Cover not available
Part of
Self- and Other-Reference in Social Contexts: From global to local discourses
Edited by Minna Nevala and Minna Palander-Collin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 342] 2024
► pp. 62–88

Chapter 4
The European Union as an in-group in British press and parliamentary debates

 | Tampere University
This chapter focuses on the representation of the European Union as an in-group in British parliamentary debates and newspaper articles in 1974–2015. The focus is on contexts in which the EU is referred to by the first-person plural pronoun we or us. Employing the methods of corpus-assisted discourse studies, the chapter will give a diachronic view of how the EU has been represented in British broadsheets and tabloids as well as in Labour and Conservative MPs’ speeches. Comparisons are also made between left-wing and right-wing discourses. The results suggest that (1) the EU is rarely included in the in-group, but (2) when it is, it is commonly evaluated positively or at least neutrally, but also criticized.
Keywords: corpus-assisted discourse studies, CADS, critical discourse analysis, parliamentary debates, newspaper articles, first-person plural pronoun, the European Union
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.We indexing in-group in political discourse
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Method
  • 4.Representation of the EU as an in-group
    • 4.1The EU as criticized
    • 4.2The EU as a project
    • 4.3The EU as co-operation
    • 4.4The EU as a global player in parliamentary debates
    • 4.5The EU as a guard in newspaper articles
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.342.04rai
References (41)
References
Alexander, Marc, and Mark Davies. 2015. Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. Available at [URL].
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2019. AntConc (3.5.8). [Computer Software]. [URL].
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, et al. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baranowska, Paula M. 2014. “The Coverage of the Eurozone Economic Crisis in the British Press.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 15 (4): 500–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carey, Sean, and Jonathan Burton. 2004. “Research Note: The Influence of the Press in Shaping Public Opinion towards the European Union in Britain.” Political Studies 52 (3): 623–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Paul, and Nathaniel Copsey. 2017. “Rethinking Britain and the European Union: Politicians, the Media and Public Opinion Reconsidered.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (4): 709–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Jennifer. 2010. “‘Do We Really Want to be Like Them?’: Indexing Europeanness through Pronominal Use.” Discourse and Society 21 (6): 619–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daddow, Oliver. 2012. “The UK Media and ‘Europe’: From Permissive Consensus to Destructive Dissent.” International Affairs 88 (6): 1219–1236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Roger, and Gunther Kress. 1979. “Critical Linguistics.” In Language and Control, ed. by Roger Fowler, Bob Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew, 185–213. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibbins, Justin. 2014. Britain, Europe and National Identity: Self and Other in International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Benjamin. 2012. “Nation, Separation and Threat: An Analysis of British Media Discourses on the European Union Treaty Reform Process.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (4): 561–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Jenni Räikkönen, and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2020. “Investigating Colloquialization in the British Parliamentary Record in Late 19th and Early 20th Century.” Language Sciences 79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imao, Yasu. 2018. CasualConc (2.0.7) [Computer Software]. Osaka, Japan: Osaka University. [URL].
Islentyeva, Anna. 2019. “The Europe of Scary Metaphors: The Voices of the British Right-Wing Press.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 67 (3): 209–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Islentyeva, Anna, and Mihera Abdel Kafi. 2021. “Constructing National Identity in the British Press: The Britain versus Europe Dichotomy.” Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies 4: 68–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krizsán, Attila. 2011. ‘The EU is Not Them, But Us!’: The First Person Plural and the Articulation of Collective Identities in European Political Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Maccaferri, Marzia. 2019. “Splendid Isolation Again? Brexit and the Role of the Press and Online Media in Re-narrating the European Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (4): 389–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mollin, Sandra. 2007. “The Hansard Hazard: Gauging the Accuracy of British Parliamentary Transcripts.” Corpora 2 (2): 187–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2000. “Political Imagery of Europe: A House Without Exit Doors?” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 21 (3): 216–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 21 (1): 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas, Ruth Breeze, Kayo Kondo, and Sara Vilar-Lluch (eds.). 2022. Pandemic and Crisis Discourse: Communicating Covid-19 and Public Health Strategy. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ofcom. 2015, December 15. News Consumption in the UK: Research Report. [URL].
Ormston, Rachel. 2015. “Do We Feel European and Does it Matter?” NatCen Social Research. [URL].
Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid, and Charlotte Taylor. 2013. Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Riihimäki, Jenni. 2019. “At the Heart and in the Margins: Discursive Construction of British National Identity in Relation to the EU in British Parliamentary Debates from 1973 to 2015.” Discourse and Society 30 (4): 412–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Räikkönen, Jenni. 2022 “Are ‘We’ European? We and Us in British EU-Related Newspaper Articles in 1975–2015.” Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies 5: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. “Leaving the EU out of the in-group: A diachronic analysis of the use of we and us in British parliamentary debates (1973–2015).” In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary Discourse across Time and Space, ed. by Minna Korhonen, Haidee Kotze, and Jukka Tyrkkö, 142-165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2021. “‘Not Soldiers but Fire-fighters’ – Metaphors and Covid-19.” Health Communication 36 (1): 50–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slembrouck, Stef. 1992. “The Parliamentary Hansard ‘Verbatim’ Report: The Written Construction of Spoken Discourse.” Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 1 (2): 101–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte. 2014. “Investigating the Representation of Migrants in the UK and Italian Press: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19 (3): 368–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. 1995. “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japanese Discourse 1: 17–27.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wenzl, Nora. 2019. “‘This is about the Kind of Britain We are’: National Identities as Constructed in Parliamentary Debates about EU Membership.” In Discourses of Brexit, ed. by Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, 32–47. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2008. “‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Inclusion and Exclusion – Discrimination via Discourse.” In Identity, Belonging and Migration, ed. by Gerard Delanty, Ruth Wodak, and Paul Jones, 54–77. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappettini, Franco. 2021. “The Tabloidization of the Brexit Campaign: Power to the (British) People?” Journal of Language and Politics 20 (2): 277–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar