Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Cognitive Perspectives on Genre
Edited by Carla Vergaro
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3] 2018
► pp. 417–429

Introduction

Cognitive perspectives on genre

 | University of Perugia
Article outline
  • 1.On genre and cognition
  • 2.The contributions to this special issue
  • 3.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 10 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00008.int
References (39)
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. The problem of speech genre. In Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas N. Huckin. 1993. Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication 101. 475–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice. 2012. Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition, Language 82(4). 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Paul J. Hopper (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capra, Fritjof. 2005. Complexity and life. Theory, Culture and Society 22(5). 33–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Amy. 2009. Re-fusing form in genre study. In Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.), Genres in the internet: Issues in the theory of genre, 27–47. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Freadman, Aviva & Peter Medway (eds.). 1994. Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul H. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter J. Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in mind and society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Emergent grammar. The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 131. 139–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyon, Sunny. 1996. Genre in three traditions. TESOL Quarterly 301. 693–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2018. Discourse analysis, 3rd edn. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1984. Active Zones. The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 101. 172–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2001. Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia. 2003. Toward a theory of text complexity. In Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi (ed.), Complexity in language and text, 23–66. Pisa: Edizioni Plus.Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 701. 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, Brian. 1995. Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 241. 393–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2006. Two conceptions of rationality in Grice’s theory of implicature. In Elvio Baccarini & Snježana Prijić-Samaržija (eds.), Rationality of belief and action, 233–247. Rijeka: University of Rijeka.Google Scholar
. 2007. Detto non detto: Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2012. Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable: Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics, 3–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Lexico-grammatical patterns, pragmatic associations and discourse frequency. In Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – collocations – patterns, 239–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2015. A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 31. 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Why cognitive linguistics must embrace the pragmatic and social dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 543–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 9–36. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Ein integratives soziokognitives Modell des dynamischen Lexikons. In Stefan Engelberg, Henning Lobin, Kathryn Steyer & Sascha Wolfer (eds.), Wortschätze: Dynamik, Muster, Komplexität, 215–231. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik. 2015. Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia 133(4). 583–623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard. 2011. Genre between the humanities and the sciences. In Marcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller & Astrid Lohöfer (eds.), Bi-directionality in the cognitive sciences, 24–41. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stukker, Ninke, Wilbert Spooren & Gerard Steen (eds.). 2016. Genre in language, discourse and cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Five Graces Group (Clay Bleckner, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman, Tom Schoenemann). 2009. Language is a complex-adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59(1). 1–26.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. The origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 2003 [1958]. The uses of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1967 [1953]. Ricerche filosofiche. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Tseng, Ming-Yu & Grace Zhang
2022. Conceptual metonymy and emotive-affective meaning at the interface: Examples from online medical consultations. Lingua 268 ► pp. 103192 ff. DOI logo
Tseng, Ming-Yu
2021. Toward a cognitive-pragmatic account of metonymic schemes of thought: Examples from online medical consultation. Journal of Pragmatics 173 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.