Cover not available
Part of
Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and counter-manipulation in times of crisis
Edited by Cornelia Ilie
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 339] 2024
► pp. 119–156

Chapter 4
Maintaining political authority and credibility during the Covid-19 crisis

The case of Czech government press conferences

| Friedrich Schiller Universität Jena

This article explores how communicative influence is instantiated through the analysis of situational settings, pragmatic means, and discursive strategies at the press conferences held by the Czech government during the Covid-19 pandemic crisis to maintain political authority and credibility. The analysis is informed by the rhetorical approach used in crisis communication studies and follows the tenets of corpus-assisted discourse studies (Taylor and Marchi 2018). It combines quantitative insights with qualitative close reading. The results point to the fact that the building and maintenance of authority and credibility is achieved by a positive depiction of one’s crisis management performance and by intensive blame management. In addition, there is a tendency towards strategic overcommunication which can hinder the understanding and critical scrutiny on the part of the audience.

Keywords: discursive strategies, blame management, pandemic management, press conferences, Covid-19, government communication
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Covid-19 crisis communication
    • 2.2Government pandemic communication
    • 2.3Government pandemic press conferences
    • 2.4Pandemic communicative influence
    • 2.5Discursive macro strategies
      • 2.5.1Legitimization/delegitimization
      • 2.5.2Blame avoidance and positive self-presentation
  • 3.Material and relevant contextual background
  • 4.Method
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Situational level
    • 5.2Pragmatic level: Pragmatic markers – Boosters and downtowners
    • 5.3Boosters: A close look
    • 5.4Downtoners: An illustrative look
    • 5.5Discursive strategies
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
  • Software
  • Corpora
  • Appendix
Published online: 17 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.339.04ber
References
Ackoff, Russel L.
1967 “Management misinformation systems.” Management Science 14: 147–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bawden, David, and Lyn Robinson
2020 “Information Overload: An Overview”. In Oxford Encyclopedia of Political Decision Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benoit, William L.
1997 “Image Repair. Discourse and Crisis Communication.” Public Relations Review 23 (2): 177–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berrocal, Martina, and Aleksandra Salamurović
2023 “Political Speeches as a tool of Covid19 crisis management? Discursive and linguistic localization of the crisis in Central Europe and Western Balkans.” In Remedies against the pandemic: How politicians communicate their crisis management, edited by Daniel Weiss and Nadine Thielemann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhakti, Aditi
2006 “Critical discourse analysis of political press conferences.” Discourse&Society 17 (2): 173–203.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad
2009 Real Grammar: A Corpus-Based Approach to English. London: Longmann.Google Scholar
Bieber, Florian
2019 The rise of authoritarianism in the Western Balkans. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael, and Cristina Marinho
2014 “Manipulation information and manipulating people” Critical Discourse Studies 11 (2): 158–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boin, Arjen, Paul Hart, Eric Stern, and Bengt Sundeliu
2016 “Managing Crises: Five Strategic Leadership Tasks”. In The Politics of Crisis Management. Public leadership under Pressure, edited by Arjen Boin, Paul Hart, Eric Stern, and Bengt Sundelius, 3–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briant, Emma
2015 Propaganda and counter-terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr
2008 “Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1): 17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2021 Metaphors of Coronavirus. Invisible Enenmy or Zombie Apocalypse. Cham: Springer Nature. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Čermáková, Anna, Jílková, Lucie, Komrsková, Zuzana, Kopřivová, Marie, and Poukarová, Petra
2019 “Discourse markers”. In Syntax mluvené češtiny [The syntax of spoken Czech], edited by Jana Hoffmannová, Jiří Homoláč, and Kamila Mrázková, 244–349. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coombs, W. Timothy
2009 “Conceptualising crisis communication.” In Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication, edited by Robert L. Heath and H. Dan O’Hair, 99–118. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Coombs, W. Timothy, and Sherry J. Holladay
eds. 2010 The Handbook of Crisis Communication. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coombs, W. Timothy, Sherry J. Holladay, and An-Sofie Claeys
2016 “Debunking the myth of denial’s effectiveness in crisis communication: context matters.” Journal of Communication 20 (4): 381–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Louise
2020 “Good and Bad Reasoning about Covid-19.” Informal Logic 40(4): 521–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cvrček, Václav, Zuzana Komrsková, David Lukeš, Petra Poukarová, Anna Řehořková, and Adrian Jan Zasina
2018 “From extra-to intratextual characteristics: Charting the space of variation in Czech through MDA.” Journal of Corpus Linguistics and Ling. Theory (online).Google Scholar
Cvrček, Václav, Zuzana Laubeová, David Lukeš, Petra Poukarová, Anna Řehořková, and Adrian Jan Zasina
2020 Registry v češtině. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Demata, Massimiliano
2024 “The legitimation of conspiracy theories through manipulation: The case of climate lockdowns.” In Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and counter-manipulation in times of crisis, edited by Cornelia Ilie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deschrijver, Cedric
2024 “News media’s epistemological framings of the Covid-19 ‘lab leak’ hypothesis: A contrastive metapragmatic analysis of ‘conspiracy theory’.” In Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and counter-manipulation in times of crisis, edited by Cornelia Ilie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Karen. M.
2021 “Covid-19 conspiracy theories.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 24(2): 270–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekström, Mats, and Göran Eriksson
2018 “Press conferences.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, edited by Ruth Wodak and Bernhard Forchtner, 342–354. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard, and Özgür Özvatan
2022 “De/legitimising EUrope througth the performaces of crises. The far-right Alternative for Germany on “climate hysteria” and “corona hysteria”.” Jounal of Language and Politics online: 1–25.Google Scholar
Fraser Bruce
1996 “Pragmatic markers”. Pragmatics 6(2): 167–190.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2007 “Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society 18(1): 53–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grepl, Miroslav & Nekula, Marek
2017 “Epistémické částice.” In CzechEncy – Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny, edited by Petr Karlík, Marek Nekula, Jana Pleskalová, [URL]
Hansson, Sten
2015a “Calculated overcommunication: Strategic uses of prolixity, irrelevance, an repetition in administrative language.” Language of Pragmatics 84: 172–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b “Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis.” Discourse & Society 26 (3): 297–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018a “The discursive micro-politics of blame avoidance: unpacking the language of government blame games.” Policy Sciences 51 (4):545–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018b “Government communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Bernhard Forchtner, 342–354. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Härtl, Holden
2018 “Name-informing and distancing sogenannt ‘so-called’: Name mentioning and the lexicon-pragmatics interface.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 37 (2): 139–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haslam, Alexander S.
2020 “Leadership.” In Together Apart: The Psychology of Covid-19, edited by Jolanda D. Jetten, Stephan Reicher, Alexander Haslam and Tegan Cruwys, 25–30. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Heath, Robert L., and H. Dan O’Hair
eds. 2009 Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Hohaus, Pascal
(Ed.) (2022) Science Communication in Times of Crisis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher
2011 The Blame Game. Spin Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Michael L.
2015 “The power of story telling in public relations: Introducing the 20 master plots.” Public Relations Review 41 (1): 480–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Do Kyun David, and Gary L. Kreps
2020 “An Analysis of Government Communication in the United States During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Recommentaiton for Effective Government Health Risk Communiction.” World Medical and Health Policy 12 (4): 398–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kjeldsen, Jens E., Ragnhild Mølster, and Ihlen Øyvind
2022 “Expert Uncertainty: Arguments Bolstering the Ethos of Expertise in Situation of Uncertainty.” In The Pandemic of Argumentation, edited by Steve Oswald, Marcin Lewiński, Sara Greco, and Serena Villata, 61–78. Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Mordercai, Grant Neeley, and Kendra Stewart
eds. 2022 The Practice of Government Public Relations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Macagno, Fabrizio and Ana Carolina Trevisan
2024 “Strategic communication in the Covid-19 pandemic: Uses of arguments and manipulative tactics in institutional social media communication.” In Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and counter-manipulation in times of crisis, edited by Cornelia Ilie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maillat, Didier, and Oswald, Steve
2013 “Biases and constraints in communication: Argumentation, persuasion and manipulation.” Journal of Pragmatics 59: 137–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maillat, Didier and Steve Oswald
2024. “Manipulation in exceptional times: Exploiting overwhelming contextual parameters for manipulative purposes.” In Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and counter-manipulation in times of crisis edited by Cornelia Ilie Amsterdam John Benjamins DOI logo
McLean, Hamish, and Jacqui Ewart
2020 Political Leadership in Disaster and Crisis Communication and Management. International Perspectives and Practices. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Jonathan
2020 Parliaments and Crisis: Challenges and Innovations. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
Olza, Inés, Veronika Koller, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Paula Pérez-Sobrino, and Elena Semino
2021 “The #ReframeCovid initiative: From Twitter to society via metaphor.” Metaphor and the Social World 11(1): 98–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswald, Steve
2014 “It is easy to miss something you are not looking for.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 97–119. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Oswald, Steve, Marcin Lewiński, Sara Greco, and Serena Villata
(eds.) 2022 The Pandemic of Argumentation. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxman, Andrew D., Atle Fretheim, Simon Lewin, Signe Flottorp, Claire Glenton, Arnfinn Helleve, Didrik F., Bjørn GunnarIversen, and Sarah E. Rosenbaum
2022 “Health communication in and out of public health emergencies: To persuade or to inform?” Health Research Policy and Systems 20(1): 28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Persson, Petra
2017 “Attention Manipulation and Information Overload” National Bureau of Economic Research, 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poos, Diana, and Rita Simpson
2002 “Cross-Disciplinary comparisons of hedging. Some findings form the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. .” In Using Corpora to Explora Linguistic Variation edited by Randi Reppen, Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Douglas Biber. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pummerer, Lotte, Robert Böhm, Lau Lilleholt, Kevin Winter, Ingo Zettler, and Kai Sassenberg
2022 “Conspiracy Theories and Their Societal Effects During the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 13(1): 49–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reyes, Antonio
2011 Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions.” Discourse and Society 22 (6): 782–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riaz, Suhaib, Sean Buchanan, and Trish Ruebottom
2016 “Rhetoric of epistemic authority: Defending field poisitions during the financial crisis.” Human Relations 69 (7): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romer, Daniel, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson
2020 “Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of Covid-19 in the U.S.” Social Science & Medicine 263: online. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Susan. C.
1987 “Information overload: Causes and consequences.” Human Systems Management 7: 143–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike, and Betty Vandenbosch
1998 “Information Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now You See It, Now You Don’t.” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 8(2): 127–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seeger, Matthew W.
2006 “Best Practices in Crisis Communication. An Expert Panel Process.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 34 (3): 232–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena
2020 “Covid-19: A forest fire rather than a wave?” Mètode Revista de Difusió de La Investigació 11: 5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Craig Allen, and Kathy B. Smith
1994 The White House speaks. Presidential leadership as persuasion. Westport, Conn: Praeger.Google Scholar
Šimík, Radek
2015 “Epistemic indefinites under epistemic modals in Czech”. In Slavic grammar from a formal perspective: Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages (FDSL 10), edited by Gerhild Zybatow, Petr Biskup, Marcel Guhl, Marcel, Claudia Hurtig, Claudia, & Mueller-Reichau, Olaf, 425–442. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A.
2014 “Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations.” Language in Society 43(2): 185–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tobias, Ronald B.
1993 20 Master Plots (And How to Build Them). Cincinnati: Ohio.Google Scholar
Tushman, Michael, and David Nadler
1978 “Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design.” Academy of Management Review 3: 613–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
1992 “Discourse and the denial of racism.” Discourse & Society 3 (1): 87–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2006 “Blaming and denying.” In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguististics, edited by Keith Brown, 59–64. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Software

Sketch Engine: Corpus Manager
Available at: [URL]
R Core Team
2021 R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: [URL]
RDUES
2021 eMargin. A collaborative annotation tool. Available at: [URL]

Corpora

Berrocal, Martina and Manuel Berrocal
2021 ParlCorp. Corpus of Czech Parliamentary Speeches. Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha 2021 Available at: [URL]
Zasina, Adrian, David Lukeš, Zuzana Komrsková, Petra Poukarová, and Anna Řehořková, A.
2018 Koditex: korpus diverzifikovaných textů. Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha. Available at: [URL].