A framework for thinking about distributed cognition
Pierre Poirier | Department of philosophy and Cognitive Sciences Institute
Guillaume Chicoisne | Cognitive Sciences Institute, Université du Québec à Montréal
As is often the case when scientific or engineering fields emerge, new concepts are forged or old ones are adapted. When this happens, various arguments rage over what ultimately turns out to be conceptual misunderstandings. At that critical time, there is a need for an explicit reflection on the meaning of the concepts that define the field. In this position paper, we aim to provide a reasoned framework in which to think about various issues in the field of distributed cognition. We argue that both relevant concepts, distribution and cognition, must be understood as continuous. As it is used in the context of distributed cognition, the concept of distribution is essentially fuzzy, and we will link it to the notion of emergence of system-level properties. The concept of cognition must also be seen as fuzzy, but for a different reason: due to its origin as an anthropocentric concept, no one has a clear handle on its meaning in a distributed setting. As the proposed framework forms a space, we then explore its geography and (re)visit famous landmarks.
2019. Distributed cognition criteria: Defined, operationalized, and applied to human-dog systems. Behavioural Processes 162 ► pp. 167 ff.
Aviles, Natalie B.
2023. Environing Innovation: Toward an Ecological Pragmatism of Scientific Practice. Sociological Perspectives 66:5 ► pp. 853 ff.
Barnier, Amanda J., John Sutton, Celia B. Harris & Robert A. Wilson
2008. A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory. Cognitive Systems Research 9:1-2 ► pp. 33 ff.
Cheon, Hyundeuk
2014. Distributed Cognition in Scientific Contexts. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 45:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Davies, Jim & Kourken Michaelian
2016. Identifying and individuating cognitive systems: a task-based distributed cognition alternative to agent-based extended cognition. Cognitive Processing 17:3 ► pp. 307 ff.
Finley, Jason R., Farah Naaz & Francine W. Goh
2018. Theoretical Perspectives from Across Psychology. In Memory and Technology, ► pp. 75 ff.
Gillett, Alexander James
2022. Development, Resilience Engineering, Degeneracy, and Cognitive Practices. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 13:3 ► pp. 645 ff.
Glăveanu, Vlad Petre
2014. From Cognitive to Cultural Theories of ‘Distribution’: A Creativity Framework. In Distributed Creativity [SpringerBriefs in Psychology, ], ► pp. 15 ff.
Manian, Chad
2020. Designing E-Learning Environments in Higher Education to Match Technological Trends. In Trends and Issues in International Planning for Businesses [Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics, ], ► pp. 152 ff.
Sutton, John
2008. Material Agency, Skills and History: Distributed Cognition and the Archaeology of Memory. In Material Agency, ► pp. 37 ff.
Sutton, John, Celia B. Harris, Paul G. Keil & Amanda J. Barnier
2010. The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9:4 ► pp. 521 ff.
Szanto, Thomas
2014. How to share a mind: Reconsidering the group mind thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Theiner, Georg
2013. Transactive Memory Systems: A Mechanistic Analysis of Emergent Group Memory. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Theiner, Georg
2014. A Beginner’s Guide to Group Minds. In New Waves in Philosophy of Mind, ► pp. 301 ff.
Wild, Fridolin, Felix Mödritscher & Steinn Sigurdarson
2011. Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments. In E-Infrastructures and Technologies for Lifelong Learning, ► pp. 126 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.