Cover not available
Review published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 14:3 (2006) ► pp.569–585
Book review

Linda Candy (ed.). Creativity and Cognition: Proceedings 2005
New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2005. x + 326 pp. ISBN 1-59593-025-6pb

Reviewed by
| London
Published online: 12 December 2007
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.3.07nis
References (27)
André, E., Klesen, M., Gebhard, P., Allen, S., and Rist, T.
1999 “Integrating models of personality and emotions into lifelike characters”. In A. Paiva and C. Martinho (eds), Proceedings of the Workshop on Affect in Interactions: Towards a New Generation of Interfaces in conjunction with the 3rd i3 Annual Conference , Siena , 136–149.Google Scholar
Blandford, A. and Green, T.
1997 “OSM: An ontology-based approach to usability evaluation”. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Representations, London: Queen Mary and Westfield College.Google Scholar
2001 “From tasks to conceptual structures: Misfit analysis”. In J. Vanderdonckt, A. Blandford, and A. Derycke (eds), People and Computers XV: Interaction Without Frontiers (HCI 2001 and IHM 2001). Lille and Toulouse: Cépaduès-Éditions, Vol. 21, 113–116.Google Scholar
Blandford, A., Green, T. and Connell, I.
2004 “Formalising an understanding of user–system misfits”. In Proceedings of EHCI-DSVIS 2004.Google Scholar
Candy, L. and Edmonds, E. A.
2002 Explorations in Art and Technology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carson, S., Peterson, J. and Higgins, D.
2003 “Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(3): 499–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. J.
2003 “Consciousness and its place in nature”. In S. P. Stich and T. A. Warfield (eds), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell, 102–142.Google Scholar
Connell, I., Green, T., and Blandford, A.
2003 “Ontological sketch models: Highlighting user–system misfits”. In E. O’Neill, P. Palanque, and P. Johnson (eds), People and Computers XVII: Proceedings of HCI’03. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 163–178.Google Scholar
Di Caro, G. and Dorigo, M.
1998 “AntNet: Distributed stigmergetic control for communication networks”. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 91: 317–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorigo, M. and Gambardella, L. M.
1997 “Ant colony system: A cooperative learning approach to the travelling salesman problem”. IEEE Transactions in Evolutionary Computation 1(1): 53–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., and Colorni, A.
1996 “The ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating ants”. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B 261: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, E.
2000 “Artists augmented by agents”. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 68–73.Google Scholar
Edmonds, E. and Candy, L.
2002 “Creativity, art practice and knowledge”. Communications of the ACM 45(10): 91–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engelbrecht, A. P.
2002 “Ant colony optimization”. In A. P. Engelbrecht, Computational Intelligence: An Introduction. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley, 199–208.Google Scholar
Harvey, I.
1997 “Evolving robot consciousness: The easy problems and the rest”. In G. Mulhauser (ed), Evolving Consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Posted at: [URL]).
Holland, O.
(ed) 2003 Machine Consciousness. Place: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
2005 “Could we build a conscious robot?” [Abstract.] Whitehead lectures in Cognition, Computation and Creativity, 2nd lecture of the 2005 autumn series, Goldsmiths’ College, University of London, October 2005.Google Scholar
Holland, O. and Goodman, R.
2003 “Robots with internal models: A route to machine con-sciousness?”. Consciousness Studies 10(4): 77–109.Google Scholar
Maniezzo, V. and Carbonaro, A.
2001 “Ant colony optimization: An overview”. In C. Ribeiro (ed), Essays and Surveys in Metaheuristics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 21–44.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. A. R., Kovacs, T., Dornhaus, A. R., and Franks, N. R.
2003 “Simulating the evolution of ant behaviour in evaluating nest sites”. In W. Banzhaf, T. Christaller, P. Dittrich, J. T. Kim, and J. Zeigler (eds), Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Artificial Life (ECAL’2003 Dortmund), (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 28011), Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 643–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Microsoft Agent
1999 Software Development Kit. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press. (Website: [URL]).
Mulhouser, G.
(ed) 1997 Evolving Consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nissan, E.
2002 “An AI formalism for competing claims of identification: Capturing the “Smemorato di Collegno” amnesia case”. Computing and Informatics 20(6): 625–656.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S.
1998 “Consciousness and body image: Lessons from phantom limbs, Capgras syndrome and pain asymbolia”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 3531: 1851–1859. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S. and Hirstein, W.
1997 “Three laws of qualia: Neurology of consciousness”. Journal of Consciousness Studies 41: 429–457.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., Hirstein, W., and Rogers-Ramachandran, D.
1998 “Phantom limbs, body image, and neural plasticity”. International Brain Research Organization News 261: 10–11.Google Scholar
Schlottman, A. and Shanks, D. R.
1992 “Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 441: 321–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar