harmon, Michael M.
1995 Responsibility as Paradox. A Critique of Rational Discourse on Government. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2012 “Epilogue: The First-Second Order Distinction in Face and Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 8 (1): 111–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworska, Sylvia, and Nanda, Anupam
2018 Doing Well by Talking Good? A Topic Modelling-Assisted Discourse Study of Corporate Social Responsibility. Applied Linguistics 39(3): 373–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
John, Peter, Benjamin Brooks, and Ulf Schriever
2019 “Speech Acts in Professional Maritime Discourse: A Pragmatic Risk Analysis of Bridge Team Communication Directives and Commissives in Full-Mission Simulation.” Journal of Pragmatics 140: 12–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Alison
2008 “ ‘From where we’re sat…’: Negotiating narrative transformation through interaction in police interviews with suspects.” Text & Talk 28: 327–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jolanki, Outi
2016 “Whose Business is It Anyway? Distributing Responsibilities between Family Members and Formal Carers.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 96–119. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Jore, Sissel H.
2019 ”The Conceptual and Scientific Demarcation of Security in Contrast to Safety.” European Journal of Security Research 4: 157–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jore, Sissel H., and Ove Njå
2010 “Risk of Terrorism: A Scientifically Valid Phenomenon or a Wild Guess? The Impact of Different Approaches to Risk Assessment.” CADAAD 2 (4): 197–216.Google Scholar
Juhila, Kirsi, Suvi Raitakari, and Christopher Hall
(eds) 2017 Responsibilisation at the Margins of Welfare Services. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach
2016 “Taking ‘Responsibility’: From Word to Discourse.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 19–36. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Lindgren, Ida, Richard Hirsch, and Peter Berggren
2007 “It Takes Three Points to Define a Common Ground: Breathing Apparatus Fire-fighters’ Communication during Rescue Operations.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1482–1502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Anina Kinzel, and Matteo Di Cristofaro
2019 “The Communicative Modus Operandi of Online Child Sexual Groomers: Recurring Patterns in Their Language Use.” Journal of Pragmatics 155: 15–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Luke Walker, and Anina Kinzel
2017 “The Role of Discourse Analysis in Terrorism Studies.” In Terrorists’ Use of the Internet: Assessment and Response, ed. by Maura Conway, Lee Jarvis, Orla Lehane, Stuart Macdonald, and Lella Nouri, 158–169. The Hague: iOS Press.Google Scholar
Matarese, Maureen T.
2016 “ ‘Getting Placed’ in Time: Responsibility Talk in Caseworker-Client Interaction.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 120–140. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Minnema, Gosse, Sara Gemelli, Chiara Zanchi, Viviana Patti, Tommaso Caselli & Malvina Nissim
2021 “Frame Semantics for Social NLP in Italian: Analyzing responsibility framing in femicide news reports.” In Proceedings of the Eighth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics, ed. by Elisabetta Fersini, Marco Passarotti and Viviana Patti. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org).Google Scholar
Murray, Jeffrey W.
2000 “Bakhtinian Answerability and Levinasian Responsibility: Forging a Fuller Dialogical Communicative Ethics.” Southern Communication Journal 65 (2–3): 133–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, Matthew C.
2009 “Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 51 (2): 12–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED: Oxford English Dictionary
Oxford University Press.
Olofsson, Anna, and Jens O. Zinn
(eds.) 2019 Researching Risk and Uncertainty, Critical Studies in Risk and Uncertainty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola
Forthcoming. “Responsibility in Construction Discourse.” In Structures in Discourse: Interaction, Adaptability, and Pragmatic Functions ed. by Martin Gill, Aino Malmivirta, and Brita Wårvik Amsterdam John Benjamins
Östman, Jan-Ola, and Anna Solin
(eds) 2016 Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings. Studies in Communication in Organisations and Professions 3. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl
1945 The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. 1 & 2. Routledge.Google Scholar
1987 “Toleration and Intellectual Responsibility.” In On Toleration, ed. by Susan Mendus, and David Edwards, 17–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant
2016 “Owning Responsible Actions/Selves: Role-Relational Trajectories in Counselling for Childhood Genetic Testing.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 37–63. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Christopher Candlin
2003 “Categorization and Explanation of Risk: A Discourse Analytic Perspective.” Health, Risk and Society 5 (2): 115–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Christopher, Iina Hellsten, and Brigitte Nerlich
2016 “Framing Risk and Uncertainty in Social Science Articles on Climate Change, 1995–2012.” In Communicating Risk, ed. by Jonathan Crichton, Christopher N. Candlin, and Arthur S. Firkins, 208–228. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solin, Anna
2016 “Construing Professional Norms in Journalism: Responsibility and Risk Reporting.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 285–303. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Solin, Anna, and Jan-Ola Östman
2016 “The Notion of Responsibility in Discourse Studies.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 1–18. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Stenvall, Maija
2016 “Responsibility and the Conventions of Attribution in News Agency Discourse.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 239–258. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Tang, Chris, and Gabriella Rundblad
2017 “When Safe Means ‘Dangerous’: A Corpus Investigation of Risk Communication in the Media.” Applied Linguistics 38 (5): 666–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomassen, Gøril, Srikant Sarangi, and John-Arne Skolbekken
2016 “Negotiating Parental/Familial Responsibility in Genetic Counselling.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 67–95. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
2012 Ideology in Language Use. Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
WHO – World Health Organization
[URL]
Zinn, Jens
(ed) 2010 Risk as Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. SI of CADAAD (Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines) 4 (2).Google Scholar
Zinn, Jens, and Anna Olofsson
2019 “Introduction.” In Researching Risk and Uncertainty: Methodologies, Methods and Research Strategies, ed. by Jens Zinn, and Anna Olofsson, 1–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar