Hedging in Scientific Research Articles
Author
This book provides a comprehensive study of hedging in academic research papers, relating a systematic analysis of forms to a pragmatic explanation for their use. Based on a detailed examination of journal articles and interviews with research scientists, the study shows that the extensive use of possibility and tentativeness in research writing is intimately connected to the social and institutional practices of academic communities and is at the heart of how knowledge comes to be socially accredited through texts. The study identifies the major forms, functions and distribution of hedges and explores the research article genre in detail to present an explanatory framework based on a complex social and ideological interpretive environment. The results show that hedging is central to Scientific argument, individual scientists and, ultimately, to science itself. The importance of hedging to student writers is also recognised and a chapter devoted to teaching implications.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 54] 1998. x, 308 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | p. viii
-
Acknowledgments | p. x
-
On Hedging and Hedges | p. 1
-
Towards a context of scientific hedging | p. 13
-
Perspective and hedging in discourse | p. 38
-
Theoretical and Methodological considerations | p. 81
-
Surface features of hedging | p. 102
-
A pragmatic analysis of hedging | p. 156
-
Examining hedges in scientific discourse | p. 189
-
Hedging and second language learners | p. 217
-
Conclusions and Implications | p. 244
-
Notes | p. 265
-
Appendix: corpus of journal articles | p. 267
-
-
Index | p. 304
“This is definitely a book to order for any library with a respectable linguistics section, and for specialists in modality and pragmatics, [...]”
Janet Holmes, University of Wellington
“[...] a book that raises issues of vital importance to teachers and researchers in the field of ESP and academic discourse generally.”
Susan Hood, Hong Kong Polytechnic University
“Hyland's book is a stimulating and comprehensive overview of the subject, which brings much literature together, and substantially advances our understanding of a complex phenomenon.”
Paul Thompson, The University of Reading, UK
Cited by
Cited by 350 other publications
Accuosto, Pablo & Horacio Saggion
2019. Discourse-Driven Argument Mining in Scientific Abstracts. In Natural Language Processing and Information Systems [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11608], ► pp. 182 ff. 
Adamczyk, Magdalena
2022. Do hedges always hedge?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 321 ff.
Adams, Heather & Elena Quintana-Toledo
2013. Adverbial stance marking in the introduction and conclusion sections of legal research articles. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 8:0
Ahmad, Ummul & Maryam Mehrjooseresht
2012. Stance Adverbials in Engineering Thesis Abstracts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 66 ► pp. 29 ff.
Albakry, Mohammed
2015. Telling by omission. In Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 66], ► pp. 79 ff.
Albelda Marco, Marta
2018. La variación genérico-discursiva de la atenuación como resultado de la variación de la imagen. Spanish in Context 15:2 ► pp. 346 ff.
Almeida, Francisco Alonso
2015. The functions of seem and parecer in early medical writing. Discourse Studies 17:2 ► pp. 121 ff.
Alonso Almeida, Francisco & Heather Adams
2012. SENTENTIAL EVIDENTIALS IN ENGLIHS MEDICAL RESEARCH PAPERS. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 7:1
Alonso Almeida, Francisco & Margarita Mele-Marrero
2014. Stancetaking in seventeenth-century prefaces on obstetrics. Journal of Historical Pragmatics ► pp. 1 ff.
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Mª Isabel González-Cruz
2012. Exploring Male and Female Voices through Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Some Modern English Travel Texts on the Canaries. Research in Language 10:3 ► pp. 323 ff.
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Francisco J. Álvarez-Gil
2021. Chapter 12. Evaluative that structures in the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. In “All families and genera”, ► pp. 228 ff.
Andow, James
2017. Intuition-Talk: Virus or Virtue?. Philosophia 45:2 ► pp. 523 ff.
Appel, Randy & David Wood
2016. Recurrent Word Combinations in EAP Test-Taker Writing: Differences between High- and Low-Proficiency Levels. Language Assessment Quarterly 13:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Ariely, Moriah, Zohar Livnat & Anat Yarden
2019. Analyzing the Language of an Adapted Primary Literature Article. Science & Education 28:1-2 ► pp. 63 ff.
Atkinson, Dwight
2012. Research Articles in English for Specific Purposes. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Auld, Euan & Paul Morris
2016. PISA, policy and persuasion: translating complex conditions into education ‘best practice’. Comparative Education 52:2 ► pp. 202 ff.
Avkhacheva, Irina, Irina Barinova & Natalia Nesterova
2020. On Hedging in Teaching Academic Writing. In Integrating Engineering Education and Humanities for Global Intercultural Perspectives [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 131], ► pp. 494 ff.
Avkhacheva, Irina, Natalia Nesterova, Olga Protopopova & Olga Soboleva
2022. Hedging in Scientific Discourse: Comparative Analysis of English and Russian Traditions in Academic Writing. In Science and Global Challenges of the 21st Century - Science and Technology [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 342], ► pp. 545 ff.
Bahadofar, Raheleh & Javad Gholami
2017. TYPES AND FUNCTIONS OF CITATIONS IN MASTER’S THESES ACROSS DISCIPLINES AND LANGUAGES. Discourse and Interaction 10:2 ► pp. 27 ff.
Bajwa, Nida Ul Habib, Cornelius J. KÖnig & Octavia S. V. Harrison
2016. Toward Evidence-Based Writing Advice: Using Applied Linguistics to Understand Reviewers’ Expectations. Academy of Management Learning & Education 15:3 ► pp. 419 ff.
Bajwa, Nida ul Habib, Markus Langer, Cornelius J. König & Hannah Honecker
2019. What might get published in management and applied psychology? Experimentally manipulating implicit expectations of reviewers regarding hedges. Scientometrics 120:3 ► pp. 1351 ff.
BAYRAM, Hüseyin
2021. Views of Social Studies Teachers on Scientific Research Methodology. Participatory Educational Research 8:4 ► pp. 64 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2019. Register, Genre, and Style,
Biber, Douglas, Jesse Egbert & Meixiu Zhang
2018. Lexis and grammar as complementary discourse systems for expressing stance and evaluation. In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 296], ► pp. 201 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Shelley Staples
2014. Exploring the prosody of stance. In Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 61], ► pp. 271 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Meixiu Zhang
2018. Expressing evaluation without grammatical stance: informational persuasion on the web. Corpora 13:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Blagojević, Slavka
2012. English and Serbian academic discourses analyzed in the light of ‘explicit reflexivity’ parameters. Discourse and Interaction 5:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Boch, Françoise & Martine Pons
2010. Le résumé de communication. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances 4:3
Boginskaya, Olga A.
2022. Functional categories of hedges: A diachronic study of Russian research article abstracts. Russian Journal of Linguistics 26:3 ► pp. 645 ff.
Boguslav, Mayla R, Nourah M Salem, Elizabeth K White, Sonia M Leach, Lawrence E Hunter & Alex Bateman
2021. Identifying and classifying goals for scientific knowledge. Bioinformatics Advances 1:1
Boland, Katarina, Pavlos Fafalios, Andon Tchechmedjiev, Stefan Dietze, Konstantin Todorov & Philipp Cimiano
2022. Beyond facts – a survey and conceptualisation of claims in online discourse analysis. Semantic Web 13:5 ► pp. 793 ff.
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, Roberto Burro, Andrzej Zuczkowski & Miguel A. Andrade-Navarro
2019. Writers’ uncertainty in scientific and popular biomedical articles. A comparative analysis of the British Medical Journal and Discover Magazine. PLOS ONE 14:9 ► pp. e0221933 ff.
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, Carla Canestrari, Ricardo Pietrobon & Andrzej Zuczkowski
2014. BioUncertainty. In Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts [Dialogue Studies, 25], ► pp. 309 ff.
BOWLES, HUGO
2012. Analyzing Languages for Specific Purposes Discourse. The Modern Language Journal 96 ► pp. 43 ff.
BRAUN, ISABEL & MATTHIAS NÜCKLES
2014. Scholarly Holds Lead Over Popular and Instructional: Text Type Influences Epistemological Reading Outcomes. Science Education 98:5 ► pp. 867 ff.
Britt, M. Anne, Tobias Richter & Jean-François Rouet
2014. Scientific Literacy: The Role of Goal-Directed Reading and Evaluation in Understanding Scientific Information. Educational Psychologist 49:2 ► pp. 104 ff.
Brook O'Donnell, Matthew, Ute Römer & Nick C. Ellis
2015. The development of formulaic sequences in first and second language writing. In Current Issues in Phraseology [Benjamins Current Topics, 74], ► pp. 83 ff.
Brůhová, Gabriela & Kateřina Vašků
2021. Lexical Bundles Ending in that in Academic Writing by Czech Learners and Native Speakers of English. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :30/2 ► pp. 33 ff.
Böttger, Claudia
2006. Communicating cooperation in multilingual business settings — translating corporate philosophies from English into German. In Kooperation und Effizienz in der Unternehmenskommunikation, ► pp. 259 ff.
Böttger, Claudia
2008. Communicating cooperation in multilingual business settings — translating corporate philosophies from English into German. In Kooperation und Effizienz in der Unternehmenskommunikation, ► pp. 259 ff.
Cambrosio, Alberto, Daniel Jacobi & Peter Keating
2004. Intertextualité et archi-iconicité : le cas des représentations scientifiques de la réaction antigène-anticorps.. Études de communication :27
Cantos, Pascual
2012. The Use of Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Linguistic Variation and Change: Types and Computational Applications. In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, ► pp. 99 ff.
Cao, Yan & Richard Xiao
2013. A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and non-native writers. Corpora 8:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa
2019. Phraseology in Specialised Language: A Contrastive Analysis of Mitigation in Academic Papers. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11755], ► pp. 61 ff.
Celiešienė, Vilija, Virginija Stankevičienė & Daiva Zavistanavičienė
2017. Expression evaluation of a quoted author in academic discourse: Inter-language (Lithuanian and English) case study. Journal of Language and Cultural Education 5:3 ► pp. 57 ff.
Charles, Maggie
2006. The Construction of Stance in Reporting Clauses: A Cross-disciplinary Study of Theses. Applied Linguistics 27:3 ► pp. 492 ff.
Chen, Chenghui & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2017. An intercultural analysis of the use of hedging by Chinese and Anglophone academic English writers
. Applied Linguistics Review 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Chen, Yu-Chieh & Jen-i Li
Cheng, Kai-Yuan
2017. A Dual-Role Account of Ceteris Paribus Laws. In Philosophy of Science in Practice, ► pp. 87 ff.
Chiluwa, Innocent
2015. Radicalist discourse: a study of the stances of Nigeria'sBoko Haramand Somalia'sAl Shabaabon Twitter. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Chovanec, Jan
2017. Gil-Salom & Soler-Monreal, eds. (2014). Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres. English Text Construction 10:1 ► pp. 165 ff.
Claveau, François & Jordan Girard
2019. Generic Generalizations in Science. Erkenntnis 84:4 ► pp. 839 ff.
Crespo, Begoña & Isabel Moskowich
2020. Astronomy, Philosophy, Life Sciences and History Texts: Setting the Scene for the Study of Modern Scientific Writing. English Studies 101:6 ► pp. 665 ff.
Csomay, Eniko
2015. A corpus-based analysis of linguistic variation in teacher and student presentations in university settings. In Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 66], ► pp. 1 ff.
Dafouz, E., B. Núñez & C. Sancho
2007. Analysing Stance in a CLIL University Context: Non-native Speaker Use of Personal Pronouns and Modal Verbs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10:5 ► pp. 647 ff.
Dahl, Trine
2004. Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline?. Journal of Pragmatics 36:10 ► pp. 1807 ff.
Dahl, Trine
2009. The Linguistic Representation of Rhetorical Function. Written Communication 26:4 ► pp. 370 ff.
Dahl, Trine
2012. Knowledge Claims. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Dayag, Danilo T.
2004. Negotiating Evaluation in Newspaper Editorials in Philippine English. Asian Englishes 7:2 ► pp. 28 ff.
Dheskali, Vincenzo
2021. USING SFG TO ANALYZE AUTHORIAL EMPHASIZERS AND PROPOSITIONAL INTENSIFIERS: A COMPARISON OF ALBANIAN AND ITALIAN ACADEMIC WRITING. Discourse and Interaction 14:2 ► pp. 61 ff.
Di Marco, Chrysanne, Frederick W. Kroon & Robert E. Mercer
2006. Using Hedges to Classify Citations in Scientific Articles. In Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications [The Information Retrieval Series, 20], ► pp. 247 ff.
Diani, Giuliana
2014. Grammar and Institutional Discourse. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Diani, Giuliana
2014. Politeness. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 169 ff.
Diruscio, Carolina Inés, Virginia Cattolica, Marisa Gonnella & Claudia Torres Zanotti
2022. LOS DISPOSITIVOS ATENUADORES: SU UTILIZACIÓN EN LA SECCIÓN INTRODUCCIÓN DE ARTÍCULOS CIENTÍFICO-ACADÉMICOS DE LAS CIENCIAS AGRARIAS EN JOURNALS EN INGLÉS. Revista Americana de Empreendedorismo e Inovação 4:2
Dolgova Jacobsen, Natalia
2018. Chapter 11. The use of hedging devices in L2 legal writing. In Language Learning, Discourse and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 64], ► pp. 275 ff.
Dong, Jihua & Louisa Buckingham
2018. The textual colligation of stance phraseology in cross-disciplinary academic discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:4 ► pp. 408 ff.
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
2018. Chapter 10. Persuasion in academic discourse. In Persuasion in Public Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 79], ► pp. 227 ff.
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga, Renata Jančaříková, Gabriela Miššíková & Renata Povolná
2017. Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse,
Dossena, Marina
2002. Review of Vihla ((1999)): Medical Writing - Modality in Focus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 110 ff.
Drury, Helen
Dubinina, Ekaterina Yurievna
2021. Quantitative Analysis of Hedges Distribution across Scientific Article Sections (by the Material of the English Language). Filologičeskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki :10 ► pp. 3255 ff.
Dueñas, Pilar Mur
2012. Hyland, Ken. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Durik, Amanda M., M. Anne Britt, Rebecca Reynolds & Jennifer Storey
2008. The Effects of Hedges in Persuasive Arguments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27:3 ► pp. 217 ff.
Durán Escribano, Mª Pilar & Ana Luz Rubio Moreda
2015. Evaluación del uso competente de los rasgos lingüísticos del IPA en relación con los niveles del MCER. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 10:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Dynel, Marta, Karol Marek Klimczak & Anna Marta Pikos
2015. Communicating Uncertainty in Financial Statement Narratives: Goodwill Impairment Testing. SSRN Electronic Journal
E.M., Bonsu & Afful J.B.A.
2022. Genre Analysis of Abstracts of Research Articles Published in Biostatistics. International Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 17 ff.
Ellederová, Eva
2022. Information technology students’ involvement in in-class debates: Speech acts and modification of the illocutionary force . Discourse and Interaction 15:2 ► pp. 28 ff.
Firoozjahantigh, Mojgan, Ebrahim Fakhri Alamdari, Amir Marzban & Sefa Bulut
2021. Investigating the Effect of Process-based Instruction of Writing on the IELTS Writing Task Two Performance of Iranian EFL Learners: Focusing on Hedging & Boosting. Cogent Education 8:1
Flottum, Kjersti
2005. The self and the others: polyphonic visibility in research articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Fløttum, Kjersti
2010. A linguistic and discursive view on climate change discourse. ASp :58 ► pp. 19 ff.
Fløttum, Kjersti
2014. Perspectives linguistiques et discursives sur la circulation du discours portant sur le changement climatique. Cahiers de praxématique :63
Fløttum, Kjersti
2014. La narrativisation, trait unificateur des genres du discours climatique ?. In Genres & textes, ► pp. 239 ff.
Francl, Michelle
2014. The write stuff. Nature Chemistry 6:7 ► pp. 555 ff.
Friess, Erin
2017. 2017 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), ► pp. 1 ff.
Fritz, Gerd
2018. Chapter 6. Leibniz vs. Locke. In Historical Pragmatics of Controversies [Controversies, 14], ► pp. 210 ff.
Fryer, Daniel Lees
2019. Chapter 9. Multiplying engagement. In Engagement in Professional Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 301], ► pp. 157 ff.
Fu, Liye, Lillian Lee & Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil
2017. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, ► pp. 1381 ff.
Galbo, Sebastian C. & Keith C. Mages
2023. Illustrating insanity: Allan McLane Hamilton, Types of Insanity, and physiognomy in late nineteenth-century American medicine. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences ► pp. 1 ff.
Gendron-Pontbriand, Eve-Marie
2017. Le traitement de la modalité épistémique dans les traductions françaises de On the Origin of Species de Charles Darwin. Meta 61 ► pp. 87 ff.
Giannoni, Davide Simone
2009. Negotiating Research Values across Review Genres: A Case Study in Applied Linguistics. In Academic Evaluation, ► pp. 17 ff.
Golmohammadi, Saeedeh, Somayeh Suluki, Forugh Daneshmand & Farzad Salahshoor
2014. Socio – Cognitive Perspective to the Analysis of the Strategic Features of the Discussion Section of Research Articles in Applied Linguistics: Native vs. Non-native Researchers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 ► pp. 604 ff.
Gonnella, Marisa de Luján, Virginia Gabriela Cattólica, Carolina Inés Diruscio & Virginia Beatriz Zamboni
2020. TERRITORIOS E INSTRUMENTOS PARA EL DESARROLLO RURAL: ANÁLISIS DE PROGRAMAS EN LOCALIDADES, INSTITUCIONES Y PUBLICACIONES. Revista Americana de Empreendedorismo e Inovação 2:1 ► pp. 166 ff.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Katarzyna Fronczak
2020. "You Don't Have Time to Think Up There. If You Think You're Dead" – A Corpus-assisted Study of Discursive Strategies to Engage Readers in Corporate Blogs. Research in Language 18:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Grandjean, Philippe
2008. Late Insights into Early Origins of Disease. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology 102:2 ► pp. 94 ff.
Grandjean, Philippe
2020. From Research to Intervention. In Health Impacts of Developmental Exposure to Environmental Chemicals [Current Topics in Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, ], ► pp. 531 ff.
Gray, Bethany & Douglas Biber
2012. Current Conceptions of Stance. In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ► pp. 15 ff.
Gray, Bethany & Douglas Biber
2014. Stance markers. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 219 ff.
Graça Pinto, Maria da, Paulo Osório & Fernanda Martins
2014. A theoretical contribution to tackling certainty and uncertainty in scientific writing. In Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts [Dialogue Studies, 25], ► pp. 291 ff.
Green, Nancy L.
2010. Analysis of communication of uncertainty in genetic counseling patient letters for design of a natural language generation system. Social Semiotics 20:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Greiner Safi, Amelia, Motasem Kalaji, Rosemary Avery, Jeff Niederdeppe, Alan Mathios, Michael Dorf & Sahara Byrne
2023. Examining Perceptions of Uncertain Language in Potential E-Cigarette Warning Labels: Results from 16 Focus Groups with Adult Tobacco Users and Youth. Health Communication ► pp. 1 ff.
Gross, Alan G.
2003. Accounting for Rhetorical Change: The Case of the Founding of the Austrian Academy of Science. Rhetoric Review 22:1 ► pp. 40 ff.
Gross, Alan G. & Paula Chesley
2012. Hedging, Stance and Voice in Medical Research Articles. In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ► pp. 85 ff.
Gu, Chonglong
2019. Mediating ‘face’ in triadic political communication: a CDA analysis of press conference interpreters’ discursive (re)construction of Chinese government’s image (1998–2017). Critical Discourse Studies 16:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Guinda, Carmen Sancho & Ken Hyland
2012. Introduction: a Context-Sensitive Approach to Stance and Voice. In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ► pp. 1 ff.
Gupta, Suman
2007. Self-Announcements and Institutional Realignments. In Social Constructionist Identity Politics and Literary Studies, ► pp. 137 ff.
Gómez, Inmaculada Fortanet
2006. Interaction in Academic Spoken English: The Use of ‘I’ and ‘You’ in the MICASE. In Information Technology in Languages for Specific Purposes [Educational Linguistics, 7], ► pp. 35 ff.
Hafner, Christoph A.
2010. A Multi-perspective Genre Analysis of the Barrister’s Opinion: Writing Context, Generic Structure, and Textualization. Written Communication 27:4 ► pp. 410 ff.
Hafner, Christoph A.
2014. Embedding Digital Literacies in English Language Teaching: Students' Digital Video Projects as Multimodal Ensembles. TESOL Quarterly 48:4 ► pp. 655 ff.
Hahn, Udo & Christine Engelmann
2014. Grounding Epistemic Modality in Speakers’ Judgments. In PRICAI 2014: Trends in Artificial Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8862], ► pp. 654 ff.
Hartley, James, Alan Branthwaite, Frank Ganier & Laurent Heurley
2007. Lost in translation: contributions of editors to the meanings of text. Journal of Information Science 33:5 ► pp. 551 ff.
Harwood, Nigel
2005. ‘We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory … The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill This Gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics 26:3 ► pp. 343 ff.
Hashemi, Mohammad R. & Iman Gohari Moghaddam
2019. A Mixed Methods Genre Analysis of the Discussion Section of MMR Articles in Applied Linguistics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 13:2 ► pp. 242 ff.
Hassan, Ali Sabah & Nadya Khairy Muhamed Said
2020. A PRAGMATIC STUDY OF HEDGES IN AMERICAN POLITICAL EDITORIALS. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 10:3 ► pp. 60 ff.
He, Yuyin & Han Wang
2013. A Corpus-Based Study of Epistemic Modality Markers in Chinese Research Articles. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7717], ► pp. 199 ff.
Herman, Thierry
2015. Gérer la modalité épistémique et le hedging : analyse comparée d’examens écrits en Lettres et en Sciences humaines. Linx :72 ► pp. 151 ff.
Hernandez-Alvarez, Myriam & Jose M. Gomez
2015. 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, ► pp. 307 ff.
HERNÁNDEZ-ALVAREZ, MYRIAM & JOSÉ M. GOMEZ
2016. Survey about citation context analysis: Tasks, techniques, and resources. Natural Language Engineering 22:3 ► pp. 327 ff.
HERNÁNDEZ-ALVAREZ, MYRIAM, JOSÉ M. GOMEZ SORIANO & PATRICIO MARTÍNEZ-BARCO
2017. Citation function, polarity and influence classification. Natural Language Engineering 23:4 ► pp. 561 ff.
Herrando-Rodrigo, Isabel
2019. Raising awareness around writers' voice in academic discourse : an analysis of writers' (in)visibility. Brno studies in English :2 ► pp. [53] ff.
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura
2017. Evidential and epistemic stance strategies in scientific communication. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 225 ff.
Hobbs, Pamela
2003. The Use of Evidentiality in Physicians’ Progress Notes. Discourse Studies 5:4 ► pp. 451 ff.
Hryniuk, Katarzyna
2018. Expert-Like Use of Hedges and Boosters in Research Articles Written by Polish and English Native-Speaker Writers. Research in Language 16:3 ► pp. 263 ff.
Huan, Changpeng
2018. Linguistic Modelling of Journalistic Stance. In Journalistic Stance in Chinese and Australian Hard News, ► pp. 9 ff.
Huschová, Petra
2015. EXPLORING MODAL VERBS CONVEYING POSSIBILITY IN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE. Discourse and Interaction 8:2 ► pp. 35 ff.
Hyland, Ken
2000. “It might be suggested that...”. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S 16 ► pp. 83 ff.
Hyland, Ken
2003. Second Language Writing,
Hyland, Ken
2005. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Hyland, Ken
2012. Undergraduate Understandings: Stance and Voice in Final Year Reports. In Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, ► pp. 134 ff.
Hyland, Ken
2014. Introductory chapter. In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23], ► pp. 1 ff.
Hyland, Ken
Hyland, Ken & Giuliana Diani
2009. Introduction: Academic Evaluation and Review Genres. In Academic Evaluation, ► pp. 1 ff.
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2016. Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance. Written Communication 33:3 ► pp. 251 ff.
Hyland, Ken & Françoise Salager-Meyer
2009. Scientific writing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 42:1 ► pp. 297 ff.
Işık-Taş, Elvan Eda
2020. The Statement of Purpose in Graduate Program Applications: The Impact of Academics’ Feedback on L2 Writer Identity. In English for Specific Purposes Instruction and Research, ► pp. 177 ff.
Jaakola, Minna
2021. Marking one’s own viewpoint: The Finnish evidential verb+kseni ‘as far as I understand’ construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44:3 ► pp. 255 ff.
Jafarigohar, Manoochehr & Amirali Mohammadkhani
2015. Reporting Verbs in Applied Linguistics Research Articles by Native and Non-native Writers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5:12 ► pp. 2490 ff.
Jalilifar, A. R. & Z. G. Shooshtari
2011. Metadiscourse Awareness and ESAP Comprehension. Journal of College Reading and Learning 41:2 ► pp. 53 ff.
Janich, Nina & Nina Kalwa
2018. Wissenschaftskommunikation. In Handbuch Pragmatik, ► pp. 413 ff.
Jaworska, Sylvia
2015. Review of recent research (1998–2012) in German for Academic Purposes (GAP) in comparison with English for Academic Purposes (EAP): cross-influences, synergies and implications for further research. Language Teaching 48:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Jian Tao & Dawang Huang
2010. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing, ► pp. 290 ff.
Johansen, Stine Hulleberg
Johns, Ann M.
2008. Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching 41:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
Juknevičienė, Rita & Łukasz Grabowski
2018. Comparing Formulaicity of Learner Writing through Phrase-Frames: A Corpus-Driven Study of Lithuanian and Polish EFL Student Writing. Research in Language 16:3 ► pp. 303 ff.
Kahnamouei, T. Kh. & A. A. Hosseini
2022. Admirative Category with an Assessment of Possibility and Motivation in Russian and Persian Interrogative Sentences. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University 23:4 ► pp. 1096 ff.
Kang, Hui & Jiajin Xu
2021. A Multifactorial Analysis of Concessive Clause Positioning. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 28:4 ► pp. 356 ff.
Kaplan, Robert B & William Grabe
2002. A modern history of written discourse analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing 11:3 ► pp. 191 ff.
Kashiha, Hadi
2021. Stance-taking across monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:4 ► pp. 352 ff.
Keserlioglu, Kerem, Halil Kilicoglu & Gerben ter Riet
2019. Impact of peer review on discussion of study limitations and strength of claims in randomized trial reports: a before and after study. Research Integrity and Peer Review 4:1
Kewell, Beth
2013. Depicting the Uncertainties of Stem Cell Science. Science, Technology, & Human Values 38:5 ► pp. 599 ff.
Khedri, Mohsen & Konstantinos Kritsis
2020. How do we make ourselves heard in the writing of a research article? A study of authorial references in four disciplines. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Kilicoglu, Halil & Sabine Bergler
2008. Recognizing speculative language in biomedical research articles: a linguistically motivated perspective. BMC Bioinformatics 9:S11
Kilicoglu, Halil, Graciela Rosemblat, Thomas C. Rindflesch & Vladimir Brusic
2017. Assigning factuality values to semantic relations extracted from biomedical research literature. PLOS ONE 12:7 ► pp. e0179926 ff.
Kjeldsen, Jens E., Ragnhild Mølster & Øyvind Ihlen
2022. Expert Uncertainty: Arguments Bolstering the Ethos of Expertise in Situations of Uncertainty. In The Pandemic of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 43], ► pp. 85 ff.
Klochkova, Elena & Tatiana Evtushenko
2021. The peculiarities of realization of modal values of necessity and epistemic possibility in the Russian and Chinese languages. Litera :2 ► pp. 42 ff.
Kobayashi, Hiroe & Carol Rinnert
2023. Connecting with the Audience: Metadiscourse. In Developing Multilingual Writing [Multilingual Education, 42], ► pp. 67 ff.
Kobayashi, Hiroe & Carol Rinnert
2023. Multilingual Scholars: Audience and Expertise. In Developing Multilingual Writing [Multilingual Education, 42], ► pp. 245 ff.
KORKMAZ, Hüsem
2022. The Use of Epistemic Modality Markers as Hedges in Scientific Research Texts. Uluslararası Alan Eğitimi Dergisi
Koteyko, Irina
2015. The Language of Press Advertising in the UK. Journal of English Linguistics 43:4 ► pp. 259 ff.
Kotwica, Dorota
2018. Chapter 3. Exploring evidentiality in Spanish Biology articles (1850–1920). In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 290], ► pp. 49 ff.
Kozlova, Natalya Yu.
2023. Imagery in Scientific Discourse. RUDN Journal of Philosophy 27:1 ► pp. 138 ff.
Kozubíková Šandová, Jana
2017. “…and our study might therefore have been slightly underpowered”: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Hedging in English and Czech Medical Research Articles. AUC PHILOLOGICA 2017:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Kozáčiková, Zuzana
2015. TO-INFINITIVE CLAUSES IN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE – NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE WRITERS COMPARED. Discourse and Interaction 8:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Kozáčiková, Zuzana
2021. Stance complement clauses controlled by verbs in academic research papers. Topics in Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 16 ff.
Kruse, Otto
2013. Perspectivas sobre la escritura académica en la educación superior europea: Géneros, prácticas y competencias. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria 11:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Kruse, Otto
2016. Wissenschaftliches Schreiben forschungsorientiert unterrichten. In Wissenschaftliches Schreiben in Natur- und Technikwissenschaften, ► pp. 29 ff.
Kuik, Cheng-Chwee
2022. Shades of grey: riskification and hedging in the Indo-Pacific. The Pacific Review ► pp. 1 ff.
Lamers, Wout S, Kevin Boyack, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R Sugimoto, Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman & Dakota Murray
2021. Investigating disagreement in the scientific literature. eLife 10
Lampert, Gunther
2020. Chapter 5. How and why seem became an evidential. In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216], ► pp. 109 ff.
Larina, Tatiana & Douglas Mark Ponton
2020. Tact or frankness in English and Russian blind peer reviews. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:4 ► pp. 471 ff.
Larina, Tatiana & Douglas Mark Ponton
2022. I wanted to honour your journal, and you spat in my face: emotive (im)politeness and face in the English and Russian blind peer review. Journal of Politeness Research 18:1 ► pp. 201 ff.
Lastres-López, Cristina
2019. Chapter 3. Conditionals in spoken courtroom and parliamentary discourse in English, French, and Spanish. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91], ► pp. 51 ff.
Lee, Youra & Seok-Hoon You
2020. Comprehension Analysis on the Discourse Marker
Function of English -ly Type Epistemic Stance Adverbials. Lanaguage Research 56:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Lee, Youra & Seok-Hoon You
2020. Comprehension Analysis on the Discourse Marker Function of English -ly Type Epistemic Stance Adverbials. Lanaguage Research 56:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Lenardič, Jakob & Darja Fišer
2021. Hedging modal adverbs in Slovenian academic discourse. Slovenščina 2.0: empirical, applied and interdisciplinary research 9:1 ► pp. 145 ff.
Li, Yingya & Bei Yu
2022. Advice Giving in Medical Research Literature. In Information for a Better World: Shaping the Global Future [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13193], ► pp. 261 ff.
Lin, Chia-Yen
2015. An exploratory comparison of the use of modifiers by native speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese in academic lectures. Text & Talk 35:1
Lin, Wan-Hua
2019. Expressing Uncertainty with Conditionals in Medical Discourse: A Comparison Across Genres. In Chinese for Specific and Professional Purposes [Chinese Language Learning Sciences, ], ► pp. 213 ff.
Lin, Yen-Yu & Siaw-Fong Chung
2021. A Corpus-Based Study on Two Near-Synonymous Verbs in Academic Journals: PROPOSE and SUGGEST. English Teaching & Learning 45:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
Liu, Xiao
2021. The Low Co-Occurrence of Nominalization and Hedging in Scientific Papers Written by Chinese EFL Learners. SSRN Electronic Journal
Liu, Xiaozhong & Jian Qin
2014. An interactive metadata model for structural, descriptive, and referential representation of scholarly output. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65:5 ► pp. 964 ff.
Livnat, Zohar
2006. Rhétorique de l’objectivité et présence de l’auteur dans l’écriture en sciences sociales. Questions de communication :9 ► pp. 95 ff.
Livnat, Zohar
2009. The Concept of Scientific Fact: Perelman and Beyond. Argumentation 23:3 ► pp. 375 ff.
Livnat, Zohar
2010. Impersonality and Grammatical Metaphors in Scientific Discourse. Lidil :41 ► pp. 103 ff.
Livnat, Zohar
2014. Negotiating scientific ethos in academic controversy. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:2 ► pp. 126 ff.
Lorés-Sanz, Rosa & Isabel Herrando-Rodrigo
2020. New concepts, different approaches: tackling e-visibility in research project websites. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 15:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Lu, Xiaofei, Olesya Kisselev, Jungwan Yoon & Michael D. Amory
2018. Investigating effects of criterial consistency, the diversity dimension, and threshold variation in formulaic language research. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 158 ff.
López Campillo, Rosa María
2021. Chapter 5. Persuasive discourse in Daniel Defoe’s political essays. In Discourse Studies in Public Communication [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 92], ► pp. 104 ff.
Malmström, Hans
2016. Engaging the Congregation: The Place of Metadiscourse in Contemporary Preaching. Applied Linguistics 37:4 ► pp. 561 ff.
Malmström, Hans
Malášková, Martina
2012. Hedges as writer protective devices in applied linguistics and literary criticism research articles. Discourse and Interaction 5:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Manan, Nor Azma & Noorizah Mohd Noor
2014. Analysis of Reporting Verbs in Master's Theses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 134 ► pp. 140 ff.
Maniati, Mahmood, Alireza Jalilifar, Amir Mashhadi & Ali Hemmati
2020. Engagement under revision: How Iranian scholars negotiate the arguability of their texts. Complutense Journal of English Studies 28 ► pp. 135 ff.
Marshall, Trisha L., Lindsay C. Nickels, Patrick W. Brady, Ezra J. Edgerton, James J. Lee & Philip A. Hagedorn
2023. Developing a machine learning model to detect diagnostic uncertainty in clinical documentation. Journal of Hospital Medicine 18:5 ► pp. 405 ff.
Martín Martín, Pedro
2010. EL INGLÉS PARA FINES ACADÉMICOS: APORTACIONES EN LA INVESTIGACIÓN Y ENSEÑANZA DEL DISCURSO CIENTÍFICO. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 5:1
Martínez Caro, Elena
2014. The expression of evaluation in weekly news magazines in English. In Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 242], ► pp. 321 ff.
Mauranen, Anna
2021. “Gonna write about it on my blog too” Metadiscourse in Research Blog Discussions. In Metadiscourse in Digital Communication, ► pp. 11 ff.
McFeetors, P. Janelle
2012. Enhancing Students' Mathematical Learning Through Focused Teacher Growth: A Review of of Promoting Purposeful Discourse…. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 43:5 ► pp. 651 ff.
McLaren-Hankin, Yvonne
2008. `We expect to report on significant progress in our product pipeline in the coming year': hedging forward-looking statements in corporate press releases. Discourse Studies 10:5 ► pp. 635 ff.
Medimorec, Srdan & Gordon Pennycook
2015. The language of denial: text analysis reveals differences in language use between climate change proponents and skeptics. Climatic Change 133:4 ► pp. 597 ff.
Mele-Marrero, Margarita & Francisco Alonso-Almeida
2011. The Role of the Pronounsheandshein Seventeenth-Century Obstetric Directives*. Studia Neophilologica 83:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Mendiluce-Cabrera, Gustavo & Montserrat Bermúdez-Bausela
2006. Sci-Tech Communication: Is There a Process of Internationalization in English and Spanish?. Meta 51:3 ► pp. 445 ff.
Menke, Mandy R.
2021. Chapter 11. Linguistic markers of stance in advanced second language Spanish academic writing. In Advancedness in Second Language Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 31], ► pp. 246 ff.
Mercer, Robert E., Chrysanne Di Marco & Frederick W. Kroon
2004. The Frequency of Hedging Cues in Citation Contexts in Scientific Writing. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3060], ► pp. 75 ff.
Mihatsch, Wiltrud
2012. Hedges. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Mikolaichik, Margarita Vladimirovna
2019. LEXICAL HEDGES IN THE BRITISH AND AMERICAN VARIETIES OF ACADEMIC DISCOURSE IN ECONOMICS: A CORPUS-BASED STUDY. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice :3 ► pp. 63 ff.
Mohd Noor, Maizura, Jean Mulder & Celia Thompson
2014. A Context-Based Approach to the Identification of Hedging Devices and Features of Writer-Reader Relationship in Academic Publications. In Occupying Niches: Interculturality, Cross-culturality and Aculturality in Academic Research [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 65 ff.
MOLLE, DANIELLA & PAUL PRIOR
2008. Multimodal Genre Systems in EAP Writing Pedagogy: Reflecting on a Needs Analysis. TESOL Quarterly 42:4 ► pp. 541 ff.
Monaco, Leida Maria
2016. Was late Modern English scientific writing impersonal?. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:4 ► pp. 499 ff.
Monaco, Leida Maria
2019. Chapter 5. Exploring the narrative dimension in late Modern English History texts. In Writing History in Late Modern English, ► pp. 84 ff.
Morante, Roser & Caroline Sporleder
2012. Modality and Negation: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Computational Linguistics 38:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
Myers, Greg
2004. Matters of Opinion,
Ehsan Namaziandost & Sajad Shafiee
2018. Gender Differences in the Use of Lexical Hedges in Academic Spoken Language among Iranian EFL Learners: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Research in English Education 3:4 ► pp. 63 ff.
Nasiri, Sina
2012. Exploring the significant role of meta-discourse in academic writing for a discourse community by academic members. International Journal of Research Studies in Education 2:1
Ndzabandzaba, Coli
2018. Language Issues in Weather Forecasts, Reporting, and Climate Change. In Handbook of the Changing World Language Map, ► pp. 1 ff.
Ndzabandzaba, Coli
2020. Language Issues in Weather Forecasts, Reporting, and Climate Change. In Handbook of the Changing World Language Map, ► pp. 3349 ff.
Nissi, Riikka, Mona Blåsjö & Carla Jonsson
2021. Workplace communication in flux: from discrete languages, text genres and conversations to complex communicative situations. Applied Linguistics Review 0:0
NKEMLEKE, DANIEL
2010. Cameroonian and foreign scholars’ discourse: the rhetoric of conference abstracts. World Englishes 29:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Nkemleke, Daniel
2014. Researching the research article in Cameroon English. Brno Studies in English 40:1 ► pp. 175 ff.
Oliver del Olmo, Sonia
2014. Hedging and attitude markers in Spanish and English scientific medical writing. In Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts [Dialogue Studies, 25], ► pp. 273 ff.
Omero, Paolo, Massimiliano Valotto, Riccardo Bellana, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni, Andrzej Zuczkowski & Carlo Tasso
2020. Writer’s uncertainty identification in scientific biomedical articles: a tool for automatic if-clause tagging. Language Resources and Evaluation 54:4 ► pp. 1161 ff.
Orr, T.
2003. Introduction to the special issue [English language training for nonnative speakers of English in science or engineering]. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 46:3 ► pp. 153 ff.
Orr, T. & A. Takahashi
2002. Proceedings. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, ► pp. 403 ff.
Ostovar-Namaghi, Seyyed Ali, Fatemeh Khorram & Farhad Moezzipour
2022. Exploring the use of modality in EFL learners’ writing. English Text Construction 15:1 ► pp. 68 ff.
Ozonoff, David M. & Philippe Grandjean
2020. What is useful research? The good, the bad, and the stable. Environmental Health 19:1
Panocová, Renáta & Lukáš Lukačín
2019. Epistemic modal markers in two domains of academic research papers in English. Brno studies in English :2 ► pp. [121] ff.
Parvaresh, Vahid
2018. ‘We Are Going to Do a Lot of Things for College Tuition’: Vague Language in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Debates. Corpus Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Peacock, Matthew
2006. A cross-disciplinary comparison of boosting in research articles. Corpora 1:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Pearson, William S.
2022. A typology of the characteristics of teachers’ written feedback comments on second language writing. Cogent Education 9:1
Peynaud, Caroline
2023. Normes discursives et styles individuels dans la presse des États-Unis. Etudes de stylistique anglaise :17
Pham, Teresa
2017. “Hard to Beat Dickens’ Characters”: Non-Canonical Syntax in Evaluative Texts. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 65:3 ► pp. 247 ff.
Pimm, David
2009. Method, certainty and trust across disciplinary boundaries. ZDM 41:1-2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Pinto, Alexandra Guedes, Henrique Lopes Cardoso, Isabel Margarida Duarte, Catarina Vaz Warrot & Rui Sousa-Silva
2020. Biased Language Detection in Court Decisions. In Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2020 [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12490], ► pp. 402 ff.
Plappert, Garry
2017. Candidate Knowledge? Exploring epistemic claims in scientific writing: a corpus-driven approach. Corpora 12:3 ► pp. 425 ff.
Plastina, Anna Franca & Fabrizia Del Vecchio
2014. Diagnostic news delivery. In Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts [Dialogue Studies, 25], ► pp. 183 ff.
Ponterotto, Diane
Ponterotto, Diane
Puente-Castelo, Luis
2019. Chapter 7. “Were this eſtimation, however, to be depended on”. In Writing History in Late Modern English, ► pp. 130 ff.
Puente-Castelo, Luis
2021. Chapter 10. “If you will take the trouble to inquire into it rather closely, I think you will find that it is not worth very much”. In “All families and genera”, ► pp. 190 ff.
Pérez-Sabater, Carmen, Begoña Montero-Fleta & Ma Luisa Pérez-Sabater
2014. Researching Powerful and Powerless Styles: Professional Mock Interviews in an English Course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 ► pp. 2402 ff.
Rabab'ah, Ghaleb
2013. Hedging in nursing and education academic articles. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues 6:3/4 ► pp. 195 ff.
Razali, Nur Zafirah & Loi Chek Kim
2023. COMMUNICATIVE STRATEGIES USED IN TOURISM AND PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH ARTICLE DISCUSSIONS. Journal of Language and Communication 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Read, Jonathon & John Carroll
2012. Annotating expressions of Appraisal in English. Language Resources and Evaluation 46:3 ► pp. 421 ff.
Rein, Kellyn
2019. Fact, Conjecture, Hearsay and Lies: Issues of Uncertainty in Natural Language Communications. In Information Quality in Information Fusion and Decision Making [Information Fusion and Data Science, ], ► pp. 155 ff.
Resche, Catherine
2004. Investigating ‘Greenspanese’: From Hedging to ‘Fuzzy Transparency’. Discourse & Society 15:6 ► pp. 723 ff.
Rezaei, Shirin, Davud Kuhi, Mahnaz Saeidi & Krisda Chaemsaithong
2021. Diachronic corpus analysis of stance markers in research articles: The field of applied linguistics. Cogent Arts & Humanities 8:1
Rezanejad, Atefeh, Zahra Lari & Zahra Mosalli
2015. A Cross-cultural Analysis of the Use of Hedging Devices in Scientific Research Articles. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 6:6 ► pp. 1384 ff.
Rinck, Fanny
2010. L’analyse linguistique des enjeux de connaissance dans le discours scientifique. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances 4:3
Rizomilioti, Vassiliki
2006. Exploring Epistemic Modality in Academic Discourse Using Corpora. In Information Technology in Languages for Specific Purposes [Educational Linguistics, 7], ► pp. 53 ff.
Rizvić-Eminović, Edina & Đelaludina Šukalić
2019. CORPUS-BASED STUDY OF THE MODAL VERBS IN THE SPOKEN AND ACADEMIC GENRES OF THE CORPUS OF CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN ENGLISH. Zbornik radova 18 :17 ► pp. 351 ff.
Roland, Marie‐Claude
2007.
Publish
and
perish
. EMBO reports 8:5 ► pp. 424 ff.
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth & Shirley Carter-Thomas
2005. The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: context, argument and interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth & Shirley Carter-Thomas
2008. When practice belies ‘theory’: Form, function and frequency of if-conditionals in specialised discourse. ASp :53-54 ► pp. 39 ff.
Rubin, Victoria L., Elizabeth D. Liddy & Noriko Kando
2006. Certainty Identification in Texts: Categorization Model and Manual Tagging Results. In Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications [The Information Retrieval Series, 20], ► pp. 61 ff.
Ruzaitė, Jūratė
2007. Vague References to Quantities as a Face-Saving Strategy in Teacher-Student Interaction. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 3:-1
Römer, Ute
2017. Language assessment and the inseparability of lexis and grammar: Focus on the construct of speaking. Language Testing 34:4 ► pp. 477 ff.
Sabet, Peyman G. P., Samran Daneshfar & Grace Zhang
2021. Elastic language in academic emails: Communication between a PhD applicant and potential supervisors. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41:3 ► pp. 263 ff.
Sabet, Peyman G.P. & Grace Q. Zhang
2018. The Pragmatic Functions of ‘I Don't Think’ and ‘I Think + Not’. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:3 ► pp. 421 ff.
Salager-Meyer, Françoise
1998. Le discours aigre-doux de la controverse scientifique : évolution de la rhétorique des confrontations académiques. ASp :19-22 ► pp. 29 ff.
Samaie, Mahmoud, Fereshteh Khosravian & Mahnaz Boghayeri
2014. The Frequency and Types of Hedges in Research Article Introductions by Persian and English Native Authors. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 ► pp. 1678 ff.
Sawaki, Tomoko
Scarpa, Federica
2020. Introducing Specialised Translation. In Research and Professional Practice in Specialised Translation, ► pp. 1 ff.
Schmauss, Lindsay Susannah & Kelly Kilian
2023. Hedging with modal auxiliary verbs in scientific discourse and women’s language. Open Linguistics 9:1
Kate Scott, Billy Clark & Robyn Carston
2019. Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation,
Shafqat, Asmara, Rafique Ahmed Memon & Tafseer Ahmed Khan
2022. Do Pakistani English writers hedge more in linguistics research than native English writers?. Journal of Humanities, Social and Management Sciences (JHSMS) 3:1 ► pp. 243 ff.
Shchemeleva, Irina
2020. Discipline and methodological paradigm. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 1:2 ► pp. 92 ff.
Shchemeleva, Irina
2022. When the unconventional becomes convention: epistemic stance in English as a lingua franca research articles. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Shen, Qian, Yating Tao & Natalia Grabar
2021. Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opinion columns: A comparative corpus-based study. PLOS ONE 16:3 ► pp. e0247981 ff.
Siew Mei, Wu
2013. Certainty Judgements and the Status of Propositions in Undergraduate Essays. RELC Journal 44:3 ► pp. 279 ff.
Simanjuntak, Risa Rumentha
2022. Revealing the rhetorical moves and linguistic patterns in discipline-related undergraduate thesis. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature) 7:2 ► pp. 345 ff.
Simpson-Vlach, Rita & Nick C. Ellis
2010. An Academic Formulas List: New Methods in Phraseology Research. Applied Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 487 ff.
Skelton, John
2012. English for Medical Purposes. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Small, Henry
2011. Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: a preliminary investigation. Scientometrics 87:2 ► pp. 373 ff.
Smirnova, Elizaveta & Svetlana Strinyuk
2020. Hedges in Russian EAP writing: A corpus-based study of research papers in management. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 9:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Solbjørg, Aud
2005. Competing roles: student teachers using asynchronous forums. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15:3 ► pp. 346 ff.
Soler-Monreal, Carmen & Luz Gil-Salom
2014. Chapter 1. Academic voices and claims. In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23], ► pp. 23 ff.
SOLIN, ANNA
2004. Intertextuality as mediation: On the analysis of intertextual relations in public discourse. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 24:2
Sorensen, R.
2006. Sharp Edges from Hedges: Fatalism, Vagueness and Epistemic Possibility. Philosophical Studies 131:3 ► pp. 607 ff.
SOYŞEKERCİ, Gökhan, Esra AYDIN ÖZTÜRK & Kamil İŞERİ
2022. METADISCOURSE MARKERS IN CONCLUDING SECTIONS OF POSTGRADUATE THESES. Çukurova Üniversitesi Türkoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi
Stajner, Sanja, Goran Glavas, Simone Paolo Ponzetto & Heiner Stuckenschmidt
2017. 2017 IEEE 11th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), ► pp. 164 ff.
Staples, Shelley
2017. Review: Aull (2015) First Year University Writing: A Corpus-based Study with Implications for Pedagogy. Corpora 12:3 ► pp. 517 ff.
Starfield, Sue
2007. New Directions in Student Academic Writing. In International Handbook of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 875 ff.
Steffens, Brent, M. Anne Britt, Jason L. Braasch, Helge Strømsø & Ivar Bråten
2014. Memory for Scientific Arguments and Their Sources: Claim–Evidence Consistency Matters. Discourse Processes 51:1-2 ► pp. 117 ff.
Stoller, Fredricka L. & Marin S. Robinson
2014. An Interdisciplinary Textbook Project: Charting the Paths Taken. In English Language Teaching Textbooks, ► pp. 262 ff.
Stoller, Fredricka L. & Marin S. Robinson
2014. Chapter 2. Drawing upon applied linguistics to attain goals in an interdisciplinary chemistry–applied linguistics project. In Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education [Language Studies, Science and Engineering, 1], ► pp. 11 ff.
Su, Qi, Huanqing Lou & Pengyuan Liu
2013. Hedge Detection with Latent Features. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8229], ► pp. 436 ff.
Suau-Jiménez, Francisca
2014. Chapter 5. Dialogic voices of writers and readers in traveller forums through interpersonality. In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23], ► pp. 137 ff.
Suau-Jiménez, Francisca & Laura Ramírez-Polo
2016. How to Blend Language and ICT in the Didactics of Scientific Translation. In Technology Implementation in Second Language Teaching and Translation Studies [New Frontiers in Translation Studies, ], ► pp. 229 ff.
Sun, Shuyi & Peter Crosthwaite
2022. “Establish a niche” via negation: A corpus-based study of negation within the Move 2 sections of PhD thesis introductions. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 189 ff.
Szczygłowska, Tatiana
2020. Creating the Authorial Self in Academic Texts: Evidence From the Expert’s Style of Writing. English Studies at NBU 6:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2014. Pragmatic Aspects of Comment Clauses in Courtroom Interaction. In Language Use and Linguistic Structure, ► pp. 255 ff.
Szymańska, Jolanta
2013. Gendered Use of the Hedge in Academic Discourse. In Language in Cognition and Affect [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 3 ff.
Tan, Chenhao, Vlad Niculae, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil & Lillian Lee
2016. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web, ► pp. 613 ff.
TAYMAZ, Neris
2021. A corpus-based comparison of use of hedges and boosters by Turkish ELT MA and PhD students. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi 17:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
ter Riet, Gerben, Paula Chesley, Alan G. Gross, Lara Siebeling, Patrick Muggensturm, Nadine Heller, Martin Umbehr, Daniela Vollenweider, Tsung Yu, Elie A. Akl, Lizzy Brewster, Olaf M. Dekkers, Ingrid Mühlhauser, Bernd Richter, Sonal Singh, Steven Goodman, Milo A. Puhan & Christos A. Ouzounis
2013. All That Glitters Isn't Gold: A Survey on Acknowledgment of Limitations in Biomedical Studies. PLoS ONE 8:11 ► pp. e73623 ff.
Theil, Christoph Kilian, Sanja Štajner, Heiner Stuckenschmidt & Simone Paolo Ponzetto
2018. Automatic Detection of Uncertain Statements in the Financial Domain. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10762], ► pp. 642 ff.
Theil, Kilian, Jens Daube & Heiner Stuckenschmidt
2022. Causal Effects of Linguistic Uncertainty on Risk Perception and Investment Behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal
Torosian, Oksana & Alevtyna Sheliakina
2022. LINGUOPRAGMATIC ASPECT OF NON-CATEGORICAL EXPRESSIONS IN ENGLISH SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science :3(35)
Toska, Bledar
2015. … every time you’ve offered an opinion, you’ve been wrong. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 55 ff.
Tseronis, Assimakis
2022. Use and abuse of the strategic function of in fact and frankly when qualifying a standpoint. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 473 ff.
Tutin, Agnès
Twumasi, Rita Akele
2021. Mitigation strategies in examiners’ reports of Mphil theses. International Journal of Research Studies in Education 10:11
Tyrkkö, Jukka
2014. “Strong churlish purging Pills”: Multi-adjectival premodification in early modern medical writing in English. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243], ► pp. 157 ff.
Uysal, Hacer Hande
2014. A Cross-cultural Study of Indirectness and Hedging in the Conference Proposals of English NS and NNS Scholars. In Occupying Niches: Interculturality, Cross-culturality and Aculturality in Academic Research [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 179 ff.
van Lacum, Edwin, Marcel Koeneman, Miriam Ossevoort & Martin Goedhart
2016. Scientific Argumentation Model (SAM): A Heuristic for Reading Research Articles by Science Students. In Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning [Contributions from Science Education Research, 2], ► pp. 169 ff.
van Lacum, Edwin, Miriam Ossevoort, Hendrik Buikema & Martin Goedhart
2012. First Experiences with Reading Primary Literature by Undergraduate Life Science Students. International Journal of Science Education 34:12 ► pp. 1795 ff.
Varga, Mirna
2020. Hedging functions of extraposed that-clauses in English and declarative subject da-clauses in Croatian academic writing. ExELL 8:2 ► pp. 83 ff.
Venclová, Natalie
2007. Communication within archaeology: Do we understand each other?. European Journal of Archaeology 10:2-3 ► pp. 207 ff.
Verbeke, Mathias, Paolo Frasconi, Vincent Van Asch, Roser Morante, Walter Daelemans & Luc De Raedt
2012. Kernel-Based Logical and Relational Learning with kLog for Hedge Cue Detection. In Inductive Logic Programming [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7207], ► pp. 347 ff.
Vincze, Laura & Isabella Poggi
2022. Multimodal signals of high commitment in expert-to-expert contexts. Discourse & Communication 16:6 ► pp. 693 ff.
Vogel, Carl & Liliana Mamani Sanchez
2012. 2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), ► pp. 517 ff.
Vold, Eva Thue
2006. Epistemic modality markers in research articles: a cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Walker, Kenny
2013. “Without Evidence, There Is No Answer”: Uncertainty and Scientific Ethos in the Silent Spring[s] of Rachel Carson. Environmental Humanities 2:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Walker, Kenny & Lynda Walsh
2012. “No One Yet Knows What the Ultimate Consequences May Be”. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 26:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Walsh, Lynda & Kenneth C. Walker
2016. Perspectives on Uncertainty for Technical Communication Scholars. Technical Communication Quarterly 25:2 ► pp. 71 ff.
Wang, Peiling & Jing Su
2021. Post-publication expert recommendations in faculty opinions (F1000Prime): Recommended articles and citations. Journal of Informetrics 15:3 ► pp. 101174 ff.
WHITT, RICHARD J.
2023. Epistemic space and key concepts in early and late modern medical discourse: an exploration of two genres. English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.
Wiraszka, Łukasz
2023. Active verbs with inanimate, text-denoting subjects in Polish and English abstracts of research articles in linguistics. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:1 ► pp. 217 ff.
Wiraszka, Łukasz
2020. Viewpoint in Translation of Academic Writing: An Illustrative Case Study. Między Oryginałem a Przekładem 26:47 ► pp. 111 ff.
Wrigglesworth, John & Mary McKeever
2010. Writing History. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 9:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Wulff, Stefanie & Ute Römer
2009. Becoming a proficient academic writer: shifting lexical preferences in the use of the progressive. Corpora 4:2 ► pp. 115 ff.
Xie, Shaoliang & Chenggang Mi
2023. Promotion and caution in research article abstracts: The use of positive, negative and hedge words across disciplines and rankings. Learned Publishing 36:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
Yang, Hui, Anne De Roeck, Vincenzo Gervasi, Alistair Willis & Bashar Nuseibeh
2012. 2012 20th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), ► pp. 11 ff.
Yang, Wenhui
2020. News Discourse and Cognitive Studies. In A Cross-Cultural Study of Commercial Media Discourses, ► pp. 9 ff.
Yoon, Hyung-Jo & Ute Römer
2020. Quantifying Disciplinary Voices: An Automated Approach to Interactional Metadiscourse in Successful Student Writing. Written Communication 37:2 ► pp. 208 ff.
Zainuddin, Siti Zaidah, Alexander Charles Damiano-Nittoli & Azlin Zaiti Zainal
2019. Hedging Functions in Malaysian Doctoral Candidature Defense Sessions. SAGE Open 9:4 ► pp. 215824401989427 ff.
Zare, Javad & Mansoor Tavakoli
2017. The Use of Personal Metadiscourse over Monologic and Dialogic Modes of Academic Speech. Discourse Processes 54:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Zhang, Grace
2016. How elastica littlecan be and how mucha littlecan do in Chinese. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Zhang, Grace
2019. The pragmatic use of ‘sort of’ in TV forums. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1 ► pp. 62 ff.
Zhang, Grace & Vahid Parvaresh
2019. Elastic Language in the Chinese Data. In Elastic Language in Persuasion and Comforting, ► pp. 83 ff.
Zhang, Grace & Vahid Parvaresh
2019. Introduction. In Elastic Language in Persuasion and Comforting, ► pp. 1 ff.
Zhang, Grace & Vahid Parvaresh
2019. Theoretical Foundations. In Elastic Language in Persuasion and Comforting, ► pp. 11 ff.
Zhang, Grace & Ming-Yu Tseng
2020. Attitudes towards elastic language in Australian online healthcare information. Internet Pragmatics 3:1 ► pp. 34 ff.
Zhang, Grace Q. & Peyman G. P. Sabet
2016. Elastic ‘I think’: Stretching Over L1 and L2. Applied Linguistics 37:3 ► pp. 334 ff.
Zhao, Cecilia Guanfang
2013. Measuring authorial voice strength in L2 argumentative writing: The development and validation of an analytic rubric. Language Testing 30:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Zou, Hang & Ken Hyland
2019. Reworking research: Interactions in academic articles and blogs. Discourse Studies 21:6 ► pp. 713 ff.
Zuczkowski, Andrzej, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni, Massimiliano Valotto & Roberto Burro
2016. Writers’ Uncertainty in a Corpus of Scientific Biomedical Articles with a Diachronic Perspective. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 203 ff.
Álvarez Gil, Francisco J.
2018. Epistemic modals in early Modern English history texts. Analysis of gender variation. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 13:1 ► pp. 13 ff.
Çakır, Hamide
2016. Native and Non-Native Writers’ Use of Stance Adverbs in English Research Article Abstracts. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 06:02 ► pp. 85 ff.
Łyda, Andrzej & Krystyna Warchał
2011. Ethnic and Disciplinary Cultures and Understatement: Litotic Constructions in Polish and English Linguistics and Biology Research Articles. In Aspects of Culture in Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Learning, ► pp. 193 ff.
ŞEN, Ekin
2021. Üstsöylem: Tanım, Modeller, Çözümlemeler Çerçevesinde Bir Değerlendirme. Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi
Šinkūnienė, Jolanta
2018. Chapter 3. The power of English. In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18], ► pp. 59 ff.
刘, 昂
2019. Empirical Study on Hedges in the Abstracts of Articles in Computer Science between China and America. Modern Linguistics 07:06 ► pp. 983 ff.
宁, 旭芳
2017. Study on the Engagement Resources in Research Article Introductions of Applied Linguistics. Modern Linguistics 05:04 ► pp. 309 ff.
[no author supplied]
1999. Book reviews. Forensic Linguistics 6:2 ► pp. 320 ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. Copyright Page. In Rhetorical Style, ► pp. iv ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. Dedication. In Rhetorical Style, ► pp. v ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2021. Issues in Grammatical Description. In Doing English Grammar, ► pp. 92 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General