Part of
Us and Others: Social identities across languages, discourses and culturesEdited by Anna Duszak †
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 98] 2002
► pp. 31–49
Edited by Anna Duszak †
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 98] 2002
► pp. 31–49
Grammar and function of we
Cited by
Cited by 49 other publications
Aijón Oliva, Miguel A.
2022. On the meanings and functions of grammatical choice. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 573 ff. 
Assouline, Dalit
2010. The Emergence of Two First-Person Plural Pronouns in Haredi Jerusalemite Yiddish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bateman, Amanda
2014. Children’s use of Englishwein a primary school in Wales. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 227 ff.
Bazzanella, Carla
2014. Grammar, interaction, and context: Unmarked and marked uses of the first person
plural in Italian. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 83 ff.
Bisiada, Mario
2023. The discursive construction of a new reality in Olaf Scholz’s Zeitenwende speech. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff.
Boer, Lianne J. M.
2021. International Law As We Know It,
Chaemsaithong, Krisda & Yoonjeong Kim
2021. “Let’s kill him”: self-reference pronouns and speaking roles in capital trials. Social Semiotics 31:4 ► pp. 585 ff.
Chaleila, Wisam & Carol Colatrella
2019. The collapse of the American upper-class collective identity: Capitalism and thenouveaux richesin Edith Wharton’sThe House of Mirth. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1 ► pp. 1594515 ff.
Dori-Hacohen, Gonen
2014. Establishing social groups in Hebrew: ‘We’ in political radio phone-in programs. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 187 ff.
Duszak, Anna
2014. Why ‘we’?: Between person marking, ideology and politeness
in contemporary Polish. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 207 ff.
Formato, Federica
2019. Women in the Public Sphere: Gendered Language. In Gender, Discourse and Ideology in Italian, ► pp. 135 ff.
Gasaway Hill, Mary Lynne
2018. Exploring the Protest Language of Songs: We Shall Overcome and 99 Luftballons/99 Red Balloons. In The Language of Protest, ► pp. 121 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2021. WIR im interaktionalen Gebrauch: Zur Verwendung des Pronomens der 1. Person Plural in der institutionellen Kommunikation – am Beispiel onkologischer Aufklärungsgespräche. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 49:2 ► pp. 292 ff.
Han, Yanmei & Tao Xiong
2022. Using wǒmen (we) to mean s/he in Chinese parents’ interaction. Pragmatics and Society 13:1 ► pp. 126 ff.
Kleinke, Sonja & Birte Bös
2018. Indeterminate us and them : The complexities of referentiality, identity and group construction in a public online discussion. In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78], ► pp. 153 ff.
Kranert, Michael
2017. ‘Today I offer you, and we offer the country a new vision’: The strategic use of first person pronouns in party conference speeches of the Third Way. Discourse & Society 28:2 ► pp. 182 ff.
Kłosińska, Urszula & Magdalena Leszko
2023. Family relationships as a source of narrative identity of people with advanced dementia. BMC Geriatrics 23:1
LaCasse, Dora
2019. The persistence of expression: Clusivity, partial co-reference, and socioeconomic differentiation of first person plural subject pronoun expression in Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Laurens, Stéphane & Mickael Ballot
2021. “We must continue.” The strange appearance of “we” instead of “you” in the prods of the Milgram experiment. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology 5:4 ► pp. 556 ff.
Lei, Lei
2022. Exploring ecological identity from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. Journal of World Languages 7:3 ► pp. 487 ff.
Mitchell, Philip & James Stewart
2017. Who are We?. Journalism Practice 11:4 ► pp. 417 ff.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
2014. Replying with the freestanding ‘we’
in Greek conversations. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 159 ff.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
2014. Constructing collectivity with ‘we’: An introduction. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 1 ff.
Rodríguez García, Óscar Javier
2023. Desubjetivación del discurso escrito y gestión de referentes en las formas de la primera persona del plural en español. Moenia
Scheibman, Joanne
2014. Referentiality, predicate patterns, and functions ofwe-utterances in American English interactions. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 23 ff.
Siewierska, Anna
2004. Person,
Simões Marques, Isabelle & Michèle Koven
Simões Marques, Isabelle & Michèle Koven
2019. “We are going to our Portuguese homeland!”. In Storytelling in the Digital World [Benjamins Current Topics, 104], ► pp. 79 ff.
Temmerman, Martina
2014. “Nail polish – We’ve chosen the nicest shades for you!”: Editorial voice and ‘we’ in a Flemish women’s magazine. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 247 ff.
Temmerman, Martina & Raymond Harder
2021. Different Shades of Hate: The Grey Zone between Offensive and Discriminatory Language in the Social Media Accounts of Flemish Politicians. In Discourse and Conflict, ► pp. 147 ff.
Uzum, Baburhan, Bedrettin Yazan & Ali Fuad Selvi
2018. Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education. Language Teaching Research 22:5 ► pp. 625 ff.
UȚĂ BĂRBULESCU, OANA & MELANIA ROIBU
2023. Câteva observații despre... noi. Clusivitatea în limba română. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 2023:2 ► pp. 306 ff.
Valle, Marc Esteve Del, Alicia Wanless-Berk, Anatoliy Gruzd & Philip Mai
2018. Chapter 8 I Click, Therefore I Am: Predicting Clicktivist-Like Actions on Candidates’ Facebook Posts During the 2016 US Primary Election. In Networks, Hacking, and Media – CITA MS
30: Now and Then and Tomorrow [Studies in Media and Communications, 17], ► pp. 137 ff.
30: Now and Then and Tomorrow [Studies in Media and Communications, 17], ► pp. 137 ff. Van Swol, Lyn M. & Aimée A. Kane
2019. Language and Group Processes: An Integrative, Interdisciplinary Review. Small Group Research 50:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Vertommen, Bram
2022. The strategic value of pronominal choice. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 361 ff.
Wai, Brian Lap-ming & Foong Ha Yap
2018. Inclusivity and exclusivity in the use of Cantonese ngo5dei6 (‘we’) in evasive replies in Hong Kong political discourse. Discourse & Society 29:6 ► pp. 691 ff.
Zhu, Xun & Rachel A. Smith
2021. Standing out while fitting in: Examining linguistic choices by boundary spanners. Communication Monographs 88:4 ► pp. 418 ff.
[no author supplied]
2004. The typology of person forms. In Person, ► pp. 16 ff.
[no author supplied]
2004. Person forms in a diachronic perspective. In Person, ► pp. 246 ff.
[no author supplied]
2004. Person agreement. In Person, ► pp. 120 ff.
[no author supplied]
2004. Person forms and social deixis. In Person, ► pp. 214 ff.
[no author supplied]
2004. Genetic classification of languages cited in the text. In Person, ► pp. 284 ff.
[no author supplied]
2004. The function of person forms. In Person, ► pp. 173 ff.
[no author supplied]
2004. List of languages in the sample by macro-area. In Person, ► pp. 282 ff.
[no author supplied]
2004. Introduction. In Person, ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2004. References. In Person, ► pp. 296 ff.
[no author supplied]
2004. The structure of person paradigms. In Person, ► pp. 75 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.