Emoji and illocutionarity
Acting on, and acting as, language
Emoji can modify a textual utterance, constitute a
stand-alone speech act, or virtually perform an action. These three broad
types of pragmatic function are usually treated separately in the literature
when they are treated at all. We classify these functions in a systematic,
unified manner by drawing on the classic speech act notion of
illocutionarity. We present a conceptually motivated typology that accounts
for the three basic types of emoji function, as well as most pragmatic
functions reported in previous emoji research, illustrating it with data
from American and Chinese social media. The scheme can serve as a practical
heuristic to guide empirical research on emoji use and a theoretical anchor
for pragmatic studies of other graphicon types.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Illocutionarity and classic speech act theory
- 2.2Speech acts and performativity in textual CMC
- 2.2.1Speech acts in textual CMC
- 2.2.2Performativity in textual CMC
- 2.3Emoji and illocutionarity
- 2.3.1Emoji as speech acts
- 2.3.2Emoji as IFIDs
- 2.3.2.1Tone modification
- 2.3.2.2Emoji as punctuation
- 3.Data sources and analytical approach
- 3.1Data sources
- 3.2Analytical approach
- 4.The classification scheme
- 4.1Examples of IFIDs
- 4.2Examples of IAs
- 4.2.1Communicative acts
- 4.2.2Behave acts
- 5.Discussion: Boundary cases
- 6.Conclusion: Theoretical and practical implications
-
Notes
-
References