2023. The discursive construction of a new reality in Olaf Scholz’s Zeitenwende speech. Critical Discourse Studies► pp. 1 ff.
Boer, Lianne J. M.
2021. International Law As We Know It,
Chaemsaithong, Krisda & Yoonjeong Kim
2021. “Let’s kill him”: self-reference pronouns and speaking roles in capital trials. Social Semiotics 31:4 ► pp. 585 ff.
Chaleila, Wisam & Carol Colatrella
2019. The collapse of the American upper-class collective identity: Capitalism and thenouveaux richesin Edith Wharton’sThe House of Mirth. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1 ► pp. 1594515 ff.
2019. Women in the Public Sphere: Gendered Language. In Gender, Discourse and Ideology in Italian, ► pp. 135 ff.
Gasaway Hill, Mary Lynne
2018. Exploring the Protest Language of Songs: We Shall Overcome and 99 Luftballons/99 Red Balloons. In The Language of Protest, ► pp. 121 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2021. WIR im interaktionalen Gebrauch: Zur Verwendung des Pronomens der 1. Person Plural in der institutionellen Kommunikation – am Beispiel onkologischer Aufklärungsgespräche. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 49:2 ► pp. 292 ff.
2017. ‘Today I offer you, and we offer the country a new vision’: The strategic use of first person pronouns in party conference speeches of the Third Way. Discourse & Society 28:2 ► pp. 182 ff.
LaCasse, Dora
2019. The persistence of expression: Clusivity, partial co-reference, and socioeconomic differentiation of first person plural subject pronoun expression in Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Laurens, Stéphane & Mickael Ballot
2021. “We must continue.” The strange appearance of “we” instead of “you” in the prods of the Milgram experiment. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology 5:4 ► pp. 556 ff.
Lei, Lei
2022. Exploring ecological identity from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. Journal of World Languages 7:3 ► pp. 487 ff.
Mitchell, Philip & James Stewart
2017. Who are We?. Journalism Practice 11:4 ► pp. 417 ff.
2021. Different Shades of Hate: The Grey Zone between Offensive and Discriminatory Language in the Social Media Accounts of Flemish Politicians. In Discourse and Conflict, ► pp. 147 ff.
Uzum, Baburhan, Bedrettin Yazan & Ali Fuad Selvi
2018. Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education. Language Teaching Research 22:5 ► pp. 625 ff.
Valle, Marc Esteve Del, Alicia Wanless-Berk, Anatoliy Gruzd & Philip Mai
2018. Chapter 8 I Click, Therefore I Am: Predicting Clicktivist-Like Actions on Candidates’ Facebook Posts During the 2016 US Primary Election. In Networks, Hacking, and Media – CITA MS30: Now and Then and Tomorrow [Studies in Media and Communications, 17], ► pp. 137 ff.
Van Swol, Lyn M. & Aimée A. Kane
2019. Language and Group Processes: An Integrative, Interdisciplinary Review. Small Group Research 50:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
2018. Inclusivity and exclusivity in the use of Cantonese ngo5dei6 (‘we’) in evasive replies in Hong Kong political discourse. Discourse & Society 29:6 ► pp. 691 ff.
Zhu, Xun & Rachel A. Smith
2021. Standing out while fitting in: Examining linguistic choices by boundary spanners. Communication Monographs 88:4 ► pp. 418 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.