Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatics and Translation
Edited by Miriam A. Locher, Daria Dayter and Thomas C. Messerli
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 337] 2023
► pp. 148–172

Chapter 7
“Don’t talk out loud, you lower the IQ of the whole street”

Impoliteness strategies in Sherlock across AVT modes and languages

| Università di Pisa
| Università di Roma Tre

This contribution examines impoliteness strategies and their translation for dubbing and subtitling in the TV series Sherlock. The theoretical framework is provided on the one hand by impoliteness theory (Culpeper 1996, 2005, 2011; Culpeper, Bousfield & Wichmann 2003; Leech 2014; Locher 2015), on the other by studies in stylistics that highlight the entertaining role impoliteness may play in the construction of characters (Bednarek 2012; Dynel 2016). In this series, impoliteness is the result of the exploitation of various meaning-making resources, all of which contribute to the overall outcome. The analysis shows that in dubbing and subtitling, a challenging case of cultural mediation (Guillot 2016), it may be reconstructed differently, with inevitable repercussions on the viewing experience of the target audience.

Keywords: impoliteness, telecinematic language, TV series, Sherlock, dubbing, subtitling
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Impoliteness
  • 3.Corpus, data and methodology
  • 4.A quantitative analysis of Sherlock’s speech: Towards a characterization
  • 5.A qualitative analysis: A sample of Sherlock’s impoliteness strategies
  • 6.A qualitative analysis: Translating impoliteness, or different Sherlocks in different AVT modes
    • 6.1Sherlock’s critical reception
    • 6.2Sherlock in the Italian dub and subtitles
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Filmography
Published online: 19 September 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.337.07bru
References
Adams, Guy
2012 Sherlock: The Casebook. London: BBC Books.Google Scholar
Balirano, Giuseppe, and Bronwen Hughes
2020 Homing in on Hate: Critical Discourse Studies of Hate Speech, Discrimination and Inequality in the Digital Age. Napoli: Loffredo.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla
2020 “Insulti e pragmatica: complessità, contesto, intensità.” In Pragmatica e semantica dell’insulto nell’italiano contemporaneo, Special issue, Quaderns d’Italià 25: 288–301, [URL]
Bednarek, Monika
2012 “Constructing ‘Nerdiness’: Characterisation in The Big Bang Theory.” Multilingua 31 (2–3): 199–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 The Language of Fictional Television. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2011 “Expressivity and Televisual Characterization.” Language and Literature 20 (1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beers Fägersten, Kristy, and Karyn Stapleton
(eds) 2017 Advances in Swearing Research: New Languages and New Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianco, Robert
2012 “Elementary, my dear Watson.” USA Today 4 May.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1992 “The Metapragmatics of Politeness in Israeli Society.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, ed. by Richard Watts, Sachico Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 255–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bohonos, Jeremy W.
2021 “Workplace Hate Speech and Rendering Black and Native Lives as if They Do not Matter: A Nightmarish Autoethnography.” Organization, June 2021 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruti, Silvia
2021 “The Politeness/Rudeness Gradient in Translation: Examples from TV Series”, In Tradurre l’oralità. Aspetti pragmatici e culturali, mediAzioni 31, ed. by Giuliana Elena Garzone, and Elena Liverani, A80–A104, [URL]
Bubel, Claudia
2004 “ ‘Men Don’t Want a Woman Who’s Too Self-sufficient’: The Linguistic (Re)construction of Female Identities in Sex and the City.” In Blickpunkt Frauen- und Geschlechterstudien, ed. by Bärbel Miemitz, 47–60. St. Ingbert: Röhrig.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1545–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 35–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2012 “Swearing Methodologically: The Impoliteness of Expletives in Anonymous Commentaries on YouTube.” Journal of English Studies 10: 25–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Conceptualizing Conversational Humour as (Im)politeness: The Case of Film Talk.” Journal of Politeness Research 12 (1): 117–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “(Im)politeness and Telecinematic Discourse”. In Pragmatics of Fiction, ed. by Miriam A. Locher, and Andreas H. Jucker, 455–487. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guillot, Marie-Noëlle
2016 “Cross-cultural Pragmatics and Audiovisual Translation.” In Audiovisual Translation: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges, Special issue, Target 28 (2), ed. by Sara Ramos Pinto, and Yves Gambier, 288–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Pamela R., and Julie Indvik
2001 “Slings and Arrows of Rudeness: Incivility in the Workplace.” Journal of Management Development 20 (8): 705–714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Stephen
2017 “Authentic in Authenticity: The Evolution of Sherlock Holmes on Screen.” Journal of Popular Film and Television 45 (2): 79–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kozloff, Sarah
2000 Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther
2010 Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1973 “The Logic of Politeness; Or, Minding Your P’s and Q’s.” In Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, April 13–15, ed. by Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark, and Ann Weiser, 292–305. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1989 “The Limits of Politeness.” Multilingua 8 (2–3): 101–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness, New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Letizia, Anthony
2012 Sherlock: A Holmesian Masterpiece. [URL]
Li, Lan
2016 “Impoliteness and Non-politeness in Workplace Emails Written by Chinese Users of English.” Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication 3: 64–77.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A.
2004 Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Interpersonal Pragmatics and its Link to (Im)politeness Research.” Journal of Pragmatics 86 (8): 5–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
2009 Television Discourse: Analysing Language in the Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowry, Brian
2012 “Sherlock.” Variety, May 4. [URL]
McClain, Kahtryn, and Grace Cripps
2016 “The BBC’s Sherlock: A ‘Sociopathic’ Master of the Social Game.” In Who is Sherlock? Essays on Identity in Modern Holmes Adaptations, ed. by Lynette Porter, 95–110. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Dan, and Archer, Dawn
2010 “A Corpus-based Approach to Mind Style.” Journal of Literary Semantics 39 (2): 167–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara
2005 “Gender and Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 1: 263–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nisticò, Simona
This volume. “Translating Conflict in Written Fiction.” In Pragmatics and Translation ed. by Miriam A. Locher, Daria Dayter, and Thomas C. Messerli 98 120 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Pearson, Christine M., Lynne M. Andersson, and Christine L. Porath
2005 “Workplace Incivility.” In Counterproductive Work Behavior: Investigations of Actors and Targets, ed. by Sue Fox, and Paul E. Spector, 177–200. American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pillière, Linda
2013 “Dr. House and the Language of Offence.” In Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Manuel Jobert, and Denis Jamet, 60–74. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Pistolesi, Elena
2002 “Flame e coinvolgimento in IRC (Internet Relay Chat).” In Passioni, emozioni, affetti, ed. by Carla Bazzanella, and Pietro Kobau, 261–277. Milano: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
2007 “Identità e stereotipi nel discorso conflittuale.” In Vicini/lontani: Identità e alterità nella/della lingua, ed. by Elena Pistolesi, and Sabine Schwarze, 115–130. Frankfurt and Wien: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Porter, Lynnette
2013 Benedict Cumberbatch, in Transition: An Unauthorised Performance Biography. London: Andrews UK Limited.Google Scholar
Rayson, Paul, Dawn Archer, Scott Piao, and Tony McEnery
2004 “The UCREL Semantic Analysis System.” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Beyond Named Entity Recognition Semantic Labelling for NLP Tasks, in association with the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), 7–12. Lisbon, Portugal.
Rayson, Paul
2003 Wmatrix: A Statistical Method and Software Tool for Linguistic Analysis through Corpus Comparison. Lancaster University, Ph.D. Thesis., University of Lancaster.
Richardson, Kay
2010 Television Dramatic Dialogue: A Sociolinguistic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Christopher
2018 “Verbal Humor in Crime Drama Television: A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach to Popular TV Series.” In The Language of Pop Culture, ed. by Valentin Werner, 162–184. New York and London, Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott-Zechlin, Ariana
2012 ‘‘‘But it’s the solar system!’ Reconciling Science and Faith through Astronomy.” In Sherlock and Transmedia Fandom: Essays on the BBC Series, ed. by Luisa Ellen Stein, and Kristina Busse, 56–69. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
Stein, Luisa Ellen, and Kristina Busse
2012 “Introduction: The Literary, Televisual and Digital Adventures of the Beloved Detective.” In Sherlock and Transmedia Fandom: Essays on the BBC Series, ed. by Luisa Ellen Stein, and Kristina Busse, 9–24. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
“
Vacant” 2023 Oxford English Dictionary. [URL]
Veirano Pinto, Marcia
2018 “Variation in Movies and Television Programs. The Impact of Corpus Sampling.” In The Language of Pop Culture, ed. by Valentin Werner, 139–161. New York and London, Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard
1992 “Linguistic Politeness and Politic Verbal Behaviour: Reconsidering Claims for Universality.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, ed. by Richard Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 43–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziccardi, Giovanni
2016 L’odio online: Violenza verbale e ossessioni in rete. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.Google Scholar

Filmography

Gatiss, Mark, and Steven Moffat
2010–2017 Sherlock. UK, BBC.Google Scholar
Lorre, Chuck, and Bill Prady
2007–2019 The Big Bang Theory. USA, CBS.Google Scholar
Shore, David
2004–2012 House, M.D. USA, Fox.Google Scholar