Cover not available
Part of
Vagueness, Ambiguity, and All the Rest: Linguistic and pragmatic approaches
Edited by Ilaria Fiorentini and Chiara Zanchi
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 347] 2024
► pp. 30–51

Chapter 3
The role of ambiguity in intentional vagueness

| University of Salerno

In order to study the relationship between ambiguity and vagueness, it is necessary to distinguish Systemic Vagueness (SV), which is a property of any linguistic codes, from Intentional Vagueness (IntV), which emerges in messages produced by speakers in response to specific communicative needs.

In fact, while ambiguity is one of the possible manifestations of SV, the expression of IntV tends to avoid ambiguous elements. This is confirmed empirically by an analysis carried out on Italian and German spoken corpora to investigate whether and how many ambiguous elements were used in Vagueness Expressions (VEs), which shows how the presence of ambiguous terms in VEs is exiguous in both languages. The almost complete absence of ambiguity and intentional vagueness co-occurring in this research seems to confirm the different nature and function of the two phenomena.

Keywords: systemic vagueness, intentional vagueness, ambiguity, spoken Italian, spoken German
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Systemic vagueness
  • 3.Systemic vagueness and ambiguity
  • 4.Intentional vagueness
  • 5.Looking for ambiguity in vagueness expressions: A corpus-based analysis
  • 6.Conclusive remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References
Albano Leoni, Federico, and Pietro Maturi
1992 “Per una verifica pragmatica dei modelli fonologici.” In La linguistica pragmatica, ed. by Giovanni Gobber, 39–50. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
2010 “A Contrastive Approach to Vague Nouns.” In New Approaches to Hedging, ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Stephan Schneider, 35–48. Bingley: Emerald Group. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L.
1975 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barotto, Alessandra
This volume. “Using Ambiguity and Vagueness to avoid Problematic Answers: The Case of Italian abbastanza.”
Bazzanella, Carla
2011 “Indeterminacy in Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue 1: 21–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate, and Ulrich Detges
(eds) 2014 Discourse functions at the left and right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of language use and language change. Leiden/Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, Max
1937 “Vagueness. An Exercise in Logical Analysis.” Philosophy of Science 4: 427–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1961 Generality, Gradience and the All-or-None. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bregman, Albert S.
1994 Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2010 Discourse Markers. In Historical pragmatics. Vol. 8, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 285–314. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987[1978] Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
2007 Mitigation. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2012 “Mezzi linguistici della mitigazione in italiano: risultati e prospettive di ricerca.” In Grammatica e pragmatica, ed. by Franca Orletti, Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri, and Anna Pompei, 147–189. Roma: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna
1994 Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collu, Laura
2017 Quantificazione vaga: uno studio contrastivo sul parlato italiano e tedesco. Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Conte, Maria-Elisabeth
1998 “Il ruolo dei termini astratti nei testi.” In Ars Linguistica. Studi per Paolo Ramat, ed. by Giuliano Bernini, Pierluigi Cuzzolin, and Piera Molinelli, 151–160. Roma: Bulzoni,Google Scholar
Crystal, David
1967 “English.” Lingua 17: 24–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutting, Joan
(ed) 2007 Vague Language Explored. Palgrave MacMillan: Houndmills. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristine, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens
(eds) 2010 Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio
1982 Minisemantica dei linguaggi non verbali e delle lingue. Roma/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio, Federico Mancini, Massimo Vedovelli, and Miriam Voghera
1993 Lessico dell’italiano parlato. Milano: Etaslibri.Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2011 “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions.” Linguistics 49 (2): 365–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfang U., and Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi
1994 Morphopragmatics. Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languages. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda, and Nikole D. Patson
2007 “The ‘good enough’ Approach to Language Comprehension.” Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (1–2): 71–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiorentini, Ilaria
2021 “Cosa, cose e l’espressione della non esaustività nel parlato.” Paper presented at workshop La modalità parlata e il suo ruolo nei modelli grammaticali, Società di Linguistica Italiana 9 September 2021.Google Scholar
Fiorentini, Ilaria, and Chiara Zanchi
This volume. Vague Stuff: Cose as a General Extender from Latin to Italian.
Ghezzi, Chiara
2022 Vagueness Markers in Italian. Age Variation and Pragmatic Change. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara, and Piera Molinelli
(eds) 2014 Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grandi, Nicola, and Lívia Körtvélyessy
(eds) 2015 Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul
1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge (MA.): Harvard University press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Sarah
2004 “Puzzles and Patterns in 50 Years of Research on Speech Perception.” In From Sound to Sense: 50+ Years of Discoveries in Speech Communication, ed. by Janet Slifka, Sharon Manuel, and Melanie Matthies, 223–246. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2013 “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?.” Linguistics 51 (6): 1205–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirschberg, Julia, and Cinzia Avesani
1997 “The Role of Prosody in Disambiguating potentially Ambiguous Utterances in English and Italian.” Proc. Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications: 189–192.Google Scholar
Holt, Lori L., and Andrew J. Lotto
2010 “Speech Perception as Categorization.” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72(5): 1218–1227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1924 The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel
1996 “Universal Tendencies in the Semantics of the Diminutive.” Language 72 (3): 533–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Sara W. Smith, & Tanja Lüdge
2003 “Interactive Aspects of Vagueness in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (12): 1737–1769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Chris
2011 “Ambiguity and Vagueness: An Overview.” In The Handbook of Semantics, ed. by Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, 507–535. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kraljic, Tanya, and Susan E. Brennan
2005 “Prosodic Disambiguation of Syntactic Structure: For the Speaker or for the Addressee?” Cognitive Psychology 50 (2): 194–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1973 “The Boundaries of Words and Their Meanings.” In New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, ed. by Charles-James N. Bailey, and Roger W. Shuy, 340–373, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Anna Laura, and Giulio Lepschy
2013 [1977] The Italian Language Today. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn
1990 “Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory.” In Speech Production and Speech Modelling, ed. by William J. Hardcastle, and Alain Marchal, 403–439. Springer: Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Local, John
2007 “Phonetic Detail and the Organisation of Talk-In-Interaction.” Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1–10. Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
Local, John, and Gareth Walker
2012 “How Phonetic Features Project more Talk.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 42 (3): 255–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magni, Elisabetta
2020 L’ambiguità delle lingue. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Mahlberg Michaela
2005 English General Nouns: A Corpus Theoretical Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia
2004 “Alterazione.” In La formazione delle parole in italiano, ed. by Maria Grossmann, and Franz Rainer, 264–292. Tübingen: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015 “Evaluation Morphology and Pragmatics.” In Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology, ed. by Grandi, Nicola, and Livia Körtvélyessy, 32–42. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud
2009 “The Approximators French comme Italian come, Portuguese como, Spanish como from a Grammaticalization Perspective.” In Grammaticalization and pragmatics: Facts, approaches, theoretical, ed. by Corinne Rossari Ricci, Claudia Spiridon, and Adriana Bingley, 65–92. Amsterdam: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, George
1963 Language and Communication. New York/Toronto/London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Moore, Brian C. J.
2008 “Basic Auditory Processes involved in the Analysis of Speech sounds.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363.1493: 947–963. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
2005 “And Stuff und So: Investigating Pragmatic Expressions in English and German.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (11): 1845–1864. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Vagueness and Hedging.” In Pragmatics of Society, ed. by Gisle Andersen, and Karin Aijmer, 293–318. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.
1902 “Vague.” In Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, ed. by James Mark Baldwin, 748. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Piantadosi, Steven T., Harry Tily, and Edward Gibson
2012 “The Communicative Function of Ambiguity in Language.” Cognition 122 (3): 280–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, David B., and Robert Remez. E.
2005 Handbook of Speech Perception. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prieto, Victor M.
2015 “The Semantics of Evaluative Morphology.” In Edinburgh Handbook of Evaluative Morphology, ed. by Nicola Grandi, and Livia Körtvélyessy, 21–31. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radulović, Milica
This volume. “Vagueness and Ambiguity of Perlocutionary Effects in Prime Minister’s Question Time Sessions.”
Ronzitti, Giuseppina
(ed) 2011 Vagueness: A Guide. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
1923 “Vagueness.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Psychology 1: 84–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sansò, Andrea
2020 I segnali discorsivi. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Schafer, Amy J., Shari R Speer, Paul Warren, and S. David White
2000 “Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension.” Journal of psycholinguistic research 29 (2): 169–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snedeker, Jesse, and John Trueswell
2003 “Using Prosody to avoid Ambiguity: Effects of Speaker Awareness and Referential Context.” Journal of Memory and Language 48 (1): 103–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
2002 “Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-reading.” Mind & Language 17: 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1982 “From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization.” In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann, and Yakov Malkiel, 245–271. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “From Subjectification to Intersubjectification.” In Motives for Language Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey (ed), 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth C.
2012 “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery.” English Text Construction 5 (1): 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, David
1993 “Ambiguity, Polysemy, and Vagueness.” Cognitive Linguistics 4 (3): 273–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rooij, Robert
2011 “Vagueness and Linguistics.” In Vagueness: A Guide, ed. by Giuseppina Ronzitti, 123–170. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voghera, Miriam
1992 Sintassi e intonazione nell’italiano parlato. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
2013 “A case study on the relationship between grammatical change and synchronic variation: The emergence of tipo[-N] in Italian.” In Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface, ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri, and Piera Molinelli, 283–312. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Dal parlato alla grammatica. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
2022a “Building the reference by similarity: from vagueness to focus.” In A Crosslinguistic Perspective on Clear and Approximate Categorization, ed. by Hélène Vassiliadou, and Marie Lammert, 271–298. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2022b “How speech mode emerges in language.” In From Speaking to Grammar, ed. by Miriam Voghera, 21–56. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023 “The role of diminutive suffixes in the Italian Time Nouns: from approximation to Focus?” Zeitschrift für Wortbildung/ Journal of Word Formation 1: 21–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voghera, Miriam, and Carla Borges
2017 “Vagueness Expressions in Italian, Spanish and English in Task-oriented Dialogues.” Normas 1 (7): 57–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voghera, Miriam, and Laura Collu
2017 “Intentional Vagueness: a Corpus-Based Analysis of Italian and German.” In Exploring intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives, ed. by Maria Napoli, and Miriam Ravetto, 371–388. Amsterdam/New York: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas
2015 “Ambiguity Avoidance is overrated.” In Ambiguity: Language and Communication, ed. by Susanne Winkler, 29–47. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas, Amy Perfors, and David Beaver
2005 “The Puzzle of Ambiguity.” In Morphology and the Web of Grammar: Essays in Memory of Steven G. Lapointe, ed. by Orgun, C. Orhan, and Peter Sells, 265–282. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Winkler, Susanne
(ed) 2007 Ambiguity. Language and Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Witek, Maciej
2015 “Linguistic underdeterminacy: A view from speech act theory.” Journal of Pragmatics 76: 15–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1967 Ricerche filosofiche. Torino: Einaudi (or. ed. 1953 Philosophische Untersuchungen, Blackwell: Oxford).Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M., and Jerrold M. Sadock
1975 “Ambiguity Tests and How to Fail Them.” In Syntax and Semantics, ed. by John P. Kimball, 1–36. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar