Distributed processes, distributed cognizers, and collaborative cognition

Stevan Harnad | Université du Québec à Montréal

Cognition is thinking; it feels like something to think, and only those who can feel can think. There are also things that thinkers can do. We know neither how thinkers can think nor how they are able to do what they can do. We are waiting for cognitive science to discover how. Cognitive science does this by testing hypotheses about what processes can generate what doing (“know-how”).This is called the Turing Test. It cannot test whether a process can generate feeling, hence thinking — only whether it can generate doing. The processes that generate thinking and know-how are “distributed” within the heads of thinkers, but not across thinkers’ heads. Hence there is no such thing as distributed cognition, only collaborative cognition. Email and the Web have spawned a new form of collaborative cognition that draws upon individual brains’ real-time interactive potential in ways that were not possible in oral, written or print interactions.

Keywords: open access, interoperability, Cognition, computation, artificial intelligence, Turing Test, neural networks, collaboration, robotics, consciousness, feeling, thinking, Descartes, mind-reading

Published online: 20 December 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.13.3.06har

Cited by

Cited by 17 other publications

No author info given

2012. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, ► pp. 515 ff.

Cowley, Stephen & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau

2010. Thinking in action. AI & SOCIETY 25:4 ► pp. 469 ff.

Cowley, Stephen J.

2008. Robots – the new linguistic informants?. Connection Science 20:4 ► pp. 359 ff.

Cowley, Stephen J.

2010. From bodily co-regulation to language and thinking. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3:2

Cowley, Stephen J.

2011. Taking a Language Stance. Ecological Psychology 23:3 ► pp. 185 ff.

Cowley, Stephen J.

2013. Naturalizing language: human appraisal and (quasi) technology. AI & SOCIETY 28:4 ► pp. 443 ff.

de la Guía, Elena, María D. Lozano & Víctor M. R. Penichet

2011. In Distributed User Interfaces [Human-Computer Interaction Series, ], ► pp. 153 ff.

Gaines, Brian R.

2010. Human Rationality Challenges Universal Logic. Logica Universalis 4:2 ► pp. 163 ff.

Ligorio, M. Beatrice, Donatella Cesareni & Neil Schwartz

2008. Collaborative Virtual Environments as Means to Increase the Level of Intersubjectivity in a Distributed Cognition System. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 40:3 ► pp. 339 ff.

List, Christian

2018. What is it Like to be a Group Agent?. Noûs 52:2 ► pp. 295 ff.

Orman, Jon

2016. Scientism in the language sciences. Language & Communication 48 ► pp. 28 ff.

Susswein, Noah & Timothy P. Racine

2009. Wittgenstein and not-just-in-the-head cognition. New Ideas in Psychology 27:2 ► pp. 184 ff.

Szanto, Thomas

2014. How to share a mind: Reconsidering the group mind thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13:1 ► pp. 99 ff.

Teixeira, Carlos S. C. & Sharon O'Brien

2019. In Translation Practice in the Field [Benjamins Current Topics, 105], ► pp. 79 ff.

Teixeira, Carlos S. C. & Sharon O’Brien

2017. Investigating the cognitive ergonomic aspects of translation tools in a workplace setting. Translation Spaces 6:1 ► pp. 79 ff.

Theiner, Georg

2014. In New Waves in Philosophy of Mind, ► pp. 301 ff.

Zheng, Robert

2010. Effects of Situated Learning on Students' Knowledge Acquisition: An Individual Differences Perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research 43:4 ► pp. 467 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.