Cover not available
Part of
Risk Discourse and Responsibility
Edited by Annelie Ädel and Jan-Ola Östman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 336] 2023
► pp. 214–231

Chapter 9
Risk discourse in the linguistic landscape

Safety information signage onboard metro carriages in Stockholm and Helsinki

ORCID logo | Södertörn University

Signs in the linguistic landscape (LL) can be used to both inform the public and to regulate their actions – functions that are highly relevant when communicating about risk. This chapter discusses the characteristics of the risk discourse carried by the linguistic landscape, more specifically the safety information signage found onboard metro carriages in Stockholm and Helsinki. The analysis deals with both how such information is presented on the multimodal signs and what kinds of risks and responsibilities are depicted as part of this information. The results show that emplacement and the visual design, more specifically the application of colours, are noteworthy characteristics of risk discourse present in the LL. Few actual risks are spelled out in the signage and even if the readers can be given responsibility to act in the face of risks, this information can be worded in different ways. Considering interpersonal speech functions, both direct commands and more ambivalent, passive statements can be found, with some differences in practices between the two cities. Overall, the situated nature of the safety information signage points to the role of place semiotics in meaning making within risk discourse, thus highlighting the value of considering the LL in order to gain a better understanding of risk communication.

Keywords: linguistic landscape, safety information, public transportation, public signs, multimodality, emplacement, risk discourse, responsibility
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Linguistic landscape studies
    • 2.2Communicating risk in the linguistic landscape
  • 3.The case study
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Results: Characteristics of the signs
      • 4.1.1Emplacement
      • 4.1.2Colours
    • 4.2Results: Contents of the signs
  • 5.Closing remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.336.09syr
References
Amos, H. William, and Barbara Soukup
2020 “Quantitative 2.0: Toward Variationist Linguistic Landscape Study (VaLLS) and a Standard Canon of LL Variables.” In Reterritorializing Linguistic Landscapes. Questioning Boundaries and Opening Spaces, ed. by David Malinowski, and Stefania Tufi, 56–76. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barni, Monica, and Carla Bagna
2015 “The Critical Turn in LL: New Methodologies and New Items in LL.” Linguistic Landscape 1 (1/2): 6–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackwood, Robert
2015 “LL Explorations and Methodological Challenges: Analysing France’s Regional Languages.” Linguistic Landscape 1 (1/2): 38–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candlin, Christopher N., Jonathan Crichton, and Arthur S. Firkins
2016 “Crucial Sites and Research Orientations: Exploring the Communication of Risk.” In Communicating Risk, ed. by Jonathan Crichton, Christopher N. Candlin, and Arthur S. Firkins, 1–14. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehrhardt, Claus
2021 “ ‘Pinkeln verboten’. Anmerkungen über Verbote in öffentlichen Räumen [‘No peeing’. Notes on prohibitions in public spaces].” In Linguistic Landscapes im deutschsprachigen Kontexten. Forschungsperspektiven, Methoden und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Forum Angewandte Linguistik 65, ed. by Evelyn Ziegler, and Heiko F. Marten, 87–110. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ekwall, Per Erik, Annelie Ädel, and Catharina Nyström Höög
2021 “Towards a Unified Affordance Approach: Searching for Congruent Meaning Making in COVID-19 Warning Designs.” Social Semiotics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1983 “The Interaction Ritual.” American Sociological Review 48 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorter, Durk
2014 “Linguistic Landscape Studies.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Online 2014 instalment, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
2014 Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Fourth Edition. Revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Crispin Thurlow
2010 “Introducing Semiotic Landscapes.” In Semiotic Landscapes. Language, Image, Space, ed. by Adam Jaworski, and Crispin Thurlow, 1–40. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Karlander, David
2019 “Mobile Semiosis and Mutable Metro Spaces: Train Graffiti in Stockholm’s Public Transport System.” In Making Sense of People and Place in Linguistic Landscapes, ed. by Amiena Peck, Christopher Stroud, and Quentin Williams, 71–87. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
2021 Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. [Third Edition.] London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Landry, Rodrigue, and Richard Y. Bourhis
1997 “Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality: An Empirical Study.” The Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16 (1): 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledin, Per, and David Machin
2020 Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. Second Edition. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lou, Jackie Jia, David Malinowski, and Amiena Peck
2022 “The Linguistic Landscape of Covid-19.” Linguistic Landscape 8 (2/3): 123–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Steve
2021 “Navigating COVID-19 Linguistic Landscapes in Vancouver’s North Shore: Official Signs, Grassroots Literacy Artefacts, Monolingualism, and Discursive Convergence.” International Journal of Multilingualism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordman, Lieselott, and Väinö Syrjälä
forthcoming). “Rules and Recommendations on Unofficial Signs – the Covid-19 Signscapes of Helsinki and Stockholm.” In Sociolinguistic Variation in Urban Linguistic Landscapes ed. by Carla Bagna, Martina Bellinzona, Sofie Henricsson, and Väinö Syrjälä Helsinki Finnish Literature Society
Puzey, Guy
2016 “Linguistic Landscapes.” In The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming, ed. by Carole Hough, 395–411. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reh, Mechthild
2004 “Multilingual Writing: A Reader-Oriented Typology – with Examples from Lira Municipality (Uganda).” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 170: 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Suzie Wong Scollon
2003 Discourses in Place. Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Syrjälä, Väinö
2015 “Svenskan i Helsingfors metro. En studie av ett lingvistiskt landskap [Swedish in the Helsinki metro. A study of a linguistic landscape].” In Svenskan i Finland 15, ed. by Mona Forsskåhl, Marja Kivilehto, Johanna Koivisto, and Pasi Metsä, 350–365. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
2022 “Linguistic Landscapes in the Stockholm Archipelago – Producing and Reflecting a Sense of Place.” Languages 7 (1):37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Mei Shan, and Selim Ben Said
2015 “Linguistic Landscape and Exclusion: An Examination of Language Representation in Disaster Signage in Japan.” In Conflict, Exclusion and Dissent in the Linguistic Landscape, ed. by Rani Rubdy, and Selim Ben Said, 145–169. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
2008 Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Mensel, Luk, Mieke Vandenbroucke, and Robert Blackwood
2016 “Linguistic Landscapes.” In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Society, ed. by Ofelia García, Nelson Flores, and Massimiliano Spotti, 423–449. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vickers, Caroline H., Christopher Lindfelt, and Marsha Greer
2014 “The Co-Influence of the Natural, Built, and Linguistic Landscape: Indexing Security.” Language Policy 14: 25–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Evelyn, and Heiko F. Marten
2021 “Linguistic Landscapes in deutschsprachigen Kontexten [Linguistic Landscapes in German language contexts].” In Linguistic Landscapes im deutschsprachigen Kontexten. Forschungsperspektiven, Methoden und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Forum Angewandte Linguistik 65, ed. by Evelyn Ziegler, and Heiko F. Marten, 13–35. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar