Article published in:Distributed Cognition
Edited by Stevan Harnad and Itiel E. Dror
[Pragmatics & Cognition 14:2] 2006
► pp. 215–234
A framework for thinking about distributed cognition
As is often the case when scientific or engineering fields emerge, new concepts are forged or old ones are adapted. When this happens, various arguments rage over what ultimately turns out to be conceptual misunderstandings. At that critical time, there is a need for an explicit reflection on the meaning of the concepts that define the field. In this position paper, we aim to provide a reasoned framework in which to think about various issues in the field of distributed cognition. We argue that both relevant concepts, distribution and cognition, must be understood as continuous. As it is used in the context of distributed cognition, the concept of distribution is essentially fuzzy, and we will link it to the notion of emergence of system-level properties. The concept of cognition must also be seen as fuzzy, but for a different reason: due to its origin as an anthropocentric concept, no one has a clear handle on its meaning in a distributed setting. As the proposed framework forms a space, we then explore its geography and (re)visit famous landmarks.
Keywords: distributed cognition, swarm intelligence, multiagent system, bounded cognition, emergence, sociality
Published online: 21 September 2006
Cited by 13 other publications
Amon, Mary Jean & Luis H. Favela
Barnier, Amanda J., John Sutton, Celia B. Harris & Robert A. Wilson
Davies, Jim & Kourken Michaelian
Gillett, Alexander James
Sutton, John, Celia B. Harris, Paul G. Keil & Amanda J. Barnier
Wild, Fridolin, Felix Mödritscher & Steinn Sigurdarson
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.