Cover not available
Review published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 12:1 (2004) ► pp.181–189
Book review

Adrian Pilkington. Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory Perspective
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000. xii + 202 pp. ISBN 90 272 5090 1

Reviewed by
| Tel Aviv University
Published online: 10 June 2004
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.12.1.15ben
References
Benari, M.
2000 Cognitive Aspects of Metaphorical Phenomena (in Hebrew). Ph.D. Dissertation submitted to Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Bergman, M.
1982 “Metaphorical assertions”. The Philosophical Review 91(2): 229–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, M.
1979 “How metaphors work: A reply to Donald Davidson”. Critical Inquiry 6(1): 131–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boswell, D. S.
1986 “Speakers’ intentions: Constraints on metaphor comprehension”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 1(3): 153–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgess, C. and Chiarello, C.
1996 “Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying metaphor comprehension and other figurative language”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 11(1): 67–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. and Faust, M. E.
1990 “The role of suppression in sentence comprehension”. In G. B. Simpson (ed), Understanding Word and Sentence. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 97–128.Google Scholar
1991 “The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17(2): 245–262.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. and Robertson, R. W.
1995 “Reading skill and suppression revisited”. Psychological Science 6(3): 165–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R.
1997 “Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis”. Cognitive Linguistics 7(1): 183–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. and Fein, O.
1999 “On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language”. Journal of Pragmatics 31(12): 1601–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Miller, D. T.
1986 “Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives”. Psychological Review 93(2): 136–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sloman, A.
1987 “Motives, mechanisms and emotions”. Cognition and Emotion 1(3): 217–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. D. and Kemler-Nelson, D. G.
1984 “Overall similarity in adults classification: The child in all of us”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(1): 137–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 “Is the more impulsive child a more holistic processor? A reconsideration”. Child Development 59(3): 719–727. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. D. and Shapiro, J. H.
1989 “The occurrence of holistic categorization”, Journal of Memory and Language. 28(4): 386–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.
1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steen, G.
1994 Understanding Metaphor in Literature: An Empirical Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sweeney, D.
1979 “Lexical access during comprehension: (Re)consideration of effects”. Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior 18(6): 645–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsur, R.
1978 “Emotion, emotional qualities, and poetry”. Psychocultural Review 21: 165–180.Google Scholar
1987 On Metaphoring. Tel-Aviv: Israel Science Publishers.Google Scholar
1992 Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. On the Shore of Nothingness. Thorverton, Essex: Imprint, Academic Press.
Tsur, R. and Benari, M.
2001 “‘Composition of place’, experiential set, and the meditative poem: A cognitive-pragmatic approach”. Pragmatics and Cognition 9(2): 203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vosniadou, S. and Ortony, A.
1989 “Similarity and analogical reasoning: A synthesis”. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–17.Google Scholar