Cover not available
Part of
Risk Discourse and Responsibility
Edited by Annelie Ädel and Jan-Ola Östman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 336] 2023
► pp. 232–243

Chapter 10
On security and safety

Governing terrorism and security through risk

ORCID logo | University of Stavanger
Although the concepts of safety and security are often treated as synonymous, they are increasingly used to distinguish between separate fields of handling risks: terrorism and other intentional crimes is associated to security, while safety implies protection from unintentional acts. This chapter investigates how safety and security, which used to be considered two different phenomena with different origins and meanings, have now become intertwined through the concept of risk, not only affecting counterterrorism responsibility but also legitimizing counterterrorism measures that would not have been accepted previously. Thorough the concept of risk, terrorism has become not just a threat but a manageable phenomenon that can be identified, predicted, and handled. By intertwining the discourses of safety and security, terrorism becomes linked to the responsibility of organizations and to the management of risk.
Keywords: security, safety, terrorism, risk, risk management, counterterrorism
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The origins of safety
  • 3.The origins of security
  • 4.The implications of 9/11 on security
  • 5.Security becomes an antonym of safety
  • 6.Safety and security as a dichotomy
  • 7.Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 24 July 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.336.10jor
References (42)
References
Amoore, Louise, and Marieke De Goede. 2008. “Introduction: Governing by Risk in the War on Terror.” In Risk and the War on Terror, ed. by Louise Amoore, and Marieke de Goede, 21–36. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, David A. 1997. “The Concept of Security.” Review of International Studies 23 (1): 5–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1996. “World Risk Society as Cosmopolitan Society? Ecological Questions in a Framework of Manufactured Uncertainties.” Theory, Culture & Society 13 (4): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. World at Risk. Polity.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, Scott Lash, and Brian Wynne. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, and Brian Wynne. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Vol. 17. Sage.Google Scholar
Berling, Trine Villumsen, Ulrik Pram Gad, Karen Lund Petersen, and Ole Wæver. 2022. Translations of Security: A Framework for the Study of Unwanted Futures. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Peter L. 1996. Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bieder, Corinne, and Kenneth Pettersen Gould. 2020. The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice. Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjørgo, Tore, and Anders Ravik Jupskås. 2021. “The Long-Term Impacts of Attacks: The Case of the July 22, 2011 Attacks in Norway.” Perspectives on Terrorism 15 (3): 2–13.Google Scholar
Boholm, Max. 2016. Risk, Language and Discourse. Doctoral dissertation. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.Google Scholar
. 2017. “The Semantic Field of Risk.” Safety Science 92: 205–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boustras, Georgios, and Alan Waring. 2020. “Towards a Reconceptualization of Safety and Security, their Interactions, and Policy Requirements in a 21st Century Context.” Safety Science 132: 104942. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap De Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Crelinsten, Ronald. 2018. “Conceptualising Counterterrorism.” Routledge Handbook of Terrorism and Counterterrorism, ed. by Andrew Silke, 363–374. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Martha. 2010. Terrorism in Context. Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Glesner, Colin. 2022. Safety and Security in and through Practice: Tensions at the Interface. PhD dissertation, ULiège.Google Scholar
Jackson, Richard. 2012. “The Study of Terrorism 10 Years after 9/11: Successes, Issues, Challenges.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 8 (32): 1–16.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Lee, and Jack Holland. 2014. Security: A Critical Introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Jore, Sissel Haugdal. 2012. Counterterrorism as Risk Management Strategies. Doctoral dissertation. University of Stavanger, Norway.Google Scholar
Jore, Sissel H. 2019a. “The Conceptual and Scientific Demarcation of Security in Contrast to Safety.” European Journal for Security Research 4 (1): 157–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019b. “Standardization of Terrorism Risk Analysis: A Means or an Obstacle to Achieving Security?” In Standardization and Risk Governance, ed. by Odd Einar Olsen, Kirsten Juhl, Preben H. Lindøe, and Ole Andreas Engen, 150–165. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020. “Is Resilience a Good Concept in Terrorism Research? A Conceptual Adequacy Analysis of Terrorism Resilience.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 46 (1): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jore, Sissel H., and Anne Egeli. 2015. “Risk Management Methodology for Protecting Against Malicious Acts: Are Probabilities Adequate Means for Describing Terrorism and Other Security Risks.” In Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems, ed. by Luca Podofillini, Bruno Sudret, Bozidar Stojadinovic, Enrico Zio, and Wolfgang Kröger, 807–815. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leveson, Nancy G. 2016. Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lindahl, Sondre, and Richard Jackson. 2022. “Responding to Terrorism Nonviolently.” In Contemporary Terrorism Studies, ed. by Diego Muro, and Tim Wilson, 413. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1991. Soziologie des Risikos. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 1996. Modern Society Shocked by its Risks. Social Sciences Research Centre.Google Scholar
Lupton, Deborah. 1999. Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muro, Diego, and Wilson, Tim. 2022. Contemporary Terrorism Studies. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mythen, Gabe, and Sandra Walklate. 2008. “Terrorism, Risk and International Security: The Perils of Asking ‘What if?’.” Security Dialogue 39 (2–3): 221–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Odd Einar, Bjørn Ivar Kruke, and Jan Hovden. 2007. “Societal Safety: Concept, Borders and Dilemmas.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 15 (2): 69–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Dan. 1978. Techniques of Safety Management. McGraw-Hill Companies.Google Scholar
Phillips, Brian J. 2021. “How did 9/11 Affect Terrorism Research? Examining Articles and Authors, 1970–2019.” Terrorism and Political Violence 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piètre-Cambacédès, Ludovic, and Claude Chaudet. 2010. “The SEMA Referential Framework: Avoiding Ambiguities in the Terms ‘Security’ and ‘Safety’.” International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection 3 (2): 55–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Power, Michael. 2004. “The Risk Management of Everything.” The Journal of Risk Finance 5 (3): 58–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ranstorp, Magnus. 2009. “Mapping Terrorism Studies after 9/11: An Academic Field of Old Problems and New Prospects.” In Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, ed. by Richard Jackson, Marie Smyth, and Jeroe Gunning, 27–47. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Renard, Thomas. 2021. The Evolution of Counter-Terrorism Since 9/11: Understanding the Paradigm Shift in Liberal Democracies. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reniers, Genserik L. L., and Amaryllis Audenaert. 2014. “Preparing for Major Terrorist Attacks Against Chemical Clusters: Intelligently Planning Protection Measures wrt Domino Effects.” Process Safety and Environmental Protection 92 (6): 583–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Emma. 1995. “What is Security?” Daedalus 124 (3): 53–98.Google Scholar
Spieker, Jörg. 2011. “Foucault and Hobbes on Politics, Security, and War.” Alternatives 36 (3): 187–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Virta, Sirpa. 2019. “Pre-crime and Standardization of Security Risks.” In Standardization and Risk Governance, ed. by Odd Einar Olsen, Kirsten Juhl, Preben H. Lindøe, and Ole Andreas Engen, 137–149. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Hansen, Susanne Therese & Stian Antonsen
2024. Taking connectedness seriously. A research agenda for holistic safety and security risk governance. Safety Science 173 ► pp. 106436 ff. DOI logo
Haugdal Jore, Sissel & Stian Lid
2024. Securing Cities in the Global War on Terrorism: The Case of Oslo. In Global War on Terrorism - Revisited, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.