Using conversation policies to solve problems of ambiguity in argumentation and artificial intelligence
This investigation joins recent research on problems with ambiguity in two fields, argumentation and computing. In argumentation, there is a concern with fallacies arising from ambiguity, including equivocation and amphiboly. In computing, the development of agent communication languages is based on conversation policies that make it possible to have information exchanges on the internet, as well as other forms of dialogue like persuasion and negotiation, in which ambiguity is a problem. Because it is not possible to sharply differentiate between problems arising from ambiguity and those arising from vagueness, obscurity and indeterminacy, some study of the latter is included. The semantic web is based on what are called ontologies, or systems of classification of concepts, shown to be useful tools for dealing with these problems.
Keywords: Conversational rules, equivocation, polysemy, legal argumentation, amphiboly, semantic web, multi-agent communication, ontologies
Published online: 22 August 2006
Cited by 3 other publications
ALXATIB, SAM & FRANCIS JEFFRY PELLETIER
Macagno, Fabrizio & Sarah Bigi
Macagno, Fabrizio & Douglas Walton
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.