Transcendental deduction of predicative structure in Kant and Brandom
Fregean predicates applied to Fregean objects are merely defined by a ‘timeless’ deductive order of sentences. They cannot provide sufficient structure in order to explain how names can refer to objects of intuition and how predicates can express properties of substances that change in time. Therefore, the accounts of Wilson and Quine, Prior and Brandom for temporal judgments fail — and a new reconstruction of Kant’s transcendental logic, especially of the analogies of experience, is needed.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
WEBB, SHEILA
2020.
Chapter 7 A Disappearing World.
Journal of Philosophy of Education 54:6
► pp. 1596 ff.
[no author supplied]
2022.
References. In
Interpreting Kant for Education,
► pp. 189 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.