The meaning of the particle lah in Singapore English
Mary Besemeres | Curtin University of Technology, Perth
Anna Wierzbicka | Australian National University, Canberra
In this paper we try to crack one of the hardest and most intriguing chestnuts in the field of cross-cultural pragmatics and to identify the meaning of the celebrated Singaporean particle lah — the hallmark of Singapore English. In pursuing this goal, we investigate the use of lah and seek to identify its meaning by trying to find a paraphrase in ordinary language which would be substitutable for lah in any context. In doing so, we try to enter the speakers’ minds, and as John Locke (1959 [1691]:99) urged in his pioneering work on particles, “observe nicely” the speakers’ “postures of the mind in discoursing”. At the same time, we offer a general model for the investigation of discourse markers and show how the methodology based on the “NSM” semantic theory allows the analyst to link pragmatics, via semantics, with the study of cognition.
Keywords: Author to supply
Published online: 10 July 2003
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.11.1.03bes
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.11.1.03bes
Cited by
Cited by 18 other publications
BOTHA, WERNER
2018. A social network approach to particles in Singapore English.
World Englishes 37:2 ► pp. 261 ff. 
Deuber, Dagmar, Jakob R. E. Leimgruber & Andrea Sand
2018. Singaporean internet chit chat compared to informal spoken language*
.
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 33:1 ► pp. 48 ff.
Gourlay, Claire & Ilana Mushin
2015. ‘Up dere la’: Final Particlelain a Queensland Aboriginal Vernacular.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 35:1 ► pp. 76 ff.
Hashim, Azirah, Jagdish Kaur & Tan Siew Kuang
2016. Identity regionalism and English as an ASEAN lingua franca
.
Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 5:2 ► pp. 229 ff.
Leung, Helen Hue Lam
2020.
In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication,
► pp. 187 ff.
LIM, LISA
2007. Mergers and acquisitions: on the ages and origins of Singapore English particles.
World Englishes 26:4 ► pp. 446 ff.
Masiola, Rosanna
2016. Interjectional issues in translation.
Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 62:2 ► pp. 300 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019.
In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21],
► pp. 97 ff.
Rieschild, Verna
2011. Arabic yacni: Issues of semantic, pragmatic, and indexical translation equivalence.
Intercultural Pragmatics 8:3
Wakefield, John C.
2012. A floating tone discourse morpheme: The English equivalent of Cantonese lo1.
Lingua 122:14 ► pp. 1739 ff.
Wakefield, John C.
2020.
In Intonational Morphology [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ],
► pp. 55 ff.
Wakefield, John C.
2020. The Syntax and Semantics of Cantonese Particles in the Left Periphery.
Studies in Chinese Linguistics 41:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Wakefield, John C. & Hung Yuk Lee
2019.
In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 19],
► pp. 333 ff.
WEE, LIONEL
2010. The particle ya in Colloquial Singapore English.
World Englishes 29:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
WILSON, GUYANNE, MICHAEL WESTPHAL, JOHANNA HARTMANN & DAGMAR DEUBER
2017. The use of question tags in different text types of Trinidadian English.
World Englishes 36:4 ► pp. 726 ff.
Wong, Jock
2004. Reduplication of nominal modifiers in Singapore English: a semantic and cultural interpretation.
World Englishes 23:3 ► pp. 339 ff.
Wong, Jock
2004. The particles of Singapore English: a semantic and cultural interpretation.
Journal of Pragmatics 36:4 ► pp. 739 ff.
WONG, JOCK
2005. “Why you so Singlish one?” A semantic and cultural interpretation of the Singapore English particle one.
Language in Society 34:02
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.