Dynamic schematic complexes
Image schema interaction in music and language cognition reveals a potential for computational affect detection
The article focuses on meaning generation in music and language cognition based on complexes of image schemas. We hypothesize that schemas are involved in dynamic interactions fostering online complex conceptual construction found both in language and elsewhere in various cognitive code expressions. Expanding on recent work, we propose that an account of image-schema interaction should include the notion of scalarity, a higher-order parameter which captures the intensity with which schemas occur and/or interact with one another. In that sense, schemas are proposed to have a binary valence (positive or negative) and a three-tier range of intensity levels. We focus on some examples of the interaction of force, path, link, balance, and containment image schemas in language and music to illustrate how a formal routine emerging from our proposal may help in addressing not only aspects of propositional semantics, but also affective and connotative nuances in musical and linguistic expression.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background and previous research
- 3.Dynamic approach to meaning generation in music and language
- 4.Improved analysis: Image schematic complexes and scalarity
- 5.Image schema combinations with the scale factor used in linguistic analysis: Some examples
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (74)
References
Antović, Mihailo. 2009. Musical metaphors in Serbian and Romani children: An empirical study. Metaphor & Symbol 24(3). 184–202.
Antović, Mihailo. 2018. Schemas, grounds, meaning: On the emergence of musical concepts through conceptual blending. Musicae Scientiae 22(1). 57–71.
Antović, Mihailo. 2022. Multilevel grounding: A theory of musical meaning. New York: Routledge.
Antović, Mihailo, Austin Bennett & Mark Turner. 2013. Running in circles or moving along lines: Conceptualization of musical elements in sighted and blind children. Musicae Scientiae 17(2). 229–245.
Antović, Mihailo, Dušan Stamenković & Vladimir Figar. 2016. “Association of meaning in program music: On denotation, inherence, and onomatopoeia.” Music Perception. 34(2). 243–248.
Antović, Mihailo, Jana Mitić & Naomi Benecasa. 2020. Conceptual rather than perceptual: Cross-modal binding of pitch sequencing is based on an underlying schematic structure. Psychology of Music 48(1). 84–104.
Athanasopoulos, George & Mihailo Antović. 2018. Conceptual integration of sound and image: A model of perceptual modalities. Musicae Scientiae 22(1). 72–87.
Barrett, Lisa Feldman. 2006. Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10(1). 20–46.
Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4). 577–660.
Bernstein, Leonard. 1976. The unanswered question: Six talks at Harvard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bierwisch, Manfred. 2009. Sprache-Musik-Bild. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 39(3). 8–34.
Brower, Candace. 2000. A cognitive theory of musical meaning. Journal of Music Theory 44(2). 323–379.
Cameron, Lynne. 2007a. The affective discourse dynamics of metaphor clustering. Ilha do Destero Florianopolis 531. 41–61.
Cameron, Lynne. 2007b. Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society 18(2). 197–222.
Cameron, Lynne J. & Juurd H. Stelma. 2004. Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(2). 107–136.
Cienki, Alan. 1997. Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In Marjolijn Verspoor, Ewe Sweetser & Kee Dong Lee (eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning, 3–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Clausner, Timothy & William Croft. 1999. Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10(1). 1–31.
Cox, Arnie. 2016. Music and embodied cognition: Listening, moving, feeling, and thinking. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Dewel, Robert. 2005. Dynamic patterns of CONTAINMENT. In Beate Hampe (ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive linguistics, 369–394. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dolscheid, Sarah, Shakila Shayan, Asifa Majid & Daniel Casasanto. 2013. The thickness of musical pitch: Psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychological Science 24(5). 613–621.
Duncan, Seth & Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2007. Affect is a form of cognition: A neurobiological analysis. Cognition and Emotion 21(6). 1184–1211.
Eitan, Zohar. 2017. Musical connections: Cross-modal correspondences. In Richard Ashley & Renee Timmers (eds.), The Routledge companion to music cognition, 213–224. New York: Routledge.
Eitan, Zohar & Renee Timmers. 2010. Beethoven’s last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: Cross-domain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context. Cognition 114(3). 405–422.
Evans, Vyvian & Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grady, Joseph E. 2005. Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In Beate Hampe (ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive linguistics, 35–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gray, Elizabeth K. & David Watson. 2007. Assessing positive and negative affect via self-report. In James A. Coan & John J. B. Allen (eds.), The handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment, 171–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hedblom, Maria, Oliver Kutz & Fabian Neuhaus. 2015. Choosing the right path: Image schema theory as a foundation for concept invention. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 6(1). 21–54.
Hedblom, Maria, Oliver Kutz & Fabian Neuhaus. 2016. Image schemas in computational conceptual blending. Cognitive Systems Research 391. 42–57.
Hedblom, Maria, Oliver Kutz, Rafael Peñaloza & Giancarlo Guizzardi. 2019. Image schema combinations and complex events. Künstliche Intelligenz 331. 279–291.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, Ray & Fred Lerdahl. 2006. The capacity for music: What is it, and what’s special about it? Cognition 100(1). 33–72.
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, Mark. 2005. The philosophical significance of image schemas. In Beate Hampe (ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive linguistics, 15–33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Johnson, Mark. 2007. The meaning of the body. Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, Mark & Steve Larson. 2003. “Something in the way she moves”: Metaphors of musical motion. Metaphor & Symbol 18(2). 63–84.
Koelsch, Stefan. 2012. Brain and music. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Koffka, Kurt. 1936. Principles of Gestalt psychology. London: Kegan Paul.
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 1993. The axiological parameter in preconceptual image schemata. In Richard Geiger & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.), Conceptualizations and mental processing in language, 307–330. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Küssner, Mats B., Liila Taruffi & Georgia A. Floridou (eds.). 2022. Music and mental imagery. New York: Routledge.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George. 1990. The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 39–74.
Larson, Steve. 2012. Musical forces. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Lerdahl, Fred & Ray Jackendoff. 1983. A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mandler, Jean & Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas. 2014. On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition 6(4). 1–23.
Mandler, Jean. 1992. How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review 99(4). 587–604.
Mandler, Jean. 2004. The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mandler, Jean. 2005. How to build a baby: III. Image schemas and the transition to verbal thought. In Beate Hampe (ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive linguistics, 137–163. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mandler, Jean. 2012. On the spatial foundations of the conceptual system and its enrichment. Cognitive Science 36(3). 421–451.
Marcoci, Sanda. 2014. Some typical linguistic features of English newspaper headlines. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 131. 708–714.
Mårdh, Ingrid. 1980. Headlinese: On the grammar of English front page headlines. Lund: CVVK Gleerup.
Oakley, Todd. 2007. Image schema. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive linguistics, 214–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Popova, Yanna. 2005. Image schemas and verbal synaesthesia. In Beate Hampe (ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive linguistics, 395–419. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Powers, Harold S. 1980. Language models and musical analysis. Ethnomusicology 24(1). 1–60.
Pratt, Carroll C. 1930. The spatial character of high and low tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology 13(3). 278–285.
Richardson, John E. 2007. Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rothfarb, Lee. 2002. Energetics. In Thomas Christensen (ed.), The Cambridge history of Western music theory, 927–955. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, James A. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(6). 1161–1178.
Russell, James A., Anna Weiss & Gerald A. Mendelsohn. 1989. Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(3). 493–502.
Russell, James A. 2003. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review 110(1). 145–172.
Ruwet, Nicolas & Mark Everist. 1987. Methods of analysis in musicology. Music Analysis 6(1/2). 3–36.
Saslaw, Janna. 1996. Forces, containers, and paths: The role of body-derived image schemas in the conceptualization of music. Journal of Music Theory 40(2). 217–243.
Spence, Charles. 2020. Assessing the role of emotional mediation in explaining crossmodal correspondences involving musical stimuli. Multisensory Research 33(1). 1–29.
Stadler, Michael W. 2020. The ontological nature of part-whole oscillations. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1). 49–100.
Watson, David, Lee Anna Clark & Auke Tellegen. 1988. Development and validation of brief measure of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(6). 1063–1070.
Zbikowski, Lawrence M. 2002. Conceptualizing music: Cognitive structure, theory, and analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zbikowski, Lawrence M. 2008. Metaphor and music. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 502–524. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zbikowski, Lawrence M. 2017. Foundations of musical grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Antović, Mihailo, Vladimir Ž. Jovanović & Mladen Popović
2024.
From spatial perception to referential meaning: convergent image schemas in the music of and texts about Beethoven’s piano sonatas.
Frontiers in Psychology 15
Pavlović, Vladan, Aleksandra Janić Mitić & Ivana Mitić
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.