The study of argumentation from a speech act perspective

Cited by nine other publications

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Ton van Haaften

2023. The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View. Argumentation 37:3 ► pp. 341 ff.

Tseronis, Assimakis

2021. How Face Threatening Are Disagreement Moves? A Proposal for an Integration of Insights from Politeness Theory into Argumentation Theory. In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36], ► pp. 167 ff.

van Poppel, Lotte

2017. Chapter 6. The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 93 ff.

Feteris, Eveline T.

2013. Strategic Maneuvering with the Argumentative Role of Legal Principles in the Case of the “Unworthy Spouse”. In Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives [Law and Philosophy Library, 102], ► pp. 85 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2013. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.

Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst

2003. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation,

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Rob Grootendorst

2015. The History of the Argumentum Ad Hominem Since the Seventeenth Century. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 611 ff.

Van Eemeren, Frans H. & Peter Houtlosser

2003. A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof. In Anyone Who Has a View [Argumentation Library, 8], ► pp. 123 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Peter Houtlosser

2015. A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 455 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.