This article explores how communicative influence is instantiated through the analysis of
situational settings, pragmatic means, and discursive strategies at the press conferences held by the Czech government
during the Covid-19 pandemic crisis to maintain political authority and credibility. The analysis is informed by the
rhetorical approach used in crisis communication studies and follows the tenets of corpus-assisted discourse studies
(Taylor and Marchi 2018). It combines quantitative insights with qualitative close reading. The results point to the
fact that the building and maintenance of authority and credibility is achieved by a positive depiction of one’s
crisis management performance and by intensive blame management. In addition, there is a tendency towards strategic
overcommunication which can hinder the understanding and critical scrutiny on the part of the audience.
Bawden, David, and Lyn Robinson. 2020. “Information
Overload: An Overview”. In Oxford Encyclopedia of
Political Decision
Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benoit, William L.1997. “Image Repair.
Discourse and Crisis Communication.” Public Relations
Review 23 (2): 177–186.
Bhakti, Aditi. 2006. “Critical
discourse analysis of political press
conferences.” Discourse&Society 17 (2): 173–203.
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2009. Real
Grammar: A Corpus-Based Approach to
English. London: Longmann.
Bieber, Florian. 2019. The
rise of authoritarianism in the Western
Balkans. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.
Billig, Michael, and Cristina Marinho. 2014. “Manipulation
information and manipulating people” Critical Discourse
Studies 11 (2): 158–174.
Boin, Arjen, Paul Hart, Eric Stern, and Bengt Sundeliu. 2016. “Managing
Crises: Five Strategic Leadership Tasks”. In The
Politics of Crisis Management. Public leadership under Pressure, edited
by Arjen Boin, Paul Hart, Eric Stern, and Bengt Sundelius, 3–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Briant, Emma. 2015. Propaganda
and
counter-terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Cap, Piotr. 2008. “Towards
the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political
discourse.” Journal of
Pragmatics 40 (1): 17–41.
Cap, Piotr. 2017. The
Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public
Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2021. Metaphors
of Coronavirus. Invisible Enenmy or Zombie
Apocalypse. Cham: Springer Nature.
Čermáková, Anna, Jílková, Lucie, Komrsková, Zuzana, Kopřivová, Marie, and Poukarová, Petra. 2019. “Discourse
markers”. In Syntax mluvené
češtiny [The syntax of spoken
Czech], edited by Jana Hoffmannová, Jiří Homoláč, and Kamila Mrázková, 244–349. Praha: Academia.
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing
political discourse: Theory and
practice. London: Routledge.
Coombs, W. Timothy. 2009. “Conceptualising
crisis communication.” In Handbook of Risk and Crisis
Communication, edited by Robert L. Heath and H. Dan O’Hair, 99–118. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Coombs, W. Timothy, and Sherry J. Holladay, eds. 2010. The
Handbook of Crisis
Communication. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.
Coombs, W. Timothy, Sherry J. Holladay, and An-Sofie Claeys. 2016. “Debunking
the myth of denial’s effectiveness in crisis communication: context
matters.” Journal of
Communication 20 (4): 381–395.
Cummings, Louise. 2020. “Good
and Bad Reasoning about Covid-19.” Informal
Logic 40(4): 521–544.
Cvrček, Václav, Zuzana Komrsková, David Lukeš, Petra Poukarová, Anna Řehořková, and Adrian Jan Zasina. 2018. “From
extra-to intratextual characteristics: Charting the space of variation in Czech through
MDA.” Journal of Corpus Linguistics and Ling. Theory
(online).
Cvrček, Václav, Zuzana Laubeová, David Lukeš, Petra Poukarová, Anna Řehořková, and Adrian Jan Zasina. 2020. Registry
v češtině. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.
Ekström, Mats, and Göran Eriksson. 2018. “Press
conferences.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language
and Politics, edited by Ruth Wodak and Bernhard Forchtner, 342–354. London/New York: Routledge.
Forchtner, Bernhard, and Özgür Özvatan. 2022. “De/legitimising
EUrope througth the performaces of crises. The far-right Alternative for Germany on “climate hysteria” and
“corona hysteria”.” Jounal of Language and
Politics online: 1–25.
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Participation,
stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse &
Society 18(1): 53–73.
Grepl, Miroslav & Nekula, Marek. 2017. “Epistémické
částice.” In CzechEncy – Nový encyklopedický slovník
češtiny, edited by Petr Karlík, Marek Nekula, Jana Pleskalová, [URL]
Hansson, Sten. 2015a. “Calculated
overcommunication: Strategic uses of prolixity, irrelevance, an repetition in administrative
language.” Language of
Pragmatics 84: 172–188.
Hansson, Sten. 2015b. “Discursive
strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for
analysis.” Discourse &
Society 26 (3): 297–322.
Hansson, Sten. 2018a. “The
discursive micro-politics of blame avoidance: unpacking the language of government blame
games.” Policy
Sciences 51 (4):545–564.
Hansson, Sten. 2018b. “Government
communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language
and Politics, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Bernhard Forchtner, 342–354. New York: Routledge.
Härtl, Holden. 2018. “Name-informing
and distancing sogenannt ‘so-called’: Name mentioning and the lexicon-pragmatics
interface.” Zeitschrift für
Sprachwissenschaft 37 (2): 139–169.
Haslam, Alexander S.2020. “Leadership.” In Together
Apart: The Psychology of Covid-19, edited by Jolanda D. Jetten, Stephan Reicher, Alexander Haslam and Tegan Cruwys, 25–30. London: Sage.
Heath, Robert L., and H. Dan O’Hair, eds. 2009. Handbook
of Risk and Crisis Communication. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Hood, Christopher. 2011. The
Blame Game. Spin Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in
Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kent, Michael L.2015. “The power of
story telling in public relations: Introducing the 20 master plots.” Public
Relations
Review 41 (1): 480–489.
Kim, Do Kyun David, and Gary L. Kreps. 2020. “An
Analysis of Government Communication in the United States During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Recommentaiton for
Effective Government Health Risk Communiction.” World Medical and Health
Policy 12 (4): 398–412.
Kjeldsen, Jens E., Ragnhild Mølster, and Ihlen Øyvind. 2022. “Expert
Uncertainty: Arguments Bolstering the Ethos of Expertise in Situation of
Uncertainty.” In The Pandemic of
Argumentation, edited by Steve Oswald, Marcin Lewiński, Sara Greco, and Serena Villata, 61–78. Springer International Publishing.
Lee, Mordercai, Grant Neeley, and Kendra Stewart, eds. 2022. The
Practice of Government Public Relations. New York: Routledge.
Maillat, Didier, and Oswald, Steve. 2013. “Biases
and constraints in communication: Argumentation, persuasion and
manipulation.” Journal of
Pragmatics 59: 137–140.
McLean, Hamish, and Jacqui Ewart. 2020. Political
Leadership in Disaster and Crisis Communication and Management. International Perspectives and
Practices. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Murphy, Jonathan. 2020. Parliaments
and Crisis: Challenges and
Innovations. Stockholm: International IDEA.
Oswald, Steve. 2014. “It
is easy to miss something you are not looking
for.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse
Studies, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 97–119. London: Bloomsbury.
Oswald, Steve, Marcin Lewiński, Sara Greco, and Serena Villata, (eds.). 2022. The
Pandemic of
Argumentation. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Oxman, Andrew D., Atle Fretheim, Simon Lewin, Signe Flottorp, Claire Glenton, Arnfinn Helleve, Didrik F., Bjørn GunnarIversen, and Sarah E. Rosenbaum. 2022. “Health
communication in and out of public health emergencies: To persuade or to
inform?” Health Research Policy and
Systems 20(1): 28.
Persson, Petra. 2017. “Attention
Manipulation and Information Overload” National Bureau of Economic
Research, 1–49.
Pummerer, Lotte, Robert Böhm, Lau Lilleholt, Kevin Winter, Ingo Zettler, and Kai Sassenberg. 2022. “Conspiracy
Theories and Their Societal Effects During the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Social
Psychological and Personality
Science 13(1): 49–59.
Reyes, Antonio. 2011. Strategies
of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions.” Discourse and
Society 22 (6): 782–807.
Riaz, Suhaib, Sean Buchanan, and Trish Ruebottom. 2016. “Rhetoric
of epistemic authority: Defending field poisitions during the financial
crisis.” Human
Relations 69 (7): 1–29.
Romer, Daniel, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2020. “Conspiracy
theories as barriers to controlling the spread of Covid-19 in the U.S.” Social
Science & Medicine 263: online.
Schneider, Susan. C.1987. “Information
overload: Causes and consequences.” Human Systems
Management 7: 143–153.
Schultz, Ulrike, and Betty Vandenbosch. 1998. “Information
Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now You See It, Now You Don’t.” Journal of
Organizational Computing and Electronic
Commerce, 8(2): 127–148.
Seeger, Matthew W.2006. “Best Practices
in Crisis Communication. An Expert Panel Process.” Journal of Applied
Communication
Research 34 (3): 232–244.
Semino, Elena. 2020. “Covid-19:
A forest fire rather than a wave?” Mètode Revista de Difusió de La
Investigació 11: 5.
Smith, Craig Allen, and Kathy B. Smith. 1994. The
White House speaks. Presidential leadership as persuasion. Westport, Conn: Praeger.
Šimík, Radek. 2015. “Epistemic
indefinites under epistemic modals in
Czech”. In Slavic grammar from a formal
perspective: Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary Conference on Formal Description
of Slavic Languages (FDSL 10), edited
by Gerhild Zybatow, Petr Biskup, Marcel Guhl, Marcel, Claudia Hurtig, Claudia, & Mueller-Reichau, Olaf, 425–442. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A.2014. “Three
orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in
interaction and social relations.” Language in
Society 43(2): 185–207.
Tobias, Ronald B.1993. 20 Master Plots (And
How to Build
Them). Cincinnati: Ohio.
Tushman, Michael, and David Nadler. 1978. “Information
processing as an integrating concept in organizational design.” Academy of
Management
Review 3: 613–625.
van Dijk, Teun A.1992. “Discourse and
the denial of racism.” Discourse &
Society 3 (1): 87–118.
van Dijk, Teun A.1998. Ideology: A
multidisciplinary
approach. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth. 2006. “Blaming
and denying.” In Encyclopedia of Language &
Linguististics, edited by Keith Brown, 59–64. Oxford: Elsevier.
Software
Sketch Engine: Corpus Manager. Available
at: [URL]
R Core
Team. 2021. R. A language and environment for
statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: [URL]
RDUES. 2021. eMargin. A collaborative
annotation tool. Available at: [URL]
Corpora
Berrocal, Martina and Manuel Berrocal. 2021. ParlCorp.
Corpus of Czech Parliamentary Speeches. Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha 2021. Available
at: [URL]
Zasina, Adrian, David Lukeš, Zuzana Komrsková, Petra Poukarová, and Anna Řehořková, A.2018. Koditex:
korpus diverzifikovaných textů. Ústav Českého národního korpusu FF UK, Praha. Available
at: [URL].
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.