Cover not available
Part of
(Non)referentiality in Conversation
Edited by Michael C. Ewing and Ritva Laury
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 344] 2024
► pp. 141–166

Chapter 8
Manipulating referentiality and creating phaticness

Repeated use of novel ad hoc NPs in Japanese conversation

| Keio University
The focus of this study is the creation of novel ad hoc expressions from the perspective of referentiality. Through the close analysis of three cases from video-recorded conversations in Japanese, we find that speakers create novel NPs by manipulating referentiality and embodiment, and achieve social bonding by humorously and intensely repeating those expressions. Even an onomatopoeic adverbial can be turned into a novel ad hoc NP. After creating and reinforcing those novel NPs with exaggerated delivery, speakers drop the exaggerated delivery, pronouncing the novel NPs as if they are regular NPs.
Keywords: novel expression, onomatopoeia, (de-)embodiment, NP, bonding, phaticness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and method
  • 3.The process of creating ad hoc NPs involving referentiality
    • 3.1Turning an onomatopoeia into a topic NP referring to a concrete object: Baki
    • 3.2Turning individual items in a list into a unified topic NP: Aisu aisu
    • 3.3Creating a novel NP through reanalysis: Den
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.344.08suz
References (27)
References
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margaret Selting. 2018. Interactional linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2014. “Towards a Dialogic Syntax: Dialogic Resonance: Activating Affinities across Utterances.” Cognitive Linguistics 25 (3): 359–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1991. “Dimensions of a Theory of Information Flow.” Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino. 1993. “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” In Talking Data : Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert, 45–89. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara. 1999. “Directions in Research: Language and the Body.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32 (1–2): 51–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Noriko and Tsuyoshi Ono. 2000. “The Occurrence and Non-occurrence of the Japanese Direct Object Marker o in Conversation.” Studies in Language 24 (1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Philip. 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–121. New York, Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru. 2011. “Claiming Epistemic Primacy: Yo-marked Assessments in Japanese.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 58–81. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2002. Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2020. “Multimodal Noun Phrases.” In The ‘Noun Phrase’ Across Languages: An Emergent Unit in Interaction, ed. by Tsuyoshi Ono and Sandra A. Thompson, 153–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, Sotaro. 1997. “Two-Dimensional Semantic Analysis of Japanese Mimetics.” Linguistics 35 (2): 379–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koiso, Hanae, Haruka Amatani, Yuriko Iseki, Yasuyuki Usuda, Wakako Kashino, Yoshiko Kawabata, Yayoi Tanaka, Yasuharu Den and Ken’ya Nishikawa. 2020. “Nihongo nichijyoukaiwa koopasu” monitaaban no sekkei, hyooka, yobiteki bunseki [Design, Evaluation, and Preliminary Analysis of the Monitor Version of the Corpus of Everyday Japanese Conversation]” Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyujo Ronshu [NINJAL Research Papers] 18, 17–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo. 2002. Shingo wa kooshite tsukurareru [Strategies of Word Creation]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1949. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” Supplement to The Meaning of Meaning, Tenth Edition, ed. by Charles Kay Ogden, and Ivor Armstrong Richards, 146–52. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi. 2006. “The Actual Status of So-called Particle Ellipsis in Japanese: Evidence from Conversation,” In Acquisition, Diachrony, and Contact: Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research, ed. by Sally Rice and John Newman. CSLI Publications, 1–12.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2020. “What Can Japanese Conversation Tell Us about ‘NP’?” In The “Noun Phrase” Across Languages, ed. by Tsuyoshi Ono and Sandra A. Thompson, 315–327. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Sandra A. Thompson, and Yumi Sasaki. 2012. “Japanese Negotiation Through Emerging Final Particles in Everyday Talk.” Discourse Processes 49 (3–4): 243–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senft, Gunter. 2014. Understanding Pragmatics. Oxfordshire: Taylor and Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko. 2020. “Shin hyougen no soohatsu: atarashiku nai naka ni meccha atarashisa mieteru apiiru [The Emergence of Novel Expressions: ‘The Appeal that We See Novelty in Non-novel Expressions’].” In Ninchi gengogaku to danwakinoo gengogaku no yuukiteki setten [Toward Dynamic Interaction between Cognitive Linguistcs and Discourse-functional Linguistics: New Frontiers in the Usage-based Approach to Grammar], ed. by Toshihide Nakayama and Naoki Otani, 183–208. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Google Scholar
Takanashi, Hiroko. 2004. The Interactional Co-construction of Play in Japanese Conversation. Ph.D. dissertation. Linguistics Department, University of California, Santa Barbara.
. 2020. “Playful Naming in Playful Framing: The Intertextual Emergence of Neologism.” In Bonding through Context: Language and Interactional Alignment in Japanese Situated Discourse, ed. by Risako Ide and Kaori Hata, 239–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. “Language Reproduction and Coordinated Agency through Resonant Play.” East Asian Pragmatics 7 (3): 395–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2019. “List Gestures in Mandarin Conversation and their Implications for Understanding Multimodal Interaction.” In Multimodality in Chinese Interaction (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics), ed. by Xiaoting Li and Tsuyoshi Ono, 65–98. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. “Multimodal Amusement Resonance as a Conversation Interactional Device: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese and English.” East Asian Pragmatics 7 (3): 333–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yonekawa, Akihiko. 2002. “Gendai nihongo no isoo [Variations in Modern Japanese].” In Gendai Nihongo Kooza 4 Goi [Modern Japanese vol. 4: Vocabulary], ed. by Yoshifumi Hida and Takeyoshi Sato, 46–70. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar